2010 Arizona Governor Election: Illegal Immigration Law Governor Jan Brewer Skyrockets in Polls Ahead of Democrat & Republican Challengers

Misguided, eh President Obama? Maybe Obama just has poll envy!

President Barack Hussein Obama, you wish that you had Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer’s poll numbers. Of course, you might if you were not on the wrong side of ever issue, against the will of the people and not a LEFT wing socialist.

Every since AZ Governor Jan Brewer signed the new Arizona immigration bill into law her poll numbers have been on the rise. Brewer is now above the 50% mark according to the most recent Rasmussen poll against Democrat challengers. Jan Brewer also has a 27% point lead in the polls for the GOP primary as her stock is soaring.

After championing her state’s new immigration law in the face of criticism from President Obama and others, incumbent Arizona Governor Jan Brewer for the first time now attracts more than 50% support in her bid for reelection against likely Democratic candidate Terry Goddard.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in Arizona shows Brewer with 52% of the vote and Goddard, who opposes the immigration law, with 39%. Seven percent (7%) prefer another candidate, while just three percent (3%) are undecided.

Jan Brewer’s new ad mocking the Democrats who just can’t read the law

Why is Brewer so popular? Maybe it is because she is strong, confident individual who is willing to stand up to Barack Obama and his minions and do the right thing for the people of Arizona. Brewer did not back down when Democrats & the MSM called the bill racist, she held her ground and did the right thing. As Brewer said to the Comedian in Chief, DO YOUR JOB! They have been over run by illegals, crime, kidnapping and drug trafficking. All this is going on and the federal government sat back and did nothing. The most Obama did was make jokes about it.

Barack Obama, No One is Laughing … Do Your Job

However Brewer has been the politician of action and has WE THE PEOPLE on her side. She especially has the AZ voters as 71% now are in favor of the new immigration law. 68% of Americans are also opposed to the boycott of Arizona.

The President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama has basically declared war on the state of Arizona and Arizona is winning. Obama and Democrats are once again terribly wrong and find themselves on the wrong side of the immigration issue as an unheard of 84% of Americans think that it is ok for eto verify documents for proper immigration status.

Jan Brewer has become a cult icon … thank you Barack Obama.

Bill O’Reilly to Obama State Dept Spokesman P. J. Crowley: “Why Did You Hire Posner? …Was Raul Castro Not Available?”

More Hope, Change and LEFT wing radicals brought to you courtesy of Barack Hussein Obama …

Bill O’Reilly had Obama State Department spokesman P.J Crowley on The Factor to answer questions as to why Michael Posner was hired and respond to Posner’s comments earlier this week comparing China’s human rights violation against their people to the Arizona immigration law.

O’Reilly asked Crowley the following as to why Posner was hired.  Posner had said in the past in 2005 that after 9-11, American Muslims were treated the same way that that Japanese-Americans were treated in the interment camps in World War II.

“Why did you hire Posner? Why hire a far left zealot?… Was Raul Castro not available?”

Unreal!!! Federal Judge Jack B. Weinstein Defending Child Sex Predators, Says Child Porn Laws to Harsh … “We’re destroying lives unnecessarily”

“We’re destroying lives unnecessarily” … Yes we are and it is because judges like Jack B. Weinstein are allowed to serve on the bench. How will we ever protect children, the most defenseless among us with the likes of this as federal judges?

Say hello to LEFTIST Jack B. Weinstein, a 43 year federal judge …

The NY Times states, the judge  has come to be identified by his efforts to combat what he calls “the unnecessary cruelty of the law.” What is his crusade this time … Child Porn laws. However, it’s not what you think … this judge things that the child porn laws are too strict and defends the child pornographers.

Judge Weinstein, who sits in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, has twice thrown out convictions that would have ensured that the man spend at least five years behind bars. He has pledged to break protocol and inform the next jury about the mandatory prison sentence that the charges carry. And he recently declared that the man, who is awaiting a new trial, did not need an electronic ankle bracelet because he posed “no risk to society.”

There is little public sympathy for collectors of child pornography. Yet across the country, an increasing number of federal judges have come to their defense, criticizing changes to sentencing laws that have effectively quadrupled their average prison term over the last decade.

That is correct, this judge stated that an electronic ankle bracelet was excessive for a sexual predator and child pornographer as he stated that this perv posed no threat to society. UNBELIEVABLE!!!

Eastern District of New York Judge Jack B. Weinstein has held unconstitutional the electronic monitoring of a Brooklyn pizzeria owner awaiting retrial on child pornography charges.

The judge found that the monitoring, mandated by the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, constitutes unconstitutionally excessive bail and violates defendant Peter Polouizzi’s procedural due process rights.

Judge Jack B. Weinstein stated “We’re destroying lives unnecessarily.” However, he was not referring to the victims of child porn … he was referring to the child pornographers! I would agree with the Astute Blogger 100%, “I THINK THAT THESE LEFTISTS ARE EVERY BIT AS BAD AND DANGEROUS AS CHILD PORNOGRAPHERS.”

Just what we need to be soft on kiddie porn.  What will the LEFT think of next to defend … child rapists? Guess where child rapists come from liberal judges … that would be the very kiddie porn criminals that you look to let off scott free.

Judge Weinstein has gone to extraordinary lengths to challenge the strict punishments, issuing a series of rulings that directly attack the mandatory five-year prison sentence faced by defendants charged with receiving child pornography.

“I don’t approve of child pornography, obviously,” he said in an interview this week. But, he also said, he does not believe that those who view the images, as opposed to producing or selling them, present a threat to children.

“We’re destroying lives unnecessarily,” he said. “At the most, they should be receiving treatment and supervision.”

Treatment and supervision … how LEFTIST, liberal can we get? Maybe we need to figure out why his parents did not get him a pony for his 6th birthday while we are at it. You know you have a problem with a judge when a child porn collector sees the man as not a judge, but a dad.

The man he has spent three years trying to save from a long incarceration is Pietro Polizzi, a married father of five who collected more than 5,000 graphic pictures of children. If prosecuted in a New York State court, he would have faced a maximum prison sentence of four years. Instead, in federal court, he faced a minimum of five years and a recommended sentence of 11 to 14 years. Because of Judge Weinstein’s intervention, he remains free as he awaits another trial.

“I don’t see Judge Weinstein as a judge,” Mr. Polizzi said during an interview as tears rolled down his face. “I see him as my father. He helps people. He doesn’t destroy lives the way the prosecutor has. He’s the one who is going to set me free from the court.”

It’s too bad that these liberal judges did not feel the need to protect the victims of child porn. News flash Judge Jack B. Weinstein … the pic is of an exploited child and the individual with that pic is a time bomb waiting to go off.

So judge, when this perv escalates his child porn pic collection to the real thing … what will you say then!!!

68% of Americans Opposed to Boycott of Arizona Over Immigration Law

Cities who boycott and Democrats best beware of what WE THE PEOPLE think …

President Barack Obama has called the new immigration law in Arizona misguided, Obama minions like Napolitano and Holder have criticized the law without reading it, Mexican President Calderon critized the law in front of a joint session of Congress while Democrats stood and applauded and cities like Boston, Los Angeles and San Diego have called for boycots of Arizona.

However, 68% of Americans are opposed to the boycott of Arizona over it’s new immigration. Cities that do boycott might be mindful of the backlash they will receive in return, like in the case of San Diego.

Boston and Los Angeles were among the first to announce boycotts of Arizona, but 68% of Americans say it’s a bad idea for other cities or states to boycott Arizona over its new immigration law.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that only 14% of Adults think it’s a good idea for cities or states to join that boycott. Ten percent (10%) don’t care one way or the other, and nine percent (9%) more are undecided.

One might ask what these cities and Democrats alike are thinking when all polls show that Americans are overwhelmingly in favor of the new Arizona immigration law and in favor of law enforcement having the right to verify immigration status of those already stopped in the act of a crime.

• 84% of Americans are in  favor of requiring people to show documents proving their immigration status
• A Fox News poll finds 65 percent of American voters think states should have right to make their own immigration laws
• 59% of Americans in Favor of Arizona Anti-Illegal Immigration Law
• 55% Favor Immigration Law Like Arizona’s For Their State
• 67% Say Mexico Does Not Want To Stop Illegal Immigration

John Morton, Head of ICE Says He Will not Process Illegals Sent by AZ Immigration Law

The ICE-man cometh, or not in this case … Think the position by the Obama Administration is not completely political when it comes to illegals, think again?

Head of ICE refuses to do the job he was sworn to do. Since when are they allowed to pick and chose the laws they wish to enforce? It is his job to enforce the law, not to determine whether it is god or not.

John Morton, assistant secretary of homeland security for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, says he will not process illegals that are sent to him by the Arizona Immigration law. Obama and his minions have called the AZ immigration law misguided and condemned it. All this while a resounding numbers of Americans are in favor of the law.

A top Department of Homeland Security official reportedly said his agency will not necessarily process illegal immigrants referred to them by Arizona authorities.

John Morton, assistant secretary of homeland security for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, made the comment during a meeting on Wednesday with the editorial board of the Chicago Tribune, the newspaper reports.

“I don’t think the Arizona law, or laws like it, are the solution,” Morton told the newspaper.

Via the Gateway Pundit, Charles Krauthammer called the Obama Administration “lawless.”

However, as Jammie Wearing Fool points out in 2008 ICE removed 72,000 illegals from Arizona. So why the change of heart? It could not be political could it? Why has the “I will bring America together” Obama Administration all but declaring war on Arizona?

The Phoenix office of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency was expecting a record year of deportations in 2008, but the final numbers exceeded predictions.

A news release just put out by ICE states the agency removed 72,955 illegal immigrants in its fiscal 2008, which ended in September, compared to 44,376 removed the previous year.

Stepped-up efforts by ICE’s little-known Detention and Removal Operations division, combined with a program to deport illegal immigrants straight from the Maricopa County Jail made the new record possible, as reported in a New Times feature article last month. New police policies are likely to keep those numbers growing in coming months, as the article detailed.

UPDATE I: NRO has an interesting take as to why it is ok to spend millions on the US-Canadian border in Vermont and for some reason we can’t do the same on the southern border with Mexico where there is a real problem. Who knew those pesky Canadians were the real illegal immigration issue?

Obama & Democrats Think 84% of Americans are Racist … 84% Favor Requiring Individuals to Show Documents Proving Immigration Status

How ouch of touch with America is Obama and the Democrats?

So the Democrats want to stand up and cheer for Mexican President Calderone calling the Arizona law discriminatory and racist, eh? So Democrats really want to take the side that the Arizona immigration law, that mirrors federal immigration law is misguided? Really!

Do Democrats really want to call people racist who agree with the idea that illegal immigration needs to be handled once and for all? Really? How out of touch are these folks, they are willing to thumb their nose at 84% of people while pandering to the Latino vote.

In a new Fox News Dynamics poll, 84% of Americans are in  favor of requiring people to show documents proving their immigration status, if officials have reasonable cause to ask for them as stated in the Arizona immigration law. Also, by a 2 to 1 margin, 65  of American voters think states should have right to make their own immigration laws and protect their borders.

84%!!! The only people not in favor of people providing proof of immigration status would have been illegals and Democrat politicians.

A Fox News poll (pdf HERE) finds 65 percent of American voters think states should have right to make their own immigration laws and protect their borders “if they believe the federal government has failed to act,” while 32 percent disagree. Moreover, a 52 percent majority favors their own state passing a bill similar to Arizona’s new immigration law. Some 31 percent would oppose it and another 18 percent is unsure.

Those living in the Midwest (56 percent) and the South (54 percent) are more likely to favor a law like Arizona’s in their state than those in the West (49 percent) or the Northeast (45 percent).

This immigration polling is in line with Rasmussen that shows that support for the Arizona Immigration law is increasing in support as people learn the truth of the law. 71% of Arizona voters now support the law while 55% support the law nationally. However, nationally 69% of voters  believe a police officer has the right to check the immigration status of anyone stopped for a traffic violation or violation of some other law if he suspects the person might be an illegal immigrant.

As GOP law makers blast the Mexican President’s comments as inappropriate, one has to wonder what the American voter thinks of the Democrats behavior during the speech. Think that was not inappropriate to stand and cheer a foreign leders comments while an overwhelming majority of Americas are in favor of the rule of law and borders. Let us understand why Arizona did what they did. It was because the federal goverment refused to handle the illegal immigration, crime and drug problems. By handling it, we do not mean granting illegals amnesty.

Hatch said Arizona was forced to pass the immigration law — which compels state law enforcement officials to require proper legal residency papers from people they suspect may be in the U.S. illegally — because of the federal government’s failure to stop drug and human smugglers, as well as illegal immigrants, from coming across the U.S.-Mexico border.

“The state of Arizona is stepping in where the federal government has failed,” said Hatch. “It is trying to stop waves of illegal immigrants, many of whom are dangerous gang members and drug and human traffickers, from crossing into its communities.”

Pollster.com has a break down off all of the polling, not good news for Obama and Democrats.

Daily Commentary – Friday, May 21st, 2010 – 7 Year Old Child Shot in Police Raid

May 21st, 2010

* The child was caught by a stray bullet fired during a struggle with another person in the household, in a raid pursuant to a homicide investigation.

Daily Commentary – Friday, May 21st, 2010 – 7 Year Old Child Shot in Police Raid [2:29m]:| Download

No Doubt About It … There’s a Rat at the White House

A picture is worth a thousand words … it is official folks, there is a rat at the White House.

Drudge via the Gateway Pundit

Many have suspected it for months and now its official, from the AP:

In his battle with the titans of Wall Street, President Barack Obama almost got upstaged by a rat.

But he didn’t even seem to notice. Assuming that’s what it was, scurrying in front of his podium Thursday in a sun-drenched Rose Garden.

Obama had just begun an afternoon statement to reporters lauding the end of a Senate filibuster on his financial overhaul plan when some kind of rodent — opinions differ on which — dashed out of the bushes to his right, just outside the Oval Office.

As photographers snapped away, the critter trundled straight past the gray podium with the presidential seal and made a bee-line for another set of bushes to Obama’s left.

Maybe a rat is not out of place after all in DC, as No Sheeple Here states … they are pretty common place.

The metaphors are too easy for this one. Was this rat looking for some stimulus money, maybe some free Obamacare? Or maybe, just maybe the rat was fleeing the sinking ship S.S. Obama.

Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Fingerprint On The Trunk, New Discovery Released, More Motions By the Defense

Orlando, FL– Yesterday, the defense team of Jose Baez, J. Cheney Mason and Andrea Lyon filed a motion to strike the Statement of Particulars including aggravating factors claiming that is does not list the States “facts” to support them. Team Baez is claiming that “may rely” does not meet the burden of the Steele citation used to compel the order from Judge Perry in the last hearing.

Read the rest at Blink on Crime:

Disgrace: Democrats Give Standing Ovation to Mexican President Calderon for Slamming the AZ Immigration Law

WELCOME TO OBAMALAND AND MORE HOPE & CHANGE …

Unbelieveable … We can now officially say that the Democrat Party is the party of “NO” Rule of law.

In the Democrats efforts to pander to the Latino community ahead of this years midterm elections, Democrats have disgraced themselves and their party forever. These people are so quick to apologize for America and blame all the evils on Republicans that they would stand and applaud the Mexican President in an effort to slam the Arizona immigration law while at the very same time they, the federal government has done nothing to enforce United States border control and illegal immigration.

“It is a law that not only ignores a reality that cannot be erased by decree but also introduces a terrible idea using racial profiling as the basis for law enforcement” (Breitbart TV)

As Hot Air states, Look carefully in the video and you’ll see Janet Napolitano (in the blue jacket) and Eric Holder (to her right) springing to their feet to pile on. I wonder if at this point either Napolitano or Holder have even read the law yet or are they just acting like the typical Obama lock step fools.

NRO is stating that Mexican President Calderon has crossed the line in his interference with United States immigration policy, which is very true.  But Calderon does so because he has a complicit US President in Obama and a Democrat party that does not believe in the rule of law or borders. However, what is most despicable is the Democrat Congress standing and cheering for a foreign President as he slams a US states law that is pretty much the same as the present federal law on enforcing immigration.

Since when has the US Congress acted like the United Nations and stood up and cheered when a foreign leader was slamming the US? Um, NEVER! However, that is not the case in Obamaland.

Not only do the Democrats fail to figuratively stand up for America, but they literally stand up for and applaud those who seek to condemn it. Worse, it is condemnation from the foreign leader whose own country is a primary source of our illegal immigration issues.

President Obama and the Democrats in Congress are the most out of touch government in the history of the United States. On every major issue, WE THE PEOPLE disagree with their position. Now the issue at hand is immigration, illegal immigration that is. We can look forward to being called racists once again because of simply believing in the rule of law.

How out of touch are Democrats? 71% of Arizona voters and 55% of Americans now support the Arizona immigration law. 71%!!! The number keeps going up the more the truth comes out of what the law actually says.

Arizona voters now support the state’s new immigration law more than ever and are still more inclined to think the law will be good for the state’s economy rather than bad. A lot of voters in the state are thinking it’s payback time, too, to those cities or states that boycott Arizona.

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in Arizona finds that 71% now favor the immigration law, while 24% oppose it.

Think immigration is not going to be an issue in the 2010 and 2012 elections? Thing again and the American people are livid.

EXIT QUESTION: President Calderon, if America is such an evil place, why do your people want to come here illegally? What does that make Mexico?