Admitting to Kidnapping & Human Trafficking Will Joran and Paulus Van der Sloot Be Arrested After Joran’s Interview With Greta Van Susteren

Will there be ramifications to Joran Van der Sloot’s admission that he sold Natalee Holloway for $10,000 and in the process admitted to kidnapping and human trafficking? Did Joran implicate his father in a crime, let alone the many other names he mentioned during the interview that he claimed had knowledge or participated in the crime and cover up?

In the wake of Joran Van der Sloot’s interview with Greta Van Susteren and “On the Record” will Aruban prosecutors look to arrest Joran and his father Paulus Van der Sloot for kidnapping and human trafficking? Joran Van der Sloot following the interview claimed that he was just lying and it never happened. However, should Aruban prosecutors arrest Joran and his father and look into the admission that the one time suspect made? It is not as though the “human trafficking” theory was not made a while back with regards to Natalee’s disappearance. Just recently, Joran Van der Sloot was also caught on video tape in Thailand discussing sex trade and human trafficking in a Thai hotel room. Alas, that was a lie too? All of his stories cannot be lies …

Will the Aruban prosecutor do his job and either prove or disprove Joran Van der Sloot’s latest admission to what  occurred in the case of missing Natalee Holloway? How many times is Joran Van der Sloot allowed to confess to a crime, only to then say he was lying? Hans Mos has a responsibility to follow up on these admissions as well as other new evidence that has come forward.

As his own US attorney Joe Tacopina stated, “he’s a sick kid”.  If as Tacopina said that Joran is incapable of telling the truth then why does he or any of the other attorney representing Joran Van der Sloot think that the “sick kid” was telling them the truth? Why wouldn’t the converse also he true when Joran states that he had nothing to do with Natalee’s disappearance? If Joran is a liar as Tacopina states, then one must also believe that he lied to his attorneys in saying that he was innocent of any crime with regarding to the disappearance of Natalee.

In a letter from Natalee Holloway’s family attorney to the Aruban Prosecutor Hans Mos, John Q. Kelly stated the following:

Read more

Missing in Aruba: Joran Van der Sloot Now Says he Sold Natalee Holloway to a Venezuelan Man Who Wanted a Blonde Girl for $10K

Joran Van der Sloot, the sociopath is back …

Did Joran Van der Sloot just admit to kidnapping and human trafficking last night in an interview On the Record? Joran Van der Sloot may have admitted to more crimes that could land him in jail for a longer period of time than just a murder charge. There are not too many people that Joran Van der Sloot did not implicate in criminal or unethical behavior. If we are to believe the story that Joran Van der Sloot provided Greta Van Susteren then we are to believe the following:

• Joran’s lawyer knew from the beginning that his client committed the crimes of kidnapping and human trafficking while stating that his client was innocent and had nothing to do with Natalee’s disappearance.
• That Paulus Van der Sloot was complicit in the cover up of his son’s crime and that he bribed Aruban police officers.
• That at least two Aruban police officers solicited and received bribes to keep quiet.
• That his teacher from his school was complicit in a cover up and obstructed justice knowing what Joran had done in selling Natalee.
• Deepak and Satish Kalpoe were accessories to the crime against Natalee Holloway and were paid $1000 for their participation in the crime. 
• That Deepak, Satish and his American attorneys knowingly obstructed justice and solicited the promise of $1 million in order for a quit pro quo for Joran to remain quiet and not say anything damning against the Kalpoe’s.
• Joran admitted to premeditated kidnapping, human trafficking and potentially accessory to murder if his “mystery” man killed Natalee.

To discuss the case, get further updates and to provide your own opinion go to Scared Monkeys.net Forum: Natalee Holloway. We will be breaking up the story in to many different part as there is just too much information to put in one story. Updates to follow.

After all the stories and lies that he has given to police. After all the stories and lies he has given to the media in past interviews. After all the admissions he has been caught in by secret filmed video, Joran Van der Sloot now has a new story to tell as to what happened to Natalee Holloway. In an interview with Greta Van Susteren Joran Van der Sloot now claims that he did not leave Natalee Holloway on the  white sand beaches of Aruban that fateful night in 2005 but instead sold her to a Venezuelan man for $10,000.

Joran Vander Sloot becomes uncomfortable in interview when discussion moves to his father Paulus and the reference of giving bribes to Aruban police officers.

Video from Fox News “On the Record” with Greta Van Susteren:

• Natalee Sold
• Money Exchange
• Police Bribe
• Near Walkout
• Shocking Twist

Joran Van der Sloot, the last reported person ever to see Natalee Holloway now tells the world that he sold Natalee Holloway to an unknown man in Aruba for $10K. He claims that an man that he met in an Aruban casino who is some where between the age of 30 to 40 offered Joran money for as was stated, “bring him a blonde girl.”

Read more

Natalee Holloway: Why Isn’t Aruban Prosecutor Hans Mos Following up on New Evidence?

It is being reported that a new witness has some forward in Aruba in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway in May 2005. A woman named Celeste who first told her story to Dutch crime reporter Peter de Vries has reportedly come forward. The new witness claims Joran van der Sloot confessed to her that he did indeed dump Natalee’s body into the ocean. Just recently during aPeter R. de Vries secret taping of Joran Van der Sloot, we saw the one time suspect in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway in a hotel room conducting what appeared to be sex trafficking in Thailand.

Natalee’s mom Beth Holloway says she believes this new witness is a girl NBC 13 introduced you to last week.

A woman named Celeste who first told her story to Dutch crime reporter Peter de Vries.

Celeste is Joran van der Sloot’s ex girlfriend. She says van der Sloot told her he knew how to dispose of bodies in the ocean so they’d never be found and that van der Sloot admitted his dad Paul coached him on what to say throughout this investigation.

Right now, the Aruban prosecutor’s office is not identifying their new witness: except to say the new witness is female and that she says van der Sloot admitted to her that he dumped Natalee’s body in the ocean.

Lead prosecutor Hans Mos says this new witness’s testimony is not enough by itself to charge van der Sloot with Natalee’s murder.

“After three years of investigating, it is very very difficult to find that evidence. We have to be realistic,” says Mos. 

CNN: Tips renew hopes of solving Holloway case

A new witness has emerged, authorities say, who can place van der Sloot and his father, Paulus van der Sloot, near a pond on the island at 4 a.m. on the day Holloway vanished.

The witness told authorities he saw a young man, wet from the chest down and wearing only one shoe, running along a road from the pond to a fast-food restaurant.

The witness said he saw the young man and an older man driving slowly down the road in a red Jeep about 10 minutes later. The pond was not among those searched in the early stages of the investigation, Mos said.

A second witness, a former girlfriend of Joran van der Sloot, also told police he made suspicious-sounding comments while they were on the beach. The witness, publicly known only as Celeste, told police van der Sloot said: “Who knows? You may now be on the beach with someone who is able to get rid of a corpse.”

So what is Hans Mos’ issue in prosecuting the case? Why does he find fault with every witness that comes forward he would implicate Joran Van der Sloot in Natalee’s disappearance? Mos stated that “the new witness would lack credibility in court unless she waited so long to come forward”. What???!!! She would lack credibility, yet Joran who has lied ever inch of the way has credibility? Maybe Mos would like to explain how any new tip or lead in the case could be something other than a witness finally coming forward? Either through guilt or what ever the case may be, how can a prosecutor continually cover for a suspect? Mos states that they are following all leads, really? The question becomes and needs to be answered by Hans Mos, why would Aruba continue to cover up a crime that has left such a dark stain on their island? Is the answer that the initial cover up is too damaging to Aruba’s reputation?

Greta Van Susteren has been the focal point of a resurgence in news from the Natalee Holloway case and her disappearance in Aruba in 2005. Greta states that she has new evidence as well regarding Natalee Holloway. However, Hans Mos refused to meet with her in Miami, FL to review what she has. Who ever heard of a prosecutor refusing to see evidence that could potentially crack a case that has been hanging over Aruba like a dark cloud?

Read more

Latest on Peter R. De Vries TV Show This Sunday on Disappearance of Natalee Holloway in Aruba … Joran Van der Sloot, Evolution of a Sociopath

The evolution of a sociopath … Joran Van der Sloot

So this is what a complicit and corrupt Aruba has unleashed on the world. When evil is not stopped in its infancy all it can do is become emboldened. Especially when the evil is an uncaring, unremorseful, unrepentant sociopath.

As previously reported, Dutch investigator Peter R. de Vries will be doing a show this Sunday on the disappearance of Natalee Holloway in Aruba. Peter R. de Vries has promised new information in the case. However, according to many comments from Dutch posters the show seems to be more based upon Joran vander Sloot and what he has been doing lately in Thailand. The fact of the matter is it does pertain in a way to the Natalee Holloway case as it shows exactly what type of individual he truly is and a propensity to do anything and not care of the consequences.

It would appear when it comes to Joran Van der Sloot, the more things change, the more they seem to just be the same. It seems according to early reports that Joran Van der Sloot may have been caught again on tape with a hidden camera. One can presume once again that Joran Van der Sloot was just lying to the camera and he knew it was there all along. Peter R. de Vries will be reporting on Joran Van der Sloot and the Thai sex trade.

Leopards do not change their spots and neither do sociopaths.

Binnenland: ‘Van der Sloot handelt in Thaise vrouwen’

From The Telegraaf: JORAN VD SLOOT NOW WOMENSTRAFFICER

AMSTERDAM - Joran van der Sloot is stalled again in the fall! In Thailand he is the second time within a year in an undercover operation getuind. This is how committed he is in Bangkok on the trade in young women has been ruled out.

The suspect for the disappearance of Natalee Holloway offers in Bangkok Thai women for sale to the Dutch prostitution market. He makes girls for 10,000 euros each, which for just 300 dollars per month in a brothel work, he says. The undercover operation was again conducted by a team of Peter R. de Vries and lasted a few weeks. One infiltrator was in Thailand as a Dutch entrepreneur in the sex industry, a trap where Joran intrapte with open eyes.
Hotel Room

De Vries showed yesterday exclusive to De Telegraaf raw undercover shocking images, which will be broadcast Sunday. Then Joran is including in a hotel room to see, while in the presence of two Thai prostitutes are doing business from the canvases. The new trap after De Vries was previously put over seven million viewers to the tube kluisterde with Joran confession, in February the whole world was about. In a prepared Range Rover Joran recognized therein that he vanished into the U.S. away from the beach and dumped her into the sea. During talks at a hotel he says now that he can make weekly young women. The visas and passports are no problem, he claims. “I rule that all, do not worry!” Formally, the girls, who think dancer to be, in our country training. In reality, they six days a week working in a brothel.
‘Typical’

De Vries: “The images show how little respect this 21-year-old shows for the lives of others. That you after the disappearance of Natalee in the trafficking goes, draws him.” According to him makes Joran is guilty of a serious crime. “The preparation of smuggling is punishable. This could be him in Thailand in big trouble.”

Read more

Peter R. de Vries Airing New Show this Sunday on Disappearance of Natalee Holloway

Peter R. de Vries, Dutch Crime investigator, will be airing a new show this Sunday on the disappearance of Natalee Holloway in Aruba. Peter R. de Vries recently nominated and won an emmy for his coverage of the Natalee Holloway case.

It will be an extra long show indeed, De Vries will not say yet if there are other witnesses with statements. He does say he will come with facts unknown until now, from the Netherlands and Aruba.

At the kick-off of the new TV season
Peter R. de Vries, Crime reporter, Sunday at half past
ten on SBS, will he be in an extra-long broadcast new facts
and developments on the case of Natalee Holloway publish. The
Vries still wanted non-disclosure or other witnesses to
statements. However he says with hitherto unknown facts from
From the Netherlands and Aruba to come.

Previous Posts:

• Han Mos, Aruban Chief Prosecutor Requests Joran Van der Sloot be Arrested on New Peter R. De Vries Evidence
• Peter de Vries Investigates the Natalee Holloway Disappearance in Aruba … Lies and conflicts of Interest

To further discuss the case, go to Scared Monkeys.net Forum: Natalee Holloway

CLASSIC: CNN Reporter Interview Philly Man … “I Voted A Couple of Times”

Well if this CNN interview with a Barack Obama supporter doesn’t pretty much sum it all up as to the coverage by the media and supposed voter fraud.

A Philly man tells a CNN reporter that he voted a couple of times today.
The CNN reporter says, “I think that’s against the law but that’s OK.”

 Hat Tip: Gateway Pundit

Just another average election day in PA:

• A Repeat of 2004 Philly Voter Chaos, Fraud
• Video: Black Panther poll intimidation in Pennsylvania?

Obama Did Not Know About His Aunt’s Illegal Alien Status or About the Reverend Jeremiah Wright

In the end during a Presidential campaign your vote comes down to one important factor. To quote Martin Luther King, Jr. … “it’s about the content of one’s character, not the color of one’s skin.”

Barack Obama claims that he had no knowledge that his Kenyan Aunt, Zeituni Onyango, was an illegal alien living in the United States. That reeks of the same lack of knowledge he had of Bill Ayers being an unrepentant domestic terrorist, convicted felon Tony Rezco or Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Are we sensing a pattern? That is rather convenient and sounds like the same old, same old as Obama also claimed that in 20 year of sitting in the pews of his Chicago church that he did not hear Reverend Wright’s anti-American and racial hatred.

Could some one who is about to be considered elected President really have sat in a church for 20 years and never heard the hatred? Conveniently enough when it was politically expedient to dismiss Revered Wright and throw him under the Obama bus, Barack wasted no time. Obama stayed at the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago until it became a politically liability to him.

To take Obama at his word would mean that he has no political skills to determine whether some one is hateful enemy or not. To believe the contrary means he is a liar.

Change We Can Believe in … Barack Obama’s Aunt from Kenya living in US illegally & Donated to Obama Campaign

Change you can believe in … Obama’s aunt is not only in the country illegally and a deportation fugitive, she has illegally contributed to the Obama campaign.

Now Obama tells us he did not know about aunt’s illegal status. Between, Ayers, Wright, Rezco et all … does Obama know much about anything? Or is he lying through his teeth? What else does America need to discover of Obama before they actually question his motives, his policies and his past?

Just the other day we had learned that Barack Obama’s aunt was living in Boston, MA in less than stellar circumstances. One wondered why Obama did not share his own wealth an help with aunt. Instead, Obama would rather have you “spread your wealth” in order to do so.

Now we find out that Obama’s aunt, Zeituni Onyango, from Kenya is illegally living in the United States. You have got to be joking. A Presidential candidate has a relative that is an illegal alien and no one prior to today ever bothered to find this out or vet Obama family members? Joe the Plumber had his records illegally searched in seconds; however, when it comes to anything to do with Obama it is never a concern. As Hot Air stated, And so, after six months of being studiously ignored, amnesty makes a last-minute cameo.

Barack Obama’s aunt, a Kenyan woman who has been quietly living in public housing in Boston, is in the United States illegally after an immigration judge rejected her request for asylum four years ago, The Associated Press has learned.

Zeituni Onyango, 56, referred to as “Aunti Zeituni” in Obama’s memoir, was instructed to leave the United States by a U.S. immigration judge who denied her asylum request, a person familiar with the matter told the AP late Friday. This person spoke on condition of anonymity because no one was authorized to discuss Onyango’s case.

Information about the deportation case was disclosed and confirmed by two separate sources, one of them a federal law enforcement official. The information they made available is known to officials in the federal government, but the AP could not establish whether anyone at a political level in the Bush administration or in the McCain campaign had been involved in its release.

In typical and expected fashion, Barack Obama denies knowing anything regarding his aunts illegal status in the United States. Ssssure he did. Just like Obama did not know that domestic terrorist Bill Ayers was unrepentant or that Obama sat 20 years in a church pew and never heard the anti-American and hateful rantings of Revered Wright.

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Saturday he didn’t know that one of his relatives was living in the United States illegally and believes the appropriate laws should be followed.

The Associated Press found that Obama’s aunt had been instructed to leave the country four years ago by an immigration judge who rejected her request for asylum from her native Kenya. The woman, Zeituni Onyango (zay-TUHN on-YANG-oh), is living in public housing in Boston and is the half-sister of Obama’s late father.

A statement given to the AP by Obama’s campaign said, “Senator Obama has no knowledge of her status but obviously believes that any and all appropriate laws be followed.”

Michelle Malkin: Obama’s illegal alien aunt (and campaign donor!) is a deportation fugitive; Bush administration moves to protect her

Well now.

Turns out Aunti Zeituni Onyango, one of Democrat presidential candidate Barack Obama’s many relatives made famous in his memoir, is an illegal alien. And not just a run-of-the-mill illegal alien on welfare.

She’s one of the hundreds of thousands of deportation fugitives — absconders – whom I’ve been reporting on for the past six years. After 9/11, the government vowed to crack down on absconders. They’ve failed abysmally.

WIZBANG: Obama’s Aunt an Illegal Alien; She Contributed to His Campaign; Lives in Public Housing

UPDATE I: Obama returns aunt’s donation after illegal immigrant report

So Barack Obama did not know that his campaign contributing aunt was in the US illegally? Obama does not seem to know much of anything. Out of curiosity this raises a larger question. How many of Obama’s campaign contributions are legal? Hell, he does not know his aunt’s legal situation, maybe Obama would like to review all of his campaign contributions and question exactly who is donating to his campaign and where they live.

Aides said Obama had not been in touch with his late father’s sister, Zeituni Onyango, 56, for at least four years, and questioned reporting about her residency status so close to Tuesday’s election against Republican John McCain.

Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt said the campaign was returning 265 dollars donated by the aunt to her nephew’s White House bid.

Foreigners cannot donate money to US presidential candidates. But aides refused to say whether returning the money was an acknowledgement that the aunt was an illegal alien.

“Given the information that has been brought to our attention, the contributions are being refunded,” LaBolt said in a statement, without elaborating.

Obama’s chief strategist David Axelrod would not comment on the aunt’s immigration status but said Obama last met her for sure at his Senate inauguration ceremony in 2004.

Searches into Private Citizen Joe the Plumber More Extensive that First Reported … Not at all Politically Motivated Though

Joe the Plumber = John Q. Public. You are asked to vote, but do not dare ask any questions. If you dare … do so at your own risk and peril as “Big Brother” is watching. This is still the United States, isn’t it? Obama has not been elected yet. There can be nothing worse in a Democracy that an overbearing government using its power to destroy its citizens. So this is what we have to look forward to … this type of change? The searches were nothing but politically motivated.

It turns out that the background checks into the private records of “Joe the Plumber” were far more extensive than first reported. “Joe the Plumber,” a common American citizen simply asked Barack Obama a question regarding the economy and next thing he knows he is being vetted by the media and the State of Ohio in a more intense manner than the very Presidential candidate, Barack Obama, that he asked the question of.

Because Barack Obama showed his true “socialist” colors and answered Joe’s question in a manner telling the United States voters that he wanted to “shares the wealth,” that meant Joe must go. Before Joe Wurzelbacher knew it he was in the media’s bulls eye as he represented a threat to the Chosen One, Barack Obama. Joe’s records were initially searched, it was just never stated how extensive the searches were.

A private citizen’s records were searched; however, it was claimed that is was not politically motivated. That was believable as Obama not being a “share the wealth” socialist. It is now being reported that the searches into Joe the Plumbers records were far more reaching than first reported.

A state agency has revealed that its checks of computer systems for potential information on “Joe the Plumber” were more extensive than it first acknowledged.

Helen Jones-Kelley, director of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, disclosed today that computer inquiries on Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher were not restricted to a child-support system.

The agency also checked Wurzelbacher in its computer systems to determine whether he was receiving welfare assistance or owed unemployment compensation taxes, she wrote.

Jones-Kelley made the revelations in a letter to Ohio Senate President Bill M. Harris, R-Ashland, who demanded answers on why state officials checked out Wurzelbacher.

Harris called the multiple records checks “questionable” and said he awaits more answers. “It’s kind of like Big Brother is looking in your pocket,” he said.

Read more

ACORN Far From Non-Partisan … But Still Taking Your Tax Dollars

ACORN is a non-profit, tax exempt entity that is supposed to be non-partisan as they take US tax payer dollars to supposedly get out the vote.

How brazen are they? Even after all the information that has been in the news regarding voter registration fraud and their partisan dealings with Barack Obama … they release the following video of support for the Obamamessiah.

Have to see to believe. So why is their tax exemption not revoked? Why are American tax payers money going to a politically partisan outfit?