The Dana Pretzer Show – Thursday, November 15, 2018 – Please Join Dana Pretzer Tonight at 7 PM ET with Special Guest: Robin Sax Discussing California Wild Fires & High Profile Crime Cases
LISTEN TO THE DANA PRETZER SHOW
- Attorney and author Robin Sax will be discussing the California wildfires and high profile crimes in the news.
This is Beyond Sick … CNN Panel Mocks Kanye West as Trump’s ‘Token Negro’ As Host Don Lemon Laughs (VIDEO)
ARE YOU KIDDING … HOW RACIST, HOW EVIL, HOW BIGOTED, BULLYING AND WRONG AND HATEFUL COULD CNN POSSIBLY BE?
Tuesday night, a CNN panel hosted by anchor Don Lemon took turns mocking Kanye West and making hateful, racist and bigoted jokes that Kanye dare embrace President Donald Trump. These hateful and panicked liberals actual called Kayne West Trump’s “token negro” and “Kanye West is what happens when negroes don’t read.” Are you kidding me? Welcome to the tolerant LEFT. How dare a black man be his own man and have his own opinions and beliefs. This cannot happen. The Progressive Left and their propaganda media must make every effort to destroy anyone, especially in the black community, who dare like President Trump.
Can you imagine what the liberal media’s reaction would be if some one on the right made these same comments? They would be fired is the answer. Even for CNN, how could this ever make the air? This network is truly no longer.
Why so afraid CNN and liberal shills? Afraid of losing the black vote? Afraid that some one influential like Kayne West could get through to the black community that then candidate Donald Trump was correct when he said during the 2016 presidential campaign to African-Americans, what have Democrats done for you, why not take a chance, what do you have to lose? Since Trump has been president black unemployment is at an all time low and small business ownership among Black Americans has jumped 400% since President Trump’s election.
Kayne West and former NFL Cleveland Brown great and activist Jim Brown will be meeting with President Trump today. I know it is hard to believe for the LEFT, but Trump has done wonders for minorities since he has been president and it scares the daylights out of the LEFT because they might just lose their meal ticket 95% voting block.
A CNN panel hosted by anchor Don Lemon took turns lacing into Kanye West on Tuesday evening, joking that his embrace of President Donald Trump has caused him to be tokenized. Several referred to him using the term “negro.”
“He’s an attention whore, like the president. He’s all of a sudden now the model spokesperson. He’s the token negro of the Trump administration,” said CNN contributor Tara Setmeyer.
“This is ridiculous and no one should be taking Kanye West seriously. He clearly has issues. He’s already been hospitalized,” she continued. “Not to trivialize mental health issues, [but] obviously Kanye has taken a turn in a very strange way.”
Another guest, former Congressman Bakari Sellers, also hit Kanye using much of the same language.
“Kanye West is what happens when negroes don’t read,” said Sellers. “And we have this now and now Donald Trump is going to use it and pervert and he’s going to have someone who can stand with him and take pictures.”
Throughout the bit, Lemon laughed along and joked about the expression of another panelist, CNN contributor Scott Jennings, who appeared visibly uncomfortable.
Former Obama AG Eric Holder: “When They Go Low, We Kick Them” … Welcome to the Intolerant & Violent Democratic Party
BE VERY CAREFUL WITH YOUR DEMOCRAT HATEFUL RHETORIC …
The Democrat party and the LEFT has become more and more intolerant and violent. As reported at the WAPO, during a campaign stop in McDonough, GA, former Obama attorney general Eric Holder altered former first lady Michelle Obama’s 2016 slogan, “When they go low, we go high” and in steads stated the new Democrat slogan is … “When they go low, we kick ‘em.” So this is what the Democratic Party is about these days? You kick them, seriously? And we wonder why individuals are being bullied in restaurants and on the streets and people receiving death threats. And this guy was the chief law enforcement officer under Obama? Doesn’t that explain a lot.
I guess we can be assured the Democrats will never go high again, as if they ever did.
For the second time this week, a leading Democratic voice is proposing that the party pursue a meaner, more combative approach — with this one going so far as to allude to metaphorical violence.
During a campaign swing in McDonough, Ga., on Sunday, former attorney general Eric Holder notes former first lady Michelle Obama’s high-minded 2016 slogan, “When they go low, we go high.” Then he makes clear he disagrees.
“No, no,” Holder says. “When they go low, we kick ‘em. That’s what this new Democratic Party is about.”
Several minutes later, Holder clarifies that he’s not advocating anything illicit.
“When I say we, you know, ‘We kick ‘em,’ I don’t mean we do anything inappropriate. We don’t do anything illegal,” Holder said. “But we got to be tough, and we have to fight for the very things that [civil rights leaders] John Lewis, Martin Luther King, Whitney Young – you know, all those folks gave to us.”
Ex-Boyfriend of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford Says She Coached A Friend Before Taking A Polygraph & Contradicted Ford’s Claims She is Afraid of Flying and Doesn’t Like Small Spaces
EX-BOYFRIEND COMES FORWARD AND CONTRADICTS DR. FORD’S SWORN TESTIMONY TO CONGRESS …
From the Federalist comes this potential bombshell, in a sworn statement provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee, a man who claims to be an ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford says that he personally witnessed Dr. Ford coach a friend on how to take a polygraph exam. If this is true, this could be trouble for Dr. Ford. Ford claimed during her testimony last Thursday that she had not ever coached or prepped anyone prior to the administering of a polygraph examination. Did she perjure herself? Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent the attorney’s of Dr. Ford a letter requesting the all polygraph-related documents and media to the Senate for review, that they have previously not provided.
Christine Blasey Ford says she never gave anyone tips on how to take a polygraph test during Senate hearings
The troubling allegations about Ford’s polygraph history and potentially false testimony were revealed Tuesday in a letter from Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, to attorneys for Ford. Ford and her attorneys have thus far refused to provide all polygraph-related documents and media to the Senate for review.
“During some of the time we were dating, Dr. Ford lived with Monica L. McLean, who I understood to be be her life-long best friend,” the ex-boyfriend, whose name was redacted from the statement he gave to the Senate, wrote. “During that time, it was my understanding that McLean was interviewing for jobs with the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s Office.”
“I witnessed Dr. Ford help McLean prepare for a potential polygraph exam,” he said. “Dr. Ford explained in detail what to expect, how polygraphs worked, and helped McLean become familiar and less nervous about the exam.”
As reported at the Daily Caller, an alleged ex-boyfriend of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford came forward on Tuesday and said that she had once coached her longtime friend on how to take a polygraph test. See the letter below. The individual also went on to state that he never witnessed that Dr. Ford was afraid of small spaces.
The letter was first obtained by Fox News’ John Roberts and it began by saying that he “found her truthful and maintain no animus” during their relationship from 1992-1998.
It said, “During that time, it was my understanding that [Ford’s roommate, Monica] McLean was interviewing for jobs with the FBI and US Attorney’s Office. I witnessed Dr. Ford help McLean prepare for a potential polygraph exam,”
“Dr. Ford explained in detail what to expect, how polygraphs worked and helped McLean become familiar and less nervous about the exam. Dr. Ford was able to help because of her background in psychology,” the letter continued.
The anonymous boyfriend also contradicted Ford’s claims that she is afraid of flying and doesn’t like small spaces.
This case further becomes a she said, they said case. There is not one witness who has come forward to corroborate Dr. Ford’s story, not even the individuals that she claimed were there. This also includes Ford’s friend. In fact she states she never met Brett Kavanaugh.
53 Year Old Accuser Deborah Ramirez Comes Forward With Allegations Against Kavanaugh … Was Drunk, 35 Years Ago, Cannot Really Remember & No One Can Corroberate Story
ANOTHER WOMAN COMES FORWARD WITH A 35 YEAR OLD STORY THAT NOT EVEN THE NEW YORK TIMES THOUGHT WAS FIT TO PRINT …
The New Yorker published a story on Sunday night of a second woman accusing Judge Brett Kavanaugh of lewd behavior from some 35 years ago while in college. Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer have released a report in the New Yorker from Deborah Ramirez, accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct. The salacious story includes a dildo and penises. And once again, we have a completely drunk woman at a party, vague memories and not one person who supposedly atteneded the party could confirm Kavanaugh was at the party. The 53-year-old accuser Deborah Ramirez told the New Yorker that she was initially hesitant to speak out because she was drunk at the time and her memory had gaps. Then miraculously after 35 years she spent six days “carefully assessing her memories” and consulting with her attorney before going public. Just like that she could remember.
Shameful. Not even the New York Times would touch this story because they could not find anyone to corroborate the story. Neither did the New Yorker. In other words, journalism is now considered just printing the vague recollections of accusation and rumor. But this is what it has come to. Piling on and making stuff up at all cost by the Left and Democrats. This is truly sad.
The woman at the center of the story, Deborah Ramirez, who is fifty-three, attended Yale with Kavanaugh, where she studied sociology and psychology. Later, she spent years working for an organization that supports victims of domestic violence. The New Yorker contacted Ramirez after learning of her possible involvement in an incident involving Kavanaugh. The allegation was conveyed to Democratic senators by a civil-rights lawyer. For Ramirez, the sudden attention has been unwelcome, and prompted difficult choices. She was at first hesitant to speak publicly, partly because her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident. In her initial conversations with The New Yorker, she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty. After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh’s role in the incident. “I would think an F.B.I. investigation would be warranted,” she said.
After 35 years and drunk at the time, suddenly she had an epiphany after 6 days of being coached by her lawyer …
Ramirez acknowledged that there are significant gaps in her memories of the evening, and that, if she ever presents her story to the F.B.I. or members of the Senate, she will inevitably be pressed on her motivation for coming forward after so many years, and questioned about her memory, given her drinking at the party.
And yet, after several days of considering the matter carefully, she said, “I’m confident about the pants coming up, and I’m confident about Brett being there.”
For some reason, even though the New Yorker had not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party, they printed this story anyhow.
The New Yorker has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party. The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident. Many did not respond to interview requests; others declined to comment, or said they did not attend or remember the party. A classmate of Ramirez’s, who declined to be identified because of the partisan battle over Kavanaugh’s nomination, said that another student told him about the incident either on the night of the party or in the next day or two. The classmate said that he is “one-hundred-per-cent sure” that he was told at the time that Kavanaugh was the student who exposed himself to Ramirez. He independently recalled many of the same details offered by Ramirez, including that a male student had encouraged Kavanaugh as he exposed himself. The classmate, like Ramirez, recalled that the party took place in a common room on the first floor in Entryway B of Lawrance Hall, during their freshman year. “I’ve known this all along,” he said. “It’s been on my mind all these years when his name came up. It was a big deal.” The story stayed with him, he said, because it was disturbing and seemed outside the bounds of typically acceptable behavior, even during heavy drinking at parties on campus. The classmate said that he had been shocked, but not necessarily surprised, because the social group to which Kavanaugh belonged often drank to excess. He recalled Kavanaugh as “relatively shy” until he drank, at which point he said that Kavanaugh could become “aggressive and even belligerent.”
In a statement, two of those male classmates who Ramirez alleged were involved in the incident, the wife of a third male student she said was involved, and one other classmate, Dan Murphy, disputed Ramirez’s account of events: “We were the people closest to Brett Kavanaugh during his first year at Yale. He was a roommate to some of us, and we spent a great deal of time with him, including in the dorm where this incident allegedly took place. Some of us were also friends with Debbie Ramirez during and after her time at Yale. We can say with confidence that if the incident Debbie alleges ever occurred, we would have seen or heard about it—and we did not. The behavior she describes would be completely out of character for Brett. In addition, some of us knew Debbie long after Yale, and she never described this incident until Brett’s Supreme Court nomination was pending. Editors from the New Yorker contacted some of us because we are the people who would know the truth, and we told them that we never saw or heard about this.”