53 Year Old Accuser Deborah Ramirez Comes Forward With Allegations Against Kavanaugh … Was Drunk, 35 Years Ago, Cannot Really Remember & No One Can Corroberate Story
ANOTHER WOMAN COMES FORWARD WITH A 35 YEAR OLD STORY THAT NOT EVEN THE NEW YORK TIMES THOUGHT WAS FIT TO PRINT …
The New Yorker published a story on Sunday night of a second woman accusing Judge Brett Kavanaugh of lewd behavior from some 35 years ago while in college. Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer have released a report in the New Yorker from Deborah Ramirez, accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct. The salacious story includes a dildo and penises. And once again, we have a completely drunk woman at a party, vague memories and not one person who supposedly atteneded the party could confirm Kavanaugh was at the party. The 53-year-old accuser Deborah Ramirez told the New Yorker that she was initially hesitant to speak out because she was drunk at the time and her memory had gaps. Then miraculously after 35 years she spent six days “carefully assessing her memories” and consulting with her attorney before going public. Just like that she could remember.
Shameful. Not even the New York Times would touch this story because they could not find anyone to corroborate the story. Neither did the New Yorker. In other words, journalism is now considered just printing the vague recollections of accusation and rumor. But this is what it has come to. Piling on and making stuff up at all cost by the Left and Democrats. This is truly sad.
The woman at the center of the story, Deborah Ramirez, who is fifty-three, attended Yale with Kavanaugh, where she studied sociology and psychology. Later, she spent years working for an organization that supports victims of domestic violence. The New Yorker contacted Ramirez after learning of her possible involvement in an incident involving Kavanaugh. The allegation was conveyed to Democratic senators by a civil-rights lawyer. For Ramirez, the sudden attention has been unwelcome, and prompted difficult choices. She was at first hesitant to speak publicly, partly because her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident. In her initial conversations with The New Yorker, she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty. After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh’s role in the incident. “I would think an F.B.I. investigation would be warranted,” she said.
After 35 years and drunk at the time, suddenly she had an epiphany after 6 days of being coached by her lawyer …
Ramirez acknowledged that there are significant gaps in her memories of the evening, and that, if she ever presents her story to the F.B.I. or members of the Senate, she will inevitably be pressed on her motivation for coming forward after so many years, and questioned about her memory, given her drinking at the party.
And yet, after several days of considering the matter carefully, she said, “I’m confident about the pants coming up, and I’m confident about Brett being there.”
For some reason, even though the New Yorker had not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party, they printed this story anyhow.
The New Yorker has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party. The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident. Many did not respond to interview requests; others declined to comment, or said they did not attend or remember the party. A classmate of Ramirez’s, who declined to be identified because of the partisan battle over Kavanaugh’s nomination, said that another student told him about the incident either on the night of the party or in the next day or two. The classmate said that he is “one-hundred-per-cent sure” that he was told at the time that Kavanaugh was the student who exposed himself to Ramirez. He independently recalled many of the same details offered by Ramirez, including that a male student had encouraged Kavanaugh as he exposed himself. The classmate, like Ramirez, recalled that the party took place in a common room on the first floor in Entryway B of Lawrance Hall, during their freshman year. “I’ve known this all along,” he said. “It’s been on my mind all these years when his name came up. It was a big deal.” The story stayed with him, he said, because it was disturbing and seemed outside the bounds of typically acceptable behavior, even during heavy drinking at parties on campus. The classmate said that he had been shocked, but not necessarily surprised, because the social group to which Kavanaugh belonged often drank to excess. He recalled Kavanaugh as “relatively shy” until he drank, at which point he said that Kavanaugh could become “aggressive and even belligerent.”
In a statement, two of those male classmates who Ramirez alleged were involved in the incident, the wife of a third male student she said was involved, and one other classmate, Dan Murphy, disputed Ramirez’s account of events: “We were the people closest to Brett Kavanaugh during his first year at Yale. He was a roommate to some of us, and we spent a great deal of time with him, including in the dorm where this incident allegedly took place. Some of us were also friends with Debbie Ramirez during and after her time at Yale. We can say with confidence that if the incident Debbie alleges ever occurred, we would have seen or heard about it—and we did not. The behavior she describes would be completely out of character for Brett. In addition, some of us knew Debbie long after Yale, and she never described this incident until Brett’s Supreme Court nomination was pending. Editors from the New Yorker contacted some of us because we are the people who would know the truth, and we told them that we never saw or heard about this.”
Special U.S Senate Election Day in Alabama for Conservative Republican Roy Moore and Ultra-Liberal Democrat Doug Jones
MY ADVICE TO ALABAMA VOTERS IS, YOU CAN UNDO A MOORE VOTE IF HE IS FOUND GUILTY, YOU CAN’T UNDO VOTING FOR A LIBERAL, ANTI-TRUMP DEMOCRAT WHO WILL SIDE WITH THE RESISTANCE ALL OF THE TIME …
It is special election day in Alabama and all eyes are on the U.S. Senate race between Republican Roy Moore and liberal Democrat Doug Jones. The LEFT, the MSM, Democrats and establishment Republicans have thrown the kitchen sink at Roy Moore with allegations of sexual misconduct; even though many of those accusers have had their stories discredited. What ever the case may be, it is up to the voters of Alabama, not the liberal media, not the outside liberal Democrat PAC money, not people from other states, but those from Alabama to make their choice. As Lynyrd Skynyrd sings in Sweet Home Alabama, “Well, I hope Neil Young (replace with anyone not an Alabama voter) will remember, A southern man don’t need him around anyhow.” Its up to you Alabama, only you.
Is a state who voted for Donald trump and his agenda 63%-35% really going to vote for a member of the liberal, Democrat resistance?
At RCP, the polls show everything from a 9 point Moore win to a 10 point Jones win. How can this be? Some one is going to be really wrong. How on the same days of polling can you get results different by nearly 20%? Some believe the FOX News poll is skewed. Could that be? Could establishment Republicans be just as much in the tank as Democrats to sabotage Moore and the Trump agenda? What do you think?
The fact of the matter is, much of this reeks of dirty Democrat and establishment GOP politics. Why did the women come forward now? If they did not want Moore to win and they claim to be Trump voting Republicans, why didn’t they make these allegations prior to the special GOP primary election? This certainly isn’t Moore’s first rodeo. Why not prior to any of his other state elections? If this was so well known about Moore, certainly the establishment GOP opposition research could have known about this. Why would those making accusations have felt the need to lie so much and withhold key pieces of information like having accused 3 other pastors of sexual misconduct, forging the year book, etc.
I have no idea is Judge Roy Moore is accused of doing what others claim. I also don’t know if the female accusers are lying. Because that has never happened before, see Duke Lacrosse and University of Virginia fraternity false rape accusations. Knee jerk reactions are never good. Do the people of Alabama really believe the Democrat party cares about them? Do they really think that Doug Jones is going to be some bridge between the GOP and Democrats? C’mon man, you know better than that. If you want a Senator who will oppose Trump, then vote for Jones. If you want the Trump agenda, then vote for Moore. You have outs if the accusations are proved true. You have zero outs with Jones.
This has been politics at its worse. The polls are open Alabama, it now all up to you.
Why Isn’t the MSM Covering the Damning Fusion GPS Senate Hearings … William Browder: Fusion GPS Was Acting on Behalf of Russia
IT WOULD APPEAR THE FUSION GPS HEARINGS DESTROY THE DEMOCRAT AND MSM AGENDA OF RUSSIA BACKING TRUMP …
Because the liberal MSM will not cover this story, listen to it here. Fusion GPS was an organization that was colluding with the Democrat party that hired a former British spy to go and try and find dirt on candidate Donald Trump. The “dossier” came out of all this. In the end, the Russians were backing Fusion GPS of which the dossier came from that was hardly flattering to Trump and looked to undermine him. This hardly seems like the actions of a cozy relationship between Russian and Trump as the MSM and Democrats have been lying about and trying to divert the attention of the American people and obstruct the Trump presidency.
This really needs to be looked at, this is huge! If you want to find collusion and the Russians, look to the Democrat party, not Donald Trump.
According to Sen. Linsey Graham, the Russians were backing Fusion GPS of which the dossier came from that was hardly flattering to Trump and looked to undermine him.
Senator Hatch: Fusion GPS Has A Lot Of Questions To Answer (July 26, 2017)
Senate Democrats tried to block William Browder, a damning witness who testified against Fusion GPS. So why would Democrats do such a thing? Maybe it is because Democrats were in bed with Fusion GPS.
Senate Democrats used a parliamentary rule Wednesday to cut short a hearing before a witness with new information could give damning testimony against Fusion GPS. Bill Browder, the CEO and co-founder of Hermitage Capital, was set to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee about the shadowy firm being hired to conduct “smear campaigns.”
Funded by Democrats, Fusion GPS hired former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele to gather opposition research against then-Republican presidential candidate Donald J. Trump. The result was the Kremlin-sourced discredited Trump dossier, which Democrats widely circulated knowing it contained discredited information.
LIVE: William Browder Testifies before Senate Judiciary Hearing Russian Meddling US Election 7/27/17
White House addresses Bill Browder’s testimony about Fusion GPS … mums the words from MSM on Russia
The Real Crimes That were Committed: Obama Aides Umasked Hundreds of Identities During Election Without Justification
AND NOW FOR SOME POLITICAL CORRUPTION, OBAMA STYLE …
From The Hill comes the following bombshell. Why wouldn’t anyone believe that Obama and his minions did such a thing? Following the 2010 midterm election loses, the Obama administration used the IRS against his enemies in The Tea Party. This just shows the lengths of corruption and political overreach that the Obama administration used to maintain power. Some one needs to go to prison for these acts against the American people.
Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), in a letter to Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, said the requests were made without specific justifications on why the information was needed.
“We have found evidence that current and former government officials had easy access to U.S. person information and that it is possible that they used this information to achieve partisan political purposes, including the selective, anonymous leaking of such information,” Nunes wrote in the letter to Coats.
The letter was provided to The Hill from a source in the intelligence community.
In March, Nunes disclosed that he had seen data suggesting Trump campaign and transition officials were having their names unmasked by departing officials in the Obama White House.
National Security Adviser Susan Rice and CIA Director John Brennan have acknowledged making such requests though they insisted the requests were for legitimate work reasons.
Nunes recused himself from his committee’s work on its investigation over Russia’s meddling in the 2016 campaign after a controversy over his charges about Obama-era unmasking.
The chairman had reviewed intelligence reports on White House grounds that he said showed unmasking of Trump officials by Obama aides. Democrats accused him of working with the White House to make the disclosures.
In Thursday’s letter, Nunes said the total requests for Americans’ names by Obama political aides numbered in the hundreds during Obama’s last year in office and often lacked a specific intelligence community justification. He called the lack of proper justifications a “serious deficiency.”
Former United Nations ambassador, Samantha Power has been identified as a key ‘unmasking’ within the previous administration.
THE POLITICAL RHETORIC IS GETTING OUT OF CONTROL …
As per s CBS News poll, an overwhelming number of Americans believe the political debate in America is becoming increasing uncivil. Well, maybe that is because it is. But then again, hasn’t it been uncivil for quite some time? However, since Donald Trump has become president, the LEFT has completely become unhinged and their so-called leaders have said some shameful and hateful things. Last week we were witness to a far-Left individual who volunteered on the Bernie Sanders campaign attempt a mass assassination of Republicans. Sadly, Americans who are polled only seem to be creatures of the moment as reported at the Politico, a majority approve of Congress’ handling of shooting. Wake up America, talk is cheap. One week later, Democrats are back to their old ways. What is ironic is that 85% of Democrats polled said that the current tone if political debate is encouraging violence and yet it is that that are causing the violence.
Members of Congress are getting positive ratings for the way they responded to the shooting in Alexandria, Virginia, last week. President Trump gets slightly lower — though still net positive — evaluations for his response to the attack, partly because Democrats are less likely to approve of his handling than of Congress’. Fifty-three percent of Americans approved of Congress’ response, and 29 percent disapproved, while 46 percent approved of President Trump’s response, and 36 percent disapproved.
And while Congress and many observers called for a more civil tone to political debate in the wake of the events, Americans of all political leanings overwhelmingly say that the tone and level of civility in our political debates has been getting worse in recent years.
These views are largely the same across ideologies, too, as about two-thirds of liberals, conservatives and even more moderates feel things have gotten worse.
Seriously America, take a good hard look to who is promoting and causing the violence.