Wikileaks Warned DNC Chairperson Donna Brazile and Vice Presidential Candidate Tim Kaine, #You’re Next!
WIKILEAKS: DONNA BRAZILE AND VP TIM KAINE … #YOU’RE NEXT!!!
WikiLeaks is putting out the tease that Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine and interim Democratic National Committee Chair Donna Brazile on Twitter Thursday evening, warning an October surprise is looming. It looks like they will be next. In the past, Kaine has tried to preempt Wikileaks hacked emails claiming they could be doctored. Hardly Tim, you folks have just been caught red handed and you can’t defend what you say behind the scenes. The Twitter Universe awaits the document dump on Kaine and Brazile. As if past emails from Donna Brazile have not already been bad enough. How exactly does she still have a job with the DNC still?
IT HAS FINALLY PASSED THE POINT OF NO RETURN, MEDIA IS SO IN THE TANK FOR DEMOCRAT PARTY AND HILLARY CLINTON … DEBATE AND REPORTING ON CANDIDATES SHOWS ITS NOTHING MORE THAN A BIAS, RIGGED SYSTEM …
The emails released by Wikileaks show one common theme, well actually two. One, the emails confirm that the media is in the tank for Hillary Clinton. Not only was the MSM in Hillary Clinton’s pocket, but so was the DNC, who is supposed to be neutral. However, the hacked emails exposed to the public show just how bias the media and DNC were for Hillary. They made a concerted effort to coronation Hillary the Democrat presidential nominee. With all this collusion for Hillary, it makes one wonder how she had as much difficulty against Sanders. One would think that Bernie Sanders’ supporters would be pissed off as they were played like a fiddle by the MSM and DNC. What else does the Wikileaks email show … the MSM is in full cover up mode for Hillary Clinton as they refuse to cover the news of the emails. The network news refuses to report on the news in an effort to protect Hillary Clinton and the fact that Team Hillary, the media and the DNC colluded to defeat Sanders in the Democrat primary. Shameful.
On October 12, WikiLeaks released part four and five of Clinton campaign Chair John Podesta’s emails, with part six to be released on October 13, and part seven to follow on October 14.
“As soon as the nomination is wrapped up, I will be your biggest surrogate,” current Interim Chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) Donna Brazile, wrote to Podesta in a January 2016 email. As a Vice Chair of the DNC, Brazile was bound to neutrality per the charter, but as shown in several emails released so far, that was not the case.
“I pushed back hard on this, and Axe. So weird to attack the kids the night before the first primary,” Brazile wrote in an email she forwarded to Podesta about what CNN was doing while she served as a CNN contributor.
On October 10, an email was released that showed Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign to an outreach campaign being conducted by the Sanders campaign. Brazile defended herself on Twitter claiming she also sent the Sanders campaign “advice,” but did not release or cite any examples.
On October 11, Mediaite’s Jordan Chariton first reported another email that showed Brazile tipping off the Clinton campaign to a question on the death penalty that would be asked at a CNN Town Hall the next day. Brazile was a CNN contributor at the time, and that wasn’t her only helpful tip. “For the debate team,” she wrote in a March email about the Voting Rights Act, forwarded to Podesta.
More bias …the fix was in for Hillary over Bernie Sanders.
In 2013, during an interview with ABC News, Brazile said, “if Clinton gets in the race, there will be a coronation of her,” foreshadowing that she and the rest of the DNC and Democratic Party would line up behind Hillary Clinton as the nominee before a single person voted in the Democratic primaries.
Neera Tanden, president of the Center for American Progress which publishes Think Progress, wrote in a January 2016 email, “But I should say that I would do whatever Hillary needs always. I owe her a lot. And I’m a loyal soldier.”
An April 2015 email describes the Clinton campaign and DNC coordinating to rig the debate schedule for Clinton’s benefit. The debate schedule was a commonly cited criticism against then-DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who resigned after the WikiLeaks release of DNC emails in July showed her overt favoritism for Clinton all through the primaries.
“Through internal discussions, we concluded that it was in our interest to: 1) limit the number of debates (and the number in each state); 2) start the debates as late as possible; 3) keep debates out of the busy window between February 1 and February 27, 2016 (Iowa to South Carolina)” read the email from Charlie Baker, a senior advisor to the Clinton campaign from the Dewey Square Group. “The other campaigns have advocated (not surprisingly) for more debates and for the schedule to start significantly earlier.”
IMAGINE WHAT THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE WOULD LOOK LIKE IF THE MSM ACTUALLY COVERED AND REPORTED ON THE ILLS OF HILLARY CLINTON?
From The Washington Times, WikiLeaks hacked emails show Clinton campaign made disparaging comments and mocked Catholics and Southerners, called Latinos “needy, ” and called supporters of Bernie Sanders “self-righteous” whiners. But do you think the MSM would ever cover this? HELL NO!!! They are too busy running cover for Hillary Clinton and doing her opposition research and political hit jobs on Donald Trump.
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE WHAT I CALL LATINOS, CATHOLICS, SOUTHERNERS AND SANDERS SUPPORTS, THE MSM WILL NOT REPORT ON IT
Long before Hillary Clinton called millions of Americans a “basket of deplorables,” her top campaign advisers and liberal allies openly mocked Catholics, Southerners and a host of other groups, according to newly released emails that offer a stunning window into the vitriol inside the Clinton world less than a month before Election Day.
The emails, published by WikiLeaks after a hack of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s private account, also show Clinton campaign officials and Democratic leaders disparaging supporters of Sen. Bernard Sanders as “self-righteous” whiners, calling Hispanic party leaders such as Bill Richardson “needy Latinos,” labeling CNN anchor Jake Tapper “a d—k” and even lambasting longtime Clinton ally Sidney Blumenthal.
The sheer number of insults in the email trove has left the Clinton campaign, along with outside organizations such as the Center for American Progress that were routinely involved in the brutal bad-mouthing, unable or unwilling to respond. Instead, they have blamed the hack on Russia and have refused to even confirm that the emails are genuine, though they also haven’t denied their authenticity.
The Clinton campaign’s biggest problem may be its assault on Catholics. Prominent Catholic organizations called on Clinton campaign spokeswoman Jennifer Palmieri to resign after the surfacing of messages showing her making fun of the faith. The campaign of Republican nominee Donald Trump seized on the opportunity to appeal to religious voters.
WikiLeaks Emails Show that Obama DOJ Had a Cozy and Coordinated Relationship with Hillary Clinton Campaign on Email/Server case
HOW MUCH MORE PROOF DOES AMERICA NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE FIX WAS IN FROM THE OUTSET AND HILLARY CLINTON WAS NEVER GOING TO BE INVESTIGATED LET ALONE INDICTED? ONE BIG INCESTUOUS AND CORRUPT GOVERNMENT.
Emails published by WikiLeaks on Tuesday suggest the Justice Department inappropriately communicated with Hillary Clinton’s campaign as the Obama administration scrambled to deal with the fallout from her use of a private server. The emails show that Brian Fallon, Clinton’s campaign spokesman and a former employee of the Justice Department, was continually tipped off and alerted by individuals at the DOJ regarding Hillary Clinton’s email and private server crimes. The corruption and collusion between the DOJ and Hillary Clinton is just incredible. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump responded to the emails and said that the connection was “unbelievable.” That it is Donald, that it is. And if we had a media that wasn’t in the tank for Hillary Clinton, the news pressure would be so great, she would have had to have stepped down from running for president.
The Corruption, Collusion and Cover Ups of this Administration are sickening
An official within Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign appeared to have discussions with sources inside the Department of Justice (DOJ) about ongoing open records lawsuits regarding the former secretary of State’s emails, according to an email released on Tuesday.
In an email from May 2015, Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said that “DOJ folks” had “inform[ed]” him about an upcoming status conference in one of the lawsuits regarding Clinton’s private email setup.
The information about an upcoming court event would have been public knowledge and open for all to attend. And it’s unclear whether the people Fallon spoke to at the Justice Department were officials who regularly communicate with the public.
However, the fact that Fallon — a former spokesman with the Justice Department — remained in contact with anyone from the department is likely to renew allegations that the Obama administration maintained an especially cozy relationship with Clinton’s presidential campaign.
On Tuesday, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said the connection was “unbelievable.”
The email “shows a level of collusion which calls into question the entire investigation into her private server,” Trump spokesman Jason Miller said in a statement on Tuesday.
“The Department of Justice must release all communications with the Clinton campaign and her allies as soon as possible in order to definitively prove their investigation was completely above board.”
The email from Fallon was contained in a collection of more than 1,000 messages allegedly stolen from campaign chairman John Podesta and posted to WikiLeaks on Tuesday.
From Legal Insurrection … Remember the Bill Clinton, Loretta Lynch “tarmac summit” and its gross appearance of impropriety? That gross appearance of impropriety cloud hangs heavy over Hillary and her emails yet again.
It’s hard to understand why Hillary’s campaign manager would be in direct contact with DOJ — that’s what Hillary had lawyers for. So something smells rotten.
There may be more revelations regarding the cozy relationship Team Hillary had with the Justice Department regarding the investigation, so stay tuned.
WAIT A MINUTE … ISN’T THIS WHY DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ WAS BOOTED AS DNC CHAIR … SO WHY ISN’T DONNA BRAZILE SHOWN THE DOOR WAS WELL?
Hey Sanders’ supporters, are you feeling burned yet? A note to all of you, your candidate never had a chance because Hillary Clinton and the RNC were working in collusion against Bernie Sanders. The DNC, who is supposed to be neutral, was working with Team Clinton and feeding them info. From Observer Politics comes the following that from Wikileaks emails, current DNC chair Donna Brazile, when working as a DNC vice chair, forwarded to the Clinton campaign a January 2016 email obtained from the Bernie Sanders campaign, released by Sarah Ford, Sanders’ deputy national press secretary. The email was announcing a Twitter storm from Sanders’ African-American outreach team. The Clinton staff wrote back to Donna Brazile … “FYI” … “Thank you for the heads up on this Donna.” UNREAL. Why is Donna Brazile still the DNC Chair? This is why Debbie Wasserman Schulz was fired.
On October 10, Wikileaks released part two of their emails from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta.
Friday, Wikileaks released their first batch of Podesta’s emails, which included excerpts from Clinton’s Wall Street transcripts that reaffirmed why Clinton refused to release them in full. During the second presidential debate, Clinton confirmed their authenticity by attempting to defend one statement she made in the speech about having a public and private stance on political issues. She cited Abraham Lincoln, a defense comparable to her ridiculous invocation of 9/11 when pressed on her ties to Wall Street during a Democratic primary debate.
The latest release reveals current DNC chair Donna Brazile, when working as a DNC vice chair, forwarded to the Clinton campaign a January 2016 email obtained from the Bernie Sanders campaign, released by Sarah Ford, Sanders’ deputy national press secretary, announcing a Twitter storm from Sanders’ African-American outreach team. “FYI” Brazile wrote to the Clinton staff. “Thank you for the heads up on this Donna,” replied Clinton campaign spokesperson Adrienne Elrod.
The second batch of emails include more evidence of collusion between the mainstream media and Clinton Campaign.
One email, received by prolific Clinton donor Haim Saban, was forwarded to Clinton staff, praising the friendly moderators in the early March 2016 Democratic primary debate co-hosted by Univision in Florida. “Haim, I just wanted to tell you that I thought the moderators for last nights Debate were excellent. They were thoughtful, tough and incisive. I thought it made Hilary appear direct and strong in her resolve. I felt it advanced our candidate. Thanks for Univision,” wrote Rob Friedman, former co-chair of the Motion Picture Group.
Another email discusses planting a favorable Clinton story in The New York Times in March 2015. “NYT heroine. Should she call her today?” Podesta wrote to other Clinton campaign staffers with the subject line ‘Laura Donohoe.’ “I do think it’s a great idea! We can make it happen,” replied Huma Abedin. The story they referred to is likely “In New Hampshire, Clinton Backers Buckle Up,” published in The New York Times on March 12, 2015 about Laura Donohoe, a retired nurse and Clinton supporter in New Hampshire.
John Harwood, New York Times contributor and CNBC correspondent, regularly exchanged emails with Podesta—communicating more as a Clinton surrogate than a journalist.
In an October 2015 email thread, Clinton staff were in damage control over Hillary’s support for the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined marriage as between a man and a woman. Hillary Clinton would not disavow her support for it. “I’m not saying double down or ever say it again. I’m just saying that she’s not going to want to say she was wrong about that, given she and her husband believe it and have repeated it many times. Better to reiterate evolution, opposition to DOMA when court considered it, and forward looking stance.”