Support for Assault Weapons Ban at Record Low in United States

WHY IN THE HELL WOULD YOU VOTE FOR ANTI-SECOND AMENDMENT HILLARY CLINTON IF SUPPORT FOR ASSAULT-STYLE WEAPONS BAN IS AT ALL TIME LOW?

According to the latest Gallup poll, the support for a ban on semi-automatic, assault-style weapons is at an all time low in the United States. Only 36% of those polled are in favor of any such ban, marking the lowest of any such support since Gallup starting polling this issue in 1996. And down from 44%, just four years ago. As reported at The Federalist support across the board is down, not just with Republicans as “barely 50 percent of Democrats currently support the ban today, compared to 63 percent support from Democrats in 1996, just two years after the federal ban was signed into law. Less than a third of independents currently support a ban, while Republican support hovers at 25 percent.”

  • 36% favor a ban on assault rifles, down from 44% four years ago
  • Half of Democrats and a quarter of Republicans favor this ban
  • A majority of those in households without guns oppose such a ban

Gallup poll_weapons ban 102616

The fewest Americans in 20 years favor making it illegal to manufacture, sell or possess semi-automatic guns known as assault rifles. Thirty-six percent now want an assault weapons ban, down from 44% in 2012 and 57% when Gallup first asked the question in 1996.

Assault rifles have been a contentious issue in American life for decades. Two years after President Bill Clinton signed a federal assault weapons ban in 1994, Gallup found that a solid majority of Americans favored such a ban. By the time the 10-year ban expired in 2004, Americans were evenly divided. And by 2011, public opinion had tilted against the assault weapons ban, with 53% opposed and 43% in favor. In Gallup’s 2016 Crime poll, conducted Oct. 5-9, opposition now exceeds support by 25 percentage points, 61% to 36%.

What seems to be certain is that Americans do not want the government telling them how and with what they can protect themselves and to keep their grubby hands off the Second Amendment. Which begs the obvious question, why on earth would you vote for Hillary Clinton who is for the ban and is anti-Second Amendment?

Trump Points Out Hillary Clinton’s Hypocrisy on Guns: “Let’s See what Happens to her’ if Hillary’s Bodyguards Should Drop their Weapons

DONALD TRUMP POINTS OUT HILLARY’S HYPOCRISY ON GUNS …

Sorry bias and in the tank for the Democrat party MSM, Donald Trump was not making any threats last night when he posed the hypothetical question of what would happen if Hillary Clinton’s body guards dropped their weapons.  Trump was pointing out the hypocrisy of Hillary Clinton in that she wanted to take away guns from “We the People” to protect our-self, yet she could have individuals with guns protecting her. But of course the Democrat media complex had to attach Trump as they have to do something to save Hillary Clinton’s presidential run as she drops like a rock in the polls.

Donald Trump accused Hillary Clinton of pushing an anti-gun agenda during a campaign rally in Miami on Friday night, and suggested his Democratic presidential rival was a hypocrite for being under Secret Service protection.

“She goes around with armed bodyguards like you have never seen before,” Trump said, “I think that her bodyguards should drop all weapons. They should disarm.”

Trump wondered how Clinton would fare under those circumstances.

“Take their guns away. She doesn’t want guns. Let’s see what happens to her,” Trump said.

33 Year Old Mother Fatally Shoots 59 Year Old Intruder Found Hiding in Her Child’s Bedroom in Oregon

WHY WE HAVE A SECOND AMENDMENT, A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS AND PROTECT OURSELVES

A mother in Portland. OR has shot and killed a male intruder in her home. The 33 year old mother was coming home with her two children, when she found a man hiding in one of the children’s rooms. Let’s just say the 59 year old perv won’t be down for breakfast. Nor will he ever be hiding in a child’s room reading to commit a crime. According to reports, the woman has not been taken in or charged. Police officials are still investigating the matter and will see if the woman will be facing charges. Charged, are you kidding? She should be given a medal.

IMG_0998

A stranger was found inside a child’s bedroom in Oregon and the mother of the kid opened fire fatally shooting the intruder on Sunday morning.

The New York Daily News reported that police officials were called at the home located in Portland, Oregon. They arrived at around 1:47 A.M. and found the intruder dead inside. The intruder is said to be a man. The homeowner, who has not been identified but is said to be 33 years old, was the one who called 911 and told officer that she shot the man.

The mother was reportedly out with her two children, ages five and 10 years old, before coming home and found the man in one of the bedrooms of her children. The woman was armed with a handgun and shot the man, who is said to be 59 years old.

But of course Hillary Clinton and Democrats would like to take guns away from We the People so that we could not defend ourselves from would be attackers and not be able to protect our families. Think about that this November.

Daily Commentary – Friday, June 24, 2016 – Democrats in Congress Hold a Sit in to Fight For a Vote on Gun Control

  • Not sure if Trump or Clinton will make a difference. One thing you can do is VOTE your concious, vote for either the Democrats who were holding the sit in or the Republicans

Daily Commentary – Friday, June 24, 2016 Download

9th CIRCUS Court of Appeals Court Rules No Constitutional Right to Carry Concealed Guns

9th CIRCUS COURT OF APPEALS AT IT AGAIN WITH THEIR LIBERAL BS

UNBELIEVABLE … Make no mistake about it folks, the liberals want to take away your guns. the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled Thursday that people do not have a Second Amendment right to carry concealed weapons in public. The Second Amendment clearly states, A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Seems rather straight-forward, unless you are a liberal activist judge with an agenda.

2nd Aemendment

A federal appeals court in San Francisco ruled Thursday that people do not have a Second Amendment right to carry concealed weapons in public, in a sweeping decision likely to be challenged by gun-rights advocates.

An 11-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued the 7-4 ruling, upholding a state law requiring applicants to show “good cause,” such as a fear of personal safety, to carry a concealed firearm.

The judges, further, definitively dismissed the argument that a right to carry a concealed weapon was contained in the Second Amendment.

“We hold that the Second Amendment does not preserve or protect a right of a member of the general public to carry concealed firearms in public,” Judge William Fletcher wrote in the majority opinion.

If challenged, it could set up a Supreme Court battle.

This should be more than enough to never vote for Hillary Clinton.

Next Page →

Support Scared Monkeys! make a donation.

 
 
  • NEWS (breaking news alerts or news tips)
  • Red (comments)
  • Dugga (technical issues)
  • Dana (radio show comments)
  • Klaasend (blog and forum issues)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Close
E-mail It