The Dana Pretzer Show – Tuesday, February 11, 2014 – With Special Guests Dr. Dale Archer and Wendy Murphy
LISTEN TO THE DANA PRETZER SHOW ON SCARED MONKEYS RADIO AT 9 PM ET
LISTEN TONIGHT LIVE AT 9 PM ET
The Dana Pretzer Show – Tuesday, February 11, 2014 Download Podcast
- With Dr. Dale Archer discussing addiction and Wendy Murphy talking about her open letter to Woody Allen
26 Year Old Father Jonathan Adleta Given Two Life Sentences for Henious Sex Crimes Against His Own Kids … “This defendant is guilty of … the destruction and scarring of his own children.” (Update: Mother Sentnced to 54 Years on Child Porn Charges)
Finally, a judge with some common sense hands down a sentence where the sex predator will never touch another innocent child again.
The following sex crimes case might be one of the sick and most egregious ever seen in the Sunshine state. A father who, along with his wife, planned before the they were born to sexually abuse their children
26 year old Jonathan Adleta, a sex predator and deviant like we hope we never see again, was sentenced to two life terms in prison in Orlando, Florida federal court for the unthinkable and “heinous” sex crime against his two children and the child of another woman. Jonathan Adleta had been convicted in September 2013 of transporting minors across a state line to engage in a sex act and conspiracy. Upon handing down the sentence ti this monster, U.S. District Judge Roy B. Dalton Jr. said of Jonathan Adleta, “this defendant is guilty of … the destruction and scarring of his own children.” His wife. 29 year old Sarah Adleta, who took part in the sexual abuse, was sentenced to 54 years in prison. She pleaded guilty to producing child pornography with her children as subjects.
Parents Plan Sexual Abuse – Most Vile Story Ever
An Orlando jury convicted Adleta on Sept. 12 of two charges: transporting minors across a state line to engage in a sex act and conspiracy.
On Monday, Dalton handed down two life sentences. He could have given Adleta as little as five years. Instead, he went with the government’s recommendation.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Karen Gable described Adleta’s acts as “despicable and egregious. … The defendant is a grave danger to children.”
The judge agreed, saying he chose two life terms, in part, because he believes Adleta would offend again.
“This defendant is guilty of the sexual exploitation of his own children,” Dalton said.
Evidence at Adleta’s trial showed that he abused his son and daughter and the child of another woman, children who ranged in age from 1 to 4.
To make matters worse, if possible after the hideous crimes of this scum bag, after the Adletas’ marriage ended, Jonathan found a new girlfriend, Samantha Bryant, who also had a daughter. Samantha Bryant told jurors at Adleta’s trial that she let him molest her daughter, too. OMG, HOW DOES A MOTHER LET A MAN MOLEST THEIR CHILDREN!!! Bryant was also charged with and pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting her daughter and allowing him to abuse the girl.
A man whose parenting plan was detailed during a graphic child-sex trial in Orlando federal court this year will soon learn how much prison time he will serve for his crimes.
His ex-wife, 29-year-old Sarah Adleta, served as a key witness for prosecutors, explaining how having sex with their two children was part of their family parenting plan — even after they divorced.
Prosecutors said Jonathan Adleta had a “sexual appetite” for his own daughter and dreamed of the day when he could have “daddy-daughter sex.”
Posted January 7, 2014 by Scared Monkeys
child abuse, Child Endangerment, child porn, Child Welfare, Crime, endangering the welfare of a child, Felony, Incest, Legal - Court Room - Trial, molestation, Pedophilia, Pornograpghy, Rape, sex crimes, sexual abuse, Sexual Assault, WTF, You Tube - VIDEO | no comments
Hmm, Is This Considered Incest … Gay 65 Year Old Man Adopts His 73 Year Old Partner as His Son to Avoid High Pennsylvania Inheritance Tax
Just curious, why isn’t the following considered incest?
Here is one way for Gays to circumvent the law, adopt your partner as your son. A 65 year old man has adopted his 75 year old partner of 44 years as his son in order to avoid the high Pennsylvania inheritance tax. Pennsylvania only recognizes marriage as being between a man and a woman and presently has no provisions for civil unions. So in order to avoid the 15% death tax if either was to pass, the younger John adopted his 75 year old partner as his son. With the adoption, they can now will each other their assets with only a 4% tax. Huh, imagine that, the dad is 10 years younger than his son. The reason why the younger man adopted the older was because the older mans father was still alive. You can’t have two primary fathers, now that would be just wrong, wouldn’t it. (sarcasm intended)
A man in Pennsylvania has adopted his partner of 44 years to circumvent high property taxes that would be imposed on either of the men if the other dies.
John, 65, and his partner Gregory*, 75, made the decision to become father and son to avoid a 15 per cent tax on any property and assets willed to one if the other should die – a much higher tax than married spouses or family members are required to pay.
The state of Pennsylvania, where the men reside, recognizes marriage as being only between a man and a woman and has no provision for civil unions at this time.
Wait a minute, so the gay lovers are now father and son and cohabiting is a sexual relationship? Isn’t that the definition of incest? From how the story reads, the judge who resided over the adoption knew that the two were gay and even asked what was the purpose of the adoption. Thus, the judge knew the soon to be father and son were lovers and cared less. Sorry, but according to the law what these two are now doing breaks the incest law in the Keystone state. Isn’t it just amazing how have a legal system that overlooks the laws on the books for some, but not for others.
§ 4302. Incest.
A person is guilty of incest, a felony of the second degree,
if that person knowingly marries or cohabits or has sexual
intercourse with an ancestor or descendant, a brother or sister
of the whole or half blood or an uncle, aunt, nephew or niece of
the whole blood. The relationships referred to in this section
include blood relationships without regard to legitimacy, and
relationship of parent and child by adoption.
(Nov. 17, 1989, P.L.592, No.64, eff. 60 days; Mar. 31, 1995, 1st
Sp.Sess., P.L.985, No.10, eff. 60 days)
Another question that needs to be asked, how many people get denied adaption who are doing it for noble reason, not to circumvent the law? Doesn’t it seem a bit odd that the courts would allow a fraud to be perpetrated? The intent of adoption is not to circumvent the law. So if gays can’t get married, they just adopt each other? Huh. Although it would appear that this judge had no issue in granting the adoptions as he was told the truth as to why it was occurring.
The couple’s lawyer told the couple that they wouldn’t be required to tell the judge their sexual orientation or the nature of their relationship, but John worried the judge would ask, and he’d have to tell the truth under oath.
The judge, as it happened, did ask. ‘He said, “I am really curious, why are you adopting [Gregory]?”‘
‘I said, “Because it’s our only legal option to protect ourselves from Pennsylvania’s inheritance taxes,” said John. ‘He got it immediately.’
After signing the papers, the judge turned to John and said, ‘Congratulations, it’s a boy.’
How in the did a judge allow an adoption to go forward that would allow incest to occur and basically make a joke out of it? What would happen if a man and a woman did the same thing and were lovers? Would it be looked upon so favorably be the law?