WikiLeaks Emails Show that Obama DOJ Had a Cozy and Coordinated Relationship with Hillary Clinton Campaign on Email/Server case
HOW MUCH MORE PROOF DOES AMERICA NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE FIX WAS IN FROM THE OUTSET AND HILLARY CLINTON WAS NEVER GOING TO BE INVESTIGATED LET ALONE INDICTED? ONE BIG INCESTUOUS AND CORRUPT GOVERNMENT.
Emails published by WikiLeaks on Tuesday suggest the Justice Department inappropriately communicated with Hillary Clinton’s campaign as the Obama administration scrambled to deal with the fallout from her use of a private server. The emails show that Brian Fallon, Clinton’s campaign spokesman and a former employee of the Justice Department, was continually tipped off and alerted by individuals at the DOJ regarding Hillary Clinton’s email and private server crimes. The corruption and collusion between the DOJ and Hillary Clinton is just incredible. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump responded to the emails and said that the connection was “unbelievable.” That it is Donald, that it is. And if we had a media that wasn’t in the tank for Hillary Clinton, the news pressure would be so great, she would have had to have stepped down from running for president.
The Corruption, Collusion and Cover Ups of this Administration are sickening
An official within Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign appeared to have discussions with sources inside the Department of Justice (DOJ) about ongoing open records lawsuits regarding the former secretary of State’s emails, according to an email released on Tuesday.
In an email from May 2015, Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said that “DOJ folks” had “inform[ed]” him about an upcoming status conference in one of the lawsuits regarding Clinton’s private email setup.
The information about an upcoming court event would have been public knowledge and open for all to attend. And it’s unclear whether the people Fallon spoke to at the Justice Department were officials who regularly communicate with the public.
However, the fact that Fallon — a former spokesman with the Justice Department — remained in contact with anyone from the department is likely to renew allegations that the Obama administration maintained an especially cozy relationship with Clinton’s presidential campaign.
On Tuesday, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said the connection was “unbelievable.”
The email “shows a level of collusion which calls into question the entire investigation into her private server,” Trump spokesman Jason Miller said in a statement on Tuesday.
“The Department of Justice must release all communications with the Clinton campaign and her allies as soon as possible in order to definitively prove their investigation was completely above board.”
The email from Fallon was contained in a collection of more than 1,000 messages allegedly stolen from campaign chairman John Podesta and posted to WikiLeaks on Tuesday.
From Legal Insurrection … Remember the Bill Clinton, Loretta Lynch “tarmac summit” and its gross appearance of impropriety? That gross appearance of impropriety cloud hangs heavy over Hillary and her emails yet again.
It’s hard to understand why Hillary’s campaign manager would be in direct contact with DOJ — that’s what Hillary had lawyers for. So something smells rotten.
There may be more revelations regarding the cozy relationship Team Hillary had with the Justice Department regarding the investigation, so stay tuned.
THE FBI WAS WELL AWARE OF THIS WHEN THEY DECIDED NOT TO RECOMMEND PROSECUTION AGAINST HILLARY CLINTON.
We now learn from FOX News that two bankers boxes containing printouts of Clinton’s emails have gone missing in the Clinton private email server crimes are missing. Imagine that. The FBI should be ashamed of themselves and director Comey needs to resign. Just how corrupt is the FBI in their complicity to help Hillary Clinton cover up her obvious crimes? Or is the FBI that incompetent? In either case, Comey needs to resign in disgrace. How any one with the mountain of evidence and the obvious evidence tampering and attempt t destroy evidence was not recommended to be indicted by and FBI and prosecuted by the Department of Justice is one of the greatest travesties of justice and coverups this country has ever seen.
But what difference does it make that two boxes of my emails went missing, the liberal MSM will never care or report on it.
This case gets worse and worse and the cover-up just gets more obvious each passing day. Now it is up to Donald Trump to nail her on this in the next debate and actually articulate the issue, the crime and the conspiracy to cover up her actions. America, how could you possible vote for some one that you know is this corrupt?
These boxes didn’t go missing, they were destroyed and everyone knows it.
Buried in the 189 pages of heavily redacted FBI witness interviews from the Hillary Clinton email investigation are details of yet another mystery — about two missing “bankers boxes” filled with the former secretary of state’s emails.
The interviews released earlier this month, known as 302s, also reveal the serious allegation that senior State Department official Patrick Kennedy applied pressure to subordinates to change the classified email codes so they would be shielded from Congress and the public.
The details about the boxes are contained in five pages of the FBI file – with a staggering 111 redactions – that summarize the statements of a State Department witness who worked in the “Office of Information Programs and Services (IPS).” The employee told the FBI that, “Initially, IPS officials were told there were 14 bankers boxes of former Secretary of State Hillary CLINTON’s emails at CLINTON’s Friendship Heights office.” Friendship Heights is a neighborhood that straddles the Northwest neighborhood of the District of Columbia and Maryland.
The State Department witness further explained to the FBI that “on or about December 5, 2014, IPS personnel picked up only 12 bankers boxes of CLINTON’s emails from Williams & Connolly.”
The officials were not sure if the boxes “were consolidated or what could have happened to the two other boxes.
Wikileaks’ October Surprise Planned by Julian Assange on Tuesday in Video Appearance After First Canceling Due to Security Concerns
JUST WHAT DOES WIKILEAKS HAVE AS AN ‘OCTOBER SURPRISE’ FOR HILLARY CLINTON?
After having canceled his first appearance due to security concerns, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is now planning to appear via video link Tuesday morning at Wikileak’s tenth anniversary celebration in Berlin, Germany. According to Heat Street, Assange may be planning to release some new information his organization has obtained about the U.S. Democratic Party; however, it is unknown whether he will dump the dirt on Hillary Clinton. Originally, Assange was to make an announcement from the balcony of London’s Ecuadorian Embassy, where Assange has sought sanctuary for years, but was canceled due to security concerns.
After canceling a planned announcement in London, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is now planning to appear via video link Tuesday morning at Wikileak’s tenth anniversary celebration in Berlin. He’s a last-minute addition to the roster of festivities taking place this week in Germany.
Wikileaks used its Facebook page to confirm that Assange would speak at the event, which takes place at 3am Eastern time.
Sources close to the event tell Heat Street that Assange may be planning to release some new information his organization has obtained about the U.S. Democratic Party. But Heat Street has yet to receive independent confirmation that Assange plans to dump information specifically on Hillary Clinton.
The news that Assange plans to appear (remotely) in Berlin comes after Wikileaks abruptly canceled a much-anticipated announcement in London that was to be made from the balcony of London’s Ecuadorian Embassy, where Assange has sought sanctuary for years. The cancelation was first reported by NBC News. According to NBC’s Jesse Rodriguez, the announcement was canceled due to “security concerns”.
There had been widespread anticipating that Tuesday’s announcement might have been Assange’s long-promised document dump on Hillary Clinton.
Just what does Julian Assange have on Hillary Clinton and will it derail her presidential campaign? Previously, Assange stated that he had “enough evidence” to indict Hillary Clinton. Everyone is awaiting this political bombshell and ‘October Surprise.’ A top Donald Trump supporter ominously declared that Wednesday will be the end for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. If Assange truly has the goods on Hillary Clinton and Democrats and does sway the presidential election for Donald Trump, my prediction is that Julian Assange will be names Time. Man of the Year.’
WOW, HILLARY CLINTON BLAMED COLIN POWELL FOR USING PRIVATE EMAIL, THE BUCK STOPS WITH EVERYONE ELSE BUT THE PANT SUIT …
The NY Times is reporting that Hillary Clinton told the FBI that it was former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell had advised her to use a personal email account. Hey Colin, how do the tire tracks feel on your back from the bus that just ran you over driven by Hillary Clinton? According to the Democratic nominee, Powell made the suggestions at a small dinner party shortly after Clinton took over at the State Department in 2009 and in an email exchange around the same time. Hmm, I wonder if those emails were turned over? Who knows of Powell did or not, but you know what I can guarantee he didn’t advise Hillary Clinton to do … have her own email server in her bathroom capturing all of the private emails. It is sickening to see the lengths this woman will trash everyone else to save her political ass.
Hey Colin, was that the Hillary Mystery Machine that just ran you over?
Pressed by the F.B.I. about her email practices at the State Department, Hillary Clinton told investigators that former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell had advised her to use a personal email account
The account is included in the notes the Federal Bureau of Investigation handed over to Congress on Tuesday, relaying in detail the three-and-a-half-hour interview with Mrs. Clinton in early July that led to the decision by James B. Comey, the bureau’s director, not to pursue criminal charges against her.
Separately, in a 2009 email exchange that also emerged during the F.B.I. questioning, Mrs. Clinton, who had already decided to use private email, asked Mr. Powell about his email practices when he was the nation’s top diplomat under George W. Bush, according to a person with direct knowledge of Mr. Powell’s appearance in the documents, who would not speak for attribution.
The journalist Joe Conason first reported the conversation between Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Powell in his coming book about Bill Clinton’s postpresidency, “Man of the World: The Further Endeavors of Bill Clinton,” which The Times received an advanced copy of.
Do we really need a president who cannot take responsibility for their own actions when they are caught in lie after lie after lie?
DRIP, DRIP DRIP …
Wikileaks has now released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials. You can listen to them HERE.
Another shoe has been dropped by Wikileaks.
On the night President Obama and Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine were scheduled to speak to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the anti-secrecy whistle-blower group released hacked voicemails of top Democratic officials.
Wikileaks put up a page containing 29 mp3 files of calls, identified by phone number, running approximately 14 minutes combined.
Guccifer 2.0, the hacker who breached the Democratic National Committee, has released a cache of purported DNC documents to The Hill in an effort to refocus attention on the hack.
The documents include more than 11,000 names matched with some identifying information, files related to two controversial donors and a research file on Sarah Palin.
“The press [is] gradually forget[ing] about me, [W]ikileaks is playing for time and [I] have some more docs,” he said in electronic chat explaining his rationale.
The documents provide some insight into how the DNC handled high-profile donation scandals. But the choice of documents revealed to The Hill also provides insight into the enigmatic Guccifer 2.0.
The hacker provided a series of spreadsheets related to Norman Hsu, a Democratic donor jailed in 2009 for running a Ponzi scheme and arranging illegal campaign contributions. The DNC responded by assembling files to gauge the exposure from Hsu to its slate of candidates.
Similar files on Paul J. Magliocchetti, a lobbyist closely associated with the late Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), provide a quick reference document outlining Magliocchetti’s donations to Republicans. Magliocchetti pleaded guilty in 2010 to involvement in a pay-for-play campaign finance scheme.