RSSObama Looks to Limit United States Use of Nuclear Weapons, Even in Self Defense
Welcome to Obamanation …
What will Obama create a new incentive program for Nukes as he did with cash for clunkers, because that worked so well. Because US national security is so over-rated. As we all know peace through weakness works wonders. Or is it peace through nuance.
What exactly is President Hussein Obama’s motivation here? How dangerous is this President for America? This President is now bordering, actually he has now gone over the line, on doing things intentionally that would weaken and harm the United States.
Obama now wants to revamp American nuclear strategy to substantially limit the conditions under which the United States would use nuclear weapons. Are you serious? So much for National Security and protecting and defending the US Constitution. In the dangerous times we live in, what type of message does it send to the World that the US is weak and looks for appeasement?
President Obama said Monday that he was revamping American nuclear strategy to substantially narrow the conditions under which the United States would use nuclear weapons, even in self defense.
But the president said in an interview that he was carving out an exception for “outliers like Iran and North Korea” that have violated or renounced the main treaty to halt nuclear proliferation.
Discussing his approach to nuclear security the day before formally releasing his new strategy, Mr. Obama described his policy as part of a broader effort to edge the world toward making nuclear weapons obsolete, and to create incentives for countries to give up any nuclear ambitions. To set an example, the new strategy renounces the development of any new nuclear weapons, overruling the initial position of his own defense secretary.
Mr. Obama’s strategy is a sharp shift from those of his predecessors and seeks to revamp the nation’s nuclear posture for a new age in which rogue states and terrorist organizations are greater threats than traditional powers like Russia and China.
This might be one of the most dumb, foolish and ignorant policies ever devised, even for the likes of Barck Hussein Obama. So once again we ask the question, what is his motivation?
On its face, that is unbelievably stupid. A country attacks us with biological weapons, and we stay our hand because they are “in compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty”? That is too dumb even for Barack Obama. The administration hedged its commitment with qualifications suggesting that if there actually were a successful biological or chemical attack, it would rethink its position.
How dangerous and naive could this community organizer possibly be? Nuclear weapons obsolete, when every rouge terrorist nation is looking to gain them. Creating incentives for terrorists to stop nuclear ambitions … WTF!!! As Atlas Shrugs states, since when has surrender been a nuclear strategy?
Obama says to our enemies, bring it on, we won’t fight ya — leaving us bare naked vulnerable like a virgin slipped a Rohypnol on her first date with a Chicagoland gangsta.
Obama is removing nuclear defense at a time when Iran’s devout mullahcracy is building their nuclear arsenal with the global objective of a universal caliphate.
He is leaving America flailing in the hostile wind. Was there ever a more frightful time in American history? Seriously?
Hot Air questions the New Obama policy: No nuke retaliation for bio or chemical attack. The fact of the matter is, a weak President like Obama would never use a nuke under no circumstances and every rouge and terror state knows that. Does Obama want to put into place the law of unintended consequences? Instead of terror orgs trying to gain nukes, instead they will look to develop bio weapons instead. NICE!
EXIT QUESTION … since when do rouge states and terrorists care about treaties and nuanced statements?
This President has got to go, let us just hope we still have an America left when that happens.
Posted April 6, 2010 by Scared Monkeys Barack Obama, Iran, Islamofascist, Obamanation, Socialism, US National Security, War on Terror, WTF | 24 comments |
If you liked this post, you may also like these:
Comments
24 Responses to “Obama Looks to Limit United States Use of Nuclear Weapons, Even in Self Defense”
Leave a Reply
someone expected he’d do otherwise?
Obama says to our enemies, bring it on, we won’t fight ya — leaving us bare naked vulnerable like a virgin slipped a Rohypnol on her first date with a Chicagoland gangsta.
Or like Natalee Holloway on a date with Urin Vandercrap !!!
I wonder if obamanos took lessons from aruba somehow ???
Are we still headed for the rocks or has the ship changed course towards the reef ???
Every day obamanos proves a little bit more that he is the anti christ !!!
*%$@ obama !!!
This is an invitation to our enemie’s & should send chills down the spine of every American with the common sense to see it.
Obama is setting the stage for a horrible attack to occur by saying we wont retaliate for a bio-weapon attack.
Now we hear today that the president or whatever he is of Afghanistan is ready to join up with the taliban & what is Obama’s response?
“If those statement’s keep up Obama isn’t going to let him visit the whitehouse”
Hey maybe a ride in Airforce One over a beer or two will fix it heh.
Obama is by far the best president in decades,the u.s. is on route of being half as rouge as you condemn others,a true world leader he’s accomplished more in one year then many worked decades to fulfill,a health care plan for every obese or whining american, a safer world with less nuclear weapons(still enough to destroy civilization as we know it so stop b!tching).He deserved his Nobel prize.
#4 Oh he deserves it all right !!! Right up his @$$ !!!
yes, he has accomplished more than many…has a Nobel Prize to “prove it”. Funny how that works. Didn’t realize a Nobel could be awareded for accomplishing so much destruction.
Must be a plot to drive the sane insane.
#4 ROFLMAO Thanks for the laugh. I needed that today.
I think Obama really believes that “All you need is love”. That was at the end of the Beatles’ Magical Mystery Tour album, which if you’ve ever seen the movie, explains a lot about our current administration. Personally, I think “Fool on the hill” fits better!
However, have no fear, WHEN we are attacked (I mean really attacked with a nuke on a US city) these do-gooders peaceniks will be clamouring to be the first one to push the button!!!!
We have a gutless and spineless President who is waving the white flag before we are even attacked !
How does he expect us to defend ourselve with our
hans tied behind our back ? Russia and China will never agree to do the same in their countries so while they develope newer and better weapons we will be defending ourselve with flint rock rifles against biological warfare and to fend off weapons of mass distruction we will use pea shooters.
This is the most insane decision I have ever heard of. It makes one wonder whose side he is on because it is certainly not in our best interests.
first it will be the nukes then our own
personal firearms.
Yes because we know that China & Russia will comply. LMAO
As #9 pointed out. Other countries will continue to advance their weapons while we sit on our hands and do nothing. Now that they all know how weak our President is, just ripe for the picking. How will we defend ourselves against WMD?
What a bunch of idiots. I’m sure the other countries would like to discuss this over a beer at the White House. Maybe Obama will offer them a ride on AF1.
Fools
what a bs.
first: the US doesn’t really need nukes for selfdefence, they got enough hardware to do the job without and if nuked, they will nuke back….and we will be gone anyway…
and what country would be suicidal enough to attack the US (the Taliban didn’t attack the US, Osama & co. did, don’t think the Taliban wanted the attack on them to happen) with a chem. attack?
with a bio attack, chances are good that we all die.
and he is not removind the nuke defence, you still got enough nukes to wipe out earth a couple of dozen times.
same for bio and chem. warfare, US Militairy is still researching those fields.
and again, the US militairy does not need nukes to flatten a country.
only those fooled by this jabroney are
believers. even those of his own race disagree
behind his back but will not publicly for fear
of reprisal by their own race.
it’s good to see conservative blacks within the
tea party and to see them unafraid of obama’s
followers. as they said it’s not about black and
white. they are tired of of being stereotyped
as democrats only and are tired of obama’s
taxing of Americans. they consider themselves
as Americans.
#4: this is the disease you created with your
ignorant president. census workers are reporting
that the census bureau managers are telling them
to slow down and stretch out their work in ordere
to make it look like obama created 750,000 jobs.
they report that the job couls be done with a third of the manpower and are caslling it a gross
misuse of tax dollars. #4, your president is corrupt and as worthless as teats on a bull.
sorry for the misspelled words guys
Dolf, you tool, it doesn’t matter how many weapons we have if we don’t use them. He is going to limited the use of these weapons.
Please grow a brain before you start posting on things you know nothing about.
When you are as ignorant as Barry about how a government should be run, you do things like this. When was he ever in the military other than that he recieved as a muslim child.
What a piece of work.
He makes Carter look like a genius.
Michelle
funny to see the no brain remark
what do you think when nukes are used?
byebye earth
or do you think the neighbours of the nuked country really like it (there is a thing called fallout)
and ps, they are not used anyway, so why not limited their use?
and the US Militairy doesn’t need nukes to hit back
Dotn wory aboutt tha mispellled wordz SUPA DAVA. Wee no yu wetadded. Moron.
#20 Seems to me you are the retarded one. Do you have any intelligent comments you would like to post or do you just like making an ass of yourself?
21.Michelle Smith on April 9th, 2010 9:40 am
#20 Seems to me you are the retarded one. Do you have any intelligent comments you would like to post or do you just like making an ass of yourself?
You might wanna look in a mirror Michelle.
#22 WTH are you talking about? #20′s post was completely irrelevant and unintelligible.
Why would I need to look in a mirror? I didn’t make those retarded remarks, #20 did.
you do make retared comments…nore the word retard.
But I agree, Jack didn’t post anything constructive, he was provoking