Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee Devin Nunes Says Trump Communications ‘Incidentally’ Collected By Intelligence Agencies (VIDEO)
Devin Nunes, the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee tells press he has been notified that Trump team communications have been “incidentally,” legally collected. He also said more names involved in Trump campaign have been unmasked but none of the information was related to the Russia investigations.
The question is why were the names of those under surveillance unmasked?
Nunes went on to say that the handling of the surveillance and unmasking was inappropriate.
Are you Kidding … “A Streetcar Naked Desire?” … How Could Anyone Miss This One on The Wheel of Fortune? (VIDEO)
A STREETCAR NAKED DESIRE … ALRIGHTY THEN, MIGHT WANT TO TO WATCHING PORN AND MAYBE WATCH SOME CLASSIC MOVIES DUDE!!!
What might have been one of the worst misses ever from The Wheel of Fortune comes the following … A Streetcar NaKed Desire. OOPS! What might be even worse in the case of this embarrassed contestant is, that he actually thought he knew the answer. One has to wonder what goes on in the minds of some people. Well, we know know what was going on in Kevin’s. But to Kevin’s defense, much like how Cliff Clavin of Cheer’s fame guessed in Final Jeopardy, “who are 3 people who have never been in my kitchen” and was factually correct, maybe it was the same for Kevin and he has the movie A Streetcar Naked Desire in his DVD collection.
A contestant on “Wheel of Fortune” on Tuesday missed the equivalent of a very short putt.
A player identified as “Kevin” was one letter away from solving the puzzle. It read, “A Streetcar Na-ed Desire.” Kevin decided to spin the wheel again and landed on the $600 piece. He said, “K.”
He was wrong and the crowd let out a collected sigh. The opponent to Kevin’s left correctly solved the puzzle, “A Streetcar Named Desire.”
“A Streetcar Named Desire” is the name of the famous work by American playwright Tennessee Williams.
THAT’S THE TICKET, HAVE THE WORST PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN MODERN TIMES RUN AGAIN IN 2020 …
Hillary Clinton’s former campaign manager Robby Mook appeared on MSNBC’s “For The Record With Greta” and stated that he would not rule out that Clinton would run for president in 2020. SERIOUSLY? That’s the ticket Democrats, run the worst presidential candidate in modern times again because you have nothing else. Currently, the Democrats have no leaders and it is a rudderless ship. Who else is going to run for the Dems in 2020? But as for Hillary Clinton running again, I find that hard to believe. Hillary lost in the primaries to an unknown named Barack Obama in 2008 and lost an unlosable presidential race to Donald Trump in an electoral landslide in 2016. Sorry Hillary, your time is over, in fact it was over when you lost to Obama in 2008. Find something else to do, there are plenty of woods to hike.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton could be running for president again in 2020.
Clinton’s former campaign manager Robby Mook appeared on MSNBC’s “For The Record With Greta” Monday night to discuss the possibility of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
Clinton was spotted in Pennsylvania over St. Patrick’s Day weekend, according to host Greta Van Sustern, who suggested that the visit could be related to a 2020 presidential bid.
Mook would not rule out if Clinton was planning to run against President Donald Trump in 2020, but he did say the Clinton camp’s focus is on figuring out the degree to which Russia was involved in the last election cycle.
“I’m going to let her answer for that,” Mook said. “I think what happens right now, we’ve got to get to the bottom of what happened in 2016 then we can start worrying about the next cycle. But we’ve got to make sure that this cannot happen again in two years or four years to anybody else.”
HOW PATHETICALLY SAD AND UNINFORMED HAS AMERICA BECOME?
As reported at The Hill, according to a recent C-SPAN survey only 43% of likely U.S voters could name “A” Supreme Court Justice. Wow, not all of them, not a majority of them, not even two. What a sad state of affairs. It really makes one wonder just how uninformed of an electorate we rally have in this country that less than half could not name one justice. Making matters worse, probably more than that percentage could name the judges from the final tear of American Idol. Take a good looks below folks, these would be the Justices of the Supreme Court, including the late, great Antonin Gregory Scalia.
What makes matters even more puzzling is that although the majority of respondents were unable to identify a member of the court, 90% of all respondents indicated they felt the Supreme Court had a key impact on their daily life. Let’s understand this, you have no idea the names of the people who impact your lives? HEAVEN HELP US!!!
Only 43 percent of likely U.S. voters can name a Supreme Court justice, according to a C-SPAN survey released Sunday.
The survey comes as President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, began confirmation hearings on Monday.
According to the survey, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was named more than her fellow justices, with 16 percent of those surveyed giving her name.
Chief Justice John Roberts followed behind, at 12 percent, and Justice Clarence Thomas was named by 10 percent of people surveyed.
The numbers drop off precipitously from there, with just 3 percent naming Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
Justices Anthony Kennedy, Samuel Alito and Elena Kagan were named by 1 percent, while no one among the 1,032 likely voters surveyed named Justice Stephen Breyer, who was confirmed more than 20 years ago under President Clinton.
OH CANADA … SO YOU THINK ITS JUST THE USA THAT WANTS ILLEGALS DEPORTED, EH?
According to a recent Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll, nearly half of Canadians want to deport those individuals who have entered Canada illegally. Well how do you like that, Canadians appeared to be just as concerned about illegal immigration as Americans, as 48% said they wanted illegals deported. I guess that makes Canadians bigoted too? It would seem that Canadians do not like those who come to their country without following the rules. Sound familiar?
Nearly half of Canadians want to deport people who are illegally crossing into Canada from the United States, and a similar number disapprove of how Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is handling the influx, according to a Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll released on Monday.
A significant minority, four out of 10 respondents, said the border crossers could make Canada “less safe,” underlining the potential political risk for Trudeau’s Liberal government.
The increasing flow of hundreds of asylum-seekers of African and Middle Eastern origin from the United States in recent months is becoming a contentious issue in Canada.
Although there has been broad bipartisan support for high levels of legal immigration for decades in Canada, Trudeau is under pressure over the flow of the illegal migrants.