Mitt Romney Slams Obama For Saying He Can’t Change Washington From Inside … So Much for Change You Can Believe In

Romney says Obama has thrown in the white flag of surrender again …

On the campaign trail Mitt Romney slammed President Barack Obama’s comments that he could not change Washington from the inside. Romney had a fantastic response to Obama’s weak “I can’t change Washington” comment. Romney vowed to give Obama that chance to making change from the outside with a presidential election win in November 2012. It is time for a new President when Obama waives the white flag of change surrender. Obama has gone from the candidate of change and “YES I CAN” to “NO I CAN’T”. Barack Obama promised change and now he is the one who cannot get change even though he had a Democrat House and Senate for the first two years of his presidency.

Mitt Romney says he will make changes from the inside, he will bring Republicans and Democrats together and restore the American economy. Maybe Obama should have spent more time governing and leading, reaching across the aisle as he promised, and not campaigning, golfing, vacationing and causing a greater divide. Just a thought.

Hot Air has more on Obama’s failure to be able to influence Washington as the Leader of the Free World. Um, wasn’t this the rason why he was elected in the first place?

Okay, hold the phone — the President of the United States is powerless to influence Washington’s inner workings? I thought that was supposed to be the entire point of America electing him?

Barack Obama, NO HE CAN’T, …”You can’t change Washington from the inside” … What Happened to 2008, “I can bring Change?”

CHANGE YOU CAN’T BELIEVE IN …

Talk about an “EPIC FAILURE”. Barack Obama, who ran on “Hope & Change” in 2008, who ran on the idea that he would bring change to Washington, DC now admits … NO HE CAN’T.  As reported at the Politico, Obama says, “You can’t change Washington from the inside”. HUH? My what a difference 4 years makes and a completely failed Presidency. Dear Mr. President, are you completely clueless or once again can you just not take responsibility for your ineptness? It does not matter whether one is on the inside or the outside, change comes about through strong, persuasive leadership and a message, agenda and policy that actually is better than what was in place.  Might I remind everyone that Obama had control of the House and Senate for the first two years of his administration. What did he change? Let’s face it, Obama just can’t get the job done and need to go.

A surprising comment from President Barack Obama, at the Univision forum in Florida earlier, on things he has learned after four years: “You can’t change Washington from the inside.”

It’s a tricky thing to claim outsider status after serving in the White House for four years (and in the Senate before that), after running on a hope and change message, and it is not an especially helpful comment for a president running for reelection with a plea to voters to let him finish the work he began but hasn’t closed out.

The rest of his statement was about doing more to involve the public to bring change from the “outside,” which is more in line with what he said before. But if the small pool of persuadable voters see Obama as saying Washington is irretrievably broken, even for him, they could be open to a fresh case from his opponent.

In 2008 Obama said he would bring change, “I can bring a lot of people along on my coattails”.

That was then, this is now. Suddenly Obama can’t bring change from the inside. After all his promises, after all this pandering … “NO HE CAN’T. So Obama can’t change Washington from the inside, he says, you can aonly change Washington from the Outside. America … its your job in 2012 to put Obama on the outside.  Jammie Wearing Fool compares Obama’s glaring gaffe of change to Romney’s so-called secret tape mishap. Which one do you the the liberal, corrupt mead complex will focus on?

From the Washington Free Beacon:

“The most important lesson I’ve learned is that you can’t change Washington from the inside,” he told a Univision forum Thursday. “You can only change it from the outside.”

President Obama’s Foreign Policy Approval Rating Drops After Mideast Turmoil, Protests & Murders

Can You Say President Jimmy Carter II?

President Barack Obama’s foreign policy approval ratings drop significantly following the continued Middle East protests and deadly attack in Libya that saw the death of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans on the a11th anniversary of 9-11.  even with a skewed sampling of +5D, the NBC/Wall Street Journal poll released Tuesday found the president’s foreign policy approval among registered voters at 49%, down from 54%. Even worse, the fall among Independents went from 53% in August to 41%.

The first opinion poll to be conducted after last week’s deadly attack on a U.S. consulate in Libya and a spate of anti-American protests across the Muslim world has recorded a five-point drop in approval for President Obama’s handling of foreign policy.

The NBC/Wall Street Journal poll released Tuesday found the president’s foreign policy approval among registered voters at 49 percent, down from 54 percent one month earlier.

“The fall was steeper among independents, going from 53 percent in August to 41 percent,” NBC reported.

Is it any wonder why the Obama White House and their minions are trying to claim that the attacks were spontaneous and not a premeditated terror attack. The Obama White House would rather blame a movie trailer of a movie no one has seen, rather than take responsibility for their failed foreign Middle East policy and the fact that they ignored advance warnings and had little to no security on the anniversary of 9-11, of all days.

Rut-Roh, what is the liberal MSM to do? Their failed narrative to make the protests be all about Romney’s condemnation of Obama rather than Obama doing his job has failed. The MSM all but declared Romney’s chances over. Not so fast … Maybe, just maybe there is hope and Americans are outraged at the lack of response and the lack of responsibility from Obama in the wake of the protests and murders. All the while he just continues to campaign and fund raise as Americans are dead.

President Barack Obama Says, If GOP Wants Me ‘To Walk the Dog or Wash Their Car, I’m Happy to Do It’

The United Stated economy is headed over the cliff and the Middle East is on fire and Obama is still in the silly season as the most partisan and divisive President ever now says, can’t we all just get along. Obama lower the federal deficit? Since when has Obama ever been concerned with lowering the deficit? Obama promised in 2008 he would reduce the deficit in half, all he has done is increase it like no other president before him. Actually like almost all other presidents combined before him.

Even though under Obama’s first term in office the United States has had 43+ consecutive months of unemployment over 8%, record federal debt including over $5 trillion under this president, record number of people on food stamps and Obama makes the following foolish comment, “If GOP Wants Me ‘To Walk the Dog or Wash Their Car, I’m Happy to Do It”. After nearly four years of not listening to Republicans, after nearly four years of Obama and Democrats insulting and calling the GOP Nazi’s and that the GOP wants to harm old people, children and pollute the air … 50 days out from an election Obama now wants to play nice? Give me a break.

President Barack Obama, on the stump in the swing state of Ohio on Monday, said that in working with Republicans to reduce the deficit, he was willing to show “more love” and even “wash their car” to get the job done.

While speaking in Cincinnati on Monday, Obama said, “The only thing they [Republicans] can do is keep trying to bluff their way through until November, and hope that you won’t call them on it. But understand Cincinnati, look, I want to work with them to reduce the deficit. I’ve said if the Republicans need more love, if they want me to walk the dog or wash their car, I’m happy to do it.”

Obama wants to work with the GOP like when he and Democrats did with ramming Obamacare down the throats of Americans against the will of the people? How about like that Obama $1 trillion stimulus package that was so bi-partisan?

The Lonely Conservative nails it with the best line of the day, “The guy who goes out of his way to skirt Congress every chance he gets. He’d eat their dogs before he’d work with Republicans, at least the ones with principles.” Amen Sister!

Obama Administration Blames Movie, Says Not Directed at US Policy, Not to the Administration, Not to the American Poeple … UNREAL!

Jay Carney becomes the Baghdad Bob of the Obama Administration … Obama has found nwe person to blame other than George W. Bush.

How out of touch, clueless or just plain wrong could the Obama Administration really be? Obama White House spokesman actually said the following with a straight face when discussing the Middle East that is on fire. Jay Carney told reporters today that the Middle East protests were in response to a video, not directed at United States policy, not to the Administration (of course not), and not toward the America people. Because when it comes down to it, Obama and his minions have to save Obama, the hell with everything else. As stated at the Daily Caller, the most important thing to remember with the fact that the Middle East is on fire is that it has nothing to do with the Obama Administration and its policies.

Sorry President Barack Obama, from the apologetic Cairo speech, to thumbing your nose at Israel, to your notion that the Arab Spring would promote democracy, to sitting on your hands when Iranians wanted freedom to your lack of response to the current chaos in the Middle East that say four Americans murdered and dragged through the streets … YOU BUILT THIS!

From the Washington Free Beacon:

CARNEY: We also need to understand that this is a fairly volatile situation and it is in response not to United States policy, and not to, obviously, the administration, or the American people, but it is in response to a video, a film that we have judged to be be reprehensible and disgusting. That in no way justifies any violent reaction to it, but this is not a case of protests directed at the United States writ large or at U.S. policy, this is in response to a video that is offensive to Muslims.

Again, this is not in any way justifying violence, and we have spoken very clearly out against that and condemned it. And the president is making sure in his conversations with leaders around the region that they are committed as hosts to diplomatic facilities to protect both personnel and buildings and other facilities that are part of the U.S. representation in those countries.

Talk about playing politics with the crisis in the Middle East. Obama and his minions will do and say anything to deflect the blame from the explosion that took place in Egypt and Libya and the escalated to 21 countries. Obama and his spin machine have tried to tout Obama as strong on foreign policy. Sorry, appeasement is never a wise idea for foreign policy. The VIDEO was merely an excuse for radical Islam to pounce.  So we are supposed to believe that four murdered Americans in Libya, chants of death to the USA, burning of likenesses of Obama in effigy and protests across the Middle East and the world a just a result of a video? How small is this president? Or is he just that dangerously naive? An ounce of leadership would have been the call Mr. President, not continuing to to be the Campaigner in Chief.