Daily Commentary – Monday, June 29th, 2009 – Michael Jackson’s Death Not Comparable to Princess Di

• Dana reminds us that, despite what some in the media have been saying, Michael Jackson had a dark side and was certainly not royalty.
  
   

   Daily Commentary – monday, June 29th, 2009 – Michael Jackson’s Death Not Comparable to Princess Di [1:16m]: | Download

14 Responses to “Daily Commentary – Monday, June 29th, 2009 – Michael Jackson’s Death Not Comparable to Princess Di”

1. Susan on June 29th, 2009 4:33 pm

   Well kids, I hate to break it to ya, but Diana was rumored to be pregnant with her boyfriend’s child at the time of her untimely death. Diana was no angel, but I’ll agree her dark side was not as dark as Michael’s. We go blame Joe “the freak” Jackson for Michael’s dark side

2. Susan on June 29th, 2009 4:34 pm

   I meant we “can blame”, not “we go…

   geez

3. Maggie on June 29th, 2009 4:57 pm

   I think pretty much they all have a dark side, some is just not made public until years later. I was a big fan of Princess Diana’s..and her great work. Stayed up all night to watch her funeral and still couldn’t believe it was real. She too, also had a dark side with the numerous affairs with married and unmarried men, bulimia.. reported suicidal.. and marrying a man she knew was in love with someone else.

4. Greg the mongoose on June 29th, 2009 5:21 pm

   Michael Jackson and Princess Di, both helped the sick. Princess Di was a very earthy woman. Michael Jackson was stuck in thriller. Princess Di had her Royal title and security taken away after the divorce. Which probably set her up for the accident. I met Michael Jackson back in the summer of 1988 he looked like 110 lbs back then. As a teenager I could not escape his music. I was stuck living in a Michael Jackson world. Like Elvis, Michael Jackson follows the downfalls of Great fame. I just sold Michael Jackson’s autograph on ebay for a bundle of cash. God bless Michael Jackson.

5. Susan on June 29th, 2009 5:25 pm

   Excellent points, Maggie

   Not only was Prince Charles NOT in love with Diana, neither was the Royal Family.

   I hardly think there’s any way to compare Diana and Michael, alive or dead.

   I can guarantee one thing is for sure, Michael Jackson was better known and loved by more people than Diana could ever be. Not everyone follows the lifes of Royalty nor could they care less about ‘em. Why should we when Royalty look down at us as mere commoners?

6. Carpe on June 29th, 2009 5:30 pm

   I am over the dead child molestor.

   …and he was. You did watch the Bashir interview
   in its entirety, right? Unless you wear a Special
   Ed helmet and ignite your own farts with a lighter for entertainment… then you know
   darn well he absolutely was an UBER FRUIT LOOP.

   Yeah he could dance well, yup, he could sing well too.

   Well LADI-FRIGGIN’-DAAAAAAA!!!! -Chris Farley

   

7. Greg the mongoose on June 29th, 2009 6:12 pm

   The sperm donor for Michael Jackson Children is?
   Please keep this a secret? Uri Geller.
   Old interviews before the children were born, Michael stated his crazy love about Uri’s kids. Uri offered to make some for him. I really must be the only person on earth that listened to Uri and Michael’s interviews. They really loved each other a lot.

   http://site.uri-geller.com/uploads/images/white_house_glass_house_/sc024668bb.jpg

8. ANewGirl on June 29th, 2009 8:43 pm

   #1- Susan—Princess Diana was NOT pregnant at the time of her death. That was recently confirmed and just a rumour.

9. Susan on June 30th, 2009 4:13 am

   ANewGirl – That is exactly what I said, “it was rumored”. I did NOT say Diana was pregnant.

10. katablog.com on June 30th, 2009 7:43 am

    There is no comparison between Princess Diana and Wacko Jacko. There is NO excuse for sexually abusing children – and yes, Wacko Jacko did – regardless of what a crazy star struck jury said. I detest that he’s being made an idol and that so much time is given to his death which he brought on himself.

11. ANewGirl on June 30th, 2009 9:16 am

    Katablog–There should be no comparison made of the 2, I agree.

    You can detest that he is an Idol all you want, (and believe what you want in regards to the allegations and charges brought against him)—none of that changes his place in the History of Music and Dance.

12. SUPER DAVE on July 1st, 2009 12:48 pm

    i don’t consider grabbing your balls and squealing ooh ! dancing.

13. Dolf on July 1st, 2009 4:41 pm

    don’t know if he was a real molester, but I saw the Bashir interview and well…..mr. Jackson had some serious issues.

    the only thing he and late princess Diana had in comming is that due to huge media attention (asked by us all) they got seriously twisted in the head (mr. Jackson from the age of 4)

14. Dolf on July 1st, 2009 4:41 pm

    and what about the parents who let their child sleep at his place…esp. after the first trail

Leave a Reply