Rasmussen Poll: 26% Of Obama’s Supporters View Tea Party As Nation’s Top Terror Threat … Liberalism Really is a Disease

The AMA does not need to made obesity a disease … they need to make Liberalism one.

According to a recent Rasmussen poll, 26% of those who approve of President Barack Obama’s job performance think that the Tea Party is a greater threat to America than radical Muslim. They don’t call these folks “moonbats” for nothing. As for those who actually have a functioning brain and who disapprove of Obama’s performance, 75% consider radical Muslims to be the bigger terrorist threat and just 1% are influenced by the MSM and name the Tea Party. It is rather remarkable that those who are for the US Constitution, limited government and balanced budgets is some how considered worse than those who would kill Americans. So sorry if the Tea Party believes in freedom and liberty. However, this is what happens when a Presidents makes more of an effort to have a war on its own citizens who express their First Amendment rights of Free Speech and a lapdog liberal MSM acts as a presidents propaganda arm to smear his political enemies rather than report the truth. UNREAL.

Must watch VIDEO … Yea, because these folks look and act like terrorists, unreal! (Tennessee Tea Party 4/15/09)

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 51% of Likely U.S. Voters consider radical Muslims to be the bigger threat to the United States today. Thirteen percent (13%) view the Tea Party that way, and another 13% consider other political and religious extremists to be the larger danger. Six percent (6%) point to local militia groups. Two percent (2%) see the Occupy Wall Street movement as the bigger terrorist threat. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

However, among those who approve of the president’s job performance, just 29% see radical Muslims as the bigger threat. Twenty-six percent (26%) say it’s the Tea Party that concerns them most. Among those who Strongly Approve of the president, more fear the Tea Party than radical Muslims.

This is actually quite something. The far LEFT is truly deranged. Sorry, but I strongly oppose Barack Obama, his agenda and pretty much 99.9% of what he believes in, but I do not think the radical LEFT is a greater threat to America than Al-Qaeda. However, after this poll … maybe the radical, far LEFT is more dangerous.

The Daily Caller reminds us that the Tea Party has never committed an act of terror. Too bad the Leftist Occupy movement can’t say the same.

The Bystander in Chief President Obama Hasn’t Called Russians, Chinese About Snowden … “I’m Not Going to Be Scrambling Jets to Get a 29 Year-Old Hacker” Edward Snowden

The Bystander in Chief Barack Obama … Talk About leading from Behind.

And now we have more proof that President Obama just does not get engaged in issues unless it has to do with “green energy”, a war on oil or coal, or attacking conservatives and the Tea Party. As reported at The Weekly Standard, President Obama hasn’t called the Chinese and Russians about NSA leaker Edward Snowden, the man wanted by the U.S. government for espionage. HUH? Obama said smugly, “I’m Not Going to Be Scrambling Jets to Get a 29-Year-Old Hacker.” REALLY? Just a hacker? Hasn’t it been reported that Snowden had taken US intelligence? Hasn’t Snowden’s actions of disclosing NSA surveillance secrets been touted as damaging and one of the worst cases ever? Now we hear from Obama, Snowden is just a hacker. Obama really has no credibility any more. Just curious, how damaging or severe was what Snowden did if it does not prompt a call from Obama?

How does some one go from super spy potentially telling China and Russia some of our greatest secrets saved on a thumb drive and public enemy number # charged with espionage, to just a common hacker? Maybe if it was a campaign stop or fund raiser Obama would have made a call.

“No, I’m Not Going to Be Scrambling Jets to Get a 29-Year-Old Hacker”

Isn’t this the same president that did not meet with his jobs council for 6 months during a recession? And the same president that no one knows where he was the night that the Benghazi consulate was attacked by terrorist and four Americans were murdered?

UPDATE I: But then Obama says according to CBS News, he is “concerned” Edward Snowden could leak more. How concerned could he really be, if he refuses to engage. Talk about a weak, weak president.

“I continue to be concerned about the other documents he may have,” Mr. Obama said at the joint news conference in Dakar with Senegalese President Macky Sall. “He has those documents. He’s released some of them but not all of them have been released.”

George Zimmerman Murder Trial: CNN Legal Analyst Gets Owned by Mark Nejame in Analysis of Prosecution Witness Rachel Jeantel

Witness is credible because she presented facts that have already been accepted as facts, HUH?

Talk about a MSM liberal bias to analyzing the George Zimmerman murder trial in the death of  Trayvon Martin. CNN analyst Jeffrey Toobin made excuses for prosecution witness Rachel Jeantel, the last individual to ever talk to Trayvon Martin. Toobin tried to defend the witness as credible; however, she has been caught in lies. Some how Toobin thinks that it is completely appropriate for Trayvon Martin to refer to George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watch volunteer, who was following Martin as a “creepy ass cracker”. Toobin opined that she successfully portrayed Zimmerman as the aggressor and that he was following Martin. HUH? Toobin also said she was credible, because it was ok and acceptable for her to lie. Good grief.

Along came Mark Nejame for some sane analysis. Nejame came out with the obvious, there has been no opposition to the fact that George Zimmerman was following Trayvon Martin. We already knew that, it has been pretty much stipulated. There is nothing new there. What is in question is that how the two individuals came together to the eventual violent end. Of course conveniently CNN then cut off Nejame because it did not fit their agenda.

Sorry folks, this case is supposedly based upon race by the prosecution. They are trying to portray that Zimmerman, the “white” Hispanic had it in for Trayvon Martin because “they always get away with it”. Yet, it would appear from Martin’s own words to his friend, “creepy ass cracker” is following me, that Martin has just as many racial bigotries as they claim Zimmerman has. Let’s just call it like it is, this was a case of two individuals who came together at the wrong time, the wrong place and with the wrong attitudes.

Daily Commentary – Thursday, June 27, 2013 – Rachel Jeantel, a Friend of Trayvon Martin Testifies

• On day two of the George Zimmerman trial, Rachel Jeantel claims Trayvon told her that a “Creepy Ass White Cracker” was following him

George Zimmerman Murder Trial: Prosecution Witness Rachel Jeantel Testifies … “Creepy Ass Cracker Is Following Me”

“Creepy Ass Cracker Is Following Me” …

The George Zimmerman  murder trial continued as Rachel Jeantel took the stand for the prosecution. Rachel was the last person to have a conversation with Trayvon Martin before he was shot to death by George Zimmerman.  According to Jeantel’s testimony yesterday that Trayvon described the man following him as a “creepy ass cracker”. HMM. This is supposed to be a witness for the prosecution? Isn’t the focus of the prosecutions case against Zimmerman that he targeted Trayvon Martin and profiled him? You mean calling Zimmerman a “creepy ass cracker” is some how better? So who is the racist?  Such a statement kind of puts us into the mind of Trayvon Martin, doesn’t it? Is this person supposed to help the prosecution or harm them?

Rachel Jeantel said she told Trayvon to run after he said: ‘The n**** is still behind me.’

She said she heard Trayvon ask the man ‘Why are you following me?’ and that he said, ‘What are you doing around here?’