George Zimmerman Murder Trial: CNN Legal Analyst Gets Owned by Mark Nejame in Analysis of Prosecution Witness Rachel Jeantel
Witness is credible because she presented facts that have already been accepted as facts, HUH?
Talk about a MSM liberal bias to analyzing the George Zimmerman murder trial in the death of Trayvon Martin. CNN analyst Jeffrey Toobin made excuses for prosecution witness Rachel Jeantel, the last individual to ever talk to Trayvon Martin. Toobin tried to defend the witness as credible; however, she has been caught in lies. Some how Toobin thinks that it is completely appropriate for Trayvon Martin to refer to George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watch volunteer, who was following Martin as a “creepy ass cracker”. Toobin opined that she successfully portrayed Zimmerman as the aggressor and that he was following Martin. HUH? Toobin also said she was credible, because it was ok and acceptable for her to lie. Good grief.
Along came Mark Nejame for some sane analysis. Nejame came out with the obvious, there has been no opposition to the fact that George Zimmerman was following Trayvon Martin. We already knew that, it has been pretty much stipulated. There is nothing new there. What is in question is that how the two individuals came together to the eventual violent end. Of course conveniently CNN then cut off Nejame because it did not fit their agenda.
Sorry folks, this case is supposedly based upon race by the prosecution. They are trying to portray that Zimmerman, the “white” Hispanic had it in for Trayvon Martin because “they always get away with it”. Yet, it would appear from Martin’s own words to his friend, “creepy ass cracker” is following me, that Martin has just as many racial bigotries as they claim Zimmerman has. Let’s just call it like it is, this was a case of two individuals who came together at the wrong time, the wrong place and with the wrong attitudes.