Daily Commentary – Tuesday, July 31, 2012 – CNN Apologizes For Stupid Lead in Song for Sarah Palin Interview

• CNN apologizes for playing Stupid Girls song just prior to interview with Sarah Palin. Instead of stupid girls should be stupid network!

Daily Commentary – Tuesday, July 31, 2012 Download

Wall Street Betting on Real Hope & Change in 2012 Presidential Election … A Mitt Romney Victory

Betting on the future of saving America …

Is Wall Street betting on a Mitt Romney victory in November as for the reason for the recent three day market rally? An analyst concludes that the rally was due to the markets placing their bets on a Romney victory. One can only hope for this change in the 2012 Presidential election as nothing Obama has done could cause any positive movement in the markets. The consistent poor jobs numbers, lack of GDP growth and continual lack of stability in the economic environment as to taxes, all lead to Wall Street wanting nothing to do with another Obama 4 years.

With just 100 days left until the U.S. presidential election, investors are beginning to make bigger bets on which candidate will carry the day.

One analysis concludes that last week’s sharp three-day market surge can only mean that Wall Street is banking on a victory from Republican Mitt Romney.

That’s the logical interpretation one can draw from a rally amid conditions that otherwise would demand a sell-off, Morgan Stanley chief U.S. equity strategist Adam S. Parker said in an analysis that asserts there is no other reason now to like stocks than a Romney win.

It is hard to imagine that an incumbent president with such a poor economic record could be reelected. As reported at The Other McCain, the polls are trending toward Mitt Romney as much as the Obama cheerleading MSM wants to deny. At some point Americans are going to take a serious look at their choices and their current predicament and future prospects. When that occurs, the bottom will fall out of Obama’s polling numbers. Look for another two months of poor economic data and Obama only talking about taxing the rich for this to come to fruition.

Barack Obama Canceled Operation to Kill Osama 3 Different Times at Adviser Valerie Jarrett’s Urging, Then Waited 16 Hrs to Make Call

This gives ‘Leading from Behind’ a new meaning … Does Obama and the MSM really want to get into a “WIMP” debate?  When a Commander in Chief fails to pull the trigger in three separate occasions and takes military advise from a political adviser, one might not have the right to be called “Commander”.

Thisguy wussed out three times and had the audacity to spike the football after OBL’s death?

“President Obama’s greatest success was actually his greatest failure,” Leading From Behind,“ he said, traces the arc of six key Obama administration decisions, and shows how the president made them — and, often, failed to make them. (Miniter told The Daily Caller Friday.)

Barack Obama and his spin minions tried to make the killing of Osama Bin Laden as the crown jewel of Obama’s war on terror. Oh sorry, overseas contingency operation. It was supposed to make Obama look tough; however, from Richard Minter’s book, ‘Leading from Behind’ we learn an interesting factoid regarding the war-hawk Barack Obama. It would appear that Obama canceled the operation to kill Bin Laden on three separate occasions, before finally approving the May 2, 2011 Navy SEAL mission. Then he waited 16 hours to finally pull the trigger, if you will.

At the urging of Valerie Jarrett, President Barack Obama canceled the operation to kill Osama bin Laden on three separate occasions before finally approving the May 2, 2011 Navy SEAL mission, according to an explosive new book scheduled for release August 21. The Daily Caller has seen a portion of the chapter in which the stunning revelation appears.

Read more

Barack Obama … Pandering and the Paying for Votes, From Obamacare to Welfare to Taxes … the Redistribution of Wealth for Votes

The Panderer in Chief,  Obama’s War of Dependence …

President Barack Obama stated that if his $787 billion stimulus was passed unemployment would be kept below 8%. We all know that did not happen as the United States has experienced 41+ months of unemployment over 8%. What of the tax payers hard earned money that was allocated to failed “green” energy companies that were Obama backers? What about Obamacare that as it turns out will increase the cost of healthcare and not insure the very people that Obama intended it to. Instead, many companies will most likely take the $2000 penalty and push the employees off on the government plan and in turn creating a further dependent America. What about the fact that more people applied for disability rather than jobs created in the last couple of months? Obama has even gone so far to gut welfare reform, a bi-partisan law passed during the Clinton Administration. Why, to pander to the lazy for votes and make Americans even more generationallly dependent.

Courtesy: Vanderbilt ’12

The way that ole Obama is throwin’ around We the People’s
hard earned money to chum up votes and add great numbers
to the dependency dole, we should at least sit up and take note.
If he is rehired for another four years, we may not be able to
borrow enough from China and our great grandchildren in order
to pay for his extensive Regime, let alone take care
of America’s actual pressing issues.

So why is Barack Obama doing nothing for the economy? Why are his policies directly going against the tenants of American capitalism? Why did he block the XL Keystone pipeline that would have created 1000′s of jobs and now Democrats backpedal as China readies $15.1 billion Canadian oil deal. Thanks Barack. Instead we have a President who would rather fund raise and golf, rather than attend his own Jobs panel. Is it any wonder that Americans now blame Obama for the bad economy and not GWB.

Instead of a President who emboldened Americans to remain “exceptional”, we are presented with a President who is all about class warfare. Barack Obama, the welfare and food stamp President would rather make Americans dependent upon the government than themselves. In the end, this is what his grand master scheme is. Create a class of people that because slaves to the State and in turn buy their votes forever.

AMERICA, WAKE UP … the United States fought a War of Independence, not dependence. Whether that King is across the Atlantic or in Washington, DC … this country was founded on hard work, risk taking and determination, not dependence on government.

Former VP Cheney Said During ABC Interview … Obama worse than Carter, ‘one of our weakest presidents’

As the MSM is fixated on former Vice President Dick Cheney’s comments regarding Sarah Palin and her being the wrong pick in 2008, they seemed to have missed this little nugget of information … Cheney refers to Barack Obama as “one of our weakest presidents”. If the weakness fits, then wear it. Cheney said that Obama was an even weaker President than Jimmy Carter. Ouch! Just as the LEFT was getting all giddy with Cheney’s Sarah Palin comments, they now have retreated to their we hate Cheney mantra as he dare make a disparaging, yet truthful comment regarding President Obama. Just curious, how come Barack Obama does not reference the anti-terror infrastructure and policies he inherited from GWB when it comes to dealing with terrorism?

“I wouldn’t say he’s been soft on terror, but I think he’s made a number of mistakes,” he said. “Bin Laden, fine. A lot of that intelligence that laid the ground work for what ultimately led to the capture of bin Laden was a result of programs we had in place in the Bush administration.” (The Politico)

Former Vice President Dick Cheney, in his first interview since a heart transplant operation in March, blasted President Obama calling him “one of our weakest presidents.”

“Obviously, I’m not a big fan of President Obama,” said Cheney in an excerpt from an interview with ABC News aired Monday on “Good Morning America.” “I think he’s been one of our weakest presidents.  I fundamentally disagree with him philosophically, be hard put to find any Democratic president I disagree with more.”

Asked by ABC’s Jonathan Karl if Obama was “worse than Jimmy Carter in your perspective,” Cheney responded “yes.”

I guess this makes Cheney a racist.