10 Month Old Lisa Irwin Still Missing … Mom Says Her Arrest is Imminent;


10 month old Lisa Irwin is still missing after having disappeared in a presumed kidnapping/abduction in Kansas City, MO on  October 4, 2011.  After numerous searches there is still no sign of missing Lisa Irwin. The police claim they do not have any suspects in this missing child case; however, Deborah Bradley, the mom of missing baby Lisa believes the police are going to arrest her.

A Missouri woman whose 10-month-old daughter went missing a week ago says she believes she’s about to be arrested by Kansas City police, possibly as early as today, in the case. Police, however, deny plans to arrest the woman.

It’s the latest public twist in what’s known as the “Baby Lisa” case.

Kansas City police say they have hit one roadblock after another in their bid to find the blond 10-month-old who was reportedly last seen Oct. 3, when her mother, Deborah Bradley, tucked her in for the night. The baby’s father, Jeremy Irwin, returned home from a night shift about 3:30 a.m. the next morning, and that’s when the couple discovered the baby was missing, they told police.

Don’t ask for things, they might come true. A note to Deborah Bradley, if you put it out there, it might just happen. However, as the police continue to investigate the circumstances of baby Lisa’s disappearance and question the parents, one never knows what direction the case will take. Of course a failed lie detector test is never a good thing.

But Capt. Steve Young, a spokesman for the Kansas City Police Department, has told The Times that officials still do not have any suspects.

Nonetheless, Bradley believes that police seem determined to pin the potential kidnapping on her instead of focusing on finding the real culprit, according to Ashley Irwin, the missing child’s aunt. Irwin told ABC that she believes Bradley’s arrest is “inevitable” — but also misguided.

“It’s what the police do,” Irwin was quoted as saying. “They don’t have any leads, so they just have to pin it on somebody.”

The family of missing Lisa Irwin has hired a private investigator, Wild Bill” Stanton, to help search.

A nationally known private investigator is now working with Lisa Irwin’s family to find the missing infant, who disappeared more than a week ago.

“Wild Bill” Stanton, a former New York policeman who has served as an ABC News and NBC News security consultant, told reporters that he’ll be conducting an independent investigation, but added that he hopes to meet with police.

“I’m here to seek the truth,” Stanton told reporters late Tuesday. “And wherever the truth leads, that’s where I’m going to go.”

If you liked this post, you may also like these:

  • Parents of Missing Lisa Irwin Cancel Interview with Baby’s Brothers and Police
  • Disappearance And Deception Turns To Decomposition: Dogs Smell Death at Lisa Irwin’s Home
  • Parents (Deborah Bradley and Jeremy Irwin) of Missing Baby Lisa Irwin Hire Attorney Joe Tacopina, Former Joran Van der Sloot Lawyer
  • Missing Lisa Irwin: Police & Investigators Show Up to Home of Missing Baby Lisa with Shovels, Bomb Detection Devices to Search KC Home & Yard of Jeremy Irwin and Deborah Bradley
  • 10 Month Old Lisa Irwin Still Missing in Kansas City, MO … Police Say Parents Not Cooperating, Searches End? (UPDATE: Mom Said to have Failed Lie Detector Test)

  • Comments

    12 Responses to “10 Month Old Lisa Irwin Still Missing … Mom Says Her Arrest is Imminent;”

    1. Miklo on October 12th, 2011 12:20 pm

      Apparently, Ms. Bradley (Baby Lisa’s mother) was seen buying a bottle of wine with an ‘unknown man’ on a recent store surveillance video.

      Is it possible that while Mr. Irwin was working late that Ms. Bradley was spending time with “someone else”… And the “someone else” decided to take Baby Lisa?

      This awkward twist may render Ms. Bradley “tecnically innocent” in her daughter’s disappearance, but has made her reluctant to reveal everything she knows about the circumstances surrounding the events that lead to the child’s disappearance.

    2. Miklo on October 12th, 2011 1:00 pm

      This is sometimes (THOUGH NOT ALWAYS) true of crimes…

      A person may be victimized while doing something that he or she really shouldn’t be doing…

      Victims are sometimes reluctant to report crimes -or cooperate with the authorities, because of the other questions that will be raised and issues that will be revealed during a full investigation.

    3. kitty on October 12th, 2011 6:57 pm

      #1/2. good insight, however if she knows what’s best for her daughter, she’d better start talking and yesterday wasn’t soon enough. The interesting thing was that they purchased “baby wipes & wine”… that being said, if a person’s going to harm a baby, you’d not necessarily buy baby wipes IMO. unless he/she was transporting that child… that doesn’t make sense otherwise. How old are her two other children?(didn’t she have 2 boys?) where are they? I’d ask her about the purchases, who the man she was with is and if she’s determined to have her daughter back, safe ~ get talking sister, time is of the essence here. Co-operate, and tell the truth please. Your baby’s life is at stake.

    4. NGBoston on October 12th, 2011 8:09 pm

      I post with a heavy heart that before the latest info came out—basic instincts told me that there was a decent chance baby Lisa was alive.

      Now, not so sure. Something is off here and has been from the start. Too many things do not add up. While speculation is only just that- pure speculation—why is Bradley now putting out there in the press that she believes they (LE) are just trying to make her the scapegoat and pin Lisa’s disappearance on her? What of the failed lie detector test? As you all point out—who is this unidentified “Man”, and since she still is married to her Husband (not the Man she was living with her so called “fiance”) what gives is right?

      The other inter-familial relationships need to be looked at and the cell phone records are key;

      This woman knows more than what she is saying.

      For the life of this baby- she needs to do more than talk. Some other true crime sites are now speculating they believe this to be another case of not necessarily a murder- but an accident gone wrong….panicked Mother- trying to cover up a death.

      While I pray with all my heart this baby is still alive- the more time that passes- the more I’m inclined to believe she wasn’t abducted or sold- she is perhaps deceased and THOSE IN THE KNOW-specifically- BRADLEY is covering up.

      What a sad shame that people simply cannot be honest if in fact, a real accident did occur.

    5. tara on October 13th, 2011 7:16 am

      who had the baby when Mother & “guy” went wine shopping? This whole thing stinks….just hope that there will eventually some justice for this baby.

    6. Moi on October 13th, 2011 8:28 am

      Remember Haylee Cummings? A supposed “intruder” took her too. The girlfriend of Ronald Cummings was said to have been at a party without Halee, but since she has refused to come clean for years we will never know the truth. Hopefully this isn’t the same case with the baby in this story. Such a cute little thing :(

      As with Haylee’s story…supposedly a “door was open” and “lights on that shouldn’t have been.” Cannnot these women come up with a better story? Or do they puppet the same they’ve heard before? What a mess…not that I hope any of them are telling a story mind you.

    7. kitty on October 13th, 2011 10:11 am

      NG I too thought that it may be an accident gone bad or something to that nature ~ or shaken baby syndrome…? and panic set in?

      Your suggestion of the phone records, stellar!

      The lie detector is an indicator that somethings up and sadly, with time continuing as it has with no results of finding the baby, Mamma’s gotta fess up what she knows… I’m with you NG ~ Who had the baby when she was shopping with Mr. Unidentifiable here? Why buy baby wipes if the baby was still alive? Where were her boys?, how old are they? Was the baby left home when she went a shopping? Are there camera’s at intersections/parking lots to see if the baby was in the car? (endangerment of a child if she was left alone while shopping?)… too many Q. not enough answers. I hope the LE keep uncovering all they can ~ sad one here…

    8. skat on October 13th, 2011 3:43 pm

      The family didn’t hire the PI. He is a “Leonard Padilla” media whore, looking for attention. (So naturally, HLN had Leonard on to talk about how the guy was probably just looking for attention.)

      The PI is claiming some random “wealthy family” hired him.

    9. NGBoston on October 14th, 2011 4:56 am

      #8-Skat…you are on point. To a degree, when the MSM gets involved or begins to hype high-profile cases such as these—-there are a few positive benefits that come out of all the media attention.

      As you point out- it also brings out the snakes in the grass just looking to capitalize on someone else’s pain and misery a la Padilla or that bag of feces Attorney, Baez. I guess the other side of that argument, is that even if guilty of a crime in our Society–a perp is allowed due process.

      @ Kitty:

      From what I have read on BOC and The Hinky Meter-

      there were 2 other boys in the home. One was supposedly “asleep” w/Bradley in her bed when the “abduction” occured along with a stray kitten they had found earlier in the day. Hmnnnnnnnnnn… No mention of where the older boy was at the time of incident—imagine he was sleeping also?

      LE is being tight-lipped on his name, but apparently the “other man” in the photo has been identified as a platonic “friend” (he-hummm) clearing throat—who said he was “platonic”? and the same Man on the video in the store with Bradley is also being identified as a neighbor or someone living in the neighborhood that is a “friend” of Bradley’s. LE will not release his name, and have only said they will not rule anyone out so far as suspects. You know how they get when more clues are uncovered.

      Then, there were stories that changed about exactly what Ms. Bradley purchased. Box of Wine, but no paper plates. Baby Wipes, check.

      Oddly, also stated in the video surviellance, it was noted that neither party seemed stressed, upset, harried, in a rush or appeared to be under any emotion duress while making their purchases.

      The timeline is crucial in this case. As are the cell phone records and FINANCIAL records of this Woman. She never divorced her husband yet (he is in the Service) but yet she lives with her “fiance”, they have a baby- they also have full custody of her Fiance’s children from his previous relationship.

      From what I have seen so far, I really feel the “fiance’ was caught blindsided by this whole thing. I do not believe he was involved.

      Ms. Bradley has some talking and deep , very deep soul searching to do.

      WHERE IS BABY LISA? I would make the most awful Homicide Detective in the World, Kitty! I would have her in the interview room for hours and be grilling more than her arse in there. Seriously, I give so much credit to LE who handle these types of cases. It must be so aggravating to sometimes KNOW you have a perp in front of you who is not telling the truth just to cover their ass.

      BTW, I am not convinced still this baby was intentionally murdered. Then again, I keep changing my mind as this case gets stranger and stranger.

      Either way, God’s loving light surrounds you Baby Lisa. I only hope that now he stays with you eternally as those who wish so much to bring you home are still searching.

      Like Zahara Baker—I am behind them 100% to never give up until you are brought home.

      So sad.

    10. kitty on October 14th, 2011 6:47 am

      (sigh) ~ it is so very sad NG and your post, thanks… many of us feel as you do. and Bless the LE in this case. and that little baby, Bless.

      the other guy was apparently her brother?

      praying, praying, praying!

      and you’d be an awesome HD, NG! Your gut instinct alone is better than those most trained!~ As far as the grilling, I’d bring the oven mitts and join you!

    11. NGBoston on October 14th, 2011 4:57 pm

      Her Brother now? That’s not what I read, but I also haven’t read about it for a few days. Was that confirmed?

      Her Brother? Hmnnnnnnnnnnn

    12. Amanda on October 16th, 2011 6:47 pm

      Got a big question IF this unknown guy or as specified her brother was buying wine than was the baby in the car when she got stolen instead of the house. I can’t tell u how many kidnappings happen because mother is to stupid to take her child with her.

    Leave a Reply

    Support Scared Monkeys! make a donation.

    • NEWS (breaking news alerts or news tips)
    • Red (comments)
    • Dugga (technical issues)
    • Dana (radio show comments)
    • Klaasend (blog and forum issues)
    E-mail It