President Barack Obama Tells Bill O’Reilly He is Not Moving to the Center … “”I haven’t, I didn’t move to … I’m the same guy”
Obama …Change? Hardly.
During the President Barack Obama – Bill O’Reilly pre-Super Bowl interview yesterday on FOX, Obama told O’Reilly that he was not moving to the center. Bill O’Reilly, the king of cable news asked President Obama whether he was pivoting following the shellacking the Democrats took during the 2010 midterm. Obama’s response should be a wake up call to independents who though he was. Obama said, no, “I haven’t — I didn’t move to… I’m the same guy.”
President Obama on Sunday dismissed the notion that his administration in recent weeks has pivoted toward the political center to raise his approval ratings as the 2012 campaign nears.
After ushering through Congress measures to throw a lifeline to troubled U.S. corporations, stimulate the economy and dramatically overhaul the nation’s healthcare system, Obama has since cut a deal with congressional Republicans on taxes and called for a freeze on most federal spending.
But when pressed Sunday during a live interview with Fox’s Bill O’Reilly on what political analysts say is a clear sprint toward the center, Obama dismissed the notion with a “no.”
“I haven’t — I didn’t move to… I’m the same guy,” he said.
So much for the liberal media’s attempt to portray Obama was moving to the center and being “Reaganesque”. From the horses mouth, Obama is the same old liberal president as he ever was. So much for Obama being a moderate. Americans might want to remember these words in the 2012 elections,
Posted February 7, 2011 by Scared Monkeys
Barack Obama, Bill O'Reilly, Hope and Change, Liberals, Media, Obamacare, Obamanation, Obamanomics | 21 comments
If you liked this post, you may also like these:
21 Responses to “President Barack Obama Tells Bill O’Reilly He is Not Moving to the Center … “”I haven’t, I didn’t move to … I’m the same guy””
Leave a Reply
No Sh!t, I could have told you that. He is an Ass and we need to vote him out period. The only thing I regret is Nancy Polluted is the monority speaker and Prince Harry is still in control of the Senate, therfore in 2012 we not only need to vote Obummer out, we need to vote the rest of the house out and the senate as well. Then lets see how high and mighty King Obummer and his Hiney, Prince Harry out.
Enough is enough. Or maybe you believe the Obammer’s Labor Department Lies that the unemployment rate fell to 9.00% with a mere gain of 36,000 jobs in one week. That is BS with a capital BS.
Sorry for the errors in #1. I meant to say minority not monority, and therefor not therfore. And the last sentance in the first paragraph should end are and not out.
I will try to send this again since you would not accept it before.
I just listened to Obummer’s speech to the Chamber of Commerce. I first would like to say in response to Obummer’s claim his administration is trying to run the government like the business people would run their businesses. My response to that is our business people would not spend money they did not have with a dificit they can not control. What has this Clown ever run, it certainly was not a business. I might add as a former now retired, Loan Officer, if Obummer came to me with a loan request I would tell him not no but hell no based on the country’s balance sheet with a smile on my face while privately laughing my ass off. Do you readers get the picture, our daily interest on this fool’s borrowing is insane.
Secondly, Obummer said the businesses also owe the country. Might I remind his highness, we are a capitalistic society and it is the government that owes the businesses of our Great Country a laissez faire approach to governing and not a meddling take over of all our businesses including the healthcare sector approach.
Well if has’nt moved and is the same guy God help us. Very bad news.
“I might add as a former now retired…”
Let me guess Dawg1948 – you are currently on social security and medicare.
Did I guess right?
You want a “Laissez Faire” approach to governing, move to Somalia. I’m sure you’ll like it there.
He was the same guy that sat in Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s pews for 20 years. The same guy that began his campaign in Bill Ayers living room. The same guy that threw his white grandmother (who raised him) under the bus. The same guy that voted present in the Senate.
He was all those things when he ran for President, and he’s still exactly the same person.
#5- YoYo- Are you serious? What does Dawg’s personal age, or income status have to do with his comments?
I don’t understand what your retorts or comments have to do with the context of what Dawg posted at all….TOTALLY OFF TOPIC.
When are you ever going to put your Moonbat Libtard Crackpipe down, YoYo and get an effing clue is what I’d like to know.
You just don’t seem to have the ability to look at the big picture and it doesn’t matter- even if it was clearly right in front of you on a 62″ Hi-Def Flat Screen you still would not comprehend how our Government really works.
I just want to know—what the hell did your comments even mean or have to do with a damn thing????????????? IDIOT
I will not write my response to YOYO the third time. I will simply say YOYO you are wrong and not very bright. If you knew the truth you would not believe it because you are not bright enough to understand the form of government we are supposed to have.
Bring on the civil war !!!
I hate to say it Buster, but it is probably on the way. If YOYO thinks we are simply a laissez faire form of government and nothing more then we are in for it. YOYO, try a representative form of govenmnent a Constitutional Republic. If that is the case then why was Prince Harry buying votes for the Obummercare with taxpayers money. Think ;about it YOYO are you stupid?
Here’s something you missed yo-yo (not unusual for you). If Dawg is on SS and medicare, it’s probably because he and his employer PAID into those systems for 30 to 40 years. Are you thinking that he should now move to a shelter or just die now that Congress spent all that money?
I hear you; I sure wish you could have been there to stop Reagan, GHW Bush, and GW Bush when they came calling for their HUGE deficit hand-outs. Think how much better off America would be without having added that $9+ Trillion from these three presidents. Just think of it, that was ten times all of the debt prior to Reagan!
Railing against a supposed meddling government while sucking on the government teet. No, that’s not hypocrisy, not at all. Lol.
“it is the government that owes the businesses of our Great Country a laissez faire approach to governing”. Again, you want a laissez faire approach to government, go to Somalia.
Funny how Ayn Rand promoted laissez faire at the same time she was on medicare and social security.
And after reading your posts #1,2,3 I’m pretty sure you shouldn’t be the “decider” as to who is or isn’t bright Dawg1948. Haha.
I know this was just a slip-up, but to clarify for others; Obama voted ‘present’ while in the Ill State Senate, not the US Senate.
#14 YoYo – So if you purchase insurance (auto, health, accident, whatever) and you actually USE it by filing a claim, are you sucking off the government or insurance company teet?
If not, then why would you believe that someone who PAID into SS and/or Medicare for years and years is sucking off the government teet?
Sucking off the government teet is someone who chronically uses welfare, Medicaid and other government programs while NEVER producing anything for the nation feeding them.
Social Security and Medicare were sold as an insurance program to pay workers in their retirement years. Supposedly we weren’t smart enough to take our money and save it ourselves, so the government did it for us. Problem is, they spent it and so now the young folks are getting the bill. That doesn’t change the fact that these people paid into the system and were promised something in return.
No matter how hard the Dems try, they just cant seem to polish their turd so it looks or smells better … so it is with Obozo
Ditto #16… can’t say it any clearer than that…
I have paid $big into mandatory Social Security over last 35 years … I would have preferred to have invested that money myself. Right now I would be glad to take a buy-out for just the money paid in .. fat chance
SM: I agree. I would opt out in a second.
I don’t quite understand your last paragraph where you say about SocSec: “they spent it and so now the young folks are getting the bill”. According to Treasury reports, the SS trust fund had, at the end of 2010, a balance of $2.4 Trillion. Estimates out to 2015 have the balance growing to just over $3 Trillion.
Now of course, they did spend each year of its existence, funds to send out monthly checks to recipients. Estimates for FY2010 spending for benefits is $540 Billion (actual for 1st qtr FY2010 is $146,506,102,505.21).
In light of these statistics, I can’t find any correlation to your comments. Are these the subject of your comment, or what was it you were referring to?
SM: As for the SS trust fund, are we counting IOU’s as $’s?
YOYO, there is no doubt in my mind I am more educated and more intelligent than you and it is obvious in your posts. You just picked on the wrong one, fool. ROFLMAO.
All I can offer as explanation, for now, is this explanation. It discusses the “IOU” question, among other related SS topics. I can’t say I fully agree with the commentary, but there was much to like, IMO.