RSSBarack Obama Thumbs his Nose at Separation of Powers and Insults the SCOTUS … Low Rent and No Class
DEMOCRAT HYPOCRITES!!!
The Audacity of Dope, A disrespectful and defiant President insults the SCOTUS …
Wonder why America is disenchanted with Barack Obama and his so called Hope & Change. Talk about bad form … and this President and his fellow Democrat minions go upset when Rep. Joe Wilson R-(SC) said, “You Lie”. Barack Obama lectured the Congress and America during his State of the Union Speech on civility and then pulled this stunt?
It almost defies logic, reason and respect; however, Barack Hussein Obama did the unthinkable during his first State of the Union Speech and tried to intimidate the Supreme Court of the United States.
So much for separation of powers, but Obama thinks he is above everything.
Justice Alito can be seen saying “Not True”
NRO shows that Justice Alito was correct in his “not true” comment and Obama engaged in demogoguery of the worst kind,
With the SCOTUS in plain sight of Barack Obama, the One made the following classless and disgraceful comment by insulting the SCOTUS and having his fellow Democrat lapdogs stand clapping and cheering furthering the insult and thumbing their noses at the separation of powers.
Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that’s why I’m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong.
Barack Obama obviously never learned the cardinal rule of Luke 6:31, Do to others as you would have them do to you. What leadership from this President. He expects others to act in a civil manner while he acts in such a disrespectful manner as ever seen by a President to another branch of government.
These Democrat hypocrites railed on Rep. Joe Wilson R-(SC) for his “you lie” moment and the breech of decorum, yet when their Obamamessiah does even worse they applaud it.
The shot of the black-robed Supreme Court justices, stone-faced, was priceless.
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) stood up behind the justices and clapped vigorously while Alito shook his head and quietly mouthed his discontent.
Schumer and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md) are trying to find a way to legislate around the Supreme Court decision.
“All you have to do is read the dissent, the four justices who said this will defintely open the floodgates to big corporate special interests. Anybody who thinks that’s not true is out of touch with the American political process.” Van Hollen said.
Van Hollen told POLITICO he expects to unveil the package in the next 10 days to two weeks.
Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) was glad the president called out the Supreme Court.
So the President is invited to come to the House of Representatives and speeck as a guest and it is ok for him to provide a breach of decorum and lower the office of the Presidency more than he already has. Some folks don’t think it was ok. More from Michelle Malkin.
“The President’s swipe at the Supreme Court was a breach of decorum, and represents the worst of Washington politics …
More close up VIDEO’s of Justice Alito can be seen at MEDIAITE.
The Gateway Pundit provides Sarah Palin’s views of the “NOT TRUE” comment.
Posted January 28, 2010 by Scared Monkeys Barack Obama, Bizarre, Government, Judicial, Obamanation, Supreme Court, WTF, You Tube - VIDEO | 33 comments |
If you liked this post, you may also like these:
Comments
33 Responses to “Barack Obama Thumbs his Nose at Separation of Powers and Insults the SCOTUS … Low Rent and No Class”
Leave a Reply
Embattled Obama Declares in Speech, ‘I Don’t Quit’
—
That’s too bad! He really should reconsider.
YOU STILL LIE
Right, just because conservatives have been dissing the Supreme Court for most of the last 60 years, doesn’t give Obama the right to be critical, now that there is a conservative majority on the bench.
____________
SM: Name the President and the State of the Union Speech that a Republican President did the same?
NAME IT OR STUFF IT!
You sad pathetic, disrespectful souls on the LEFT. Are you really this pathetic? Do you hear yourself? You make a blanket statement like Conservatives dissing the SCOTUS to a sitting President at a SOTU speech?
IDIOTS! This is the reason why you and Obama will be crying as river in midterm 2010 and in 2012.
America is sick of your hate and disrespect and stupidity.
R
The most disturbing thing I saw was our Attorney General standing up and clapping five feet away from the Justices. He’s the guy that ignores the law when it involves the rights of American citizens, ignores Black Panther thugs intimidating voters on voting day, yet wants to grant those same rights to terrorist bastards trying to kill us.
Our President has NO respect for separation of government. He doesn’t want any branch other than the Executive to have power hence: all the czars and back dooring of restrictions on his office. Classy guy. The pompous ass still doesn’t get it yet. He still thinks it’s all about him. I guess a couple of letters to him mean more than 1.2 million people marching on Washington or the Miracle in Massachusetts. Hopefully he’ll “get it” on election day 2012.
He did some fast talking !!! His speech was full of bandaids !!!
Well, we all know that corporate America is under represented in US politics. Finally the court will allow big biz to be heard, so next time the bailouts will be in the zillions.
_________
SM: You mean the bail outs that Obama gave corporations? Oh wait, or do you mean the Unions and the sweetheart tax bribe deals?
R
Any one notice that when Obama was talking about the ills of Washington and what the PEOPLE hated, he was basically talking about himself.
Obama telling Congress to make a law to go around the Supreme Courts decisions was a huge mistake.
Here it goes…now he’s trying to reach into shaping social policy in the face of the Supreme Court…anybody remember his interview on a radio show where he says the Supreme Court did not do enough to bring “social justice” to the country.
He is BASICALLY and ARROGANTLY taking a SHIZ on the Constitution.
This guy and his croonies are really out of touch with the average American citizen.
His jobs plan has no details. More nuclear jobs? Really, how to you make nuclear “green?” LOL….
Flip flop flip flop flip flop flip flop!
i watched the barry & nancy show last night and you know what ? that bastard is still ignorant and FOS just like the rest of the communist democrat liberals !!!!
he is a conceited a$$ hole and needs to be brought down a few notches.
anyone but me notice the applause que and nancy jumping up and clapping at every word whether truth or lie ?
nancy’s hemorrhoids must have been itching and burning last night. she was jumping up and down at every lie and couldn’t seem to be still.
and did you see the exchange between her and barry ? looked like a love fest. i bet she’s getting some almost brown sugar from her boy barry.
I have found one of the easier things to teach a young voter — strayed from the idea’s of freedom, is that of the importance of checks and balance of powers. Our very survivabilty. Fortunate we have been the few times we errored away, to get back on track.
No balance of power, and we indeed have no abilty to sass, plenty of citizens decapitated, and Onebama rule. Unless it is the Kennedy family would still be recieving bama-bows.
The Supreme Court interprets the law and determines if they are just. It determined that the ad financing law was not, so it struck it.
The President, who beleived in the *principle* of the law, is perfectly entitled to ask Congress to creat a new law to fix the gap. Perhaps the SOTU was not the best place to have done it (made worse by the explosive applause by those sitting in the chamber behind the justices) but that’s precisely how the system is supposed to work.
On a related note: For a court whose conservative majority have so long claimed deference to precedent, overturning 3 SCOTUS decisions in 30 years on this issue, when the only thing that has changed is the composition of the court, should be a wake-up call for anyone who wonders what direction the court is headed.
Super Dave,
It was the Pelosi yeast infection hippy dippy shake, dude.
Everybody is doing it on the west coast now!
…and there’s a cream for it.
carpe, it’s called barry butter.
Talk about a Superiority Complex—-Obama’s taunting and disrespect of the US Supreme Justices was completely unheard of in over 200 years of SOTU Addresses…….whether he agrees with their decisions or not—-who knows the law as it applies to our Constitution better than they? DISGRACEFUL
“We have cut taxes for the Middle Class” – BLATANT LIE!!!!!!!! Nowhere in the 365 + days O-Bomb-A has served has there been a Tax Rate Cut or Tax Cut for Middle Class! NOWHERE!!!!!!!!!!
Nice job of glossing over what happened in Mass. w/Senator Scott Brown’s Victory recently as well and not even mention his name. Truth hurts.
Most of this SOTU was just words—what he should have spent more time addressing- he did not–and some issues he spoke of were irrelevant—WHO CARES ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING!!!!!!! No one but the Goracle. He seemed very angry & defensive for most of it and once again, feels like he left of mainstream America going—”Huh? What just happened?” He was all over the place and determined to send the message that it’s HIS POLITICAL AGENDA he is pushing through—and not what AMERICA WANTS OR NEEDS.
WE HAVE A CHOICE! WE HAVE A VOICE! Keep fighting, Barry. Mr. Obama’s defiance will keep him from winning his bid for re-election in 2012.
***** Post-SOTU Photo of the Day *******
http://michaelgraham.com/archives/post-sotu-photo-of-the-day/
Dear SM,
re:NAME IT OR STUFF IT!
“But Obama’s criticism of the Supreme Court was not unusual. Previous presidents have made similar comments about the judicial branch. Ronald Reagan effectively criticized the Supreme Court while he argued in favor of prayer in schools in his 1988 State of the Union:”
(Quoting RR)
“And let me add here: So many of our greatest statesmen have reminded us that spiritual values alone are essential to our nation’s health and vigor. The Congress opens its proceedings each day, as does the Supreme Court, with an acknowledgment of the Supreme Being. Yet we are denied the right to set aside in our schools a moment each day for those who wish to pray. I believe Congress should pass our school prayer amendment.”
And in 2004, Bush decried “activist judges” who were “redefining marriage by court order”:
“Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives. On an issue of such great consequence, the people’s voice must be heard. If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our Nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.
The outcome of this debate is important, and so is the way we conduct it. The same moral tradition that defines marriage also teaches that each individual has dignity and value in God’s sight.”
In 1973, the Supreme Court decided that fetuses were not considered “persons” for purposes of the Constitution in Roe v. Wade. Discussing abortion, Reagan said in his 1984 State of the Union address:
“And while I’m on this subject, each day your Members observe a 200-year-old tradition meant to signify America is one nation under God. I must ask: If you can begin your day with a member of the clergy standing right here leading you in prayer, then why can’t freedom to acknowledge God be enjoyed again by children in every schoolroom across this land?”
[...]
“During our first 3 years, we have joined bipartisan efforts to restore protection of the law to unborn children. Now, I know this issue is very controversial. But unless and until it can be proven that an unborn child is not a living human being, can we justify assuming without proof that it isn’t? No one has yet offered such proof; indeed, all the evidence is to the contrary. We should rise above bitterness and reproach, and if Americans could come together in a spirit of understanding and helping, then we could find positive solutions to the tragedy of abortion.”
re:America is sick of your hate and disrespect and stupidity.
Thank you for acting as the spokesman for America. Your loving and respectful tone will serve as a shining example for all.
re: “We have cut taxes for the Middle Class” – BLATANT LIE!!!!!!!! Nowhere in the 365 + days O-Bomb-A has served has there been a Tax Rate Cut or Tax Cut for Middle Class! NOWHERE!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_02/016948.php
February 18, 2009
BIGGEST. TAX CUT. EVER. (REDUX)…. We talked a week ago about the tax-cut provisions of the economic stimulus package, and how it turns out that President Obama proposed and passed one of the largest tax cuts in American history — $282 billion over two years — without Republican support.
I’m glad to see some others are picking up on this. Yesterday, Marc Ambinder noted:
Don’t know if anybody has yet noticed in the Republican Party but President Obama was presented last week a major talking point for 2012.
He’ll sign today one of the largest tax cuts in history.
#18 Dear Robert:
——-Obama’s tax cuts, meanwhile, are SHORT-TERM refunds paid directly to working and middle class families (some of which Republicans have denounced as “welfare”). ***** And how much of that grossly over-exaggerated figure is actally alloted for more public service programs for low-income families ????
Name the specific tax cuts, would you please Robert !! What—you mean like the 10,000 tax shelter per-year if you have a child enrolled in College? THAT IS NOT A TAX CUT, and THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL MIDDLE CLASS FAMILIES. Also—this figure does not mean that these are immediate cuts which apply to all Americans or cuts that many, in fact, will not be eligble for. Also-when are they effective? Not for the LAST YEAR HE WAS IN OFFICE- and are any even included for 2010?
When you can show “us” the money, and the details–then we could call it legitimate. Up until now—Americans have seen nothing and some of the “cuts” he has proposed will not be effective until 2011 AND BEYOND. Americans need help NOW, AMERICANS NEED JOBS NOW!
Obama got more money from unions, and overseas donors than any other candidate. Yet he is against this?
You can not take money from unions, and overseas donors, and pretend your on the high road. Obama is a Liar.
Robert,
Save your breath……While I agree…most people on here are HBR brain washed. Hanniy,Beck, and Rush…their favorite role models. They still think Obama’s running up the deficit….although Republicans are actually the ones who’ve ran it up the most while in office. They cry about health care..yet they only offer ideas that were in the bill…I guess they didn’t read those lines. And no..I didn’t agree with the bill…but at least they put something out there instead of sitting up their butts for 8 years like Barney did. I guess these guys want more money influence over congressman…so they can buy the rest of the votes the Republcan votes they need.
Obama’s tax-cut plan in the recovery package is not only arguably bigger than any previous plan, but it’s also better targeted. George W. Bush’s tax cuts were long-term income-tax rate cuts, which amounted to a generous break for those at the top, since the wealthy pay most income taxes. A.L. reminds us today, “The Bush tax cuts were skewed dramatically toward the wealthy. In 2004, 60% of the tax cuts went to the top 20 percent of income earners with over 25% going to the top 1% of income earners. Those numbers have increased since then as the cuts to the estate tax have taken effect.”
Obama’s tax cuts, meanwhile, are short-term refunds paid directly to working and middle class families (some of which Republicans have denounced as “welfare”).
re Wolf
I fault Republicans , who did nothing to stop Bush from growing the deficit, at a time when we were not in an emergency situation, for now attacking Obama for putting us further into debt. Once they lost their virginity on deficit spending, they can’t reclaim it. I fault Democrats for turning the stimulus package into a grab bag for every dollar they could get for there constituency, whether or not it was in line with the intended purpose of providing jobs.
I don’t want to pick on Republicans only, but the tone of this blog is that they are saints & the Dems are sinners. I would just like those who think that way to remember -
“Former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill was told “deficits don’t matter” when he warned of a looming fiscal crisis.
O’Neill, fired in a shakeup of Bush’s economic team in December 2002, raised objections to a new round of tax cuts and said the president balked at his more aggressive plan to combat corporate crime after a string of accounting scandals because of opposition from “the corporate crowd,” a key constituency.
O’Neill said he tried to warn Vice President Dick Cheney that growing budget deficits-expected to top $500 billion this fiscal year alone-posed a threat to the economy. Cheney cut him off. “You know, Paul, Reagan proved deficits don’t matter,” he said, according to excerpts. Cheney continued: “We won the midterms (congressional elections). This is our due.” A month later, Cheney told the Treasury secretary he was fired.”
http://www.ontheissues.org/2004/Dick_Cheney_Budget_+_Economy.htm
Thus, it seems hypocritical to now act as the deficit is the only thing that matters.
Name the tax cuts in the recovery plan doofus? Specifically point to them?
LOGIC and MATH you heartless liberals…
He is getting ready to raise taxes on the middle class…THAT IS A FACT.
His freeze on discretionary spending is BS. He had the largest budget increase in US history, 24% from FY 09 to FY 10. The freeze will be at the FY 10 level. If he wanted to free up more funds he could revert to the FY 09 levels and cut earmarks…won’t do it.
You have no clue. Let’s hear YOUR opinion besides reguritating news articles from liberal newspapers and blogs. Please….
Americans know he has no tax cuts. Americans know that the cost of the so called recovery act which hasn’t worked has gone up $75B. Pelosi wants to add another $300 billion to the already $1.3 trillion healthSCARE bill!
Dude, take your head out of Obama’s rear for a moment!
You do realize his tax cuts amount to something like an extra $8.00 a pay check. Woo-hoo…
Can go buy my bottle of hennessy now!
the ever delusional wolf is back to worship massa some more.
it was GWB that kept this country safe. now any thug or terrorist with a suit can walk in the white house unchecked. the terrorists are eating this up and see the weakness of an administration of thugs. your party is full of tax cheats that are now cheating you and you lap it up because obama tells you that it tastes good.and just like the rest of your party, your only answer is to blame the other guy instead of your boy who has now put a price on the head of every American. i hope you don’t have children because i would hate to see them suffer obama’s disaster.
#21- Wolf—Sorry, but you are an IDIOT!!! Hannity, Beck or RUSH have nothing to do with anything. They haven’t brainwashed us–we are THE FREE INDEPENDENT AND CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS who can THINK FOR OURSELVES AND FORM OUR OWN OPINIONS, Thanks.
Also- at least we know how to read, write and comprehend the English language. We also understand how a budget works and how to calculate a damn spreadsheet which is the least I can say for half of you dumb ass liberals. Please notice- I said about half of all Libs are Morons like you- not all. And do you know why, YOU, specifically, are a Moron????? Simple: It’s because anybody who can state “they still think Obama is running up the deficit” & believe that Obama IS NOT doing just EXACTLY that-(RUNNING UP THE DEFICIT)
Well……..DUH! Learn how to add and subtract you Fool!
I thought this might be a forum for the interesting exchange of ideas, but you guys seem only interested in hearing from people that agree with you and engaging in juvenile name-calling at those who disagree. I know there are conservatives out there who can discuss issues in a serious & thoughtful manner, but I see only kool aid drinkers here. The impression is that you people would rather see America go down in flames than see Obama succeed & the country prosper. I know the following headline must be sooo painful to you people, but it was reported today -
“U.S. Economy Grew at Fastest Pace in 6 Years Last Quarter”
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/30/business/economy/30econ.html?hp
Bye
___________
SM: Robert spare us the drama. If Obama succeeds, America is destroyed.
Sorry if we do not like Socialism here. You might want to try the American Communist Web site.
We have no problem discussing ideas that are not MARXIST. If any Republican Senator or US Rep sides with Obama with any of his socialist agenda ,,, they will be voted out of office on their ass as well.
Sorry, America is still a center right country and Obama’s 15 minutes (gag 4 yrs) will be up soon. He is a defiant clown who is hell bent on destroying America.
signed, the management
[...] It Depends on How You Define ‘Outburst’ Much has been made of the SOTU “face-off” between President Obama and Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito. Leave it to both sides to try to try and score political points of a non-issue. “It almost defies logic, reason and respect; however, Barack Hussein Obama did the unthinkable during his first State of the Union Speech and tried to intimidate the Supreme Court of the United States,” wrote one conservative blogger. [...]
Dear Robert M,
Nice answers! Thank you for shutting up the bunch of ignorant evil people we call SCARED MONKEYS.
You have proven the SM’s clan wrong every time and I applaud you for this, I have read some other articles from SM and they seem to act a lot like communists, censoring all who disagree with them and not leaving any place for some good debates and discussion. IMO is that SM is being paid by special interests to blog about certain things and indoctrinate weak-minded people to have the same believes as SM (and their special interests).
_______
SM: You are being foolish. We allow more ridiculous and ignorant comments from liberals like yourself to prove our point … you people are insane. So how long have you been paranoid and are you taking meds for it?
I love debate and freedom of speech as long as its respectful. My house, my rules. If you want something different, create your own blog, its a free country. Or at least it was before Obama and his progressives got into office.
Debate? In order for you folks to debate on the LEFT there has to be some, even 5% facts to your claims. Sadly, you are vacant of any such thing.
Paid for by special interest, LOL … now that is rich. If you make a claim like that fool, you best be prepared to back it up or shut up. I guess i better run to the mail box and wait for my special interest check. Funny thing, 5 years later since we began SM and I am still waiting for it/
Maybe its you that is bought and paid for by special interests and the reason why you are a seminar commenter acting as a troll?
You have an opportunity right now to state your point of view but instead you just attack a site for its content. Go back to the Huffington Post, or Daily Kos, cuz those sites never delete comments from the right.
Make a point and move on.
R
Now some serious notes about the suppreme court. As some of you may not know yet Justice Alito has been named Suppreme Court Judge by a REPUBLICAN President, which explains why he has the same opinions as the REPUBLICANS. If you look deeper into the Suppreme Court Judges and their past you will notice that there are 5 republican-named judges and 4 democratic-named judges. Guess how many votes it took to reverse this century old law? The law has been reversed by a 5 to 4 majority. Do you see the connection now? The problem is that the Suppreme Court is a political entity (to our disgust) but that’s the way it is. The only way the suppreme court could be truly non-partisan is if the suppreme court would be anonymously nominated by state court judges or something in that form. As long as we have Presidents nominating Suppreme Judges the Suppreme Court will always favour a certain political party.
_______
SM: Jen, did you have the same issue when the SCOTUS passed Roe v. Wade?
Once again Libs are uninformed and listen to only their CNN or MSM sound bites. Your Obamamessiah misquoted and misstated what the SCOTUSactually did. But then again, what could we expect from a liberal. ACORN lawyer.
R
Yes, I’ll have the same issue whenever the Suppreme Court makes a decision on a any law, because these are ruled by politics, and it should not be this way. The Suppreme Court should stay far away from anything concerning politics. The real problem is that those Judges are being elected by presidents and that is something that should be changed, but won’t since not enough people are even aware how Suppreme Court judges are REALLY being nominated.
____________
SM: Every body with a 6th grade education knows how SCOTUS justices are nominated.
Some how I doubt that u are going to lose sleep when Obama appoints a communist as his justice when one steps down in the next 3 years. Maybe he can appoint one of the lawyers from the AG’s office who defended and advocated for terrorists who tried to harm the USA. Wouldn’t that be special.
They do have to be confirmed by the Senate. This nation can only hope that no justices are appointed before the 2010 midterms.
R
He CAN act outside the separation of powers because the sheople of America elected a foreigner as President. Just wait and see what else comes from Barry Not-So-Good between now and 2012.