Obama White House (Anita Dunn) Admits … We Control the News Media

 

“Very rarely did we communicate through the press anything that we didn’t absolutely control.” (Anita Dunn, White House Communications Director)

Every White House tries to shape the message that they want to present to the American people; however, is the Barack Obama and his minions taking this to a whole new level and looking to control the media? It would appear from comment and action that might be the case.  Is this the reason why the Obama Administration has come out swinging against Fox News? Not because they are not a true media outlet, but because they cannot control them.

President Obama’s presidential campaign focused on “making” the news media cover certain issues while rarely communicating anything to the press unless it was “controlled,” White House Communications Director Anita Dunn disclosed to the Dominican government at a videotaped conference.

“Very rarely did we communicate through the press anything that we didn’t absolutely control,” said Dunn.

“We just put that out there and made them write what Plouffe had said as opposed to Plouffe doing an interview with a reporter. So it was very much we controlled it as opposed to the press controlled it,” Dunn said.

Continued Dunn: “Whether it was a David Plouffe video or an Obama speech, a huge part of our press strategy was focused on making the media cover what Obama was actually saying as opposed to why the campaign was saying it, what the tactic was. … Making the press cover what we were saying.”

Among other things like needing an enemy to focus on, maybe this is the reason why the Barack Obama White House has such a difficult time with Fox News and feels the need to attack them? And attack some more. They are not falling into lock-step with the rest of the MSM.

As Town Hall states, with all all too in the tank Obama media happy to neglect their job as journalists, the Obama White House’s control is made easy. It is pretty easy to control the media when they are all to ready and willing to follow Obama’s marching orders. The media is supposed to be the People’s opposition and questionng vehicle to prevent a government from spinning out of control. Sadly, today’s MSM only believes in being the opposition to some and Barack Obama knows it.

The White House apparently feels it must marginalize Fox for a reason. And the only reason I can come up with is the White House feels it is hurting it’s agenda. To me the most telling remark about Fox came when Dunn said that when President Obama goes on Fox he believes he’s debating the opposition.

I thought that’s what all real journalists considered themselves – the opposition. Now, apparently, journalistic worth is measured by the White House as how compliant you are and how willing you are to carry water for them.



If you liked this post, you may also like these:

  • Daily Commentary – Wednesday, October 21st, 2009 – Anita Dunn Controls the Media?
  • Helen Thomas Tells Obama White House to Back Off FOX News … Pigs Just Flew
  • Obama White House Whines & Tells CNN They Are Punishing FOX NEWS for Dissent
  • CNN Down 68% in Prime Time Ratings … FOX News Up Almost 10% Since Obama WH Declared War on Fox
  • Obama Lost in Smallness Continues … White House War of Words with Fox News … Freedom of the Press




  • Comments

    22 Responses to “Obama White House (Anita Dunn) Admits … We Control the News Media”

    1. Carpe on October 19th, 2009 8:51 am

      Anita Dunn’s hero is Mao Zedong of China!

      So interesting. If she was speaking out against
      Mao… he would probably have had her buried alive.

      Our country is in grave trouble.

      “Let the people speak up. If they have good arguments, we listen to them; if they don’t, we refute them.”

      “What we have in excess is women. So if you want, we can give a few of those to you, some tens of thousands. Let them go to your place. They will create disasters. That way you can lessen our burden.”

      Mao Zedong quotes

      Mao’s English interpreter Sidney Rittenberg, who remains the only American ever to be admitted into the Chinese Communist Party, was himself imprisoned in solitary confinement for a total of 16 years during the power struggles of Mao’s rule. However, in his memior The Man Who Stayed Behind, Rittenberg states that he believes Mao never intended to cause the deaths and suffering endured by people under his chairmanship. In his remarks on the matter Rittenberg has declared that Mao “was a great leader in history, and also a great criminal because, not that he wanted to, not that he intended to, but in fact, his wild fantasies lead to the deaths of tens of millions of people.”[52]

      There continue to be disagreements on Mao’s legacy. Some historians claim that Mao Zedong was a dictator comparable to Hitler and Stalin,[56][57] with a death toll surpassing both.[3][4] Mao was also frequently compared to China’s First Emperor Qin Shi Huang, notorious for burying alive hundreds of scholars. During a speech to party cadre in 1958, Mao said: “He buried 460 scholars alive; we have buried forty-six thousand scholars alive… You [intellectuals] revile us for being Qin Shi Huangs. You are wrong. We have surpassed Qin Shi Huang a hundredfold.”[58]

      Chairman Mao – A real PEOPLE PERSON. He was all heart.

    2. super dave on October 19th, 2009 10:29 am

      of course, all medis except Fox is on the obama take. a boycott of all but Fox would put these paid shills to looking for a new job.
      most would be begging Fox for a chance to turn on obama for a paycheck.

    3. rightknight on October 19th, 2009 10:43 am

      Chairgal Anita ZeDunn is just one of the ‘clouded mind’ tools
      surrounding Obowma. The overflowing gang of Czars he’s
      hired are a collection of oddball zealots with an impressive
      lean toward Communism rather than Freedom. Do any of
      us think Barry’s intentions are to fulfill his Oath to Protect
      and Defend the Constitution of the United States of America?

      Now, does anyone feel that the Mass Media (excepting Fox
      for example) has done it’s job in asking questions and
      challenging the current Administration? Does ZeDunn amount
      to anything more than a pebble on the road toward actual
      investigative reporting of the news? If so, why?

      Rumblings among these ‘Control Freaks’ is that the Internet
      might have to be shut down for protracted periods at the
      will of the Administration. HMMmmm! The information Hwy
      of Free Speech shutdown at the will of Obowma? Is this right?

    4. Jack Hammer on October 19th, 2009 11:56 am

      The government controls the media, while Fox News warps your minds.

    5. yoyo muffintop on October 19th, 2009 1:12 pm

      Ahhhh, creating problems where there are none. How industrious of the anti-realists. What a shock!

      This has nothing to do with “controlling the news media” – the quote says they control their communications, i.e. what information they release to the media. It’s right there in black and white.

    6. Tamikosmom on October 19th, 2009 4:09 pm

      Think about the departure of Glen Beck as a CNN talk show host just a short time prior to election day.

      Coincidence? I don’t think so.

      Anita Dunn speaks the truth. The problem is the American people are not comprehending the dangerous ideology that is taking hold within the country that was once perceived as the greatest democracy on the face of the earth. Freedom reigned!!

      My grandfather’s words in his writings over 40 years ago imply that the signs were there but many were blinded … many were deceived.

      His words:

      “Over time … the liberal agenda will take hold and allow the communist ideology to ultimately triumph in the democracies throughout the free. Not a gun will be fired. The people voluntarily use their own ballot and vote away their rights and freedoms.”

      Janet

    7. Carpe on October 19th, 2009 6:24 pm

      It looks like they are working Alinsky Rule #12
      with this one.

      RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

      Only they are aiming it at FOX overall and not
      just honing in on one person.

    8. Ruth on October 19th, 2009 7:17 pm

      I sure don’t want someone like Anita Dunn talking to any of my grandchildren.

      What the heck is happening in our country – we have a bunch of communists running it.

      How can so many people be so stupid to elect Obama – he is trashing our country to the point of no return.

    9. Ruth on October 19th, 2009 7:17 pm

      I sure don’t want someone like Anita Dunn talking to any of my grandchildren.

      What the heck is happening in our country – we have a bunch of communists running it.

      How can so many people be so stupid to elect Obama – he is trashing our country to the point of no return.

    10. Ruth on October 19th, 2009 7:17 pm

      I sure don’t want someone like Anita Dunn talking to any of my grandchildren.

      What the heck is happening in our country – we have a bunch of communists running it.

      How can so many people be so stupid to elect Obama – he is trashing our country to the point of no return.

    11. tuyvnsurvivor on October 19th, 2009 7:50 pm

      6, not sure I understand all you are saying, since with our few words we do not first understand our personship.

      But, assualt on free speech or our basic not to be changed rights are frightening.

      I understand recklesness is assigned anytime one compares one to Hitler. And I am not from Norway nor a historian. Though I find answers in history. Norway had a population I compare to our own. And it was the more civalized, hard working, optimist thinkers (such as conservatives here), who progressively obeyed thier government in retreat. Giving up free speech, allowing treaspass, and stair steping one progression at a time until the Nazi’s came in individual homes to force sharing of blankets, food, and plunder dominance…any flesh was not love. They endoctrinated their way in and passed out mean. I fear that complacentcy here. Enemies do not appear with horns, they look no different than Pelosi; it is the crippling torturous ideas they point and not necessarily the direction of their pointed weapon…progression itself is to be an alarm.

      I have been shot several, some very minor, times. Once a 7 day comma. ANd after it I served another 4 months in combat, right back to being a pointman. It hurts. Though I was trying to save free speech for people I only barely spoke their language. I am mighty slow to want us to go to any war after all of that business. When it is about basic undeniable rights, I would move a bit quicker.

      Most ALL of us have done more for America than Obama will in his lifetime. If it is I learned anything whatsoever from algebra.

    12. tuyvnsurvivor on October 19th, 2009 8:09 pm

      I am terrible to notice Dunn’s manorisum’s and this is not at all my standard way. I have spoken to the public and I shake terribly, no doubt some miss my message as they watch my shakes…the old comma got me on that one for a lifetime. I am a little over weight. ANd ugly hit me with age; should carry an old picture of myself to prove I was once decent looking.

      But that Dunn looks like a snake head with all that tongue going stuff and reptilian pronouncement of her mouth. My golly, is there a rumor and prediction somewhere of, ‘a forth coming reptile woman’?

      Excuse me.

    13. katablog.com on October 19th, 2009 11:11 pm

      oh yoyo muffinhead there is simply no hope for you. You can’t even read now apparently. Here’s the complete quote from Maoist Dunn:

      President Obama’s presidential campaign focused on “making” the news media cover certain issues while rarely communicating anything to the press unless it was “controlled,”

      and another quote :

      “We just put that out there and made them write what Plouffe had said as opposed to Plouffe doing an interview with a reporter. So it was very much we controlled it as opposed to the press controlled it,”

      Now muffinhead, I know you’ve only got dough for brains, but the way I read those quotes Dunn is bragging on how IWon controlled the media. Seems others’ see it that way since the title of the article is: White House boasts: ‘We Control News Media’ Oh doesn’t that just sound like the arrogant won.

    14. Greg the Mongoose on October 20th, 2009 1:42 am

      OBAMA IS GOING TO SHUT DOWN FOXNEWS. They are just starting to lay the ground work. They have declared WAR. News only! No comments.
      No questions.

    15. super dave on October 20th, 2009 7:23 am

      when obama’s peasants are hit with the truth, they just don’t have the mental capacity to handle it. they know they worship a non-American illegal alien, they want to believe him, but are always confronted with the truth that he just isn’t what we need.
      it must be hard for them to sleep at night knowing that they had a hand in letting our country slip into the hands of destruction.

    16. tuyvnsurvivor on October 20th, 2009 8:46 am

      If I were a senator I would be an act out senator. I would not toss spears after the librals had started gunfire. They acted out and beat conservatives to the dirt, and if we have stronger senators to fight for us we would win this war more of words handlily.

      Not that I actually want the job mind you. But we can get our points on the mainstream news and fight back at Dunn with her own dumb.

      Give me a senator who will call the President a murderer. Murderer of helpless Americans, the best of us — the young. The very ones we deliberate our most caring and basic of nature. Obama a reckless murderer! ANd he has done no better with Katrina victums, or war…in action or delay.

      Swine flu vaccines are not making it to the public in time. Children and prime young adults die. Wasn’t something like this Bushs’ fault…everything was Bushs’ fault. “Murder”, I recall at war and at home. I would grandstand, we would be on mainstream news. Where is a senator of our own, more interested in saving our rights than his or her own press.

    17. Helen Thomas Tells Obama White House to Back Off FOX News … Pigs Just Flew | Scared Monkeys on October 20th, 2009 10:51 am

      [...] Fox News not a real news network Obama minions? Or is it just that you do not like the news they are reporting and breaking? News that your “in the tank” media friends refuse to cover … just the way Dunn stated Obama likes to control the media. [...]

    18. yoyo muffintop on October 20th, 2009 2:32 pm

      #13 – Because World Nut Daily has a headline that reads a certain way you just believe it? Haha. Good Lord.

      Tap into the non-partisan part of your brain and figure it out. Controlling what you release to the media has nothing to do with trying to control the media. The media is always free to do what it wants to do.

      Did you skip “Comprehension 101″ in college katablog?

    19. yoyo muffintop on October 20th, 2009 2:37 pm

      #13 – Here’s what the conservative/libertarian “Little Green Footballs” has to say about WND – Know wonder you read WND…it fits you to a “T”:

      “I’ve been sounding off about the insanity peddled by World Net Daily for quite a while. They promote every wrong, crazy idea associated with the far right: creationism, birtherism, anti-vaccinationism, and much more. And some of their writers associate openly with white supremacists and racist groups.

      After reading an especially mindless article about the Obama administration’s purported plans to set up “Nazi-like” concentration camps, Jon Henke is calling for a boycott: Organizing Against WorldNetDaily.

      But I’ll predict that he gets almost no support for this. The craziness is too strong these days, when even the RNC is advertising at WND.”

      World Net Daily Fits you perfect #13.

    20. Daily Commentary - Wednesday, October 21st, 2009 - Anita Dunn Controls the Media? | Scared Monkeys on October 21st, 2009 6:32 am

      [...] that’s what she said. The Obama White House may control some of the media, but not all of it. Is controlling the media the same as controlling the people, though? [...]

    21. super dave on October 21st, 2009 11:09 am

      why should # 13 tap into the non-partison part of her brain when the yoyocrats have never shown non-partison politics.
      the democrat party is nothing short of a street gang bent on controlling territory, money, and power.
      everything the obama administration does is behind closed doors. only criminals operate in this manner.

    22. Tamikosmom on October 21st, 2009 1:17 pm

      20. The Obama White House may control some of the media, but not all of it. Is controlling the media the same as controlling the people, though? [...]

      +++++++

      Unfortunately … Yes.

      If oppositional media is not tolerated … the children … our future generation … look to the State as all knowing and … out of respect or fear of the consequences they conform accordingly. Something akin to a child/parent relationship.

      In a parent/child relationship … for a time a child may look to his/her parents as all knowning. However … the differing opinions that the media outlets provide implie that at some point in time … these children as young adults forward are given the opportunity to question what has been instilled in them by parents as absolutes and … then are in a position to freely choose the path they they have been taught or … embark on another journey.

    Leave a Reply




    Support Scared Monkeys! make a donation.

     
     
    • NEWS (breaking news alerts or news tips)
    • Red (comments)
    • Dugga (technical issues)
    • Dana (radio show comments)
    • Klaasend (blog and forum issues)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Close
    E-mail It