More PDS, Palin Derangement Syndrome … CBC’s Heather Mallick … “White Trash Palin Has Porn Actress Look”

 

A note to Heather Mallick, once again I would rather be white trash than … ugly. Once again Sarah Palin is the target as she scares the living daylights out of liberals as she does not fit the stereotype they have set for Republican women.

Yes that is correct, more PDS, Palin Derangement Syndrome, this time from north of the border. Its not just the American MSM that has been evil toward Sarah Palin, add Canada as well. Canadian columnist Heather Mallick wrote an article on September 5, 2008 entitled “A Mighty Wind blows through Republican convention,” discussing Republican Vice Presidential choice Sarah Palin. The Canadian lib questions why Sarah Palin was picked as the Republicans had already sewn up the “white trash” vote. She also contended that Palin had a “toned-down version of the porn actress look.” NICE!

Heather Mallick contends that small towns are places that smart people escape from, for privacy, for variety, for intellect, for survival. Palin should have stayed home.”

I assume John McCain chose Sarah Palin as his vice-presidential partner in a fit of pique because the Republican money men refused to let him have the stuffed male shirt he really wanted. She added nothing to the ticket that the Republicans didn’t already have sewn up, the white trash vote, the demographic that sullies America’s name inside and outside its borders yet has such a curious appeal for the right.

So why do it?

It’s possible that Republican men, sexual inadequates that they are, really believe that women will vote for a woman just because she’s a woman. They’re unfamiliar with our true natures.

The article actually gets worse, if that is possible. Mallick, could you be more of an elitist or judgmental? Her reference “white trash”, trailers and porn stars so often in her article could only mean that there something that she need to tell us? Is there a deep seeded issue that she feels the need to unburden herself of burden?Wtf

Palin has a toned-down version of the porn actress look favoured by this decade’s woman, the overtreated hair, puffy lips and permanently alarmed expression. Bristol has what is known in Britain as the look of the teen mum, the “pramface.” Husband Todd looks like a roughneck; Track, heading off to Iraq, appears terrified. They claim to be family obsessed while being studiously terrible at parenting. What normal father would want Levi “I’m a fuckin’ redneck” Johnson prodding his daughter?

Heather Mallick also went on to write another column about Palin, this time in The Guardian. Obviously she thinks a lot of small town America and is embarrassed for having been born there.

My credentials are solid; Palin cannot out-hick me. Until I fled at 18, I never lived in a northern town of more than 12,000 people. My towns were full of Sarah Palins. These types are fine, such as they are, until they leave town and turn fraudulent. They label themselves “the salt of the earth”. It’s when they try to make that a qualification for a greater glory that things turn unpleasant.

Greta Van Susteren wins many points with Republicans not only by doing some great interviews with the First Dude of Alaska, Todd Palin, but by also calling CBC columnist Heather Mallick a pig. Not one wearing lip stick, but just a PIG!

Columnist’s Labeling Palin Backers ‘White Trash’ Spurs Review at Canadian TV



If you liked this post, you may also like these:

  • PDS at its Worse: House Dem Charlie Rangel calls Palin Disabled … However, According to Biden … Rangel is not Patriotic
  • Classless POS Larry Flynt Calls Trig Palin a “Brain Dead Virtual Vegetable”
  • D-Lister Kathy Griffin Gets Booed By US Troops After Calling Bristol Palin Fat
  • Daily Commentary – Thursday, February 18th, 2010 – Reaction to Family Guy Mockery of Sarah Palin’s Son
  • Senator John Kerry’s Idiotic Remark Regarding Sarah Palin Going Missing Rather than Mark Sanford




  • Comments

    28 Responses to “More PDS, Palin Derangement Syndrome … CBC’s Heather Mallick … “White Trash Palin Has Porn Actress Look””

    1. Richard on September 19th, 2008 4:41 pm

      I understand her point about rural ‘hicks’ not being much of anything. Seems to me we had a president who originally hailed from some backwoods Kentucky cabin …. Who was he, now?

      Oh, yeah, a guy by the name of Abe Lincoln.

      Last time I drove into Illinois, there was a sign at the border saying “Land of Lincoln.”

      Haven’t seen anything equivalent to that so far for Heather Mallick … come to think of it, I’ve never even heard of Heather Mallick.

      Who is she?

      Must be on TV, given the tone of her comments and the weight of her obvious wisdom….

    2. Maggie on September 19th, 2008 4:47 pm

      Greta had a guy from Canada on her show last night.. Greta told him this woman is a pig.. lol She said it’s one thing to disagree with their policy’s… but there is no reason to be nasty.

    3. Kay Zee Ess on September 19th, 2008 5:08 pm

      I put this comment here because I don’t know when a real topic will hit the board:

      Heard an email comment on CNN that when big business gets in trouble the government socialize losses and when the business is good they privatize profits. Sounds like we will refuse to penalize those who Sen McCain have been talking about, instead the taxpayers will be forced to bail them out by being taxed so those that did this will keep their millions and not spend one second in jail.

      Sen McCain is sounding better and better. I hope he doesn’t do another 180.

    4. Maggie on September 19th, 2008 5:21 pm

      another looney left..

      Embattled Politician: It’s Laughable That GOP VP Nominee Bases Foreign Policy On Being Able To See Russia
      Republicans Infuriated; Rep. King Blasts Rangel
      Reporting
      Marcia Kramer NEW YORK (CBS) ? Already under fire for his tax troubles, Manhattan Congressman Charles Rangel really put his foot in his mouth on Friday.

      In a CBS 2 HD exclusive interview, Rep. Rangel called Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin “disabled.”

      The question was simple: Why are the Democrats so afraid of Palin and her popularity?

      The answer was astonishing.

      “You got to be kind to the disabled,” Rangel said.

      That’s right. The chairman of the powerful House Ways & Means Committee called Palin disabled — even when CBS 2 HD called him on it.

      CBS 2 HD: “You got to be kind to the disabled?”

      Rangel: “Yes.”

      CBS 2 HD: “She’s disabled?”

      Rangel: “There’s no question about it politically. It’s a nightmare to think that a person’s foreign policy is based on their ability to look at Russia from where they live.

      Republicans think Rangel’s comments are insulting as well as shocking.

      “Charlie Rangel’s comments are clearly disgraceful,” Rep. Peter King, R-Long Island, said. “This is just another liberal Democrat who can’t accept an independent woman running for president.”

      King, who is co-chair of the McCain-Palin campaign in New York, watched Rangel’s comments with CBS 2 HD. He was particularly upset because Palin’s 4-month-old son, Trig, is disabled. He has Down’s syndrome.

      “We should be sensitive to her or any woman who has a child or family member who has any affliction at all,” King said. “And so to use the word disabled in the context of a female candidate for vice president who has a child who is disabled really is wrong. Charlie owes her and the entire disabled community and apology.”

      Advocates for the disabled are also upset.

      “It makes me feel as if he’s trying to put her down, trying to say she’s not good for the presidency or the vice presidency,” said Michael Imperiale of Disabled In Action Of Metropolitan N.Y.

      “A disabled president ran this country. He was disabled. His name was Roosevelt.”

      A spokesman for the McCain-Palin campaign also piled on, saying that this kind of rhetoric has no place in politics.

    5. yoyo muffintop on September 19th, 2008 6:21 pm

      SM: “If Barack Obama and his campaign staff think that the questions or the tone of the campaign is difficult now, they best hold on to their hats for the general election.”

      Hold on to your hat Sarah, it’s gonna get worse.

      Oh, I forgot you might be reading this so I’ll write it so you understand:
      It’s like there’s all these like really mean people and like they want their party to win so like they’ll make fun of me and stuff. Ya know kinda like they do to that guy from Illinoise (with an “e”).

      _____________
      SM: last time I checked it was Obama that was the one who was whining anytime some one said something remotely mean. Republicans have far more tough skin, they have to from all the slings and arrows. Obama may just have to dodge one or two from a Fair & Balanced Fox News.

      Obama is a cream puff
      R

    6. Maggie on September 19th, 2008 6:51 pm

      YoYo I like your new accent, it suits you..

      Let’s see if Bruce Willis came out tomorrow and called Michelle Obama a whore and if she comes to town she will be gang raped by his white brothers.. Anyone who agrees that this kind of stuff is ok …is sick… Someone needs to do a Sickoooo part 2 about the looney left..

    7. Maggie on September 19th, 2008 6:53 pm

      Nancy Pelosi..

      Pelosi is playing it differently: motherhood as preparation for public office. “Having five children in six years is the best training in the world for speaker of the House,” she told the AARP Bulletin. “It made me the ultimate multitasker and the master of focus, routine and scheduling.”

      Asked about national security during the campaign, she would preemptively bring up her mother-of-five-ness:

      Above excerpted from this link:
      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/09/AR2007010901335.html

    8. james on September 19th, 2008 7:27 pm

      the battle axe mallick needs to go look in the mirror,lol, her spit is not even good enough to shine sarahs shoes, lol. and as far as barack huesain binladen, get the velcro, he needs baby sat……..michelle looks like a chip munk on steroids, spit woman, spit, lol.

    9. caesu on September 19th, 2008 8:33 pm

      she wears a T-shirt saying “Proud to be Valley Trash”.
      so no surprise she gets called that now.
      http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/popup?id=5711505&contentIndex=1&page=15&start=false

      and look at this T-shirt she is wearing here:
      http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/popup?id=5711505&contentIndex=1&start=false&page=10

      so this columnist is not that far off.

    10. yoyo muffintop on September 19th, 2008 8:35 pm

      Maggie – And I’m sure you show the same disdain for people that tie Obama’s name in with Osama Bin Laden.
      I’m sure you’ll agree that that is sick as well.
      Right? Haven’t see your outrage but I probably just missed it.

      You like my Sarah Palin impressions huh? Who could’ve imagined someone who uses the word “like” as a 17yr old would might be VP of the USA in 2009 and we might have a President who doesn’t know how to use a computer.

      Debate next week – should be interesting.

    11. yoyo muffintop on September 19th, 2008 10:18 pm

      Troopergate

      What are you scared of Palin?
      Why is she refusing a demand to appear before an investigation into the growing “Troopergate” scandal?
      Why is she refusing to co-operate with the official investigation?
      Why did she have a team of lawyers fly to Alaska to squash the investigation?
      Why is she refusing to talk to the press?
      What are you afraid of Palin?
      What are you hiding from Palin?
      If she is so innocent and no case can possibly be made, what is she so sacred of?

      So much for transparency being a hallmark of her administration.

      Lies, lies and more lies.

    12. brie. on September 19th, 2008 11:21 pm

      Actually, Palin doesn’t deal with bulls~~t… that would be the answer to anyone’s question…she is not afraid of the press…but she is smart enough to stay away from them because of the damage them do…I believe she already stated that she is not going to support the limelight of the press…

      Obama is the worst thing we have ever seen running for the Presidency…he is a big nothing…

      What does he know about growing up in the ghetto..nothing…what does he know about the black community…nothing…he grew up in Hawaii….not a tough life…never saw real poverty..never even lived it…he was raised by white people…but turned out to be a black Muslim racist..!!!!! With a big MOUTH!!!

    13. Miss-Underestimated on September 19th, 2008 11:41 pm

      Heather looks like Robin Williams in drag.

      BTW. watch what happens now with Fannie and Freddie, I bet Obama gets thrown to the wolves.

    14. rightknight on September 20th, 2008 1:51 am

      Ugly botch paid for by Canadians. This mistake (and it is a mistake), is underwritten by working folks in Canada. The CBC is sort of a socialist rag that spews whatever it feels like. Watch out USA it could happen here…..! Wait, what’s that you say, the NY Times is doing what?….

    15. Scared Monkeys on September 20th, 2008 9:15 am

      It is simply shameful that one would make these kind of comments based upon one’s hateful opinions of one’s looks and place of origin. All of course paid for by the tax payers of Canada.

      It is interesting to see into the heart of a moonbat liberal and see that it is ok to make fun of trailer park white trash. Its OK to make fun of small towns and that its people’s desire to get out of them.

      HOW OUT OF TOUCH THESE MOONBATS TRULY ARE.

      Whether it be the MSM in the USA, Canada, or any other place. Whether it is the LEFT, MSM, Blogs, politicians, etc … the only reason why they are attacking Sarah Palin as they are is because she is a woman with an “R” before here name.

      Democrats have been pandering to women for years that they are the party of women … now suddenly the Republicans and McCain have made a bold move in picking Palin to be VP.

      The Dems talk a good game; however, it was McCain who pulled the trigger and made history.

      TALK IS CHEAP AND ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS.

      Democrats must destroy Palin or face an implosion of their Party. Palin is a 44 year old politician who stands to be in the forefront of the political landscape for the next 30 to 40 years. Let alone if elected VP … might in fact be the first female President of the United States.

      Does anyone think in 4 or 8 years as VP that anyone will be questioning her experience?

      LIBERALS are in melt down fear at that prospect.
      R

    16. Maggie on September 20th, 2008 1:07 pm

      Why would a president spend his time on a computer YOYO? McCain has already answered that one why he doesn’t.. Since when does using a computer make you ready to be president?

      As for names about Obama.. I have never refered to him as saddam hussein.. or made any comment that was racist towards him… I raised my kids to not be racist and they aren’t. In fact when the story was going around about his birth certificate , I posted it wasn’t true. Just as I have with a mass copy and pasting thing about Obama.. I told the person to go to snopes.com and check it out..parts were undetermined and untrue. I have never seen you ever do anything to stop the spread of lies and sickooo comments about Sarah Palin. not once..

      Just like Michelle Obama says a black man can get shot going to the gas station.. So can a white, german, chinese, italian, japanese.. What is her point of saying that? Or for the first time I am really proud of my country(because her husband was selected the nominee)? Their pastor brought race into it when he said.. Hillary doesn’t understand..she’s never been called a N######.
      Like Obama, I can promise you a couple million next week, if you are gullible enough to fall it.. so be it. If we are losing companies, because they can’t pay this past week, how will raising their taxes keep them here? Duh.. How can you complain about the debt, then lay out a plan to spend billions more..to send to other countries. We aren’t even taking care of our own right now.

      For a party that preaches tolerance , they are a joke.. They aren’t for women’s rights or they would value ALL women’s rights and they know it.

      Obama has never stood up to his own party..he don’t cross the aisle to work with others.. He has been a senator for 3 years..was in the Senate 143 days out of that.. according to reports.

    17. Maggie on September 20th, 2008 1:25 pm

      As for troopergate.. One of the DEMS was out saying last month and I saw it said here a few times, once by you at least.. wait for the big Oct. surprise.. Does that sound like a unbiased jury? Pictures were shown of some of them with Obama in them. Sorry, but I think it’s nothing more than business as usual.. a party telling us they are for the people, while causing more anger and hatred among people.. and partisan politics.

      Remember when Susan McDougall testified and refuse to answer if Bill Clinton lied and she went to prison. Bill pardon her and she is a hero to the democrats.. Remember it was a republican witch hunt.

    18. Tumbleweed on September 20th, 2008 11:23 pm

      We have a word for women like Ms. Mallick, it is a word I do not use lightly and only when well deserved. Ms. Mallick you are truly a BITCH!!

    19. Dan on September 21st, 2008 1:07 am

      Mallick looks like the pitbull and needs lipstick,lol. Hocky mom needs to smack the puck right in her mouth. Then redo the lipstick………

    20. Silky on September 21st, 2008 9:32 am

      Don’t even give her the attention she craves by responding to her. A Canadian yet! Who cares what they think?

    21. MrsKgNept on September 21st, 2008 2:53 pm

      Who is this woman? Somebody shut her up! I am so sick of the B.S.and negativity with this election, I’m just ready for it to be over!!!!!

      VOTE: MCCAIN/PALIN

    22. SUPER DAVE on September 22nd, 2008 6:21 am

      mallick is just jealous because no man would buy a magazine with her picture on it. she’s ugly from the face down.

    23. Brenda from Virginia on September 22nd, 2008 8:41 am

      Mallick is a woman????!

    24. Dave I'm sick of you Cannocks on September 22nd, 2008 8:55 pm

      Gretta was being kind when she called Mallick a pig. Women like her should be kept home barefoot and pregnant. On the other hand it’d probably be best if she didn’t breed.

    25. Charlie on September 24th, 2008 10:27 am

      not even barefoot, just pregnant, thats all mallick is good for.. with her command of the english language…..

    26. Desmond McGrath on September 28th, 2008 8:15 am

      An open letter to Hubert T. Lacroix
      President of the Canadian Braodcasting Corporation

      Dear Sir;
      As a long time and sometimes vocal supporter of the CBC in its past problems with the CRTC, ( http://www.crtc.gc.ca/Eng/transcripts/1999/tb0316a.htm ) and a Canadian living in the USA; I find Heather Mallick’s rant “Mighty wind blows through Republican Convention” (attached below) offensive and worse that tabloid gibberish. I find it inconceivable that the editorial standards of the once proud Canadian Broadcasting Corporation declined below that of the National Inquirer. In fact I would challenge you to read any Inquirer story in contradistinction to Ms Mallick’s sub-tabloid journalistic style; The Inquirer story would quote sources of information, use correct English and never stoop to profane language or the F___ word. Mallick only quotes two sources of minor relevance and begins her rant with the greatest journalistic faux pas “I assume”.

      Does this mean that Ms Mallick made an assumption on Senator McCain’s reasons for choosing Governor Palin and that the rest of the information was gathered personally using the time tested journalistic creed of who what where when and why?

      Ms Mallick seems quite well versed in the sexual inadequacies of Republican men; has she been, unbeknownst to the Canadian public, a latter day Mata Hari in the employ of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) bedding republican men for pillow talk secrets? Does this also mean that Ms Mallick has spied on the alleged secret meetings and had extensive hands on experience regarding their irresponsibility with semen while postponing household repairs?

      Ms Mallick’s admitted feminist stance has to leave one wondering where she and alleged other women receive their so called resentment training for nursing terrible hatred towards each other? From the amount of testosterone (even promoting firearm violence towards Levi Johnson) flowing through her vitriolic attack on governor Palin, saying she really isn’t female, can the question be asked; Does Ms Mallick have a severe case of Vagina envy?

      Ms Mallick must surely be a legend in her own mind to believe that these alleged other women can suppress the learned same sex hatred through self flagellation and reading her trashy column.

      Ms Mallick allows that “(john) Doyle’s job includes watching a lot of reality television”. Does this mean her statement “(governor) Palin has a toned-down version of the porn actress look favored by this decade’s woman” comes from extensive first hand experience of watching films of that genre?

      From attacks on Governor Palin’s personal appearance and of her family, not once has Ms Mallick discussed the genuine pros or cons of the Republican Vice-presidential nominee vs. the Democratic nominee. Nor has she done any journalistic exposé regarding George Soros’ financial manipulation of the Democratic nomination process that stole the nomination from Hillary Clinton.

      Boiled down to its essence Ms Mallick’s column is pure and simple hatred; hate mongering towards the Palin family, hatred for people she identifies as white trash, who she and Thomas Frank allow “vote Republican on social issues to give themselves the only self-esteem available to their broken, economically abused existence.” It is elitist and condescending like a later day Marie Antoinette with Cake or Death; devoid of factual journalism.

      Considering Canada has well honed anti Hate statutes, why has Ms Mallick not been summarily guillotined from her Canadian Taxpayer subsidized position with the CBC? Perhaps there is tacit agreement within the Marxist feminist hierarchy to which she reports as to her journalistic bent. Where is Mammy Yokum “good is better than evil because it’s nicer” when you need her to wash Ms Mallick’s mouth out with homemade lye soap or deliver a “Goodnight Irene Punch” to restore decency and integrity to the CBC, as you are not holding Ms Mallick to the same litmus test that you publicize for outside contributors. Listed Below

      Desmond McGrath
      A Newfoundland Patriot living in socioeconomic exile amongst the wonderful Cajuns of the southern USA.

      Guidelines for Submissions to CBCNews.ca
      Tell us your story, be a part of the news team. CBC.ca wants you to participate in online comments, video uploads and photo submissions.
      COMMENTS
      What kind of comments are suitable for CBC.ca?
      We want your perspective. Probe, analyze, inform. Challenge, advocate, debate. Inspire, entertain, enjoy. Your contributions make our online publishing and on-air programming richer, the conversations more lively and diverse.

      What is and isn’t acceptable?
      Please keep your submissions relevant to the topic.
      Be civil.
      We want to hear your own opinion. Please don’t include lengthy excerpts from other posts.
      When you are writing about legal issues, remember that people are innocent until proven guilty (that may mean using words such as “allegedly”).
      Please do not post press releases, commercial promotions or external web addresses.
      Always avoid:
      Racist, sexist and offensive language.
      Personal attacks and defamatory statements.
      Breaking copyright rules (that includes copying and pasting excepts from other sites without attribution)
      Violating someone’s privacy
      Threats or suggesting committing a criminal act.
      Insensitive comments regarding the death or injury of private individuals, especially children
      Important note: If you violate any of these rules, then your comment will not be posted and your account may be suspended.

    27. John Stacey on October 6th, 2008 9:28 am

      This is regarding CBC Heather Mallick’s totally unprovoked and vicious attack on Republican Vice-Presidential Candidate Sarah Palin. Will the taxpayer-funded CBC (whose political views should be neutral, not to the left of Carl Marx) please do all Canadians a favour and quickly fire Heather Mallick? She is a national disgrace! In addition, could the CBC just confine its political views to Canada? Especially during sensitive times like elections? And can the taxpayer-funded CBC just grow up and cease being a national disgrace itself? Does Canada even need a taxpayer-funded CBC anymore? I have a home in the USA and have to live there several months each year in peace with my good American neighbours. Even if I never went south, it is still embarrassing. Americans already think poorly enough of Canadians as it is, so why add more fuel to the fire?

    28. thebimbly on March 8th, 2010 3:52 pm

      Heather Mallick is a left wing propagandist and nothing more.

      She doesn’t have a lot of credibility outside of left wing soccer moms clubs. Her voice is limited to a corner of the CBC’s website and serves it’s purpose to gain that portion of readers and viewers.

      Otherwise, she is…well, a non entity as far as more global views are concerned. please pay no attention to our village idiot and more attention to your bevy of mindless bimbos that are surfing the waves of american media with empty heads and stupid questions. :-) Looking at you CNN

    Leave a Reply




    Support Scared Monkeys! make a donation.

     
     
    • NEWS (breaking news alerts or news tips)
    • Red (comments)
    • Dugga (technical issues)
    • Dana (radio show comments)
    • Klaasend (blog and forum issues)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Close
    E-mail It