Scared Monkeys Radio Daily Commentary – Wednesday, March 5, 2008, Dutch Artists Are “Sick F–ks”

 
  • Dana comments on the exhibit featuring a dead girl in white underwear, implying that the “dead body” is that of Natalee Holloway.

icon for podpress Download and Comment at ScaredMonkeysRadio.Com



If you liked this post, you may also like these:

  • Scared Monkeys Radio Daily Commentary – Tuesday, March 11, 2008 – Dana Pretzer Interviews Drew Peterson Tonight On Scared Monkeys Radio
  • Scared Monkeys Radio Daily Commentary – Wednesday, March 12, 2008 – The Court Of Public Opinion Is Only Human, But Ultimately The Law Decides Guilt Or Innocence
  • Scared Monkeys Radio Daily Commentary – Wednesday, March 26, 2008 – Mandate To Hire 6,000 New Border Agents This Year Brings About Lower Standards
  • Scared Monkeys Radio Daily Commentary – Monday, January 14, 2008 – Joran Van Der Sloot Has A Temper Tantrum on Dutch Television
  • Scared Monkeys Radio Daily Commentary – Wednesday, December 31, 2008 – DON’T DRINK AND DRIVE




  • Comments

    14 Responses to “Scared Monkeys Radio Daily Commentary – Wednesday, March 5, 2008, Dutch Artists Are “Sick F–ks””

    1. Mr. G. on March 5th, 2008 2:16 am

      Hello Dana, lol, well to me it looks like a man laying there,what ever it is to represent , I feel it is bad timming. Unless the artist is willing to come forth and explain his views on it. If it is indeed( a mocked Joran ) Joran laying there then fine, but if its Natalee, then there is definately a twisted mind at work. The pic makes no sense at all till you see Natalees name, and that makes it wide open for opinion!! Bad call in my book. To me its nothing more than another scavenger trying to make a buck on a tragedy that has become nationally known. God where is the compassion with people these days. Beth Holloway & Dave only want their Daughter home to bury her and have closure, nothing else. This art so to speak is distastefull and so wrong in its timming. Either way it is meant, it should never of been allowed to be posted….

    2. Dolf on March 5th, 2008 2:55 am

      take a dump on a piece of paper and call it art

      sometimes I feel that freedom of expression is overrated

    3. walrus on March 5th, 2008 6:17 am

      The Dutch produced wonderful artists, such as Vermeer and Rembrandt, during their Golden Age. When you look at the disgusting “artwork” that references Natalee, it reinforces the suggestion that anything will pass for art these days. The “art” itself tells you everything you need to know about the character of the person who created it. We see the true color of the vile man.

    4. buster on March 5th, 2008 8:17 am

      Hey joel van ??? if you paid attention in school you would of learned that girls have different anatomy than boys, joel you didn’t even pay attention at art school did you.

    5. OFIR on March 5th, 2008 8:44 am

      he sold his soul for the devil just by doing that was one realy wrong and showed us what kind of person he is + that is realy lowlife like the basterds from aruba ,this is not art by all shAPE OR FORM !!! realy cheap JURK person” so called artist” what a shame!!! everyone should ban his tv show and exibition gallery ,this man is emotionless poor character and 0 intelectual ,i’m shocked how far some a nobody (after he did that he is probbebly lost all credibility if he had before it’s gone out of the window) who has no self dignity .so sad ,i feel hurt for the holloways ,god please keep them strong …warm blessing from ofir

    6. EURobert on March 5th, 2008 8:54 am

      Off topic: Beth Holloway at Robert Jensen-show
      Takes a couple of seconds to load!

      http://tinyurl.com/29wrtk

    7. MissKatiekatie2u on March 5th, 2008 9:56 am

      i feel like it was representing joran not natalee .. and it makes me wonder how joran feels if he has seen it.. doesnt it scare him.. i wonder.. that this could possibly be a threat.. oh anita ..how does that make u feel..

    8. EURobert on March 5th, 2008 10:03 am

      Summary of the most important parts of the Jensen interview with PRdeVries from 03-03.

      http://tinyurl.com/326nc9

      PRdeVries (edited): When we started the show (with Patrick) the case actually was closed and Joran thought ‘he was off the hook’, and he was about to claim a damage-compensation. Now the investigation is reopened and behind the screen people work VERY hard on it ‘I know that from sources close to the case’. JORAN NOW OFFICIALLY IS SUSPECTED OF MURDER!

      Jensen about interview with Joran (edited): I went into that interview unprepared, as if I was talking to someone in a bar. But I clearly noticed when he started to hesitate and turn, starting at the question: how did you get from the beach to your home. I told him straight forward: you know more of this case. Then Joran looked at me with his ‘stone-hard’ eyes, ‘glass-hard’-eyes and said: No Jensen, that’s really not so, that’s really not so’. After the show I asked the public: ‘What do you think?’. And 99% of the audience thought he knew more of what happened.

      Peter (edited): A year and a half ago I’d done a show on this subject. And already then I thought: Joran vd Sloot you know more of this thing, you don’t tell the truth, you hide things. And you can’t give answers to the most simple questions. And an innocent person doesn’t have to call for his right to remain silent. And when you’re innocent you want to say the truth ten times over!

      Jensen (edited): At Pauw en Witteman you constantly looked at him and thought ‘you’re a liar, you’re a liar’. And he felt that constantly because of which he snapped. You know with the wine and so on… And your wife made that clever remark about Joran to Anita: “Well, you brought that up right!” (Fragment of wine incident.) And she right away threw a glass of water at Joran, didn’t she?

      Peter (ed.): Yes off course… What he can, she can do as well. LOL It all was a reaction on the fact that Anita throughout the show claimed ‘Joran was a d-e-c-e-n-t guy’ (…).

      Jensen(ed.): I have the feeling those people absolutely don’t have any control over this guy anymore.

      Peter (ed.): I have the impression that the parents don’t know half of what he’s all into. And it’s odd that they claim they would bring him to the police if they only had the smallest idea of him having something to do with it. Well, untill today I haven’t seen anything of that! LOL Even after my sting operation they don’t tell him to finally tell the truth.

    9. MissKatiekatie2u on March 5th, 2008 10:38 am

      Jorans poor excuse for parents know he did it.. pauulus more so because he was heavily involved.. maybe they all raped and filmed her.. paul definetely disposed of the body.. jorans to stupid.. and clutsy.. BUT THEY BOTH KNOW..

    10. A New Girl on March 5th, 2008 4:42 pm

      Anita sucks ! What kind of a Mother can have her head that FAR up her arse and be that deep in to her own OBVIOUS denial? She’s dumb as a box of rocks…probably the reason Paulus married her so he could get away with things. Something is VERY wrong there….just doesn’t add up. So, it’s like Paris Hilton…she just plays stupid ???

    11. MY THOUGH on March 5th, 2008 6:38 pm

      A new girl

      i agree with you.. he picked a woman that was vulnerable.. a woman he could mold.. a woman that became subserviant to him..
      a woman who gets no respect … from husband or son… shes there like a stepford wife to cook and bake .. clean house and produce minny frankensteins..in their bedroom lab…
      she is in denial alright.. she just doesnt want to believe it.. because than it would make her world less perfect.. being the wife of a judge lawyer what ever he is…she has an image she feels she has to maintain to the public.. but behind close doors.. who knows what goes on… a very dysfunctional family…how scarry .. almost like spending the night in a haunted house.. where there are bad spirits… evil lurks in the confinement of their torture.. chamber…
      wonder how they handle going out in public.. you cant hide forever.. you have to go to the grocery store. unless they pay for that tooo…
      they make a good case study for a shrink…

    12. brie on March 5th, 2008 9:28 pm

      Well I guess Paulus is still working and Anita is still teaching school even after they were told they weren’t welcome in Aruba. Haven’t heard anything different.

      I remember reading Anita was worried about Joran walking to the store after his release the 2nd time from jail and then she turned around and said the people in Aruba are supportive. The whole family is a bunch of liars.

      I wonder if Rudy removed Paulus from those committees like he said he was going to.

      Wish we could find out what’s going on over there.

    13. Dolf on March 6th, 2008 7:12 am

      brie, was it a politician who said they were not welcome anymore?

      cause that doesn’t mean that much

    14. misskatiekatie2u.. ALIAS MY THOUGHTS on March 6th, 2008 10:05 am

      brie
      i sure wouldnt want anita teaching my kids..
      shes already raised one screw up..
      seems like the island has double standards.. they are liars and two faced..
      doubting that pauulus was removed. from his comittes…
      that was for our ears only..
      disgusting to have her teach children.. brie do u know if anyone from aruba frequents this room? wonder if jossy has any info regarding your concern hmmm.

    Leave a Reply




    Support Scared Monkeys! make a donation.

     
     
    • NEWS (breaking news alerts or news tips)
    • Red (comments)
    • Dugga (technical issues)
    • Dana (radio show comments)
    • Klaasend (blog and forum issues)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Close
    E-mail It