Kathleen Savio, 3rd Wife of Drew Peterson, Death Ruled a Homicide … Stacy Peterson Still Missing

Its official … the death of Kathleen Savio was a drowning by homicide. Its pretty amazing what one can find and determine when one cares to find the truth as to how someone had died.

Kathleen Savio’s death was originally ruled an accidental death. However, that ruling has now been reversed and her death has been ruled a homicide. Drew Peterson now finds himself the ex-husband of a dead wife who’s death has been ruled a homicide and a present spouse of a missing wife, Stacy Peterson. One wonders how Drew Peterson, the person of interest in the disappearance of his present wife Stacy Peterson, feels about this new revelation. The police investigating the death of Kathleen Savio have a bit of explaining to do as well.

Peterson_savio1

Kathleen Savio, who was found dead in her bathtub in 2004, was the third wife of Bolingbrook Police Sgt. Drew Peterson. State’s Attorney James Glasgow has said evidence suggests that someone killed Savio and tried to make it look like an accident. Peterson is a suspect in his fourth wife’s disappearance. (AP Photo)

Read more

Natalee Holloway: John Q. Kelly On the Record … Civil Case & Where is the Missing Statements from Joran Van der Sloot ( Aruba Cover up & Corruption)

 ARUBAN COVER UP AND CORRUPTION … WHERE IS JORAN VAN DER SLOOT’S 5/31/05 WITNESS STATEMENT?

John Q. Kelly briefly discusses the Dutch reporting of a civil case possible being brought against Joran Van der Sloot by the parents of missing Natalee Holloway. At the moment it appears to be a non-story as Beth Holloway has had no conversations with the attorney in question.

However, the real question that has to be answered is what part did the Aruban police take in the cover up, corruption and destruction of documents and evidence in the case of Natalee Holloway. If they covered up and destroyed the initial witness statement, what else did they subsequently destroy as well? Possibly evidence taken from Deepak’s car? Once one questions police actions … all of their actions come under scrutiny.

Since the beginning of the investigation Beth Holloway had made references to a crumpled up piece of paper on that looked like a statement that was on the desk at the police station when she spoke with the ALE discussing her Natalee’s disappearance. Scared Monkeys has always questioned why there would have been no statement from Joran Van der Sloot, yet everyone else had been questioned at the outset. Are we really supposed to believe that no witness statement existed from the #1 prime suspect, Joran Van der Sloot, who was last seen with Natalee Holloway until 6/9/05.

The very same witness statement that Joran van der Sloot actually references in his own book. The very same witness statement that most likely gives rise to a confession and admission of guilt and where the ALE knew to ask questions of seizures.

Greta: He must have told the police that first time he spoke with them because why would they have asked Jug about the shaking and the epilepsy type seizures or something? I think to myself, what are the Aruban police up to? But that is for another day.

John Q. Kelly: May 31st Joran was the first person interviewed by Jacobs who was taking statements. Every police report subsequent to that. The statements made by Deepak, made by Satish, made by Beth that day we have them all. There is no statement from Joran until June 9th.

Greta: Something is funny. Something is not quite right. I would like to see our State Department get a little busy on this one. (Fox: On The Record 2/20/08)

Then there is this bit of information from Joran Van der Sloot’s book (translation) … “It is already 4 PM in the afternoon when I sign my witness statement and my father and I leave the interrogation room.”

Oh, I guess Joran Van der Sloot is lying here too?

WHAT WITNESS STATEMENT? NO ONE HAS EVER SEEN SUCH A STATEMENT! WHAT HAPPENED TO IT AND WHERE IS IT? WAS IT DESTROYED BY THE ARUBAN POLICE?

Interestingly enough we seem to have most, if not all the witness and suspect statements (HERE) from the initial parts of the investigation. All, but Joran Van der Sloot’s 5/31/05 statement that is in question. The very same one that probably tipped off the Aruban police to ask Beth Holloway and Jug Twitty about whether Natalee Holloway had a history of seizures.

From Page 111 of Joran’s book:

Tuesday May 31st 2005

Joran rides bus to school, takes exam, visits with principal Werner and sleeps in sick bay.

Paul calls school at 10:30am. Jan van der Straten wants Joran to give a voluntary witness statement, since the family was creating quite some noise.

Paul meets with principal, then he and Joran head to Bubali Station.

Joran calls Deepak who says, “stick to our story, the police has also phoned Satish and me and asked us to come.”

Scared Monkeys Radio Daily Commentary – Thursday, February 21, 2008 – More Violence, Murders and Crime In Society Due To Lack Of Good Male Father-Figure Role Models And Glorification Of Negative Influences

  • Dana ponders the comments of Dr. Bev Smallwood on last evening’s Dana Pretzer Show. What has created this “perfect storm of crime” that we’re seeing lately?

icon for podpress Download and Comment at ScaredMonkeysRadio.Com

The Dana Pretzer Show on Scared Monkeys Radio – Wednesday, February 20, 2008 – Guests Include Wendy Murphy, Robin Sax, Mark Geragos and Dr. Bev Smallwood

Join Dana this week as he welcomes:

Wendy_Murphy

  • Robin Sax, author, speaker, media analyst and Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney discussing the ruling preventing the re-arrest of Joran Van Der Sloot as well as other high profile cases.
  • Defense Attorney Mark Geragos discussing the ruling that prevented the re-arrest of Joran Van Der Sloot, and other cases currently in the news.
  • Psychologist, author and lecturer Dr. Bev Smallwood, Ph.D discusses the “Valentines Day Massacre” at Northern Illinois University.

icon for podpress Download and Comment at ScaredMonkeysRadio.Com

Patrick Van der Eem in Aruba for book & Aruban Prosecutors Want to Question him in Natalee Holloway Case

In Aruba they hold open the option to arrest the witness and not the prime suspect for questioning. Does anyone see anything just so amazingly wrong about every aspect of the investigation and prosecution of the Natalee Holloway case? It is like living in the bizzaro world. Joran Van der Sloot goes free while “Chief justice Hans Mos told the paper Van der Eem could be arrested if he does not come forward voluntarily”.

Welcome to the corrupt anti-world of Aruban and its justice system. Who is it that you should be questioning? Best yet threatening. Next thing we know they will be trying Patrick van der Eem for Natalee’s disappearance.

The Aruban public prosecutor wants to question Patrick van der Eem as a witness in the Natalee Holloway case

The Aruban public prosecutor wants to question Patrick van der Eem as a witness in the Natalee Holloway case, reports Tuesday’s NRC.

Chief justice Hans Mos told the paper Van der Eem could be arrested if he does not come forward voluntarily.

Van der Eem befriended suspect Joran van der Sloot and secretly recorded him confessing to being with Natalee Holloway when she died. He is currently on Aruba working on a book about the disappearance of the US teenager.

According to Van der Eem he has nothing to hide and the public prosecutor only has to ring him.

Infiltrator Van der Eem in Aruba for book  (Amigoe 2/18/2008)

Read more

← Previous PageNext Page →

Support Scared Monkeys! make a donation.

 
 
  • NEWS (breaking news alerts or news tips)
  • Red (comments)
  • Dugga (technical issues)
  • Dana (radio show comments)
  • Klaasend (blog and forum issues)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Close
E-mail It