Maybe NOW would Ask, Who is Actually Running for President … Bill or Hillary Clinton?

Hillary Clinton … a true feminist!

What would my campaign ever do with out the aid of my man’s coattails? Remember when Hillary Clinton said, “she was no Tammy Wynette stand-by-your-man woman staying home and baked cookies”.  From Monica Lewinski to her campaign run for the Democratic nomination for Presidency, that’s all she seems to do but stand behind.

(Vanderbilt – ‘08)

Rather than being required to lay out one’s views and positions on important issues of the American People, tactical
diversions are the red herrings employed by Mrs. Clinton.  Putting Bill before the cameras and the press assigns critical debate on those issues on the sidelines. Further focus on race and gender cards being flashed by the Clintons serves to obscure reasonable inquiry into Hillary’s fitness to serve our country. God knows just how much she is dependent on Mr. Bill’s charisma. He can make or break her future.

The National Organization of Woman has relegated itself in recent years to being nothing more than a party joke. They have remained quiet when women needed their help But did not lift a finger because of political affiliation. They supported a President who went against everything they supposedly stood for in the exploitation of women. Now the New York chapter of NOW is calling Senator Edward Kennedy’s endorsement of Barack Obama as a betrayal of women.

The New York chapter of The National Organization for Women accused Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of betraying women with his endorsement of Barack Obama, prompting the organization’s national office to come to the Massachusetts senator’s defense.

“Women have just experienced the ultimate betrayal,” NOW’s New York State chapter said in a scorching rebuke. “Senator Kennedy’s endorsement of Hillary Clinton’s opponent in the Democratic presidential primary campaign has really hit women hard.”

Maybe NOW would like to answer the question, who actually is running for president, Bill or Hillary Clinton? Better than that, maybe NOW would like to ask why their feminist poster child Hillary Clinton needs so much help from a man to get elected? I thought that NOW preached about woman being independent and standing on their own without men.

To further show just how insignificant NOW has become let’s take a look at their betrayal comments toward the Senior Senator from Massachusetts, Edward Kennedy. NOW calls Edward Kennedy’s backing of a political opponent other than a woman the “ultimate betrayal” toward woman.  Funny, I would have thought Chappaquiddick was. However, the National chapter of NOW has never had an issue with a well known womanizer like Kennedy.

Shortly after the local chapter reacted to Kennedy’s endorsement, the national office of NOW in Washington, D.C., which has endorsed Clinton, released its own statement.

“The National Organization for Women has enormous respect and admiration for Senator Edward Kennedy,” NOW President Kim Gandy wrote. “For decades Senator Kennedy has been a friend of NOW, and a leader and fighter for women’s civil and reproductive rights, and his record shows that.”

Gandy said her group respects Kennedy’s decision to back Obama.

“We continue to encourage women everywhere to express their opinions and exercise their right to vote,” she said. (Breitbart)

This futher shows what NOW really stands for. NOW has never been about all women. NOW is only for woman who drink the same Kool-Aid.

Baby Was Murdered Before Being Thrown Onto Texas Roadside Search was under way for Travis Mullis

Sick … truly sick. The search is underway for Travis Mullis after an autopsy was done on a 3 month old baby boy found on the roadside. It was determined that the baby had been murdered prior to being thrown from the vehicle.

GALVESTON, Texas —  An autopsy has found that a 3-month-old baby boy was murdered before being thrown onto a Galveston roadside, still strapped into his car seat.

The infant’s death was ruled a homicide by blunt force head trauma, said John Florence, chief investigator for the Galveston County Medical Examiner’s Office.

Police in Texas have identified the biological father of the baby, the last person known to be with the child, and are calling him a person of interest in the infant’s death, according to MyFoxHouston.

A search was under way for Travis Mullis, 21, after an Alvin woman, whose name hasn’t been released, tentatively identified the body as that of her son. She contacted police on Tuesday, saying she hadn’t seen her son since Mullis took him that morning.

Scared Monkeys Radio Daily Commentary – Wednesday, January 30, 2008 – Taser Scrutiny Is (Usually) Unjustifed

• Dana questions at what point use of a taser becomes excessive force.

Download and Comment at ScaredMonkeysRadio.Com

An Overview Of Military Deaths In The Past 26 Years

The following item found its way to my e-mail box today. A brief Google search took me to the source of the message, a posting by “gruffcw3″ on a web site called VAJOE.COM. With Red feeling under the weather today and taking a much needed break from the usual commentary, I thought I’d post this message for the Monkey faithful to discuss. – Dugga

Bet you didn’t know the following! I surely did not.

These are some rather eye-opening facts: Since the start of the war on terror in Iraq and Afganistan, the sacrifice has been enormous. In the time period from the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 through now, we have lost over 3000 military personnel to enemy action and accidents. As tragic as the loss of any member of the US Armed Forces is, consider the following statistics:

The annual fatalities of military members while actively serving in the armed forces from 1980 through 2006:

1980 ......... 2,392
1981 ......... 2,380
1984 ......... 1,999
1988 ......... 1,819
1989 ......... 1,636
1990 ......... 1,508
1991 ......... 1,787
1992 ......... 1,293 ----------
1993 ......... 1,213
1994 ......... 1,075
1995 ......... 2,465 8 Clinton years: 13,417 deaths
1996 ......... 2,318
1997 ......... 817
1998 ......... 2,252
1999 ......... 1,984 ----------
2000 ......... 1,983
2001 ......... 890
2002 ......... 1,007 7 BUSH years @ 9,016 deaths
2003 ......... 1,410
2004 ......... 1,887
2005 ......... 919
2006.......... 920 ----------

If you are confused when you look at these figures…so was I.

Do these figures mean that the loss from the two latest conflicts in the Middle East are LESS than the loss of military personnel during Mr. Clinton ‘s presidency; when America wasn’t even involved in a war? And, I was even more confused; when I read that in 1980, during the reign of President (Nobel Peace Prize) Jimmy Carter, there were 2,392 US military fatalities!

These figures indicate that many of our Media & Politicians will pick and choose. They present only those ‘facts’ which support their agenda-driven reporting. Why do so many of them march in lock-step to twist the truth. Where do so many of them get their marching-orders for their agenda?

Our Mainstream Print and TV media, and many Politicians like to slant; that these brave men and women,who are losing their lives in Iraq, are mostly minorities! Wrong AGAIN— just one more media lie! The latest census, of Americans, shows the following distribution of American citizens, by Race:

European descent (White).... 69.12%
Hispanic ................... 12.50%
Black....................... 12.30%
Asian ....................... 3.70%
Native American ............. 1.00%
Other ....................... 2.60%

Now… here are the fatalities by Race; over the past three years in Iraqi Freedom:

European descent (white) .... 74.31%
Hispanic .................... 10.74%
Black ........................ 9.67%
Asian ........................ 1.81%
Native American .............. 1.09%
Other ........................ 0.33%

These statistics are published by Congressional Research Service, and they may be confirmed by anyone at:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf (Please look at this report site if you have the chance.)

Now ask yourself these two questions:
1. ‘Why does the mainstream Print and TV Media never provide statistics like these?’
2. ‘Why do the mainstream media hate the web as much as they do?’

You do the Math! These figures don’t lie… but, Media-liars figure…and they sway public opinion!

UPDATE: More discussion of this controversial message is going on here as well.

Scared Monkeys Radio Daily Commentary – Tuesday, January 29, 2008 – “Don’t You Have Anything Better To Do?”

• Dana brings us the story of a liberal moonbat-infested Vermont town considering indicting President and Vice-President Bush and Cheney for “war crimes.”

Download and Comment at ScaredMonkeysRadio.Com