Maybe NOW would Ask, Who is Actually Running for President … Bill or Hillary Clinton?
Hillary Clinton … a true feminist!
What would my campaign ever do with out the aid of my man’s coattails? Remember when Hillary Clinton said, “she was no Tammy Wynette stand-by-your-man woman staying home and baked cookies”. From Monica Lewinski to her campaign run for the Democratic nomination for Presidency, that’s all she seems to do but stand behind.
(Vanderbilt – ‘08)
Rather than being required to lay out one’s views and positions on important issues of the American People, tactical
diversions are the red herrings employed by Mrs. Clinton. Putting Bill before the cameras and the press assigns critical debate on those issues on the sidelines. Further focus on race and gender cards being flashed by the Clintons serves to obscure reasonable inquiry into Hillary’s fitness to serve our country. God knows just how much she is dependent on Mr. Bill’s charisma. He can make or break her future.
The National Organization of Woman has relegated itself in recent years to being nothing more than a party joke. They have remained quiet when women needed their help But did not lift a finger because of political affiliation. They supported a President who went against everything they supposedly stood for in the exploitation of women. Now the New York chapter of NOW is calling Senator Edward Kennedy’s endorsement of Barack Obama as a betrayal of women.
The New York chapter of The National Organization for Women accused Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of betraying women with his endorsement of Barack Obama, prompting the organization’s national office to come to the Massachusetts senator’s defense.
“Women have just experienced the ultimate betrayal,” NOW’s New York State chapter said in a scorching rebuke. “Senator Kennedy’s endorsement of Hillary Clinton’s opponent in the Democratic presidential primary campaign has really hit women hard.”
Maybe NOW would like to answer the question, who actually is running for president, Bill or Hillary Clinton? Better than that, maybe NOW would like to ask why their feminist poster child Hillary Clinton needs so much help from a man to get elected? I thought that NOW preached about woman being independent and standing on their own without men.
To further show just how insignificant NOW has become let’s take a look at their betrayal comments toward the Senior Senator from Massachusetts, Edward Kennedy. NOW calls Edward Kennedy’s backing of a political opponent other than a woman the “ultimate betrayal” toward woman. Funny, I would have thought Chappaquiddick was. However, the National chapter of NOW has never had an issue with a well known womanizer like Kennedy.
Shortly after the local chapter reacted to Kennedy’s endorsement, the national office of NOW in Washington, D.C., which has endorsed Clinton, released its own statement.
“The National Organization for Women has enormous respect and admiration for Senator Edward Kennedy,” NOW President Kim Gandy wrote. “For decades Senator Kennedy has been a friend of NOW, and a leader and fighter for women’s civil and reproductive rights, and his record shows that.”
Gandy said her group respects Kennedy’s decision to back Obama.
“We continue to encourage women everywhere to express their opinions and exercise their right to vote,” she said. (Breitbart)
This futher shows what NOW really stands for. NOW has never been about all women. NOW is only for woman who drink the same Kool-Aid.
Posted January 30, 2008 by Scared Monkeys
Hillary Clinton, Politics, Presidential Election 2008 | one comment
If you liked this post, you may also like these:
One Response to “Maybe NOW would Ask, Who is Actually Running for President … Bill or Hillary Clinton?”
Leave a Reply
That’s who’s really running.