The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of Sentencing of Sex Offender Cases


Sentencing of sex offenders in different states has run the gambit from less than a slap on the Sex_offenderwrist to making sure they never see the light of day. Of course the latter is preferred so that no individual needs to be “the next victim” as sex offender escalate their crimes. How judges have dealt with “sex offenders” has become quite an issue.

Here are some recent dealing with sex offenders in the courts, The Good The Bad and The Ugly.

Note, the “Ugly” more refers to the most heinous nature of what this predator did and the number of victims. 800 year sentence is more than good … Its GREAT!!!

Posted February 10, 2007 by
Child Welfare, Crime, Sex Offender | one comment

If you liked this post, you may also like these:

  • So Raping 13 Year Old Girls is OK if you are 5′ -1″ (Richard W. Thompson – Sex Offender)
  • Sex Offender Alfonso Rodriguez Jr. found guilty of kidnapping resulting in Dru Sjodin’s death
  • New Jersey Sex Offender Residency Laws Create Conundrum For Landlords and Sellers
  • Amber Alert New Jersey: Terry Dusseault, 8, Abducted By Sex Offender Father
  • Oklahoma Police Want felony molestation charges against a sex offender Neil Rodreick

  • Comments

    One Response to “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of Sentencing of Sex Offender Cases”

    1. joe bear on February 11th, 2007 3:59 pm

      sentence is to short

    Leave a Reply

    Support Scared Monkeys! make a donation.

    • NEWS (breaking news alerts or news tips)
    • Red (comments)
    • Dugga (technical issues)
    • Dana (radio show comments)
    • Klaasend (blog and forum issues)
    E-mail It