Obama Says the Hell with the 4th Amendment, Calls Airport pat-downs Frustrating but Necessary

Barack Obama … The Audacity of Grope.

President Barack Hussein Obama says the trashing of the 4th Amendment of the US Constitution frustrating but necessary. So why does Obama think that it is necessary to feel up children, cancer survivor women with breast prosthesis, nuns and any one who does not look like a Islamic radical Muslim terrorist. After all, Obama can’t even mention the word “war on terror” or radical Islam, so why does he think it is necessary to trash America’s civil rights?

President Obama said today he sympathizes with passenger complaints about aggressive body pat-downs at airports, but his counter-terrorism aides say they are necessary to guard against hidden explosives.

Balancing privacy and security is a “tough situation,” Obama told reporters at a news conference following the NATO summit in Lisbon, Portugal.

“One of the most frustrating aspects of this fight against terrorism is that it has created a whole security apparatus around us that causes a huge inconvenience for all of us,” Obama said.

The Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution specifically guards against unreasonable searches and seizures and also requires search and arrest warrants be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause.

Amendment 4 – Search and Seizure
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Who thinks that Obama would let a TSA agent touch his “JUNK”? Sorry, but this same president said we needed Obamacare and a ridiculous stimulus package when we did not. Most likely, Obama has been such a failure when it has come to domestic policy like health care, the economy, jobs and unemployment that he knows if there was one slight sucessful terrorist act on his watch that his approval ratings would go to the 20′s. Because of that he is willing to take away all rights and forget that we have a US Constitution.

Think Barack Obama would let hos wife or daughters get felt up by the TSA … NEVER!

Um, what would Obama know about any kind of inconvenience caused by the TSA. Is Obama groped (sexually assaulted) or forced to have naked pics of “The One” before he gets on Air Force One? Is Obama’s wife Michelle, or his two young daughters, Malia and Sasha, forced to be felt up by TSA officials or have naked body scans? Hardly.

Why is President Obama against the torture of radical Muslim terrorist but for the shredding of innocent Americans Fourth Amendment rights? Why is Obama against profiling terrorists, but for the humiliation and assaults on women and children?

WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PRESIDENT?

They claim it is in the name of safety, yet Obama and Democrats are against going specifically after and targeting Muslim terrorists.

The Audacity of TSA Grope: Airport Passengers Face $11,000 Fines For Refusing to be Groped

Welcome to America, the “home of the free” and the … well it used to be.

As reported in the Sun Sentinel, airport travel passengers that if you do not submit to having naked scans or a sexual groping that you will be fined $11,000 and face possible arrest. yes, that is what it has come to. Your rights of privacy have been taken from you. Sounds like Obamacare.

A note to the TSA, Napolitano and Obama … if this is your answer to security, the terrorists have won.

If you don’t want to pass through an airport scanner that allows security agents to see an image of your naked body or to undergo the alternative, a thorough manual search, you may have to find another way to travel this holiday season.

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is warning that any would-be commercial airline passenger who enters an airport checkpoint and then refuses to undergo the method of inspection designated by TSA will not be allowed to fly and also will not be permitted to simply leave the airport.

That person will have to remain on the premises to be questioned by the TSA and possibly by local law enforcement. Anyone refusing faces fines up to $11,000 and possible arrest.

The ACLU has finally decided to support a cause that does not have a political agenda. As stated by the Gateway Pundit, get feeled up or fined … what options, eh?

Meanwhile, the American Civil Liberties Union was urging Americans to petition the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the TSA, to change the new policies.

“All of us have a right to travel without such crude invasions of our privacy,” the ACLU said in a statement. “Tell DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano to put in place security measures that respect passengers’ privacy rights. You shouldn’t have to check your rights when you check your luggage.”

TSA Takes “Naked” Body Scan that Reveal all of 12 Year Old Girl Without Parents Present… Since When is This Legal?

WTF!!! So taking revealing pics of 12 year olds is OK without parental consent? That’s correct, let’s pick the 12 year old girl out of the line and subject her to a full body scan but let the 22 year old male from Yemen to pass through unscathed.

So we are supposed to trust the TSA, huh?

Since when is taking revealing, naked pics of 12 year old girls legal? In most every other venue and instance such an act would be considered child porn. However, not with the TSA. So it’s ok for the TSA to do wht is in essence strip searches of 12 year old girls without their parents present? That is exactly what happened to a Baltimore, MD family and their 12 year old daughter.

There’s been lots of talk lately about body scanners — the new airport security tool that allows screeners to see through clothes. People are concerned about privacy, delayed flights, health effects.

Now there’s another concern. What about kids? Do they have to go through this, too? And what are parents’ rights?

Read more

Cathy Bossi, Cancer Survivor Flight Attendant Forced to Remove Prosthetic Breast During TSA Groping

THE AUDACITY OF GROPE … TSA FIASCO #30. 

Since when do we provide criminals more rights in the Unites States than we do people just trying to get on a plane?

How many of these stories do we need to hear in order for these TSA assaults to stop! Cathy Bossi, a 3year breast cancer survivor and a flight attendant who has worked the past 28 years for US Air was forced to show her prosthetic breast during a pat-down. WTF!!!

In early August Bossie was walking through security when she says she was asked to go through the new full body-scanners at Concourse “D” at Charlotte Douglas International.

She reluctantly agreed.  As a 3-year breast cancer survivor she says she didn’t want the added radiation through her body.  But, Bossi says she did agree.

Read more

TSA Love Pats as Sen. Claire McCaskill (MO-D) Says or Sexual Assault?

What ever happen to probably cause?

As the TSA tries to defend their over the top violations of Americans individual rights and some US Senators like Claire McCaskill (MO-D) have the foolish notion to compare them to “love pats”, an Ohio woman traveling with a baby stated on Fox News that her experience was much different. The woman called it a sexually assaulted by a TSA agent and went on to describe the horrific experience. 

As stated at the Gateway Pundit, “Sorry, Claire, this was no love pat.”

However, maybe US Senators will have special rules for having their junk touched. Is this where we have gotten to in America where criminals are set free for not being mirandized and evidence is thrown out of court by judges for illegal search and seizures, yet innocent individuals flying are sexually assaulted by the TSA?

EXIT QUESTION: Is the TSA sure none of their employees are sexual predators?