Obama Says the Hell with the 4th Amendment, Calls Airport pat-downs Frustrating but Necessary


Barack Obama … The Audacity of Grope.

President Barack Hussein Obama says the trashing of the 4th Amendment of the US Constitution frustrating but necessary. So why does Obama think that it is necessary to feel up children, cancer survivor women with breast prosthesis, nuns and any one who does not look like a Islamic radical Muslim terrorist. After all, Obama can’t even mention the word “war on terror” or radical Islam, so why does he think it is necessary to trash America’s civil rights?

President Obama said today he sympathizes with passenger complaints about aggressive body pat-downs at airports, but his counter-terrorism aides say they are necessary to guard against hidden explosives.

Balancing privacy and security is a “tough situation,” Obama told reporters at a news conference following the NATO summit in Lisbon, Portugal.

“One of the most frustrating aspects of this fight against terrorism is that it has created a whole security apparatus around us that causes a huge inconvenience for all of us,” Obama said.

The Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution specifically guards against unreasonable searches and seizures and also requires search and arrest warrants be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause.

Amendment 4 – Search and Seizure
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Who thinks that Obama would let a TSA agent touch his “JUNK”? Sorry, but this same president said we needed Obamacare and a ridiculous stimulus package when we did not. Most likely, Obama has been such a failure when it has come to domestic policy like health care, the economy, jobs and unemployment that he knows if there was one slight sucessful terrorist act on his watch that his approval ratings would go to the 20′s. Because of that he is willing to take away all rights and forget that we have a US Constitution.

Think Barack Obama would let hos wife or daughters get felt up by the TSA … NEVER!

Um, what would Obama know about any kind of inconvenience caused by the TSA. Is Obama groped (sexually assaulted) or forced to have naked pics of “The One” before he gets on Air Force One? Is Obama’s wife Michelle, or his two young daughters, Malia and Sasha, forced to be felt up by TSA officials or have naked body scans? Hardly.

Why is President Obama against the torture of radical Muslim terrorist but for the shredding of innocent Americans Fourth Amendment rights? Why is Obama against profiling terrorists, but for the humiliation and assaults on women and children?


They claim it is in the name of safety, yet Obama and Democrats are against going specifically after and targeting Muslim terrorists.

If you liked this post, you may also like these:

  • Hillary Clinton Says, TSA Pat Down’s for Thee, Not For Me … she would not want to submit to an airport security pat-down”
  • Don’t mess with Texas … Texas House Bans Offensive Security Pat-Downs
  • This is Necessary? TSA Pat Down Leaves Bladder Cancer Patient Humiliated & Covered in Urine
  • TSA Says they Will Keep Feeling Up Passengers, Uses Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution as Excuse
  • The Audacity of TSA Grope: Airport Passengers Face $11,000 Fines For Refusing to be Groped

  • Comments

    11 Responses to “Obama Says the Hell with the 4th Amendment, Calls Airport pat-downs Frustrating but Necessary”

    1. Tweets that mention Obama Says the Hell with the 4th Amendment, Calls Airport pat-downs Frustrating but Necessary | Scared Monkeys -- Topsy.com on November 20th, 2010 10:02 pm

      [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Bob Connors, Airport. Airport said: Obama Says the Hell with the 4th Amendment, Calls Airport pat-downs Frustrating but Necessary: Source: scaredmon… http://bit.ly/dC8Ku4 [...]

    2. Steve Holloway on November 20th, 2010 10:07 pm

      He wants to punish the American people for going against Him and his dems.

      I say that because why would he at the first of this part of the speech say HE didn’t have to be searched…. But YOU DO and theirs nothing you can do about it because it’s about safety ha ha.

      No way would he let this happen to his girls.

      Think about that for a minute.

      Israel has it right and that’s how we need to do it.

    3. Tamikosmom on November 20th, 2010 10:39 pm


      This Canadian’s daughter, SIL and four grandkids returned last week from a wonderful Florida holiday. Screen searches were where it was at. No complaints from the kids but daughter and SIL … while feeling very uncomfortable with the process … believed that without an alternative the screening was necessary from a safety perspective. It should be understood that those reading the screen images are in another area and are not able to observe respective passengers. BTW … my SIL is a commercial pilot.

      If these screen searches had been applied on the morning of 9/11 … maybe 2000 lives would not have been sacrificed in the name of Allah.

      Red … while I have been reading your blogs on the topic … I was thinking that Islamic terrorists would agree with you 100% and … knowing your positions regarding some of the issues of Islam … agreement does not happen often. LOL

      SM: Actually Janet if profiling was applied on 9-11, 3000 would not have died. Also remember that every thing the terrorist brought on the flights were legal back then. The body scans or pat downs would not have prevented any thing actually.

      Sorry if I happen to think that there is a better way to deal with terrorism than treat everyone including you as being a terrorist.

    4. Tamikosmom on November 20th, 2010 11:22 pm


      I am not disagreeing with you when you state that the screening/patdown process is invasive but … what is an effective alternative.

      If profiling was where it was at … the terrorist would change his/her profile. Maybe children’s teddy bears would be where it was at … maybe a nun’s habit.

      Anyways … time for a game of Scrabble.

      Good Night All
      SM: I hear what you are saying, but the answer cannot be to take every ones rights away. If so, the terrorist have won.

      However, folks like Obama do not want to waterboard terrorist to get info, yet they would treat Americans like criminals. If we allow these types of searces, yet allow criminal rights to searches, we truly had met Obama in Wonderland.


    5. PA Mom on November 20th, 2010 11:43 pm

      I know a lot of people that won’t be flying anytime soon, and this includes me. If I can’t get there by car or train, I won’t be going.

    6. rightknight on November 21st, 2010 2:26 am

      So, are we to assume that rubber gloves snaking up
      under burqas and hijabs is going to be the new standard
      inspection of Islamic women? What about a surgical implant
      in a sympathizer? Oh, my!

    7. Steve Holloway on November 21st, 2010 9:35 am

      The terrorists are NOW experimenting by surgical implanting the bomb into the body which means it can’t be detected and also by inserting the bomb into a body opening like drug runners’

    8. southernsue on November 21st, 2010 9:44 am

      this needs to stop. it is enraging watching these small children getting stripped searched. we teach our kids not to let strangers near them and now we have people at the airports doing just that.

      grab your kids and run as fast as you can and if they try to stop you just yell back that you will see them in court. at least your child will not have to go through this ridiculous search.

      the terrorist are laughing at us.

    9. nun on November 21st, 2010 11:10 am

      When he and his family comply, then I will consider his arguments for this intrusive, invasive, and ineffective screening method.

    10. Dolf on November 22nd, 2010 10:01 am

      what has this got to do with Obama?

      if he would hace said the oposite..you would have shouted that he didn’t protect you well enough

    11. super dave on November 22nd, 2010 11:28 am

      i say give obama a cavity search with a louisville slugger. large end first.

    Leave a Reply

    Support Scared Monkeys! make a donation.

    • NEWS (breaking news alerts or news tips)
    • Red (comments)
    • Dugga (technical issues)
    • Dana (radio show comments)
    • Klaasend (blog and forum issues)
    E-mail It