FBI & DOJ Agreed to Destroy Laptops of Hillary Clinton Aides with Immunity Deal (VIDEO)

HOW MUCH MORE CORRUPT CAN IT GET, THE FBI HAS NO MORE CREDIBILITY, THEY ARE NOTHING MORE THAN A COVER UP ENTITY FOR OBAMA AND HILLARY CLINTON …

As reported at FOX News, the FBI and Department of Justice agreed to immunity deals for two top Hillary Clinton aides included a side arrangement obliging the FBI to destroy their laptops after reviewing the devices. UNREAL. The arrangement was with former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills and ex-campaign staffer Heather Samuelson and also limited the search to no later than Jan. 31, 2015. This entire FBI investigation stinks to the high heavens and it is now obvious that FBI director James Comey has no credibility and he is nothing more than a political tool. As Legal Insurrection opines, once again, more information only leads to more questions instead of answers. Doesn’t it make you wonder why Clinton aides would have needed immunity deals for laptops when the devices were government property?

THIS IS JUST ONE BIG COVER-UP, CORRUPT, CORRUPT, CORRUPT!!!

Immunity deals for two top Hillary Clinton aides included a side arrangement obliging the FBI to destroy their laptops after reviewing the devices, House Judiciary Committee sources told Fox News on Monday.

Sources said the arrangement with former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills and ex-campaign staffer Heather Samuelson also limited the search to no later than Jan. 31, 2015. This meant investigators could not review documents for the period after the email server became public — in turn preventing the bureau from discovering if there was any evidence of obstruction of justice, sources said.

The Republican chairman of the House Judiciary Committee fired off a letter Monday to Attorney General Loretta Lynch asking why the DOJ and FBI agreed to the restrictive terms, including that the FBI would destroy the laptops after finishing the search.

“Like many things about this case, these new materials raise more questions than answers,” Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., wrote in the letter obtained by Fox News.

“Doesn’t the willingness of Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson to have their laptops destroyed by the FBI contradict their claim that the laptops could have been withheld because they contained non-relevant, privileged information? If so, doesn’t that undermine the claim that the side agreements were necessary?” Goodlatte asks.

The immunity deals for Mills and Samuelson, made as part of the FBI’s probe into Clinton’s use of a private email server when she served as secretary of state, apparently included a series of “side agreements” that were negotiated by Samuelson and Mills’ attorney Beth Wilkinson.

The side deals were agreed to on June 10, less than a month before FBI Director James Comey announced that the agency would recommend no charges be brought against Clinton or her staff.

Director Comey, you are worse than a WEASEL.

Donald Trump Calls for Special Prosecutor to Investigate “Crooked Hillary Clinton” and Clinton Foundation (VIDEO)

IT IS OBVIOUS THAT OBAMA ADMINISTRATION WILL NOT HONESTLY INVESTIGATE HILLARY CLINTON … TRUMP CALLS FOR SPECIAL PROSECUTOR.

As reported at FOX News, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump called for an “expedited investigation” by a special prosecutor into “pay-to-play” dealings at the Clinton Foundation. Actually America, let’s call it for what it really was … influence peddling. Trump said that if he was elected president, he would appoint a special prosecutor. The Clinton Foundation has been nothing more than a Clinton slush fund and as Trump stated, the Clinton Foundation “is one of the most corrupt enterprises in political history.” Trump stated that the Foundation should be shut down and the money should be given back. Trump went on to say that the Obama administration, FBI and Justice Department have already shown that they are incapably of fairly and without bias investigate Hillary Clinton and her crimes … its time for a special prosecutor now!

Trump discusses the new 15,000 emails and calls for a special prosecutor immediately, immediately, immediately.

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump called for an “expedited investigation” by a special prosecutor into “pay-to-play” accusations involving the Clinton Foundation, amid new allegations the group sought special access for donors with Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

“The Clintons made the State Department into the same kind of pay-to-play operations as the Arkansas government was: pay the Clinton Foundation huge sums of money and throw in some big speaking fees for Bill Clinton and you got to play with the State Department,” Trump said at a campaign rally Monday night in Akron, Ohio.

“The amounts involved, the favors done, the significant amount of time, require an expedited investigation by a special prosecutor immediately, immediately,” he added.

Trump also called the investigation by the FBI and Justice Department into Clinton’s private email server a “whitewash,” and said the two agencies “cannot be trusted to quickly or impartially investigate Hillary Clinton’s crimes.”

A review of State Department call logs for Cheryl Mills, the longtime Clinton confidant who served as chief of staff for the entirety of Clinton’s four-year tenure as America’s top diplomat, reflects at least 148 messages from Laura Graham – then the Clinton Foundation’s chief operating officer – between 2010 and 2012. No other individual or non-profit appears in the logs with anything like that frequency or volume, the review found.

WAPO Slams Lying Hillary Clinton … Clinton’s Claim that the FBI Director said Her Email Enswers were ‘Truthful’

HILLARY CLINTON IS A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR …

The WAPO just called Hillary Clinton a LIAR! Hillary Clinton went on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace and just lied through her teeth. It is unbelievable that even after FBI director Comey stated that she lied, was not trustworthy and said that Hillary Clinton mislead the America public and she is still lying. UNREAL. The FBI director said that Clinton was extremely careless and negligent.

AMERICA, DO YOU REALLY WANT TO ELECT A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR AS PRESIDENT?

Hillary Clinton Interview at FOX NEWS SUNDAY, 7/31/16

(Just lying thru her teeth at the 14:20 mark)

“Director Comey said my answers were truthful, and what I’ve said is consistent with what I have told the American people, that there were decisions discussed and made to classify retroactively certain of the emails.”
—Hillary Clinton, interview on “Fox News Sunday,” July 31, 2016

Clinton made these remarks after “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace played a video of her saying: “I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified materials. I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time. I had not sent classified material nor received anything marked classified.”

As Wallace put it, “After a long investigation, FBI Director James Comey said none of those things that you told the American public were true.”

Trey Gowdy GRILLS James Comey On Hillary Clinton Emails 7/7/16

After Clinton denied that, Wallace played another video of an exchange between Comey and Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), chair of the House Select Committee on Benghazi:

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received. Was that true?
COMEY: That’s not true.
GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said, “I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material.” Was that true?
COMEY: There was classified material emailed.

As Right Scoop opines, the WAPO gave Hillary Clinton 4 Pinocchio’s.

As we have seen repeatedly in Clinton’s explanations of the email controversy, she relies on excessively technical and legalistic answers to explain her actions. While Comey did say there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public — which was the point of Wallace’s question. Comey has repeatedly not taken a stand on her public statements.

And although Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified, he also said that there were some emails that were already classified that should not have been sent on an unclassified, private server. That’s the uncomfortable truth that Clinton has trouble admitting.

FBI Director James Comey to Face Questions on Clinton Investigation

COMEY ON THE HOT SEAT …

FBI Director James Comey will face the music this morning and have to answer Congress as to how he could lay out a case against Clinton and her “gross negligence” in handling classified emails and then suddenly do a U-turn and state he will not recommend charges. But of course this was not political. Of course not. Sorry, its a sad day when a government employee could act so reckless and purposely send and receive classified emails and then be let off the hook. The fix was in from the outset.

FBI Director James Comey will be facing skeptical and angry Congressional Republicans this morning in a hastily called hearing on Capitol Hill.The criminal case against Hillary Clinton and her aides is closed, but top Republicans want to know why she was not prosecuted for mishandling classified information while using a private email server as Secretary of State

Tuesday, Comey harshly criticized Clinton and her State Department team for being “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly-classified information. But then, Comey announced that the FBI would recommend against charging Clinton or her aides criminally.

The decision set off a firestorm of criticism from Republicans, and prompted a quick call for Congressional hearings.

“The FBI’s recommendation is surprising and confusing,” Rep. Jason Chaffetz said in a statement announcing today’s hearing. “The fact pattern presented by Director Comey makes clear Secretary Clinton violated the law. Individuals who intentionally skirt the law must be held accountable.”

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan said the decision looked like “preferential treatment for Clinton.”

FBI Director James Comey Rewrites Federal Law to Let Hillary Clinton Off the Hook … Recommends No Charges Eventhough She Used “Gross Negligence” with Emails (VIDEO)

THE FIX WAS IN ALL ALONG … DONALD TRUMP IS CORRECT, IT IS A RIGGED SYSTEM.

FBI Director James Comey systematically laid out the case as to why Hillary Clinton should be indicted of a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18) of which she met every criteria of the charge and then he did a 180 and recommended no charges be sought against Hillary Clinton. In order to do such a thing, Comey had to rewrite the federal statute to serve his own, Barack Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s purpose. UNREAL. It is a sad and shameful day when the FBI has now become politicized as pretty much every department has become under Barack Obama, add to it the EPA, FCC, IRS and AG. However, just because Director Comey did not recommend charges be brought against Hillary, he did eviscerate her and basically called her a liar and that she acted in a reckless behavior and was “extremely careless” (aka. ”Gross Negligence”)

Watch Comey’s full speech as it is hardly paints a nice picture of Hillary Clinton and in no ways states she is innocent. To the contrary, Comely calls Hillary a liar.

There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine), Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18): With lawful access to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust. Director Comey even conceded that former Secretary Clinton was “extremely careless” and strongly suggested that her recklessness very likely led to communications (her own and those she corresponded with) being intercepted by foreign intelligence services.

Yet, Director Comey recommended against prosecution of the law violations he clearly found on the ground that there was no intent to harm the United States.

In essence, in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote the statute, inserting an intent element that Congress did not require. The added intent element, moreover, makes no sense: The point of having a statute that criminalizes gross negligence is to underscore that government officials have a special obligation to safeguard national defense secrets; when they fail to carry out that obligation due to gross negligence, they are guilty of serious wrongdoing. The lack of intent to harm our country is irrelevant. People never intend the bad things that happen due to gross negligence.

As The Gateway Pundit reminds us … Remember when Hillary Clinton stated at the Democrat Party debate in January 17, 2016, “There should be no individual too powerful to jail.” That is unless you last name is Clinton and you are a Democrat in the corrupt Obama administration.