RSSFBI Director James Comey Rewrites Federal Law to Let Hillary Clinton Off the Hook … Recommends No Charges Eventhough She Used “Gross Negligence” with Emails (VIDEO)
THE FIX WAS IN ALL ALONG … DONALD TRUMP IS CORRECT, IT IS A RIGGED SYSTEM.
FBI Director James Comey systematically laid out the case as to why Hillary Clinton should be indicted of a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18) of which she met every criteria of the charge and then he did a 180 and recommended no charges be sought against Hillary Clinton. In order to do such a thing, Comey had to rewrite the federal statute to serve his own, Barack Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s purpose. UNREAL. It is a sad and shameful day when the FBI has now become politicized as pretty much every department has become under Barack Obama, add to it the EPA, FCC, IRS and AG. However, just because Director Comey did not recommend charges be brought against Hillary, he did eviscerate her and basically called her a liar and that she acted in a reckless behavior and was “extremely careless” (aka. ”Gross Negligence”)
Watch Comey’s full speech as it is hardly paints a nice picture of Hillary Clinton and in no ways states she is innocent. To the contrary, Comely calls Hillary a liar.
There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine), Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18): With lawful access to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust. Director Comey even conceded that former Secretary Clinton was “extremely careless” and strongly suggested that her recklessness very likely led to communications (her own and those she corresponded with) being intercepted by foreign intelligence services.
Yet, Director Comey recommended against prosecution of the law violations he clearly found on the ground that there was no intent to harm the United States.
In essence, in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote the statute, inserting an intent element that Congress did not require. The added intent element, moreover, makes no sense: The point of having a statute that criminalizes gross negligence is to underscore that government officials have a special obligation to safeguard national defense secrets; when they fail to carry out that obligation due to gross negligence, they are guilty of serious wrongdoing. The lack of intent to harm our country is irrelevant. People never intend the bad things that happen due to gross negligence.
As The Gateway Pundit reminds us … Remember when Hillary Clinton stated at the Democrat Party debate in January 17, 2016, “There should be no individual too powerful to jail.” That is unless you last name is Clinton and you are a Democrat in the corrupt Obama administration.
Posted July 6, 2016 by Scared Monkeys collusion, Conspiracy, Corruption, Cover-Up, cronyism, Ethics, FBI, Hillary Clinton, Liars, WTF, You Got Email-gate, You Tube - VIDEO | 3 comments |
If you liked this post, you may also like these:
Comments
3 Responses to “FBI Director James Comey Rewrites Federal Law to Let Hillary Clinton Off the Hook … Recommends No Charges Eventhough She Used “Gross Negligence” with Emails (VIDEO)”
Leave a Reply
[...] announcement comes a day after FBI Director James Comey held a press conference in which he said “no reasonable prosecutor” would pursue a case against [...]
[...] Clinton. Of course there was no mention from Justice Ginsburg that Hillary was a liar and an unindicted fraud who put the United States national security at risk with the use of her private email server while [...]
[...] US documents and the cover up and deletion of 33,000 emails after having been subpoenaed. And the FBI did nothing even though there was an obvious mountain of evidence against her. But that is what happens when we [...]