Hillary Clinton: You ‘Cannot be Civil’ with Republicans … Only When Democrats “Win Back the House and or the Senate, that’s when Civility can Start Again.” (VIDEO)

UNREAL … SO DEMOCRATS WILL ONLY BE CIVIL IF THEY GET THEIR WAY? ALL THE REASON WHY AMERICA SHOULD NEVER GIVE BACK THE POWER TO THESE INSANE BULLIES.

Yesterday Hillary Clinton, the 2016 Democrat presidential candidate who in losing to Donald Trump stated in her concession speech that she would work with him and claimed she wanted him to be a successful president for all Americans. She claimed America was big enough for everyone. Just more Clinton lies. Everyone, but those she and the LEFT disagree with. Now we hear Hillary Clinton say in a CNN interview call for a lack of civility …  “You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about. She went on to say, “That’s why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and or the Senate, that’s when civility can start.”

America, the LEFT is not being civil, they are acting as an angry mob, threatening violence, trying to intimidate and forcing individuals out of restaurants and movie theaters to get their way. This is not civil disobedience, its mob rule, its bullying. But when you have politicians like Hillary Clinton, Maxine Waters and Cory Booker promoting it, what would one expect? Democrats will only act civil if they win back the House or Senate, are you kidding? We all know to stand up to a bully and never give a bully their way, right? I hope, I really hope in the 2018 midterms, America stands up to this insanity and teaches the LEFT a lessen like they have never seen.

Is this what the LEFT has become, vote us in and believe like us or we will riot? President Trump is correct when he says, the Democrat party has become too insane.

Hillary Clinton says the time for civility is over.

After the bitter and partisan fight over the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the former secretary of State and 2016 Democratic presidential candidate declared that President Donald Trump has undermined the integrity of the nation’s highest court and that it’s time for Democrats to be “tougher” with their opponents, in an interview with CNN published Tuesday

“You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about,” Clinton told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour. “That’s why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again.”

Clinton said that Senate Republicans under Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., “demeaned the confirmation process” and “insulted and attacked” Christine Blasey Ford – who testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee about a sexual assault she alleges Kavanaugh committed in 1982 – along with other “women who were speaking out.”

Listen to Hillary’s lies from her 2016 concession speech. She never intended to wok with Trump, she was the resistance before, during and after.

Independents Disapprove of Democrats’ Handling of the Brett Kavanaugh SCOTUS Nomination by a 28 Point Margin

INDEPENDENTS DISAPPROVE OF HOW DEMOCRATS HANDLED KAVANAUGH NOMINATION … HOW WILL THIS AFFECT THE MIDTERM ELECTIONS?

As reported at the Washington Examiner, an overwhelming majority of independents disapprove with the Democrats handling of the Brett Kavanaugh SCOTUS nomination process. By a 28 point margin, independents disapprove of how Democrats Democrats handled the Supreme Court nomination of judge Kavanaugh. This cannot bode well for Democrats in the upcoming 2018 midterm elections. The Kavanaugh vote has energized both bases; however, the energy from the right is trending upwards ans appears to be in line with independents.

The insanity from the LEFT is over the top as protesters, many paid, have taken this too far and jumped the shark. The more foolishness, disrespect and craziness, the more moderates and middle of the road folks think that we can never give these people power.

This is what insanity and mob rule looks like … How do you think this plays with indies and middle America?

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

What’s interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Democrats: We Already Know Know Brett Kavanaugh Is Guilty … So Much for the Presumtion of Innocense

SO MUCH FOR THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE … WELCOME TO THE BAIS & TAINTED DEMOCRAT JURY.

The actions of the LEFT and Democrats should be frightening to all. Their political bias and Trump resistance at all cost, including trashing the US. Constitution and the laws of the United States is chilling.  The Democrats have deemed SCOTUS nominee Judge  Brett Kavanaugh as guilty of something he has not either been accused of in a court of law, nor substantiated. That is correct, guilty before being proven innocent. No one knows whether Kavanaugh or his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, is telling the truth or credible, until they present their case in front of the Senate Judiciary committee. But not for Democrats, they know he is guilty. They have a crystal ball.

I have two cases for you where all thought they were guilty also, Duke Lacrosse and the University of Virginia rape case brought to us by Rolling Stone. We both know now has both of those sexual assault and rape cases went , don’t we? Both were lies. Crystal Mangum and Jackie lied. No such accusations ever occurred. But of course these two huge miscarriages of justice and jumps to conclusions seem to mean nothing to Democrats.

Let’s take a look at the fact we know. A supposed accusation of sexual misconduct happened 36 years ago when Christine was 15 years old, but was never mentioned to anyone, including family, friend or the authorities. Not until 2012 in a doctors office and no names were referenced. Her therapist notes state that four people were present, 3 individuals have come forward to say they have no knowledge or recollection of the incident.  Ford can’t remember the year the incident happened, she can’t remember how she got to the house party, or how she got home, or where the part was. She was a 15 year old girl consuming alcohol and has no memory of major facts of the case. The accused, Brett Kavanaugh has denied it ever happened. So tell me … if this was in a court of law in front of a jury, this would be the textbook definition of reasonable doubt. But not for Democrats, Kavanaugh Is Guilty, even though nothing has been presented in front of them. Talk about a tainted and bias jury.

JUST FOOD FOR THOUGHT, WHAT HAPPENS IF KAVANAUGH PROVIDES PROOF LIKE A PASSPORT OR PHOTO STAMPED PICS THAT HE WAS NO WHERE NEAR THIS SO-CALLED PARTY? WILL THERE BE DEMOCRAT APOLOGIES?

Watch VIDEO here.

No matter.

Kavanaugh, many Democrats say, is clearly guilty.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) said Thursday: “I believe her because she is telling the truth and you know it by her story.” [You know it by her story? What story? Dr. Ford's story is 36 years old and lacking the basic who, what where, when and why of any story. The accusers story is vague at best. If anything, Ford's story is so lacking in every form of detail that is pertinent to the case, that it is the textbook definition of reasonable doubt.]

“Judge Kavanaugh has not asked to have the FBI review the claims,” Gillibrand added. “Is that the reaction of an innocent person? It is not.” [WTF you liberal fool, talk about your straw argument. Judge Kavanaugh does not have the right or standing to ask the FBI to do anything. The FBI is not his personal private detective. No Sen. Gillibrand, the mark of an innocent person is his obsolete denial of what he is being accused of and his want to show up on Monday and clear his name.]

When Sen. Duckworth (D-Ill.) was asked about Kavanaugh denying the accusation, the senator responded, “Well, I have heard, you know, many, many predators say and refute allegations against them.” [Actually Sen. Duckworth, many accusers actually know when and where the presumed assault took place.]

Former spokesman for Bernie Sanders and CNN contributor, Symone Sanders, said she didn’t even need to wait for more information: “For me there is no debate. I believe Professor Ford. Judge Kavanaugh has lied multiple times under oath.” [Wow, really Bernie. Kavanaugh lied under oath. When. I think Bill Clinton might be squirming with that position you took, hoping Juanita Broderick doesn't pursue her rape claims years later.]

And here are other select quotes from Democratic lawmakers:

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) said: “I believe Dr. Ford as I refer to her because she makes a very credible case. It is really difficult for someone to come forward in this way. Why should she destroy her life? Already there are efforts to cast aspersions on her credibility, to look into her family, all of that. This is really very much like what happened with Anita Hill where she was vilified, she was called names. This cannot happen to Dr. Ford.” [Hmm, she came forward and the letter that was supposed to remain confidential was presented right before the Kavanaugh vote. It might be more credible that this is a political scam.]

Sen. Blumenthal (D-Conn.): “Let me just say right at the outset I believe. Dr Ford, I believe the survivor here, there’s every reason to believe her. She has come forward courageously and bravely knowing that she would face a nightmare of hostile and vicious scrutiny and challenge. And there are plenty of reasons to disbelieve Judge Kavanaugh after his evasive and seemingly misleading testimony before the Judiciary Committee.” [So here is a dude that strictly on the accusations of a woman, he is believable and Kavanaugh is guilty. You want want to see Duke Lacrosse rape case and UVA. Really? You better hope no woman ever accuses you of anything.]

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.); “I hope that she does [testify], because I’m afraid that what the Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee really want is they want her to go away. They don’t want the country to hear from her, and they certainly don’t want the country to hear from her live and on television. She’s absolutely right, the FBI should do a thorough vetting of these allegations. The Senate shouldn’t simply rely on hearing two conflicting accounts and decide, ‘Well, we’re OK with not knowing. We’re OK with the fact we might be putting a — someone who committed attempted rape on the Supreme Court of the United States.’ They should get to the bottom of this. And it wouldn’t take that long to do. This is the same crowd that waited a year to fill the last vacancy during the Obama administration on the Supreme Court, so why this rush? And I think they realize they have a very imperfect candidate, in fact they may have a candidate who has committed attempted rape.”

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.):  “Listen, it comes down to credibility to your point. It’s going to be about listening to what each party has to say, but I believe her. Listen, first of all, anybody who comes forward at this point to — to be prepared to testify in the United States Senate against someone who’s being nominated to one of the most powerful positions in the United States government, that takes an extraordinary amount of courage. And frankly, you know, I have personally prosecuted sexual assault cases, and my concern is— and she knows this — she is putting herself out there knowing that they’re going to try and excoriate her. She’s doing it, I believe, because she knows that this is an important matter. It’s a serious matter, who serves on that court. And she has the courage to come forward? She has nothing to gain. What does she have to gain?” [LOL, what does she have to gain? Seriously? She is a Democrat operative. I think we all know what she has to gain. Good grief, do not insult people's intelligence.]

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.): “Well I can tell you it really does have a ring of truth to it. The fact that she can refer to therapist notes so that she did bring it up before. I am skeptical of polygraphs, but those who believe them, she has passed a polygraph test.” [The notes that Durbin refer to in no where references names.]

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.): “I believe Professor Ford. I think she’s credible and I think when the investigation is finished and when she testifies and Judge Kavanaugh testifies, I think a majority of senators will find her credible.”

Teenage Anti-Gun Activist David Hogg Protesting at NRA with ‘Armed Security’

YOU JUST CAN’T MAKE THIS STUFF UP, THE HYPOCRISY OF THE LEFT ….

From the Washington Examiner, 18 year old, outspoken, anti-gun advocate from Parkland high school student David Hogg, showed up at a protest at the NRA headquarters in Fairfax, Va with armed security. Yes, that was not a misprint. The outspoken and misinformed gun grabbing teen activist had armed security. While Hogg tries to take your guns away from you and impose on your Second Amendment rights to own and have a gun, he has guns of his own for his own security. In other words Hogg should be spouting, guns for me, not for thee. But then again, isn’t this just typical hypocrisy and a double standard of the LEFT?

The National Rifle Association mocked gun control activist David Hogg for apparently showing up to a protest at the NRA headquarters in Fairfax, Va., this weekend with “armed security.”

“Today, @davidhogg111 (with armed security) and a bunch of gun-grabbing activists protested our empty HQ, and there were some interesting people there. Our social team chatted up the crowd and ended the day with ice cream paid for by @Everytown! Stay tuned for video interviews!” the NRA’s official Twitter account said on Saturday along with some photos. Everytown for Gun Safety is a nonprofit gun-control group.

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) Says ‘Americans should be out in the streets screaming’ for Trump’s head

MORE FROM THE UNHINGED LEFT …

From the Washington Examiner, comes more from Rep. ‘Mad Max” Maxine Waters and her over the top theatrics.  This time she says that Americans should be out in the streets screaming’ for President Donald Trump’s head. Really Maxine? Is this before or after they should be in the streets cheering for the great economy, the record low black, Hispanic unemployment, the record level of participation in the work force, the over 25,000 DOW, or the tax cuts that put more money in our pockets. Take a look around you Maxine, things are actually good in America, unless you are on the unhinged, whining LEFT. Trump is winning and that means America is winning, Maxine then stated, “He can call me whatever he wants do. He does not intimidate me, and I’m not gonna stop talking about him.” Actually Maxine Trump wants you to keep talking, You have become the face of the Democrat party and no sane individual would ever vote you back into power. But who knew you were a capitalist? Maybe you folks on the LEFT might want to provide Americans with your definition of capitalist.

President Donald Trump is Making America Great Again and the likes of Maxine Waters don’t want that to happen.

Liberal Rep. Maxine Waters Wednesday urged Americans to take to the streets and scream for an end to President Trump’s term, endorsed impeachment and vowed that the White House won’t intimidate her.

Talking on CNBC, she said, “I think he’s dangerous,” and added, “I don’t know why people take it. I think Americans should be out in the streets screaming to the top of their voice. Do something. Make something happen.”

The California Democrat was interviewed by host John Harwood during a CNBC event and poked at Trump, who regularly pokes at her, and she suggested that racism was involved. She also claimed that the president was employing tactics against his critics suggested by Russian President Vladimir Putin.