83 Year Old Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Crosses the Line … Calls Trump a “Faker” (Update: Trump Responds, “Her Mind is Shot, Resign!)

JUST IMAGINE WHAT THE MSM WOULD BE SAYING IF JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS MADE SUCH A COMMENT ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON?

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg crossed the line when she made insulting and partisan political comments regarding Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president. Justice Ginsburg called Trump “a faker” who must release his tax returns and criticized the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, for having no consistency and for saying whatever comes into his head at any moment. She went on to say that Trump had an ego and could not imagine the possibility that Trump could be president. In the same CNN interview, Ginsburg suggested she believes the next president will be presumptive Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton. Of course there was no mention from Justice Ginsburg that Hillary was a liar and an unindicted fraud who put the United States national security at risk with the use of her private email server while serving as Secretary of State under Barack Obama. Of course not. But these bizarre comments, that certainly crossed the line, also seem to create the appearance of impropriety that Ginsburg could ever act in an non-bias manner if trump was elected President.

“How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns?” Ginsburg said late Monday, according to CNN. “The press seems to be very gentle with him on that

“Every other presidential candidate has turned over tax returns,” she said.

Ginsburg also criticized Trump, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, for having no consistency and for saying whatever comes into his head at any moment.

“He really has an ego,” she said.

“I think he has gotten so much free publicity. At first I thought it was funny. To think that there’s a possibility that he could be president.”

Really, who has an ego and who has no consistency and for saying whatever comes into his head at any moment? One might just say that about you RBG. How on earth could this justice ever judge a case fairly?

GOP rep: Ginsburg’s Trump attacks ‘inexcusable.

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) says Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg crossed a line attacking Donald Trump.

“It was totally inexcusable and unprofessional for Justice Ginsburg to insult a presidential candidate,” he said Tuesday on the House floor, according to The Washington Examiner. “It hurt the credibility of the Supreme Court and it showed bad judgment.

“It will be difficult for the American people to believe Justice Ginsburg can be impartial in any rulings that involve political issues,” added Smith, who has endorsed Trump. “[It will] only contribute to the public’s feeling that justice system may be rigged.”

In response to Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s ‘Faker’ comments, Donald Trump called for Ruth Bader Ginsburg to resign. Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee tweeted Justice Ginsburg’s “mind is shot” and should “resign.”

My personal opinion is that this may just backfire on the LEFT and be just what Donald Trump needed just ahead of the GOP National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio. These are the kinds of things that the GOP needs to be slapped upside the head with, especially the establishment and Never-Trumpers. We all know the political system is rigged, now we are witness the the SCOTUS being rigged too. Justices are never supposed to dabble in the political rhealm for the appearance of bias when ruling on cases. So much for that now. 83 year old RBG embarrassed herself and as Slate reported, may have risked her legacy to insult Donald Trump.

These comments will most certainly be spoken at the RNC and all will be reminded that elections have consequences. Numerous SCOTUS positions will most likely be nominated by the next president, RGB being one of them.

FBI Director James Comey to Face Questions on Clinton Investigation

COMEY ON THE HOT SEAT …

FBI Director James Comey will face the music this morning and have to answer Congress as to how he could lay out a case against Clinton and her “gross negligence” in handling classified emails and then suddenly do a U-turn and state he will not recommend charges. But of course this was not political. Of course not. Sorry, its a sad day when a government employee could act so reckless and purposely send and receive classified emails and then be let off the hook. The fix was in from the outset.

FBI Director James Comey will be facing skeptical and angry Congressional Republicans this morning in a hastily called hearing on Capitol Hill.The criminal case against Hillary Clinton and her aides is closed, but top Republicans want to know why she was not prosecuted for mishandling classified information while using a private email server as Secretary of State

Tuesday, Comey harshly criticized Clinton and her State Department team for being “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly-classified information. But then, Comey announced that the FBI would recommend against charging Clinton or her aides criminally.

The decision set off a firestorm of criticism from Republicans, and prompted a quick call for Congressional hearings.

“The FBI’s recommendation is surprising and confusing,” Rep. Jason Chaffetz said in a statement announcing today’s hearing. “The fact pattern presented by Director Comey makes clear Secretary Clinton violated the law. Individuals who intentionally skirt the law must be held accountable.”

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan said the decision looked like “preferential treatment for Clinton.”

Lying, Crooked Hillary Clinton … Donald Trump Releases Video Contrasting Clinton’s Lies to FBI Director Comey’s Statements

LYING, CROOKED HILLARY!!!

Hillary Clinton may not have been recommended for charges due to politics; however, that did not stop FBI Director Comey from shredding Hillary Clinton and her mountain of lies she has told regarding the emails, her private server and putting America at risk. One can only take Comey’s actions in one way, since she was not guilty of a crime, she was guilty of being incompetent. Do we need an another incompetent president?

The fact of the matter is, FBI Director Comey proved that Hillary Clinton is a liar and that she should never be given access to any of America’s secrets ever again. If this is how reckless and woefully incompetent she was as Secretary of State, one can only imagine how she will act as president.

AMERICA, WAKE THE HELL UP. DO YOU REALLY WANT A LYING CROOK AS PRESIDENT? REALLY?

FBI Director James Comey Rewrites Federal Law to Let Hillary Clinton Off the Hook … Recommends No Charges Eventhough She Used “Gross Negligence” with Emails (VIDEO)

THE FIX WAS IN ALL ALONG … DONALD TRUMP IS CORRECT, IT IS A RIGGED SYSTEM.

FBI Director James Comey systematically laid out the case as to why Hillary Clinton should be indicted of a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18) of which she met every criteria of the charge and then he did a 180 and recommended no charges be sought against Hillary Clinton. In order to do such a thing, Comey had to rewrite the federal statute to serve his own, Barack Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s purpose. UNREAL. It is a sad and shameful day when the FBI has now become politicized as pretty much every department has become under Barack Obama, add to it the EPA, FCC, IRS and AG. However, just because Director Comey did not recommend charges be brought against Hillary, he did eviscerate her and basically called her a liar and that she acted in a reckless behavior and was “extremely careless” (aka. ”Gross Negligence”)

Watch Comey’s full speech as it is hardly paints a nice picture of Hillary Clinton and in no ways states she is innocent. To the contrary, Comely calls Hillary a liar.

There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine), Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18): With lawful access to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust. Director Comey even conceded that former Secretary Clinton was “extremely careless” and strongly suggested that her recklessness very likely led to communications (her own and those she corresponded with) being intercepted by foreign intelligence services.

Yet, Director Comey recommended against prosecution of the law violations he clearly found on the ground that there was no intent to harm the United States.

In essence, in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote the statute, inserting an intent element that Congress did not require. The added intent element, moreover, makes no sense: The point of having a statute that criminalizes gross negligence is to underscore that government officials have a special obligation to safeguard national defense secrets; when they fail to carry out that obligation due to gross negligence, they are guilty of serious wrongdoing. The lack of intent to harm our country is irrelevant. People never intend the bad things that happen due to gross negligence.

As The Gateway Pundit reminds us … Remember when Hillary Clinton stated at the Democrat Party debate in January 17, 2016, “There should be no individual too powerful to jail.” That is unless you last name is Clinton and you are a Democrat in the corrupt Obama administration.

Bill O’Reilly Discusses AG Loretta Lynch & Bill Clinton Private Meeting with ABC15 Reporter Christopher Sign Who Broke the Story (VIDEO)

ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA LYNCH’S ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS AS TO WHY SHE AND BUBBA CLINTON MET IS ALL BS …

The private meeting between AG Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton, that could only be described as unethical and every appearance of impropriety, has blown up in the Clinton’s faces and Hillary Clinton is going to take the brunt of it. USA Today reports, the meeting raises eyebrows. Really, just eyebrows? It should raise a lot more than that. Last night on The O’Reilly Factor, Bill O’Reilly interviewed Christopher Sign, the ABC15 reporter, who broke the story about Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch’s meeting at an airport in Phoenix AZ.

Lynch claimed it was an unplanned meeting. Hmm, really, that is not what it seemed to be after listening to the video below. Watch and listen directly from the individual who had first hand knowledge of this dirty, clandestine meeting that should never have taken place. According to Christopher Sign, the FBI on the tarmac told everyone around the vicinity of the two planes, no cameras and no cell phones. Hmm, really? So the FBI was part of the cover up too? This whole thing stinks to the high heavens. But when you have the Clinton’s involved, what else would you expect?

A note to the rest of the MSM … this is what fantastic investigative news coverage looks like.