The Hypocrisy of the LEFT … Government Officials Can Still Own Assault Weapons Under Sen. Feinstein’s Assault Weapons Ban Bill

 

MORE LEFTIST HYPOCRISY: ASSAULT STYLE WEAPONS BAN FOR THEE, NOT FOR WE …

We have known for quite some time that the LEFT have considered themselves better than “We the People” and that they live by a different set of rules, even though they tell us to do just the opposite. However, the hypocrisy from the LEFT might have hit an all time high, or low as the case may be. U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (CA-D) has for decades tried to ban assault-style weapons and infringe upon our Second Amendment rights. Her latest bill is just yet another attempt to take guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens. But there is one little provision that seems to have been overlooked. For all of Feinstein’s grandstanding and exploiting the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting, for all of her appearances in the MSM calling assault-style guns and the other weapons on her banned list evil, government officials are exempt as weapons used by government officials and law enforcement will not be prohibited by the law!!!

Not everyone is exempted from owning military-style assault weapons under new legislation proposed by U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

Weapons used by government officials and law enforcement will not be prohibited by the law proposed by the California Democrat, which would prohibit the sale, manufacture and importation of 158 specifically named semi-automatic weapons and ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. Any weapons legally owned before the bill’s enactment would also be exempt, although those firearms would have to be registered in a national database.

In addition, more than 2,200 types of hunting and sporting rifles and manually operated firearms would also be exempt.

Check out all of the weapons under Feinstein’s bill that John Q. Public is not allowed to have, but the privileged class of the government is exempt from and will be able to own.

Since when is the government more important than “We the People”? Since when are the people treated like second rate citizens as compared to the ruling class? This is exactly what Our Founding Fathers set out to prevent when they created the United States of America. UNBELIEVABLE! Just curious, if these weapons are so dangerous, why would government officials be allowed to have them? Could it be because they are a great form of protection against the bad guys? This really is nothing more than a gun grab by the LEFT.

WAKE THE HELL UP AMERICA, MANY INDIVIDUALS HAVE DIED TO PROTECT YOUR LIBERTIES AND FREEDOM. PRETEND LIKE YOU ACTUALLY HAVE A CLUE LIKE YOU CARE AND CARE ABOUT YOUR COUNTRY.



If you liked this post, you may also like these:

  • Executive Privilege … Dennis K. Burke, Obama Contributor Who Helped Enact Assault-Weapons Ban, Ran ‘Fast and Furious’
  • Senator Dianne Feinstein’s Gun Ban Shot Down By Harry Reid, Vows She is Not Done Yet … “I’m Not Going To Lay Down And Play Dead”
  • Oh the Hypocrisy … Gabby Giffords’ Husband Mark Kelly Testifies Against Assault Weapons Then Gets Caught Buying an AR-15
  • Amazing, Senator Feinstein (D-CA) Says Watertown Citizens Don’t Need “Assault Weapons” During a Time When Killer Terrorists Roamed Their Town
  • Fast & Furious High Powered Assault Weapons Found in Mexico Drug Cartel Enforcer’s Home




  • Comments

    12 Responses to “The Hypocrisy of the LEFT … Government Officials Can Still Own Assault Weapons Under Sen. Feinstein’s Assault Weapons Ban Bill”

    1. rightknight on January 28th, 2013 11:14 am

      The transformation of a group of self-serving
      ruling class into an actual Totalitarian Government
      happens slowly at first. There is a ‘tipping point’
      at which the beast acquires all power and control
      over it’s citizens however. That is the point the
      ruling class is completely criminal in nature.

    2. A Texas Grandfather on January 28th, 2013 12:18 pm

      This is another effort for the socialist/Democrats to destroy the Constitution by attacking the Bill of Rights. This woman took an oath to defend the Constituion, but it is obvious that she has no intention of complying with her oath. She needs to be removed from office as do all of those who support this activity.

    3. dennisintn on January 28th, 2013 12:33 pm

      the imperial presidency has dripped down to the imperial congress. you ain’t seen nothing yet.
      dennisintn

    4. A Texas Grandfather on January 28th, 2013 6:45 pm

      It is time for every citizen to make it known to these thugs that their days of this type behavior are over.

      The people need to march on Washington D.C. two million strong and let them see what they have to face.

    5. Tamikosmom on January 28th, 2013 10:58 pm

      The definition of hypocrisy!!

      NRA – STAND AND FIGHT
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miSjgv1MH7s

      NRA: The media speaks for elites, American speaks for itself
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=133DC4LU3zw

      Obama signs bill granting lifetime Secret Service protection to former presidents and spouses
      January 10, 2013
      http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-01-10/politics/36273120_1_obama-signs-bill-secret-service-protection-children-of-former-presidents

    6. Tamikosmom on January 28th, 2013 11:02 pm

      Since when is the government more important than “We the People”? Since when are the people treated like second rate citizens as compared to the ruling class? This is exactly what Our Founding Fathers set out to prevent when they created the United States of America. …

      Posted January 28, 2013 by Scared Monkeys

      ++++++++

      George Washington:
      ”A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who would attempt to abuse them, which would include their own Government.”

      Ronald Reagan:
      “There are those in America today who have come to depend absolutely on government for their security. And when government fails they seek to rectify that failure in the form of granting government more power. So, as government has failed to control crime and violence with the means given it by the Constitution, they seek to give it more power at the expense of the Constitution. But in doing so, in their willingness to give up their arms in the name of safety, they are really giving up their protection from what has always been the chief source of despotism — government.”

    7. Tamikosmom on January 28th, 2013 11:14 pm
    8. rightknight on January 29th, 2013 1:32 am

      Grandma Feinstein is just another example of the need
      to install term limits. It often takes a term to determine
      the depth of insanity some of these fakirs possess. Time
      to cut our losses here I would say.

    9. publicenemy2u on January 29th, 2013 12:27 pm

      Why does the goverment needs assault weapons. To kill the junior Rambo’s that won’t abide by the law silly people. To those that must own killing machines a FFL might come in handy. Of course that’s expensive but we don’t want the welfare crowd well armed now do we? But then you would have to account for the arsenal in your gun safe . Thanks to gun lobby I can buy a assault rifle, armour piercing ammo,100 round mags, unlimited, unrecorded ammo, night vision sights and flash suppressors and rumor has the NRA is pushing for silencers to be made legal. If I haven’t been involuntarily committed to a mental health facility I’m good to go, now where did I put that body armour?

    10. Rusty Bridges on January 30th, 2013 8:34 am

      Public enemy, first of all it is “an” assault rifle, not “a”. I’m not usually the grammar police but I couldn’t help it.

      Second, please do tell where you can get some of that armour piercing ammo? You might need to let the fbi know, it is quite illegal

      You want to actually have a conversation on why a US citizen should have a high capacity magazine? I can tell you why in the simplest terms: because the criminals have plenty of weapons with high capacity magazines that aren’t afraid to use them and the gov’t will never be able to get them.

    11. publicenemy2u on January 30th, 2013 11:47 am

      Rusty, for the right amount of money we can get just about anything we want or need, and a fmj .308 will disable most non military vehicles if you are so inclined. A sabot slug will too. My point is that it’s too easy now to become a “ONE MAN ARMY” and our countries future is at stake, the safety of our kids and grandkids is at stake, in most cases your rights are protected until they infringe on mine, …..life, liberty and pursuit of happiness are trumped by the second amendment

    12. publicenemy2u on January 31st, 2013 4:12 pm

      Rusty, you made research armour piercing ammo. It’s easier to get than either of us thought
      http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/07/29/armor-piercing-ammo/

    Leave a Reply




    Support Scared Monkeys! make a donation.

     
     
    • NEWS (breaking news alerts or news tips)
    • Red (comments)
    • Dugga (technical issues)
    • Dana (radio show comments)
    • Klaasend (blog and forum issues)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Close
    E-mail It