RSSObama Adviser Axelerod Says, Romney’s Effort in Pennsylvania a Sign Mitt is in ‘deep trouble’ … Hmm, Then Why Dispatch Bill Clinton to PA?
This morning on FOX News Sunday, Obama senior political adviser David Axelrod told Chris Wallace that the Romney campaigns move to Pennsylvania was a sign of desperation and that they were in “deep trouble”.
Senior Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod said Mitt Romney’s visit to Pennsylvania shows the GOP nominee’s campaign is in “deep trouble” and losing in the traditional battlegrounds.
Axelrod told Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday” that the Romney campaign’s move into Pennsylvania is a sign of desperation because they are trailing in polls in Ohio, a state no Republican has won the election without.
“The battleground states on which we have been focusing on are not working out for them,” Axelrod said. “We’re ahead in all of them and now are looking for somewhere, desperately looking for somewhere to try and dislodge some electoral votes to win this election. And I can tell you that’s not going to happen.”
Ok, if it is such a sign of desperation on the part of Romney campaigning in Pennsylvania, what does one call it when Obama dispatches Bill Clinton to the Key Stone state? That is correct, Team Obama feels the need to send former President Clinton to PA to stem the “mittemtum”. If its such a waste of time and a sign that Romney is in “deep trouble”, how does Axelrod justify sending Obama’s greatest asset, Bill Clinton to Pennsylvania. In fact, as reported at the Gateway Pundit, Clinton is scheduled to do four rallies in PA.
I would dare say that it just might be Obama who is in trouble in Pennsylvania. Isn’t it interesting that Obama cannot go himself to Pennsylvania to stump in front of those folks who cling to their Bibles and guns. When will blue collar Democrats understand that Obama is 180 degrees different from Obama. A vote for Obama will end coal and any energy jobs in PA.
However, in the end when talking spinning the battleground states and what party is ahead, I think it comes back to who you think is telling the truth. To hear the GOP and Democrats discuss who is ahead is like listening to a divorce case. One of the two has to be lying as the laws of physics prove that both Obama and Romney can’t win convincingly.
If that is the litmus test, who is telling the truth, sorry but Team Obama has no credibility. For folks who can’t tell us the truth about Benghazi prior to an election as have not wanted to answer difficult questions about FEMA screw ups like running out of water following Hurricane Sandy … who is really going to believe you now?
If you liked this post, you may also like these:
Comments
8 Responses to “Obama Adviser Axelerod Says, Romney’s Effort in Pennsylvania a Sign Mitt is in ‘deep trouble’ … Hmm, Then Why Dispatch Bill Clinton to PA?”
Leave a Reply
There is no truth in Axelrod. If he is talking it is a lie. Obama is in trouble everywhere so Axelrod is trying to jawbone his way past the questions.
[...] about Benghazi, David Axelrod said that this rally meant Romney is in deep trouble. Really, then why did they send Bill Clinton to PA?Tweetvaso linkgoogle_ad_client = "ca-pub-1395656889568144"; /* 300×250, created 8/11/08 */ [...]
Bill Clinton isn’t much help. He is saying moronic belittling things about Romney, nothing of any substance. And again, Bill Clinton shamed the office of the presidency, and he really needs to remember that and stay out of the public eye.
______________________
SM: I actually believe this hurts Obama. Many people like Clinton, especially as more and more years go by that he is out of office.
However, Clinton presided over a good economy, Obama not so much.
I honestly think that many Democrats long for Bill Clinton and think that Obama pales in comparison.
I will also say this, how pathetic is Obama that he needs Clinton to drag him over the finish line?
R
Baghdad Bob Axelrod In the fine tradition of Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, Axelrod is keeping up the party line as the Republican victors are seen massing in the background.
whatever
curious. when Obama wins Tuesday night.
will you be a baby and cry like a spoiled kid and will your side cause another 4 years of obstruction? Or will you be a mature adult like Christie and work with the man.
America and the world will be watching
_______________________
SM: LOL, we point out fact and that’s your response?
What might be funnier is you praising Christie when he has spent the last 4 years calling Obama a bumbling fool not fit for the office of the presidency.
[...] appears that the Obama campaign is panicked by Romney’s surge into Pennsylvania as they have sent Bill Clinton to do four campaign events [...]
why. Christie doesn’t care of someone is R or D….He gets the job done.
Unlike the current republicans who rather than have our country get better spent 4 years obstructing Obama just for the sake of obstructing. After all it was your goal from the 1st day.
Good for your base……Bad for mainstream.
That is exactly why there is no mittmentum…..
you wont get any more than your base…..Us independents wont vote R because of your scary social agenda
you will see……there isn’t any mittmentum….Obama is going to get someplace between 280-320 EV and you will be freaking out.
fiz : as in fizzed out democrat. get a job and feed your own kids for once in your life. oh, i forgot, democrats don’t work do they ?