WMD Intel Not ‘Dead Wrong’

 

James S. Robbins of the National Review Online writes a compelling article on appearances can be deceiving. Sometimes the obvious argument doesn’t make sense.

The deception campaign was too systematic, too thorough, in ways that went well beyond what would be necessary simply to generate suspicion. This activity continued during and after the war when it would make no difference.

The floor tiles were missing, the walls cleaned, the plumbing fixtures gone, the pipes under the floors ripped out. This was not the result of looting — the apartment had been sanitized, disinfected. How many such sites could there have been in Iraq? Were they all found and checked?

Not to mention allegations that critical nuclear and chemical program components were taken to Syria, Iran, or Russia.

Posted April 3, 2005 by
Main | no comments


If you liked this post, you may also like these:

  • Scared Monkey Posts From The Weekend You May Not Have Seen
  • GWB Not Attending Obama’s Photo-Op: Just Curious, Realeasing Photo’s of Bin Laden is Spiking the Football … but a Victory Lap at Ground Zero Isn’t?
  • NH State Rep. Timothy Horrigan Resigns After Sarah Palin Death Comment, “Well a dead Palin wd be even more dangerous than a live one”
  • Barack Obama Signs Westminster Abbey’s Distinguished Visitors’ Book with the Wrong Year … 2008
  • US Rep. Peter King (NY-R): “Through Waterboarding … We Got Vital Information That Directly Led Us to Bin Laden” … Obama Wrong Again




  • Comments

    Leave a Reply




    Support Scared Monkeys! make a donation.

     
     
    • NEWS (breaking news alerts or news tips)
    • Red (comments)
    • Dugga (technical issues)
    • Dana (radio show comments)
    • Klaasend (blog and forum issues)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Close
    E-mail It