Another Obama Lie, Remember When Barack Said He Was Not Going after Guns … Now Obama Wants to Enact New Gun Control Measures in 2013

THE LION LYING KING … The 2012 President election is proof-positive that there is a sucker born every minute … This is what happens America when you  reelect a less than honest President to a second term who has no accountability to “We the People”. You thought this president could care less what the people thought during his first term in office, America, you ain’t seen nothing yet.

In 2008 Barack Obama told America that, “ I am not going to take your guns away … it just ain’t true. It ain’t true.” Any you actually believed him. Now America is going to pay for the ignorance of the uninformed voter.

“I believe in the Second Amendment. I will not take your shotgun away. I will not take your rifle away. I won’t take your handgun away… But I am not going to take your guns away. So if you want to find an excuse not to vote for me, don’t use that one because it just ain’t true. It ain’t true.”

That was then and this is now. President Barack Obama during a Sunday interview this morning on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ said he would make gun control a priority in his new term, pledging to put his “full weight” behind passing new restrictions on firearms in 2013.

“I’m going to be putting forward a package and I’m going to be putting my full weight behind it,” Obama said in an interview aired on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “I’m going to be making an argument to the American people about why this is important and why we have to do everything we can to make sure that something like what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary does not happen again.”

But he has also called on Congress to move quickly to reinstate the federal assault weapons ban and a ban on the sale of high-capacity magazines.

Obama on Sunday repeated those calls and said he would meet with lawmakers on both sides of the aisles to see action.

“I’ve been very clear that an assault-rifle ban, banning these high capacity clips, background checks, that there are a set of issues that I have historically supported and will continue to support,” the president said.

Really, Obama has been clear? More like it depends on what BS story he is using to pander for votes.  Far be it from Obama to exploit the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in an attempt to harm the Second Amendment using the Newtown, CT murders as the excuse. Just like with the fiscal cliff where none of the discussions have a thing to do with deficit or debt reduction, Obama’s far Left anti-gun restrictions will do a damn thing to protect children. Obama’s own Chicago, Illinois has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country, yet they just had their 500th murder this past week,  the highest amount since 2008. The Lonely Conservative points out that mum is the word for Obama and Dems when it comes to discussing how the left deinstitutionalized the insane so they’re walking among us, or how criminals don’t normally abide by gun laws.

FANTASTIC … Ted Nugent Tells CNN’s Piers Morgan to “Suck on My Machine Gun!”

OMG, this is must see VIDEO!!!

During an interview on CNN between Piers Morgan and Ted Nugent, the pro-Second Amendment rocker Nugent tells the lib host that “any one who wants to disarm me can drop dead”. He then went on to say one of the most priceless lines in quite some time, ” … Suck on my Machine Gun”.

Watch Nugent Own Piers Morgan 

Gallup: NRA Has 54% Favorable Image in United States, Only 38% Unfavorable

Before Barack Obama and the rest of the anti-Second Amendment right, anti-gun Democrats over-reach and attempt to exploit the horrendous actions of a crazed, lone, insaneoid gunman Adam Lanza who murdered his mother and then went on a shooting rampage at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT killing 26, including 20 children … they may want to take a look at how Americans feel about those who Democrats and the MSM want to demonize. According to a recent Gallup Poll, 54% of Americans have a favorable image of the NRA, while only 38% have an unfavorable one. This even after the liberal MSM has tried to smear the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre for his press conference comments and ’Meet the Press’ interview asking to protect children by arming individuals in the schools.

The NRA’s positions on guns and gun control legislation have received significant attention from media and politicians during the last week after the association’s top lobbyist, Wayne LaPierre, held a press conference in the wake of the Newtown school shooting. LaPierre denounced the idea of additional gun control legislation and instead called for armed guards in the nation’s schools. The press conference came midway through the field period of this Dec. 19-22 USA Today/Gallup poll.

Other polls have shown that Americans place gun control only fourth on the list for protecting children, following police presence in schools, greater focus on mental health screening and decreasing gun violence in movies, TV and video games.

Liberal Hypocrisy … NBC’s David Gregory Mocks NRA’s LaPierre for Proposing Armed Guards in Schools, Yet He Sends His Kids to High Security School (Update: Obama’s Daughters Have 11 Armed Guards at Their School)

Once again we are presented with liberal hypocrisy and the double standard. What is good for them, is not the same that “We the People” are allowed.

As reported that The Weekly Standard, me thinks David Gregory dost protest too much. Actually, me thinks David Gregory is two-faced.

Following the tragic mass murders at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT that saw 26 murdered, including 20 children and six adults, NBC’s Davis Gregory went on an anti-Second Amendment gun rant mocking the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre for his proposing that armed guards be put in schools for the children’s protection. As LaPierre has stated, “the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun.” Gregory, the ‘Meet the Press’ host went on to rail that armed guards might not be effective in preventing mass murders at school.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

David Gregory mocked the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre for proposing that armed guards be at every school in America. But the NBC host seems to have no problem with armed guards protecting his kids everyday where they attend school in Washington, D.C.

“You proposed armed guards in school. We’ll talk about that in some detail in a moment. You confronted the news media. You blamed Hollywood and the gaming industry. But never once did you concede that guns could actually be part of the problem. Is that a meaningful contribution, Mr. LaPierre, or a dodge?,” asked Gregory.

Later the host suggested that guns don’t prevent violence in schools (he cited the mass shootings at Columbine and Virginia Tech). “But you would concede that, as good as an idea as you think this is, it may not work. Because there have been cases where armed guards have not prevented this kind of massacre, this kind of carnage. I want you would concede that point, wouldn’t you?,” Gregory pleaded.

The NBC host would go on the rest of the segment to suggest that armed guards might not be effective in preventing mass murders at school.

But wait, when it comes to his own children it is a different story.  As it turns out, Gregory not only send his children to a school with armed security guards, he also benefits from the fact that Barack Obama’s children attend the same school and thus Secret Service is present as well. That is correct, the school that Gregory and Obama send their children to has 11 armed security guards for their protection, but some how putting armed guards, police, etc. in other schools s labeled crazy by the Left and the liberal, corrupt media complex.

The Gregory children go to school with the children of President Barack Obama, according to the Washington Post. That school is the co-ed Quaker school Sidwell Friends.

According to a scan of the school’s online faculty-staff directory, Sidwell has a security department made up of at least 11 people. Many of those are police officers, who are presumably armed.

Moreover, with the Obama kids in attendance, there is a secret service presence at the institution, as well.

So why is it perfectly OK for it to have armed security and police in schools of the privileged like David Gregory and Barack Obama, but not that to protect the children of “We the People”? Hmm?

NBC’s Gregory Investigated by DC Police for Posessing Illegal High Capacity Gun Magazine

Is there a double standard … will NBC’s ’Meet the Press’ David Gregory be charged with possession of an illegal gun magazine as stated by DC gun laws or slapped on the wrist?

Last Sunday NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ David Gregory played show and tell with a high capacity gun magazine while playing anti-Second amendment gin advocate, rather than news journalist. Many questioned how this was possible as to possess such an item in DC was considered illegal by law. According to Breitbart, DC police are looking into the allegations that Gregory violated the DC gun laws during the show.

Hmm, looks like David Gregory is possessing an illegal gun magazine to me.

Washington D.C. Police Chief Cathy Lanier has confirmed that the department is looking into allegations that NBC’s David Gregory violated D.C.’s gun banning laws during a recent taping of Meet the Press.

In a discussion about gun control, host David Gregory brandished a 30-round magazine purportedly for an AR-15 or similar “assault rifle.”  The discussion took place on December 23, during the broadcast of NBC’s Sunday morning political talk show.

DC High Capacity Ammunition Magazines – D.C. Official Code 7-2506.01, and reads as follows. So what part about “possessing” and “regardless of whether magazine is attached to firearm” can Gregory say he did not violate? The law is the law.

(b) No person in the District shall possess, sell, or transfer any large capacity ammunition feeding device regardless of whether the device is attached to a firearm. For the purposes of this subsection, the term large capacity ammunition feeding device means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The term large capacity ammunition feeding device shall not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.