Illary Clinton: Clinton Campaign Team Goes Against Secret Service Protocol and Avoided ER to Conceal Details of her Medical Treatment

ONCE AGAIN HILLARY CLINTON AVOIDS TRANSPARENCY, THIS TIME WITH HER HEALTH … WHAT IS SHE HIDING FROM AMERICAN VOTERS?

The New York Post is reporting that Hillary Clinton’s campaign went against Secret Service protocol and instead of going to a state-designated Level I Trauma Center following her collapse Sunday for medical treatment, Clinton campaign operatives change course to avoid having Hillary Clinton being seen by doctors, nurses and other medical workers who could leak details to reporters. Instead, they went to Chelsea Clinton’s NYC apartment.

Really, she supposedly had pneumonia and nearly fainted and instead of going to get medical attention from professionals she went to her daughter’s apartment and played with her grandchildren. Huh? She knowingly has pneumonia that is infectious and plays with grandchildren? Please, spare us the non-sense. The truth is that she did not go to the emergency room because A. she did not want anyone but her inner circle to know what is wrong with her and B. they know exactly what is wrong with her and this has happened multiple times.

The media and the American people need to demand her medical records or she be seen and evaluated by an independent doctor and the true diagnosis be revealed. Enough of this Clinton lying. For that matter, have Trump do the same. The American people are entitled to the truth of the health of a presidential candidate so that they know what they are voting for.

Hillary Clinton was headed to an emergency room following her frightening collapse at the Sept. 11 memorial ceremony — but detoured to daughter Chelsea Clinton’s apartment to keep details of her medical treatment under wraps, The Post has learned.

Secret Service protocol called for the Democratic presidential nominee to be rushed to a state-designated Level I Trauma Center in the wake of her Sunday-morning health crisis, sources said. In Manhattan, that would be Bellevue Hospital.

But a campaign operative decided to change course to avoid having Clinton seen by doctors, nurses and other medical workers who could leak details to reporters, according to a source.

In addition, Clinton’s van was supposed to be escorted by an NYPD detail, but the Secret Service whisked her away from Ground Zero before cops could accompany her, another source said.

The former secretary of state had told police officials that she didn’t want the escort at all, but the NYPD overruled that request, the source added.

NBC Moderator Matt Lauer Fields Storm of Criticism Over Clinton-Trump Forum Because He Actually Asked Hillary Tough Questions (VIDEO)

HOW COMICAL, MATT LAUER RECEIVES MAJOR CRITICISM BECAUSE HE DIDN’T THROW HILLARY SOFT BALLS AND PROTECT LYING, CROOKED HILLARY …

The LEFT and the liberal MSM headed by the New York Times is losing their mind and crying foul because Matt Lauer actual did what a moderators was supposed to do last night and pressed Democrat Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on her emails and exposing classified information. How dare he ask her tough questions. How comical that those on the LEFT have suddenly realized that there is no more real journalism in America. But not because of any valid reasons. only because one actually tried to hold Hillary’s feet to the fire. Guess what, that is what the media is supposed to do, irregardless of what political party they are.

Matt Lauer asks, why was it just a mistake and not disqualifying? Liberals are upset that Lauer did not give Hillary Clinton a pass. The LEFT is upset that Lauer did not carry the water for Hillary and deflect that fact that she is a liar and mishandled top secret documents. So the LEFT is upset because some one actually dare vet Hillary and confront her with her reckless and illegal actions.

The judgment as President questions begin at the 4:40 minute mark of video

It was a high-stakes political moment, far from the chummier confines of the “Today” show and, for Matt Lauer, NBC’s stalwart of the morning, a chance to prove his broadcasting mettle on the presidential stage.

The consensus afterward was not kind.

Charged with overseeing a live prime-time forum with Donald J. Trump and Hillary Clinton — widely seen as a dry run of sorts for the coming presidential debates — Mr. Lauer found himself besieged on Wednesday evening by critics of all political stripes, who accused the anchor of unfairness, sloppiness and even sexism in his handling of the event.

Granted 30 minutes with each candidate, who appeared back-to-back at the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum in Manhattan, Mr. Lauer devoted about a third of his time with Mrs. Clinton to questions about her use of a private email server, then seemed to rush through subsequent queries about weighty topics like domestic terror attacks.

When an Army veteran in the audience asked Mrs. Clinton to describe her plan to defeat the Islamic State, Mr. Lauer interjected before the candidate could begin her reply.

More from the Transcripts of the Clinton-Trump MSNBC Commander in Chief Forum:

LAUER: You’re talking about judgment.

CLINTON: … and then makes the decision. Makes the decision, that’s right.

LAUER: So judgment is a key.

CLINTON: Temperament and judgment, yes.

LAUER: The word “judgment” has been used a lot around you, Secretary Clinton, over the last year-and-a-half, and in particular concerning your use of your personal e-mail and server to communicate while you were secretary of state. You’ve said it’s a mistake.

CLINTON: Mm-hmm.

LAUER: You said you made not the best choice. You were communicating on highly sensitive topics. Why wasn’t it more than a mistake? Why wasn’t it disqualifying, if you want to be commander-in- chief?

CLINTON: Well, Matt, first of all, as I have said repeatedly, it was a mistake to have a personal account. I would certainly not do it again. I make no excuses for it. It was something that should not have been done.

But the real question is the handling of classified material, which is I think what the implication of your question was. And for all the viewers watching you tonight, I have a lot of experience dealing with classified material, starting when I was on the Senate Armed Services Committee going into the four years as secretary of state. Classified material has a header which says “top secret,” “secret,” “confidential.” Nothing — and I will repeat this, and this is verified in the report by the Department of Justice — none of the e-mails sent or received by me had such a header.

LAUER: Were some of the e-mails sent or received by you referring to our drone program, our covert drone program?

CLINTON: Yes, because — of course, there were no discussions of any of the covert actions in process being determined about whether or not to go forward. But every part of our government had to deal with questions, and the secretary of state’s office was first and foremost. So there are ways of talking about the drone program…

(CROSSTALK)

LAUER: And you said you thought your communications on that were fairly routine?

CLINTON: Well, let me say, the FBI just released their report about their investigation, they discussed drone matters in the unclassified section of their report.

LAUER: But Director Comey also said this after reviewing all the information. He said there is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.

CLINTON: Well, Matt, I just respectfully point to the hundreds of experienced foreign policy experts, diplomats, defense officials who were communicating information on the unclassified system because it was necessary to answer questions and to be able publicly to go as far as we could, which was not acknowledging the program.

But I would be in Pakistan, as I was on several occasions. There might very well have been a strike. I would be asked in a public setting, in an interview, about it. It was known to have happened. We had to have an answer that did not move into classified area. And I think we handled that appropriately.

LAUER: You mentioned you’re in Pakistan. Some of the e-mails you sent and received happened while you were overseas. And Director Comey also said that while they have no proof, we assessed that it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail accounts.

CLINTON: Matt, there is no evidence. Of course anything is possible. But what is factual is the State Department system was hacked. Most of the government systems are way behind the curve. We’ve had hacking repeatedly, even in the White House. There is no evidence my system was hacked.

Navy Veteran Just Obliterated Hillary Clinton during MSNBC Forum with Question: “I Would Have Been Prosecuted and Imprisoned” (VIDEO)

LYING, CROOKED HILLARY JUST GOT DESTROYED IN YET ANOTHER LIE AT LAST NIGHT’S MSNBC COMMANDER IN CHIEF FORUM:

Last night at the MSNBC forum, a precursor to the 2016 Presidential debates, Hillary Clinton got destroyed by a Navy veteran who asked a simple enough question and one that all Americans need to ask of lying, crooked Hillary … “Had I communicated this information not following the prescribed protocols I would have been prosecuted and imprisoned. Secretary Clinton, how can you expect those such as myself who are and were trusted with America’s most sensitive information to have any confidence in your leadership as president when you clearly corrupted our national security.”

John Lester: As a Naval flight officer I held the top secret sensitive compartmentalized information clearance. And that provided me access with materials and information highly sensitive to our war fighting capabilities. Had I communicated this information not following the prescribed protocols I would have been prosecuted and imprisoned. Secretary Clinton, how can you expect those such as myself who are and were trusted with America’s most sensitive information to have any confidence in your leadership as president when you clearly corrupted our national security.

Hillary responded with more lies.

(Video Hat Tip: The Gateway Pundit)

CNN Fact Checkers Confirms Hillary Clinton Aide Destroyed Mobile Devices With Hammers (VIDEO)

HILLARY CLINTON SHOULD BE DISQUALIFIED FROM EVEN RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES …

Watch the exchange below from CNN where the smug CNN anchor stops the accusations toward Hillary Clinton and her staff destroyed mobile devices with hammers to get a fact check thinking that the accusations were “trumped” up lies. The CNN anchored learns the truth that Clinton did in fact destroy the mobile devices with hammers. Even media bias can’t help lying Hillary. When was the last time they ever fact checked Hillary Clinton on the fly?

Lying, crooked Hillary strikes again.

BORIS EPSHTEYN: 17,500 emails that she lied about turning over. The server wipe. Within weeks of there being a report that she had a private server, it was wiped. She thought that “C,” which stands for classified, stood for cookie or something. She thought that drone strikes are not classified. She said that the reason she used a private server was for convenience, that she only had one device, she used 13 Blackberries and 5 iPads. This is somebody who is absolutely disqualified from becoming president. They destroyed Blackberries with hammers in the State Department.

BROOKE BALDWIN: Evan, Evan, Evan, Evan, hold on, can you fact check that? Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, Evan Perez, hammers? Can you fact check that for me please on the fly?

EVAN PEREZ: Yes they did, Brooke. As you mentioned there were 13 devices, mobile devices and 5 iPads that the FBI said that in some way were used with her private email server and they did in some cases just destroy them with hammers when they were done using them.

ABC News/WAPO Poll: Record Number of Americans Now Dislike Hillary Clinton and Climbing … Record High, Now On Par With Trump

THE MORE AMERICANS HEAR ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON, THE MORE THEY DISLIKE HER …

According to the most current ABC News/WAPO poll, Hillary Clinton, the Democrat nominee for president is as unpopular as she has ever been and climbing. More Americans than ever now dislike Hillary. As per the poll, among all adults, 56% now view Clinton unfavorably, up 6 percentage points in three weeks. The more and more that American here of her corrupt, criminal and ethically challenged behavior with regards to use of a private email server and the use of her job as Secretary of state in a quid pro quo, incestuous relationship with the Clinton Foundation. Just today we now here that the FBI found 30 emails that were not turned over by Clinton that had to do with Benghazi. Look for her unpopularity numbers to go up even more. Hillary Clinton is a walking scandal, ethically challenged and unable to tell the truth. The reality is that if the MSM was not so bias and in the tank for Hillary, her unpopular numbers would be even high and most likely in the high 70′s.

Among registered voters, she’s now on par with Republican nominee Donald Trump, who had a 37 percent/60 percent favorable/unfavorable split in the new poll

Hillary Clinton’s unpopularity reached a new high in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll, putting her on par with Donald Trump among registered voters.

The latest findings solidify their positions as the two most unpopular presidential candidates in polling dating back more than 30 years.

Among all adults, 56 percent now view Clinton unfavorably, up 6 percentage points in three weeks, compared with 63 percent who say the same about Trump.

Among registered voters, the two candidates have nearly identical unfavorable ratings: 59 percent for Clinton versus 60 percent for Trump

Full report can be read HERE.