CNN Fact Checkers Confirms Hillary Clinton Aide Destroyed Mobile Devices With Hammers (VIDEO)

HILLARY CLINTON SHOULD BE DISQUALIFIED FROM EVEN RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES …

Watch the exchange below from CNN where the smug CNN anchor stops the accusations toward Hillary Clinton and her staff destroyed mobile devices with hammers to get a fact check thinking that the accusations were “trumped” up lies. The CNN anchored learns the truth that Clinton did in fact destroy the mobile devices with hammers. Even media bias can’t help lying Hillary. When was the last time they ever fact checked Hillary Clinton on the fly?

Lying, crooked Hillary strikes again.

BORIS EPSHTEYN: 17,500 emails that she lied about turning over. The server wipe. Within weeks of there being a report that she had a private server, it was wiped. She thought that “C,” which stands for classified, stood for cookie or something. She thought that drone strikes are not classified. She said that the reason she used a private server was for convenience, that she only had one device, she used 13 Blackberries and 5 iPads. This is somebody who is absolutely disqualified from becoming president. They destroyed Blackberries with hammers in the State Department.

BROOKE BALDWIN: Evan, Evan, Evan, Evan, hold on, can you fact check that? Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, Evan Perez, hammers? Can you fact check that for me please on the fly?

EVAN PEREZ: Yes they did, Brooke. As you mentioned there were 13 devices, mobile devices and 5 iPads that the FBI said that in some way were used with her private email server and they did in some cases just destroy them with hammers when they were done using them.

WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange Says Reporters are ‘Erecting a Demon’ by Protecting Hillary Clinton

ITS PRETTY BAD WHEN JULIAN ASSANGE BECOMES THE VOICE OF REASON … JUST HOW LOW HAS THE MEDIA FALLEN …

Julian Assange accused the press of unfairly supporting Clinton, who he described as a “demon.” Assange said, “The American liberal press, in falling over themselves to defend Hillary Clinton, are erecting a demon that is going to put nooses around everyone’s necks as soon as she wins the election, which is almost certainly what she’s going to do.” If it were not for media bias Clinton would have been forced to withdraw from the race with the scandals in her closet. But instead, a bias media props her up just enough to hold a lead over Trump. Will the Wikileaks emails of Hillary make a difference? Do the people care that she is a liar and can’t be trusted? The election will hinge on two things, the first presidential debate and what Assange truly has on Hillary Clinton with regards to her emails.

Washington Times:

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Wednesday accused “the American liberal press” of “erecting a demon” by shielding Hillary Clinton from criticism.

Mr. Assange took part in an hourlong interview with The New York Times on Facebook Live to discuss his role in influencing the 2016 presidential election.

He told journalist Jo Becker from the Ecuadorean embassy in London — where he has evaded extradition to Sweden for five years over sexual assault charges he calls political retribution — that reporters were doing the nation a disservice by not properly covering Mrs. Clinton’s record.

“The American liberal press, in falling over themselves to defend Hillary Clinton, are erecting a demon that is going to put nooses around everyone’s necks as soon as she wins the election, which is almost certainly what she’s going to do,” Mr. Assange said.

ABC News/WAPO Poll: Record Number of Americans Now Dislike Hillary Clinton and Climbing … Record High, Now On Par With Trump

THE MORE AMERICANS HEAR ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON, THE MORE THEY DISLIKE HER …

According to the most current ABC News/WAPO poll, Hillary Clinton, the Democrat nominee for president is as unpopular as she has ever been and climbing. More Americans than ever now dislike Hillary. As per the poll, among all adults, 56% now view Clinton unfavorably, up 6 percentage points in three weeks. The more and more that American here of her corrupt, criminal and ethically challenged behavior with regards to use of a private email server and the use of her job as Secretary of state in a quid pro quo, incestuous relationship with the Clinton Foundation. Just today we now here that the FBI found 30 emails that were not turned over by Clinton that had to do with Benghazi. Look for her unpopularity numbers to go up even more. Hillary Clinton is a walking scandal, ethically challenged and unable to tell the truth. The reality is that if the MSM was not so bias and in the tank for Hillary, her unpopular numbers would be even high and most likely in the high 70′s.

Among registered voters, she’s now on par with Republican nominee Donald Trump, who had a 37 percent/60 percent favorable/unfavorable split in the new poll

Hillary Clinton’s unpopularity reached a new high in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll, putting her on par with Donald Trump among registered voters.

The latest findings solidify their positions as the two most unpopular presidential candidates in polling dating back more than 30 years.

Among all adults, 56 percent now view Clinton unfavorably, up 6 percentage points in three weeks, compared with 63 percent who say the same about Trump.

Among registered voters, the two candidates have nearly identical unfavorable ratings: 59 percent for Clinton versus 60 percent for Trump

Full report can be read HERE.

FBI Recovers 30 Hillary Clinton Emails Involving Benghazi Attack That Hillary & State Department Never Turned Over

LYING, CROOKED HILLARY CLINTON BUSTED AGAIN … WILL SHE EVER BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE?

The State Department says about 30 emails that may be related to the 2012 attack on U.S. compounds in Benghazi, Libya, are among the thousands of Hillary Clinton emails recovered during the FBI’s recently closed investigation into her use of a private server. The emails were not included in the 55,000 pages previously provided by Clinton. Imagine that, she deleted them. Hillary Clinton is a lying snake who claimed she had turned over all of her business emails and only deleted the ones that where personal. Oh, I guess she was planning to take yoga classes in Libya? This was an obvious attempt by Hillary Clinton to obstruct justice and hide the emails. Will she ever be held accountable for her heinous and criminal acts?

The emails were included among the roughly 15,000 emails FBI agents said they pulled from Clinton’s server in the course of a year-long probe.

Others were deleted beyond recovery after the Democratic nominee’s team used a digital tool called BleachBit to scrub the hardware that was eventually confiscated by law enforcement agents.

The discovery of 30 such emails is significant because Clinton has repeatedly assured the public, Congress and FBI agents that she turned over all work-related communications in late 2014.

TIME:

Government lawyers told U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta Tuesday that an undetermined number of the emails among the 30 were not included in the 55,000 pages previously provided by Clinton. The State Department’s lawyer said it would need until the end of September to review the emails and redact potentially classified information before they are released.

Mehta questioned why it would take so long to release so few documents, and urged that the process be sped up. He ordered the department to report to him in a week with more details about why the review process would take a full month.

The hearing was held in one of several lawsuits filed by the conservative legal group Judicial Watch, which has sued over access to government records involving the Democratic presidential nominee. The State Department has said the FBI provided it with about 14,900 emails purported not to have been among those previously released.

UPDATE I: In further Clinton scandal news, Judicial Watch Submits Email Questions to Hillary Clinton – Written Answers, Under Oath, Due September 29.

What are the odds this gets done in time and Hillary instead says she was too busy or just flat out ignores the court order like she has ignored everything else.

The Tale of Hillary Clinton & the Clinton Foundation Corruption Continues … Donors Given Special Access to State Department

AMERICA, WHAT MORE DO YOU NEED TO SEE TO SHOW YOU THAT HILLARY CLINTON IS AS CORRUPT AS IT GETS?

The AP is reporting, not Fox News, the AP, that more than one half, at least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Hillary Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs. This is called influence peddling folks, or as many like to now refer to it as “pay for play.” What is this, the mob and a protection racket? as Powerline opines, “So it wasn’t absolutely impossible to get a meeting with the Secretary of State if you didn’t contribute to her slush fund, but it was extremely unlikely.”

How could anyone in good conscious actually vote for this corrupt woman who sold the State Department out to the highest bidder. What do you think that she will do as president?

More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money – either personally or through companies or groups – to the Clinton Foundation. It’s an extraordinary proportion indicating her possible ethics challenges if elected president.

At least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to a review of State Department calendars released so far to The Associated Press. Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million.

Donors who were granted time with Clinton included an internationally known economist who asked for her help as the Bangladesh government pressured him to resign from a nonprofit bank he ran; a Wall Street executive who sought Clinton’s help with a visa problem; and Estee Lauder executives who were listed as meeting with Clinton while her department worked with the firm’s corporate charity to counter gender-based violence in South Africa.

The AP’s findings represent the first systematic effort to calculate the scope of the intersecting interests of Clinton Foundation donors and people who met personally with Clinton or spoke to her by phone about their needs.

The 154 did not include U.S. federal employees or foreign government representatives. Clinton met with representatives of at least 16 foreign governments that donated as much as $170 million to the Clinton charity, but they were not included in AP’s calculations because such meetings would presumably have been part of her diplomatic duties.

What more do the American people need to see before they can put one and one together and get exactly what Bill and Hillary Clinton were doing? You know its bad when even the WAPO raises an eyebrow at the actions of Hillary Clinton. Sorry America, Hillary Clinton has run out of chances to say she didn’t know, she does not recollect and it was just bad judgement, and not a crime. If it was 5 to 10 out of 154 individuals, that might have been defensible. But when more than 55% of individuals overlap between State and the Clinton Foundation donors … sorry, you are guilty as hell. That goes beyond you should have known better and is an act with intent.

But, COME ON, MAN. It is literally impossible to look at those two paragraphs and not raise your eyebrows. Half of all of the nongovernmental people Clinton either met with or spoke to on the phone during her four years at the State Department were donors to the Clinton Foundation! HALF!

And those 85 people donated $156 million, which, according to my calculator, breaks down to an average contribution just north of $1.8 million. (Yes, I know that not everyone gave the same amount.)

It just plain looks bad. Really bad.

No one is alleging that the Clinton Foundation didn’t (and doesn’t) do enormous amounts of good around the world. It does. (That’s for you, my dearest Twitter haters.) But what the Clinton Foundation does with the money it receives isn’t the point here. At issue is whether there was a too-fuzzy line between Clinton’s work at the State Department and the contributions being made to the foundation. And while nothing in the AP story is proof of any wrongdoing, it is proof of bad judgment.