10/24/17: Hannity Discusses Clinton-DNC-Russian Dossier and Clinton-Obama-Russian Uranium Deal with Gregg Jarrett and Dr. Sebastian Gorka (VIDEO)

MORE MUST WATCH VIDEO FOLLOWING THE BOMBSHELL RUSSIAN DOSSIER FUNDED BY HILLARY AND DNC ..

Last night on Hannity, Sean discussed the Hillary Clinton and DNC involvement in funding the Russian dossier on Donald Trump and the Clinton-Obama-Russian Uranium One deal with Gregg Jarrett and Dr. Sebastian Gorka. With regards to the Uranium One dirty deal h Gregg Jarrett stated that the confidential FBI informant could not be gagged and prevented from speaking to Congress. Jarret cited Supreme court case, McGrane v. Doherty.

If there is collusion, it is Hillary-Russian collusion not Trump-Russian collusion. Hillary Clinton and the DNC was paying Fusion GPS for the dossier where Christopher Steele  Moscow and talked to the Kremlin and gather false information for lies and disinformation during a presidential campaign from the Russians. Hmm, where is  Special Counsel Robert Mueller?

The most shocking revelation of all that stinks to the heavens is … Robert Mueller, Rod Rosenstein, Andrew Weisman and James Comey all appear to have covered this up. They never notified Congress, which they were legally bound to do. And the Democrats and Mueller are worried about 100,00 of Facebook ads and not 20% of the United States uranium. Add AG Eric Holder to the mix as well.  They all knew in 2009 and let this deal go through. The fix was in.

Hillary Clinton Campaign and DNC Paid for Research Behind Russia Dossier (VIDEO)

HILLARY CLINTON PROVED TO BE A LIAR ONCE AGAIN … MORE CLINTON COLLUSION!

THIS IS HUGE!!! Oh the irony, for months and months the Clinton campaign has blamed the Russians for losing the election. Now it appears that the Clinton campaign and the DNC who funded the Russian dossier … BOMBSHELL from the WAPO. Marc E. Elias is a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign as well as the DNC, and made the decision to work with Fusion GPS in April 2016. This after Elias had vigorously denied any such involvement. NY Times reporter, Maggie Haberman, also does not seem to be too amused with being lied to regarding the Trump dossier. Haberman tweeted, “Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year.”

The question might be after all this time, why did the the Clinton campaign and DNC admit to funding Fusion GPS and the dossier? Could it be because Fusion GPS is having their bank records subpoenaed? Is this their way of hoping the subpoena goes away because God only knows what a treasure trove on info linking Fusion GPS and other Democrats and maybe even Republicans as well. Reports state that the Fusion GPS was initially funded by a Republican donor.

The Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped fund research that resulted in a now-famous dossier containing allegations about President Trump’s connections to Russia and possible coordination between his campaign and the Kremlin, people familiar with the matter said.

Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.

After that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community, according to those people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained the company in April 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Before that agreement, Fusion GPS’s research into Trump was funded by an unknown Republican client during the GOP primary.

The Clinton campaign and the DNC, through the law firm, continued to fund Fusion GPS’s research through the end of October 2016, days before Election Day

Oh what a tangled web they weave, when the Clinton’s practice to deceive. So the Mueller investigation was looking at Trump for collusion with the Russians, yet now we have evidence of collusion of Hillary, the Democrats and the Russians.  A presidential campaign paid for International dirt (Russia) that went thru American intel agencies and was used by the FBI.

Twitter explodes on the news of Hillary Clinton and DNC involvement as many run like rats off the sinking ship. The DNC was quick to distance itself from the new found info that it was in fact the DNC and Hillary’s campaign who was finding the “dirty” dossier stating, “Chairman Tom Perez and the new leadership of the DNC were not involved in any decision-making regarding Fusion GPS, nor were they aware that Perkins Coie was working with the organization.”

Clinton lawyer, DNC helped bankroll research that led to Trump-Russia dossier.

The Democratic National Committee and a lawyer for Hillary Clinton helped bankroll research that led to the now-infamous dossier on alleged ties between the Donald Trump campaign and Russian government operatives, sources familiar with the matter said Tuesday.

Marc Elias, a lawyer who represented the DNC and the Clinton campaign, retained a Washington firm, Fusion GPS, to carry out the research, the sources said. Services from the firm were retained from April 2016 until before the election in early November, a source said.

The involvement of the Clinton campaign and the DNC could lead to the first legal test for investigators on Capitol Hill. Fusion GPS has asked that a federal judge block a request for the House Intelligence Committee that would grant lawmakersaccess to Fusion GPS’ bank records. The firm argues that turning over the records would violate its constitutional rights.

Late last week, Trump speculated on Twitter that the dossier might have been funded by Democratic officials.

“Workers of firm involved with the discredited and Fake Dossier take the 5th. Who paid for it, Russia, the FBI or the Dems (or all)?” Trump tweeted Thursday.

Democrat Maxine Waters Threatens President Donald Trump, “I Will Go and Take Trump Out Tonight” (VIDEO)

WTF … IMAGE IF E REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS SAID THE SAME THING ABOUT BARACK OBAMA?

Hmm, so who goes high when the others go low? Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters made a threat of violence against a sitting president.  The LEFT and MSM can try and spin this all they want, this is what she did. So when will the Secret Service be paying a visit to this insanoid Democrat? Just how irresponsible can the LEFT be with their hateful rhetoric that is meant to rile up the base. This is despicable and she should be sanctioned by the House for her actions. This is not free speech, this is an act of violence.

Once again I will say, what you the LEFT’s and MSM’s reaction be in a GOP representative has made such a threat to Barack Obama? Yup, the double standard is sickening.

Who is the unstable individual who should be kicked out of politics? Maxine Waters is a lunatic. It is sad that the LEFT would actually try and defend this. They are actually defending Waters’ rhetoric. She did not say take him out in 2018 or 2020. She said tonight.

UPDATE: YouTube deletes Maxine Waters promise to ‘go and take out Trump’.

Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-FL) Laughs that She’s now a ‘Rock Star’ … What a Sick Indivual Who Thinks This is All About Her (VIDEO)

WTF … TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT WHAT THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAS BECOME … THE OPPOSITE OF OUR BRAVE, SELFLESS MILITARY

Check out the reaction below from Democrat Congresswomen Frederica Wilson following the words of former general John Kelly.  She really is an “empty barrel” and a disgrace. Representative Wilson laughed. LAUGHED!!! Like this was all about her. And she called President Trump out as having no empathy? What kind of a sick human being gets their 15 minutes of fame off the death of a military soldier? This woman is a cold hearted, narcissist who is consumed with so much hate and thinks so much of herself, maybe it is she who has some mental issues. The people of Florida in your district must be so proud.

Take a good look America of the insanity and repulsive behavior that lives and thrives in the Democrat party these days. I am shocked and appalled as well that an elected official does not have the common decency to shut up and respect the sacrifice of a fallen solder.

Following Chief of Staff General John Kelly’s comments, Rep. Frederica Wilson actually had the audacity to say that Kelly only said it to keep his job. I think she must be confusing what she would do. Really, Gen. Kelly has served the United States in the military and lost his son, who also served? A note to this poor excuse of an individual, you will never know what it means to have the character of Gen. John Kelly. You really are an empty barrel.

‘The Five’ Rips ‘Shameful’ Rep. Wilson For Claiming ‘Gen. Kelly Just Wants to Keep His Job’

White House Chief of Staff Gen. John Kelly Addresses Reporters & Blasts … Rep. Wilson (D-FL) for Politicizing the the Death of Sgt. La David Johnson (VIDEO) … “Appalled & Stunned” … “She is an Empty Barrel”

WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF GEN. KELLY SETS THE RECORD STRAIGHT AND PUTS THE LEFT, MSM AND DEMOCRATS IN THEIR PLACE.

Words cannot describe what General Kelly said yesterday in addressing the uproar over President Trump’s comments to the widow of a fallen soldier. Please take a moment to watch and see what true class and character looks like. He was stunned and broken hearted by the actions of Rep. Wilson who politicized a sacred event. Sorry folks, this man has the honor, service and sacrifice to set the record straight. The media and the LEFT might want to think twice when you go up against true character and class.

Any response from the LEFT, Democrats, liberals or the MSM rings hollow and petty. But what would you expect from empty barrels?

Transcript:

JOHN F. KELLY, White House chief of staff: Well, thanks a lot. And it is a more serious note, so I just wanted to perhaps make more of a statement than an — give more of an explanation in what amounts to be a traditional press interaction.

Most Americans don’t know what happens when we lose one of soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, our Coast Guardsmen in combat. So let me tell you what happens:

Their buddies wrap them up in whatever passes as a shroud, puts them on a helicopter as a routine, and sends them home. Their first stop along the way is when they’re packed in ice, typically at the airhead. And then they’re flown to, usually, Europe where they’re then packed in ice again and flown to Dover Air Force Base, where Dover takes care of the remains, embalms them, meticulously dresses them in their uniform with the medals that they’ve earned, the emblems of their service, and then puts them on another airplane linked up with a casualty officer escort that takes them home.

A very, very good movie to watch, if you haven’t ever seen it, is “Taking Chance,” where this is done in a movie — HBO setting. Chance Phelps was killed under my command right next to me, and it’s worth seeing that if you’ve never seen it.

So that’s the process. While that’s happening, a casualty officer typically goes to the home very early in the morning and waits for the first lights to come on. And then he knocks on the door; typically a mom and dad will answer, a wife. And if there is a wife, this is happening in two different places; if the parents are divorced, three different places. And the casualty officer proceeds to break the heart of a family member and stays with that family until — well, for a long, long time, even after the internment. So that’s what happens.

Who are these young men and women? They are the best 1 percent this country produces. Most of you, as Americans, don’t know them. Many of you don’t know anyone who knows any one of them. But they are the very best this country produces, and they volunteer to protect our country when there’s nothing in our country anymore that seems to suggest that selfless service to the nation is not only appropriate, but required. But that’s all right.

Who writes letters to the families? Typically, the company commander — in my case, as a Marine — the company commander, battalion commander, regimental commander, division commander, Secretary of Defense, typically the service chief, commandant of the Marine Corps, and the President typically writes a letter.

Typically, the only phone calls a family receives are the most important phone calls they could imagine, and that is from their buddies. In my case, hours after my son was killed, his friends were calling us from Afghanistan, telling us what a great guy he was. Those are the only phone calls that really mattered.

And yeah, the letters count, to a degree, but there’s not much that really can take the edge off what a family member is going through.

So some Presidents have elected to call. All Presidents, I believe, have elected to send letters. If you elect to call a family like this, it is about the most difficult thing you could imagine. There’s no perfect way to make that phone call.

When I took this job and talked to President Trump about how to do it, my first recommendation was he not do it because it’s not the phone call that parents, family members are looking forward to. It’s nice to do, in my opinion, in any event.

He asked me about previous Presidents, and I said, I can tell you that President Obama, who was my Commander-in-Chief when I was on active duty, did not call my family. That was not a criticism. That was just to simply say, I don’t believe President Obama called. That’s not a negative thing. I don’t believe President Bush called in all cases. I don’t believe any President, particularly when the casualty rates are very, very high — that Presidents call. But I believe they all write.

So when I gave that explanation to our President three days ago, he elected to make phone calls in the cases of four young men who we lost in Niger at the earlier part of this month. But then he said, how do you make these calls? If you’re not in the family, if you’ve never worn the uniform, if you’ve never been in combat, you can’t even imagine how to make that call. I think he very bravely does make those calls.

The call in question that he made yesterday — or day before yesterday now — were to four family members, the four fallen. And remember, there’s a next-of-kin designated by the individual. If he’s married, that’s typically the spouse. If he’s not married, that’s typically the parents unless the parents are divorced, and then he selects one of them. If he didn’t get along with his parents, he’ll select a sibling. But the point is, the phone call is made to the next-of-kin only if the next-of-kin agrees to take the phone call. Sometimes they don’t.

So a pre-call is made: The President of the United States or the commandant of the Marine Corps, or someone would like to call, will you accept the call? And typically, they all accept the call.

So he called four people the other day and expressed his condolences in the best way that he could. And he said to me, what do I say? I said to him, sir, there’s nothing you can do to lighten the burden on these families.

Well, let me tell you what I told him. Let me tell you what my best friend, Joe Dunford, told me — because he was my casualty officer. He said, Kel, he was doing exactly what he wanted to do when he was killed. He knew what he was getting into by joining that 1 percent. He knew what the possibilities were because we’re at war. And when he died, in the four cases we’re talking about, Niger, and my son’s case in Afghanistan — when he died, he was surrounded by the best men on this Earth: his friends.

That’s what the President tried to say to four families the other day. I was stunned when I came to work yesterday morning, and brokenhearted at what I saw a member of Congress doing. A member of Congress who listened in on a phone call from the President of the United States to a young wife, and in his way tried to express that opinion — that he’s a brave man, a fallen hero, he knew what he was getting himself into because he enlisted. There’s no reason to enlist; he enlisted. And he was where he wanted to be, exactly where he wanted to be, with exactly the people he wanted to be with when his life was taken.

That was the message. That was the message that was transmitted.

It stuns me that a member of Congress would have listened in on that conversation. Absolutely stuns me. And I thought at least that was sacred. You know, when I was a kid growing up, a lot of things were sacred in our country. Women were sacred, looked upon with great honor. That’s obviously not the case anymore as we see from recent cases. Life — the dignity of life — is sacred. That’s gone. Religion, that seems to be gone as well.

Read more