EPIC … Rep. Trey Gowdy Rips Rosenstein About DOJ, FBI Corruption and Conflicts of Interest (VIDEO)

TREY GOWDY SHOULD HAVE BEEN ATTORNEY GENERAL …

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein testified before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday morning and Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) let his have it. Bob Goodlatte, the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. called for the hearing after recent media reports revealed the political bias and motives of Special Counsel Mueller’s staff.

As Gowdy begins his grilling of Rosenstein … “What the hell is going on at the Department of Justice and the FBI!!!”

Trey Gowdy questioned the conflicts of interests in the DOJ, FBI and the Mueller Special Counsel. Gowdy pointed out the very reason for a Special Counsel is to avoid conflicts of interest then continues to outline all of the corruption and conflicts of interest with the associates in the Mueller investigation. The DOJ, FBI and Mueller Special Counsel is rife with conflicts of interest, collusion and corruption.

Mueller Probe ‘Conflicts of Interest’ Troublesome for an ‘Objective FBI’:

Congressman Trey Gowdy said the perceived conflicts of interest in Robert Mueller’s probe of President Trump hurt the FBI’s and DOJ’s standing in the public’s view.

“This was a really bad fact pattern,” Gowdy (R-S.C.) said of allegations of politically charged language or actions against Peter Strzok, Andrew Weissmann and Bruce Ohr.

“These are really bad facts if you believe in an impartial Department of Justice and FBI,” he said.

Gowdy grilled Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein about “obsequious emails” sent by Weissmann to “a fact witness” later identified as outgoing Attorney General Sally Yates.

Trey Gowdy discusses his question of Rosenstein post EPIC rant

Clinton Mole & FBI Agent Peter Strzok Dismissed from Mueller Probe Changed Comey’s Description of Clinton to ‘Extremely Careless’

WHAT A SHOCK, A DOUBLE STANDARD FOR HILLARY CLINTON …

Just how much corruption was there in the Hillary Clinton email investigation? How does the pro-Hillary FBI agent Peter Strzok find his way on both the Hillary Clinton email server investigation and Robert Mueller’s witch hunt? Does anyone really wonder? And why didn’t Mueller inform everyone that one of the key investigators had such a conflict of interest? Mueller has a HUGE credibility problem. Mueller already had conflicts of interest in this investigation. Now it would seem impossible how this investigation could ever be impartial or credible. It was a witch hunt from the outset.

VIA CNN:

A former top counterintelligence expert at the FBI, now at the center of a political uproar for exchanging private messages that appeared to mock President Donald Trump, changed a key phrase in former FBI Director James Comey’s description of how former secretary of state Hillary Clinton handled classified information, according to US officials familiar with the matter.

Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey’s earlier draft language describing Clinton’s actions as “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” the sources said.
The drafting process was a team effort, CNN is told, with a handful of people reviewing the language as edits were made, according to another US official familiar with the matter.

The shift from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for “gross negligence.”

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, raised questions over why the change was made after receiving documents from the FBI last month, but the identity of who was behind the edit has not been reported until now.

CNN has also learned that Strzok was the FBI official who signed the document officially opening an investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, according to sources familiar with the matter. As the No. 2 official in counterintelligence, Strzok was considered to be one of the bureau’s top experts on Russia.
But the news of Strzok’s direct role in the statement that ultimately cleared the former Democratic presidential candidate of criminal wrongdoing, now combined with the fact that he was dismissed from special counsel Robert Mueller’s team after exchanging private messages with an FBI lawyer that could be seen as favoring Clinton politically, may give ammunition to those seeking ways to discredit Mueller’s Russia investigation.

Sean Hannity 12/5/2017: The Mueller Deep State Witch Hunt … Hillary Clinton Double Standard and Trump-hating FBI Agent Peter Strzok (VIDEO)

THIS IS UNREAL HOW CORRUPT THE FBI IS AND WAS …

Watch and learn and you will begin to see how all the pieces fit together. The fix was in from the start with the Hillary Clinton investigation and subversive, Trump haters in the FBI paved the way for the current Mueller witch hunt. Sorry, Mueller’s investigation has zero credibility at this point. Maybe it is the FBI, James Comey and Mueller who need to be investigation for obstruction of justice, collusion, covering up and corruption?

Attorney General Jeff Sessions Considering Second Special Counsel to investigate wrongdoing by the Clinton Foundation and the controversial Sale of a Uranium Company to Russia

WHATS GOOD FOR INVESTIGATIONS OF DONALD TRUMP AND THE RUSSIANS SHOULD BE GOOD FOR THE GANDER AND THE CLINTON’S AND THE RUSSIANS AS WELL …

Fox News is reporting that Attorney Jeff Sessions directed senior federal prosecutors to evaluate “certain issues” requested by congressional Republicans, involving the sale of Uranium One and alleged unlawful dealings related to the Clinton Foundation, leaving the door open for an appointment of another special counsel. The Democrats can whine all they want, the questions is, why wouldn’t he? Why are the Clinton’s, Democrats and the Obama administration exempt from scrutiny? The questions is, who colluded with who? After a year of special counsel investigations by Mueller, there is nothing that ties the Trump campaign with Russia in some type of collusion during the election. But what if the Trump Foundation received $150 million form the Russian or one of Donald trump’s sons got speaking fees of $150,000 from the Russians? Think that would be big news? But that’s right, that was the Clinton’s who received such things from the Russians.

In a letter first obtained by Fox News, the Justice Department responded to July 27 and September 26 requests from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and other committee members, who called for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate the matters in question.

The letter comes on the eve of Sessions’ testimony before the same committee, scheduled for Tuesday.

“The Attorney General has directed senior federal prosecutors to evaluate certain issues raised in your letters,” Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wrote.

“These senior prosecutors will report directly to the Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General [Rod Rosenstein], as appropriate, and will make recommendations as to whether any matters not currently under investigation should be opened, whether any matters currently under investigation require further resources, or whether any matters merit the appointment of a Special Counsel,” Boyd wrote.

The Justice Department does not ordinarily confirm or deny investigations, and Boyd wrote that “this letter should not be construed to do so.”

The Justice Department’s letter specifically said that some of the topics requested by Goodlatte and other committee members were already being investigated by the department’s Inspector General’s office.

The letter specifically mentioned allegations related to the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email probe, including allegations that DOJ and FBI “policies or procedures” were “not followed in connection with, or in actions leading up to or related to” then-FBI Director James Comey’s public announcement to close the Clinton email “matter” on July 5, 2016, or the letter he sent lawmakers on October 28, 2016, about newly discovered Clinton emails, and that those “investigative decisions were based on improper considerations.”

WAPO:

Attorney General Jeff Sessions is entertaining the idea of appointing a second special counsel to investigate a host of Republican concerns — including alleged wrongdoing by the Clinton Foundation and the controversial sale of a uranium company to Russia — and has directed senior federal prosecutors to explore at least some of the matters and report back to him and his top deputy, according to a letter obtained by The Washington Post.

The revelation came in a response by the Justice Department to an inquiry from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), who in July and again in September called for Sessions to appoint a second special counsel to investigate concerns he had related to the 2016 election and its aftermath.

The list of matters he wanted probed was wide ranging but included the FBI’s handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of state, various dealings of the Clinton Foundation and several matters connected to the purchase of the Canadian mining company Uranium One by Russia’s nuclear energy agency. Goodlatte took particular aim at former FBI director James B. Comey, asking for the second special counsel to evaluate the leaks he directed about his conversations with President Trump, among other things.

Former DNC Chair Donna Brazile Says About the Clinton Campaign: ‘It Was a Cult, I Felt Like It Was a Cult’ (VIDEO)

MORE DEVASTATING COMMENTS FROM DONNA BRAZILE REGARDING HILLARY CLINTON AND HER CAMPAIGN …

Former interim DNC chair Donna Brazile appeared Wednesday on The Morning Joe to discuss her new book, Hacked, that is exposing the underbelly of the beast known as the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s dirty and unethical tricks. Donna Brazile was asked, why did she, Hillary, ultimately lose the 2016 presidential election. Brazile admitted that Hillary’s arrogance is what caused her to lose the election and that her campaign was like a cult. Brazile said, “Yes, Joe, it was a cult. I felt like it was a cult. You could not penetrate them.” Brazile went on to say that she’s a grassroot organizer yet didn’t have the resources to do her job because of Hillary’s control of the money.

Brazile has been like a one woman wrecking crew with exerts from her new book, exposing the dirty little secrets of the DNC and Hillary’s campaign.

Via The Washington Examiner:

Former Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Donna Brazile said Hillary Clinton’s campaign was like a “cult” that became impossible to persuade that it needed to reach out to other states that Donald Trump eventually won.

“It was a cult,” she said on MSNBC. “I felt like it was a cult. You could not penetrate them.”

Former Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Donna Brazile said Hillary Clinton’s campaign was like a “cult” that became impossible to persuade that it needed to reach out to other states that Donald Trump eventually won.

“It was a cult,” she said on MSNBC. “I felt like it was a cult. You could not penetrate them.”