Judge Napolitano Discusses Bill Clinton’s Criticisms of ObamaCare, FBI’s Immunity Deal to Destroy Clinton Aid Laptops (VIDEO)
LIES AND CORRUPTION FROM OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND THE BENDING OVER BACKWARDS TO COVER UP FOR HILLARY CLINTON …
In Fox & Friends, Judge Napolitano discusses Bill Clinton’s sodium pentothal Obacare moment, a new low for the FBI and the DOJ carrying water for Hillary Clinton in abruptly stopping a case against an arms dealer.
Posted October 7, 2016 by Scared Monkeys Benghazi-Gate, Bill Clinton, Bill Clinton, collusion, Conspiracy, Corruption, Cover-Up, Crime, cronyism, Department of Justice (DOJ), DOJ - Dept of Justice, Ethics, Hillary Clinton, Libya, Obamacare, Obamatax, Quid Pro Quo, You Tube - VIDEO | 4 comments |
MOJO: Top 10 Reasons Why a Hillary Clinton Presidency Isn’t Guaranteed (VIDEO)
Hmm, Watch Mojo actually has one of their Top 10′s for Hillary not guaranteed the presidency.
This was created prior to the Democrat and Republican nominees were picked. However, what isn’t included in this was all the lies and obvious crimes Hillary has been caught in with regards to the use of her private emails and the use of a private email server. Which makes her even more unelectable.
MOJO needs to update their VIDEO with the following:
- The fact that Hillary cannot stay upright and has an obvious neurological issue.
- She can’t seem to tell the truth.
- Private email and private server scandal while Secretary of State.
- Secretary of State and Clinton Foundation conflict of interest.
- Deplorable’s comment
Posted September 18, 2016 by Scared Monkeys Benghazi-Gate, Clinton Foundation, collusion, Corruption, Cover-Up, cronyism, Establishment candidates, Ethics, Hillary Clinton, Liars, Partisan hack, Politics, Quid Pro Quo, Scandal, You Got Email-gate, You Tube - VIDEO | no comments |
Analysis of Commander-In-Chief Forum from The Kelly File (VIDEO)
Watch the below analysis from The Kelly File of the Commander in Chief forum and the exposing of Hillary Clinton’s continued lies. The problem is that Hillary Clinton cannot explain away her lies and the crimes that the FBI and Justice Department refused to hold her accountable. If exposing American secrets is not a disqualifying event to run as president, what is?
Posted September 9, 2016 by Scared Monkeys collusion, Corruption, Cover-Up, Crime, cronyism, Ethics, Hillary Clinton, Scandal, You Got Email-gate, You Tube - VIDEO | no comments |
NBC Moderator Matt Lauer Fields Storm of Criticism Over Clinton-Trump Forum Because He Actually Asked Hillary Tough Questions (VIDEO)
HOW COMICAL, MATT LAUER RECEIVES MAJOR CRITICISM BECAUSE HE DIDN’T THROW HILLARY SOFT BALLS AND PROTECT LYING, CROOKED HILLARY …
The LEFT and the liberal MSM headed by the New York Times is losing their mind and crying foul because Matt Lauer actual did what a moderators was supposed to do last night and pressed Democrat Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on her emails and exposing classified information. How dare he ask her tough questions. How comical that those on the LEFT have suddenly realized that there is no more real journalism in America. But not because of any valid reasons. only because one actually tried to hold Hillary’s feet to the fire. Guess what, that is what the media is supposed to do, irregardless of what political party they are.
Matt Lauer asks, why was it just a mistake and not disqualifying? Liberals are upset that Lauer did not give Hillary Clinton a pass. The LEFT is upset that Lauer did not carry the water for Hillary and deflect that fact that she is a liar and mishandled top secret documents. So the LEFT is upset because some one actually dare vet Hillary and confront her with her reckless and illegal actions.
The judgment as President questions begin at the 4:40 minute mark of video
It was a high-stakes political moment, far from the chummier confines of the “Today” show and, for Matt Lauer, NBC’s stalwart of the morning, a chance to prove his broadcasting mettle on the presidential stage.
The consensus afterward was not kind.
Charged with overseeing a live prime-time forum with Donald J. Trump and Hillary Clinton — widely seen as a dry run of sorts for the coming presidential debates — Mr. Lauer found himself besieged on Wednesday evening by critics of all political stripes, who accused the anchor of unfairness, sloppiness and even sexism in his handling of the event.
Granted 30 minutes with each candidate, who appeared back-to-back at the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum in Manhattan, Mr. Lauer devoted about a third of his time with Mrs. Clinton to questions about her use of a private email server, then seemed to rush through subsequent queries about weighty topics like domestic terror attacks.
When an Army veteran in the audience asked Mrs. Clinton to describe her plan to defeat the Islamic State, Mr. Lauer interjected before the candidate could begin her reply.
More from the Transcripts of the Clinton-Trump MSNBC Commander in Chief Forum:
LAUER: You’re talking about judgment.
CLINTON: … and then makes the decision. Makes the decision, that’s right.
LAUER: So judgment is a key.
CLINTON: Temperament and judgment, yes.
LAUER: The word “judgment” has been used a lot around you, Secretary Clinton, over the last year-and-a-half, and in particular concerning your use of your personal e-mail and server to communicate while you were secretary of state. You’ve said it’s a mistake.
CLINTON: Mm-hmm.
LAUER: You said you made not the best choice. You were communicating on highly sensitive topics. Why wasn’t it more than a mistake? Why wasn’t it disqualifying, if you want to be commander-in- chief?
CLINTON: Well, Matt, first of all, as I have said repeatedly, it was a mistake to have a personal account. I would certainly not do it again. I make no excuses for it. It was something that should not have been done.
But the real question is the handling of classified material, which is I think what the implication of your question was. And for all the viewers watching you tonight, I have a lot of experience dealing with classified material, starting when I was on the Senate Armed Services Committee going into the four years as secretary of state. Classified material has a header which says “top secret,” “secret,” “confidential.” Nothing — and I will repeat this, and this is verified in the report by the Department of Justice — none of the e-mails sent or received by me had such a header.
LAUER: Were some of the e-mails sent or received by you referring to our drone program, our covert drone program?
CLINTON: Yes, because — of course, there were no discussions of any of the covert actions in process being determined about whether or not to go forward. But every part of our government had to deal with questions, and the secretary of state’s office was first and foremost. So there are ways of talking about the drone program…
(CROSSTALK)
LAUER: And you said you thought your communications on that were fairly routine?
CLINTON: Well, let me say, the FBI just released their report about their investigation, they discussed drone matters in the unclassified section of their report.
LAUER: But Director Comey also said this after reviewing all the information. He said there is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.
CLINTON: Well, Matt, I just respectfully point to the hundreds of experienced foreign policy experts, diplomats, defense officials who were communicating information on the unclassified system because it was necessary to answer questions and to be able publicly to go as far as we could, which was not acknowledging the program.
But I would be in Pakistan, as I was on several occasions. There might very well have been a strike. I would be asked in a public setting, in an interview, about it. It was known to have happened. We had to have an answer that did not move into classified area. And I think we handled that appropriately.
LAUER: You mentioned you’re in Pakistan. Some of the e-mails you sent and received happened while you were overseas. And Director Comey also said that while they have no proof, we assessed that it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail accounts.
CLINTON: Matt, there is no evidence. Of course anything is possible. But what is factual is the State Department system was hacked. Most of the government systems are way behind the curve. We’ve had hacking repeatedly, even in the White House. There is no evidence my system was hacked.
Posted September 8, 2016 by Scared Monkeys collusion, Corruption, Cover-Up, Crime, cronyism, Democrat-Media Complex, Ethics, Hillary Clinton, Liars, Media, Media Bias, MSNBC, NBC, You Got Email-gate, You Tube - VIDEO | 4 comments |
CNN Fact Checkers Confirms Hillary Clinton Aide Destroyed Mobile Devices With Hammers (VIDEO)
HILLARY CLINTON SHOULD BE DISQUALIFIED FROM EVEN RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES …
Watch the exchange below from CNN where the smug CNN anchor stops the accusations toward Hillary Clinton and her staff destroyed mobile devices with hammers to get a fact check thinking that the accusations were “trumped” up lies. The CNN anchored learns the truth that Clinton did in fact destroy the mobile devices with hammers. Even media bias can’t help lying Hillary. When was the last time they ever fact checked Hillary Clinton on the fly?
Lying, crooked Hillary strikes again.
BORIS EPSHTEYN: 17,500 emails that she lied about turning over. The server wipe. Within weeks of there being a report that she had a private server, it was wiped. She thought that “C,” which stands for classified, stood for cookie or something. She thought that drone strikes are not classified. She said that the reason she used a private server was for convenience, that she only had one device, she used 13 Blackberries and 5 iPads. This is somebody who is absolutely disqualified from becoming president. They destroyed Blackberries with hammers in the State Department.
BROOKE BALDWIN: Evan, Evan, Evan, Evan, hold on, can you fact check that? Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, Evan Perez, hammers? Can you fact check that for me please on the fly?
EVAN PEREZ: Yes they did, Brooke. As you mentioned there were 13 devices, mobile devices and 5 iPads that the FBI said that in some way were used with her private email server and they did in some cases just destroy them with hammers when they were done using them.
Posted September 4, 2016 by Scared Monkeys CNN, collusion, Corruption, Cover-Up, Crime, cronyism, Ethics, Hillary Clinton, Liars, Media Bias, Quid Pro Quo, WTF, You Got Email-gate, You Tube - VIDEO | 4 comments |