CNN: Obama Administration Using These Gruesome Videos of Alleged Chemical Attack to Guilt America into Military Action Against Assad & Syrian

As reported at CNN, the Obama Administration is using gruesome and disturbing videos of the aftermath of a chemical attack against the Syrian people by Syrian President Assad. But how is this any different than being told that a chemical attack occurred? It’s more of the same play on emotional, rather than telling us, “We the People” and Congress, what is the reason why there needs to be US involvement in a Syrian civil war. Of course this is heinous, but there are many things that occur in this world that are heinous that the US does nothing about. Sec. of State John Kerry had stated regarding Syria, ‘Not the Time to Be Silent Spectators to Slaughter’.  So let’s understand this, the first 100,000 people killed in Syria, that was OK to be a silent spectator, but now that chemical weapons were used, that is different? Really?

Barack Obama, John Kerry, et all have still failed to explain how this was against US national security.

I still do not know how Obama could draw a “red line” yet have nothing in place so if one went over that line, retaliation would occur. You don’t make such claims and ultimatums if you have butkis. This rodeo clown is so used to playing politics with his rhetoric against the GOP, that he has no concept how to act as a leader on world events. Instead, he folded like a house of cards and showed he has zero leadership skills.

These are some of the hard-to-stomach images that the Obama administration has shown a select group of senators in closed-door briefings to make the case that a limited military attack on Syria is justified.

CNN was the first to obtain the 13 different videos seen by members of the Senate Intelligence Committee that depict the gruesome scene of an chemical weapons attack in Syria on August 21. The administration told senators that their authenticity was verified by the intelligence community.

The attack, allegedly carried out by Syrian forces under President Bashar al-Assad, has touched off the most critical foreign policy question since the uprising began in 2011: Is a military response merited?

Video Warning – Disturbing in nature

As the anniversary of 9-11 is nearly upon us and the one year anniversary of the Benghazi terror attack, Obama’s greatest obstacle is how does he justify attacking Assad that will benefit the Al-Qaeda infested Syrian government opposition, when we have supposedly been at war with these terrorists for 12 years? Sorry, but how does the United States act in any military fashion that would aid Al-Qaeda?

6 Responses to “CNN: Obama Administration Using These Gruesome Videos of Alleged Chemical Attack to Guilt America into Military Action Against Assad & Syrian”

1. katts on September 8th, 2013 1:35 pm

   In the news today it was stated that the UK allowed the sale of gas to Syria

2. katts on September 8th, 2013 1:46 pm

   Being that many the worlds countries have large Muslim populations; the UK,France, Sweden, US, what do people think is realistically going to happen?

   That the immigrant Muslims will side with their Christian host countries? It will be chaos from the inside out

   Think martial law, gun confiscation and all the domestic battles Obama lost, now enforced by executive order.

   A possibility? A plan?

3. katts on September 8th, 2013 2:19 pm

   The perfect planned storm.

   Today’s headlines UK provided gas to Syria for 6 years

   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415081/Britain-sent-poison-chemicals-Assad-Proof-UK-delivered-Sarin-agent-Syrian

   You must well know this is no coincidence. The US government had to know all along that the UK was providing the Syrian gas, and has lied in wait for an opportune time to start serious trouble

   Just a coincidence that these Christian countries populations have all had Muslim immigration foisted upon them despite the populations outraged protests?

   So a sufficient level of Muslim immigration has been reached to assure enough internal strife and chaos as to dictate martial law, or at least a cover for continued globalization – the destruction of each country’s independent sovereignty.

4. Westfield on September 8th, 2013 3:37 pm

   and we were going to sell them F16 fighter jets? Hmmm

5. katts on September 8th, 2013 5:28 pm

   And who benefits

   Wallstreet – as this will fix their balence sheets. Evil, plain and simple evil

   Good article
   http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-08/guest-post-qe-us-foreign-policy-and-who-really-wins-upcoming-war-syria

   Also Jim Rogers previous partner of George Soros and founder of the Quantum fund last week posted this not so subtle hint.

   In his book “Investment Biker” he states that war is always about money, never anything but.

   Sept 4, 2013 THE PROFIT MOTIVE 1990

   http://jimrogers-investments.blogspot.com/2013/09/video-profit-motive-1990.html

6. A Texas Grandfather on September 8th, 2013 9:42 pm

   War is always about money and spoils that enrich those who provide the money.

   The Rothchild family often were involved in funding both sides prior to WWI.

Leave a Reply