RSSBarack Obama … Pandering and the Paying for Votes, From Obamacare to Welfare to Taxes … the Redistribution of Wealth for Votes
The Panderer in Chief, Obama’s War of Dependence …
President Barack Obama stated that if his $787 billion stimulus was passed unemployment would be kept below 8%. We all know that did not happen as the United States has experienced 41+ months of unemployment over 8%. What of the tax payers hard earned money that was allocated to failed “green” energy companies that were Obama backers? What about Obamacare that as it turns out will increase the cost of healthcare and not insure the very people that Obama intended it to. Instead, many companies will most likely take the $2000 penalty and push the employees off on the government plan and in turn creating a further dependent America. What about the fact that more people applied for disability rather than jobs created in the last couple of months? Obama has even gone so far to gut welfare reform, a bi-partisan law passed during the Clinton Administration. Why, to pander to the lazy for votes and make Americans even more generationallly dependent.
Courtesy: Vanderbilt ’12
The way that ole Obama is throwin’ around We the People’s
hard earned money to chum up votes and add great numbers
to the dependency dole, we should at least sit up and take note.
If he is rehired for another four years, we may not be able to
borrow enough from China and our great grandchildren in order
to pay for his extensive Regime, let alone take care
of America’s actual pressing issues.
So why is Barack Obama doing nothing for the economy? Why are his policies directly going against the tenants of American capitalism? Why did he block the XL Keystone pipeline that would have created 1000′s of jobs and now Democrats backpedal as China readies $15.1 billion Canadian oil deal. Thanks Barack. Instead we have a President who would rather fund raise and golf, rather than attend his own Jobs panel. Is it any wonder that Americans now blame Obama for the bad economy and not GWB.
Instead of a President who emboldened Americans to remain “exceptional”, we are presented with a President who is all about class warfare. Barack Obama, the welfare and food stamp President would rather make Americans dependent upon the government than themselves. In the end, this is what his grand master scheme is. Create a class of people that because slaves to the State and in turn buy their votes forever.
AMERICA, WAKE UP … the United States fought a War of Independence, not dependence. Whether that King is across the Atlantic or in Washington, DC … this country was founded on hard work, risk taking and determination, not dependence on government.
Posted July 30, 2012 by Scared Monkeys 2012 Elections, Barack Obama, Capitaism, Crony Capitalism, Economy, Jobs, Keystone XL Pipeline, Presidential Election, Recession, The Lying King, Unemployment | 9 comments |
If you liked this post, you may also like these:
Comments
9 Responses to “Barack Obama … Pandering and the Paying for Votes, From Obamacare to Welfare to Taxes … the Redistribution of Wealth for Votes”
Leave a Reply
AMERICA, WAKE UP …
AMERICA, WAKE UP … the United States fought a War of Independence, not dependence. Whether that King is across the Atlantic or in Washington, DC … this country was founded on hard work, risk taking and determination, not dependence on government.
Posted July 30, 2012 by Scared Monkeys
++++++
The entire Patrick Buchanan article is a must read.
.
.
In the Long Run, Is the GOP Dead?
by Patrick J. Buchanan: Obama’s America – and Ours
The GOP must work harder to win Hispanic votes, we are told. But consider the home economics and self-interest of Hispanics.
Half of all U.S. wage-earners pay no income tax. Yet that half and their families receive free education K-12, Medicaid, rent supplements, food stamps, earned income tax credits, Pell grants, welfare payments, unemployment checks and other benefits.
Why should poor, working- and middle-class Hispanics, the vast majority, vote for a party that will reduce taxes they don’t pay, but cut the benefits they do receive?
The majority of Latinos, African-Americans, immigrants and young people 18 to 25 pay no income taxes yet enjoy a panoply of government benefits. Does not self-interest dictate a vote for the party that will let them keep what they have and perhaps give them more, rather than the party that will pare back what they now receive?
Read more:
http://lewrockwell.com/buchanan/buchanan255.html
ALLEN WEST: The Obama Administration’s Immigration Order Is A Voter Fraud Ploy
Jun. 15, 2012
“I think there’s devils in the details,” West said. “That’s why we should allow this legislative process to go through our committees. Because I can start to ask questions about what is going to happen as far as their right to vote.
“Is this one of those backdoor opportunities to allow people in the next five months to get the opportunity to vote? Will we see Janet Napolitano and the president come out with a new edict that says, ‘Since we allow this people to be here legally, we’re now going to allow them to have the opportunity to vote. So, how far down the rabbit hole does this go? That’s the greatest concern — that we have something where we really don’t know how the details will flesh out. We just have this basic executive order.”
Read more:
http://www.businessinsider.com/allen-west-obama-immigration-dream-act-voter-fraud-tea-party-2012-6
Allen West Comments on Obama Immigration Policy – (June 15, 2012)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhpN9nvduoU
The United States fought a War of Independence, not dependence. Whether that King is across the Atlantic or in Washington, DC … this country was founded on hard work, risk taking and determination, not dependence on government and the fact the natives believed we would honor our treaties before we stole the land.
Next up…how the the Puritans loved to hang “shakers” and how our forefather’s were “traitors”… more history please!
__________________
SM: What a surprise that you could not tell the differencfe between a Patriot and a traitor. Then again, it figures, I expect very little.
Here is the history lesson …
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
“that all men are created equal”, except wo-men and bla-ck men and gay men/women and Catholic’s. That took awhile. When the rich own the entire United States, like Ted Turner and Koch brothers and your great grand children are wage slave renters and sharecroppers, play your “Patriot” trump card and see what happens. A dog pen in Gitmo waits for thee. By then it will be Correction Corporation of America as no bid jailers and Mitt’s great grand kids will go to BYU by selling off alittle bit of the stock.
_________________
SM: If you hate this country so much, you could always leave and go elsewhere.
At first entitlements are lavished on anyone and everyone. Soon
the source of the entitlement monies dries up because everyone
is taking it and no one is earning it to give to the nice Government.
Two classes remain: 1.) the “everyone created equal class” of
the masses, and 2.) the “central Government class” which runs
the masses as it pleases. One might think that the “central Government
class’ would make certain that everyone in the masses got to have
$6800 shirts, $540 sneakers, lavish vacations, lobster/caviar, frequent
golf games, mansions, and top of the line healthcare.
RE: “President Barack Obama stated that if his $787 billion stimulus was passed unemployment would be kept below 8%.”
[8% was from a chart written and release by two Obama economic advisers released on 1-10-09 (http://goo.gl/CLLXN). The chart was an estimate, not a factual statement or especially an promise as oft claimed]
———-
According to the BLS, the monthly 2009 UE numbers for Jan / Feb / Mar were 7.8% / 8.3% / 8.7% respectively. It is safe to expect that UE was at or near 8.0% on inauguration day (1-20-09).
After Obama became President, UE continued to grow the rest of 2009 steadily, month by month [Apr:8.9 / May:9.4 / Jun:9.5 / Jul:9.5 / Aug:9.6 / Sep:9.8 / Oct:10.0 / Nov:9.9 / Dec:9.9] , with its peak in October 2009 as shown. Now something caused the rates to move as they did. Although some may opine that Obama somehow caused (or laughably was responsible for) the pre-inauguration rate changes, that seems unlikely.
Looking beyond inauguration, there must also be a cause for the rate changes. If some believe an Obama policy added to the rate changes, I’ve not heard of their reasoning. If the entire period from April 2008 is looked at, there is a continuous job decline from then until the 2009 peak.
A reasonable premise might be that the ongoing 2007 recession during that period was the primary, and likely sole factor in the steady decline in jobs (increase in UE). At a minimum, the period before 1-20-09 was where Bush policies were affecting the economy. Perhaps some think the new administration have immediate accountability for economic conditions on day 1. I’d like to hear the explanation behind such thinking, as I doubt a faltering and crashing economy can be quickly shifted off its course.
———-
But I digress. The real idea I’m posting about is when did the UE rate actually exceeded 8.0%. It was late January 2009, and thinking that that economy could have been kept from exceeding 8.0% seems out-of-place, since it was already at or beyond 8.0%, and the stimulus passage was still about a month away (2-19-09).
Once you learn the facts behind the story, further attempts to hold Obama to an impossible task will sound foolish.
That pretty much sums it up for me.
The redistribution of wealth for votes is spot on.
Obama literally had lots of help (ACORN, for starters) buying perhaps millions of votes in to office in 2008, and he will have more help this time as well.
What frightens me, as a Mass resident, is that since the economy is still in rough shape with so many more millions of Americans out of work- that Obama will actually end up having a better chance of getting re-elected since he is a liberal bleeding heart Democrat (Socialist in disguise) who continually puts his message out there about financially assisting the lower Socio-Economic Class.
Because of his own failed policies, stimulus packages, assorted bail-outs and other disasters while in office-he may have actually helped himself in to being the President for yet another four years.
I don’t have much faith in the American Public anymore because they were fooled the last time, and the Great Teleprompter in Chief keeps spinning all his lies about how many jobs he has created and “moving forward to finish his plan.”
Are Americans going to be stupid or desparate enough to buy it the second time around?
Add to the mix that Romney is not the most personable Man around, and I honestly don’t know.
I think Mitt has got to get tougher and make certain he picks a VP Candidate who has a much different persona than him. I really wished Rubio were the guy.
Mitt is too nice, he needs a partner who doesn’t mince words and puts a kick ass message out there.
RE: “Obama literally had lots of help (ACORN, for starters) buying perhaps millions of votes in to office in 2008″
Wow, it must really be interesting living in your universe where anything said, no matter how wild and wacky, can have any real meaning.
I don’t know how I would be able to navigate reality with such uncritical thinking skills that leads to and supports saying and believing such drivel.