Charles Krauthammer Says The Court’s Decision on Trump’s Order ‘Disgraceful’ (VIDEO)

The Court substituted their judgement as to what constitutes a threat of American security for the president’s …

Donald Trump Responds to Appeals Court Ruling on Executive Order on Temp Travel Ban … “SEE YOU IN COURT”

TRUMP RESPONDS …

President Donald Trump responded to the 9th circus ruling to this executive order calling for a temporary travel ban by tweeting, “SEE YOU IN COURT”. And so they will as the 9th Circuit court of appeals has a 80% reversal rate at the United States Supreme Court. One has to wonder why they even have this court of appeals if that many decisions are overturned and reversed. It is obvious that this court is political and operates outside the U.S. Constitution.

“SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!” He later said to reporters that the judges had made “a political decision.”

“We have a situation where the security of our country is at stake, and it’s a very, very serious situation, so we look forward, as I just said, to seeing them in court,” he said.

UNBELIEVABLE … CNN Host Chris Cuomo Says ‘Fake News’ Insult is the ‘Equivalent of the N-word for Journalists’

AS IF THE LIBERAL MSM COULD NOT GET ANY MORE RIDICULOUS AND BE MORE INSULTINGLY WRONG …

So are black Americans going to boycott CNN after this misguided and insulting comment? CNN’s Chris Cuomo said that be believes using the term “fake news” toward the media  is the equivalent of the N-words for journalists. WOW. How could anyone be so arrogant and ignorant to make such a ridiculous comment? A note to Chris Cuomo, CNN and the rest of the MSM … the use of the word “fake news” to describe what you people pass as news is NOTHING LIKE THE N-WORD! Is this really what the liberal news thinks of black people? That some how they are in the same boat of racism and bigotry as some because they are being called out for what is bias journalism with a liberal agenda?The smug Cuomo said, you better be right if you are going to charge a journalist with fake news. REALLY? How about the journalist better get the story right and actually do the sourcing before they spew their liberal agenda based reports?

I cant wait for the backlash on these foolish comments and the apology.

CNN host Chris Cuomo said on Thursday that he believes hurling the “fake news” insult at journalists is similar to when people use racial slurs against minorities.

“I see being called ‘fake news’ as the equivalent of the N-word for journalists, the equivalent of calling an Italian any of the ugly words that people have for that ethnicity,” Cuomo said on SiriusXM.

“That’s what ‘fake news’ is to a journalist,” the CNN host continued. “It’s an ugly insult, and you better be right if you’re going to charge a journalist with lying on purpose.”

UPDATE I: You knew it would not take long for the apology as I am sure the phones and social media lit up at CNN after Chris Cuomo compared Fake news to the N-word. Cuomo could not text fast enough the following apology,  ‘I was wrong. Calling a journalist fake -nothing compared to the pain of a racial slur,’ he wrote on Twitter Thursday afternoon. ‘I should not have said it. I apologize.’

The 9th Circuit’s Dangerous & Unprecedented Use of campaign statements to block Presidential Policy

AND LEST WE NOT FORGET THEY JUST GAVE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE NONE …

A great piece from  Eugene Kontorovich, read is all.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has just upheld a nationwide temporary injunction on President Trump’s executive order relating to refugees and visas from certain countries. I think the court’s opinion is weak in most respects, but I will address one of the most interesting and potentially far-reaching aspects.

Generally, the president has vast discretion in issuing visas. One of the major arguments against the executive order is that while in principle a president can limit immigration from the seven affected countries, it would be unconstitutional for President Trump in particular to do so, because in his case the action is motivated by impermissible religious bias. The central exhibit for this argument is his campaign statements about a “Muslim ban.”

While the 9th Circuit did not address this at great length, focusing instead on due-process arguments, it did accept the basic validity of the form of the states’ argument. “The States’ claims raise serious allegations and present significant constitutional questions,” wrote the court.

There is absolutely no precedent for courts looking to a politician’s statements from before he or she took office, let alone campaign promises, to establish any kind of impermissible motive. The 9th Circuit fairly disingenuously cites several Supreme Court cases that show “that evidence of purpose beyond the face of the challenged law may be considered in evaluating Establishment and Equal Protection Clause claims.” But the cases it mentions do nothing more than look at legislative history — the formal process of adopting the relevant measure. That itself goes too far for textualists, but it provides absolutely no support for looking before the start of the formal deliberations on the measure to the political process of electing its proponents.

9th Circus Fedeal Appeals Court Rules Against President Trump on Travel Ban (Update: Trump’s Reaction … See You in Court”)

LIBERAL 9TH CIRCUS COURT AT IT AGAIN …

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 3-0 yesterday to maintained the freeze on President Trump’s immigration order that would temporarily ban individuals from coming from 7 countries and entering the United States until the vetting process was examined and improved. Thus, they have refused to reinstate the temporary travel ban. Once again the liberal activist judges of the 9th circus court, the most over-turned appeals court in the United States have gone rogue.

A federal appeals panel has maintained the freeze on President Trump’s controversial immigration order, meaning previously barred refugees and citizens from seven majority-Muslim countries can continue entering the United States.

In a unanimous 29-page opinion, three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit flatly rejected the government’s argument that suspension of the order should be lifted immediately for national security reasons, and they forcefully asserted their ability to serve as a check on the president’s power.

The judges wrote that any suggestion that they could not “runs contrary to the fundamental structure of our constitutional democracy.”

Trump reacted to the decision on Twitter, posting just minutes after the ruling, “SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!” He later said to reporters that the judges had made “a political decision.”