CNN Poll: Donald Trump Significant lead in Iowa … Ben Carson is in Second Place

According to the most recent CNN poll, Donald Trump is in the lead in Iowa. Despite Fox News, Megyn Kelly’s and the establishments attempts to sabatoge Donald Trump in the last debate, Donald Trump is in the lead in Iowa. What to make of the latest polling numbers, Americans are sick and tired of politicians ad the establishment. By the way, Ben Carson is in second place!!!

Full poll results HERE

Donald Trump has a significant lead in the race to win over likely Iowa caucus-goers, according to the first CNN/ORC poll in the state this cycle.

Trump tops the field with 22% and is the candidate seen as best able to handle top issues including the economy, illegal immigration and terrorism. He’s most cited as the one with the best chance of winning the general election, and, by a wide margin, as the candidate most likely to change the way things work in Washington.

Retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson follows Trump in overall preference with 14%, bumping Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who had held the top spot in most recent public polling in Iowa, down to third place with 9%. Walker is nearly even with a slew of other candidates.

One Response to “CNN Poll: Donald Trump Significant lead in Iowa … Ben Carson is in Second Place”

1. Truecon on August 13th, 2015 6:42 pm

   Ben “aborted fetal tissue for me and not for thy” Carson, when asked today about himself using aborted fetal tissue for research, gave a complete BS answer.

   A true conservative would never vote for either him or trump. These RINOs on TV/radio (hannity,levin) that are pushing these RINOs over the true conservative candidates is disturbing
   __________________________________________________
   SM: You might want to see what Ben Carson actually said vs. what the bias liberal MSM.

   http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/08/13/ben-carson-responds-to-report-he-used-aborted-fetal-tissue-in-1992/

   But as Carson told the Post on Thursday, saying that “you have to look at the intent” of using fetal tissue.

   “To willfully ignore evidence that you have for some ideological reason is wrong. If you’re killing babies and taking the tissue, that’s a very different thing than taking a dead specimen and keeping a record of it,” Carson said.

   But as the candidate continues to surge in national polls, Carson could soon be forced by critics to get more specific on his previous medical research.

   “Could he think his own research was useless? If it was non contributory to the field why was it published?” Gunter asked. “Maybe he forgot that he’d done the research on fetal tissue?”

   The GOP candidate added that he hasn’t used fetal tissue samples since the 1992 paper was published and further explained his role in dealing with the aborted tissue.

Leave a Reply