RSSHillary Clinton’s State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists … But, Hillary Called the Abduction of the Girls by Boko Haram was “Abominable, It’s Criminal, It’s an Act of Terrorism”
HOW PRESIDENTIAL … Hillary Clinton, I was for not calling Boko Haram terrorists, before I was for it.
Former Secretary of State and 2016 Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has a lot of explaining to do. In the wake of the Muslim Islamist terror group Boko Haram kidnapping nearly 300 girls and threatening to sell them into human sex slavery, Hillary Clinton like many jumped on the bandwagon of outrage. On Wednesday, Hillary Clinton called the abduction of the girls by Boko Haram was “abominable, it’s criminal, it’s an act of terrorism and it really merits the fullest response possible, first and foremost from the government of Nigeria. Clinton went on to say that as Secretary of State she had numerous meetings with Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan and had urged the Nigerian government to do more on counter-terrorism.
Oh contraire mon frère … Hillary Clinton supposedly urged the Nigerian government to do more on counter-terrorism, but as reported at The Daily Beast, Hillary’s State Department refused to brand Boko Haram as terrorists. According to accounts by Josh Rogin, what Hillary Clinton failed to mention was that her own State Department refused to place Boko Haram on the list of foreign terrorist organizations in 2011, after the group bombed the U.N. headquarters in Abuja. The refusal of branding Boko Haram as terrorists came despite the urging of the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA, and over a dozen senators and congressmen.But of course naming a new group to the terrorist list would have gone against Obama’s reelection talking points that al Qaeda was on the run.
As the folks at Hot Air opines,“Sound familiar? … Now Hillary wants to fight Boko Haram with hashtags. Too bad she didn’t fight them with real resources when she had the chance.”
Under Hillary Clinton, the State Department repeatedly declined to fully go after the terror group responsible for kidnapping hundreds of girls.
The State Department under Hillary Clinton fought hard against placing the al Qaeda-linked militant group Boko Haram on its official list of foreign terrorist organizations for two years. And now, lawmakers and former U.S. officials are saying that the decision may have hampered the American government’s ability to confront the Nigerian group that shocked the world by abducting hundreds of innocent girls.
In the past week, Clinton, who made protecting women and girls a key pillar of her tenure at the State Department, has been a vocal advocate for the 200 Nigerian girls kidnapped by Boko Haram, the loosely organized group of militants terrorizing northern Nigeria. Her May 4 tweet about the girls, using the hashtag #BringOurGirlsBack, was cited across the media and widely credited for raising awareness of their plight.
What Clinton didn’t mention was that her own State Department refused to place Boko Haram on the list of foreign terrorist organizations in 2011, after the group bombed the U.N. headquarters in Abuja. The refusal came despite the urging of the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA, and over a dozen senators and congressmen.
But of course Clinton’s response to these questions will be, we have 300 girls threatened to be sold into sex slavery, what difference does it make that Boko Haram are terrorists.
If you liked this post, you may also like these:
Comments
2 Responses to “Hillary Clinton’s State Department Refused to Brand Boko Haram as Terrorists … But, Hillary Called the Abduction of the Girls by Boko Haram was “Abominable, It’s Criminal, It’s an Act of Terrorism””
Leave a Reply
Boko Haram was up to no good when Bush was President — where was the conservative outrage then? The Teathuglican Party is all about their hatred of Hillary and Obama. They have no other ideas. Voters can see through the constant scandal-mongering and conservative witch hunts against Hillary Clintons. Republicans have no ideas for progress; all they have to offer are paranoid scandals, negativity, pessimism, bigotry, sexism, and gay hate — we’re sick of it.
Americans are smart enough to see that terror designations have to be handled strategically so as not to give fringe groups an anti-American propaganda tool to not raise money. Of course, Republicans don’t get this since they are children who react to things recklessless, leading the country into costly wars under false pretenses.
Republicans probably wanted Boko Haram to be able to raise money easily off a premature terrorist designation, since ambulance-chasing Republicans themselves use tragedy to raise money, with their classless and tacky fundraising on the dead bodies of Benghazi.
________________________________________
SM: Once again we have the LEFT blaming GWB for something that took place under the watch of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Guys, its old. Sorry, but this was all about the narrative that Al-Qaeda was on the run and BO was just God’s gift to fighting terrorism. Or is it Allah?
After the so-called “peaceful Muslims” have taken over, we are going to find out that all these people go by the same book. The liberal do-gooders are going to wake up to a very different world! Education for women? Trade it for a burka!