RSSUnbelievable MSM Bias: CNN’s Acosta to Romney … ‘If You Somehow Beat Obama,’ How Would You ‘Assure Blacks You’d Be Their President Also?
This is what passes as a fair and balanced media coverage of the 2012 Presidential election … CNN plays the race card.
Yet another example of the liberal, corrupt media complex bias and just how in the tank they are for President Barack Obama. The following question from the MSM is just disgusting and offensive. CNN’s Jim Acosta on Tuesday’s Situation Room asked Mitt Romney the following truly offensive question:
“If you were to somehow beat the first African-American president, what would you say to the black community to assure them that you would be their president also?”
Um, “If you were to somehow beat the first African-American president”? Forget the race baiting question for starts, “somehow” beat Obama? Really CNN? There has been 43 consecutive months of unemployment over 8%, the real unemployment number is twice that, college graduates cannot find jobs, there are record number of individuals on food stamps, the medium income as fallen sharply under Obama and basically the job growth and economy is just terrible. With an economy in such disarray, a foreign policy that is not on fire in the Middle East, a President that has failed to live up to his “Hope & Change” promises and a close campaign, is it really a stretch to believe that Obama could lose?
From NewsBusters:
JIM ACOSTA, CNN: African-Americans have a tremendous sense of pride that there is the first African-American president in the White House. If you were to somehow beat the first African-American president, what would you say to the black community to assure them that you would be their president also?
MITT ROMNEY: I want to be the president of all the people of America. I want to help all the people of America. You don’t get into a race like this with myself and my family and do the kind of work and commitment that we’ve put forward without the passion to help all of America. And the people who really need the help right now are the people in the middle class, people who have fallen into poverty. I know how to get them help. The president doesn’t.
Just curious, will CNN ask Obama whether he is going to be the President for white America? How about the President for the Tea Party? How about those that are against higher taxes and lower federal spending? How about President for those who oppose Obamacare? How about those who actually call the war on terror, the war on terror and radical Islam? How about for those who are unemployed and disagree with Obama’s failed economic policies? How about for those who cling to their Bibles and guns?
Of course not. As stated by the Gateway Pundit, “what is more shocking, is that Acosta has no idea how biased he is. Nor does he care.”
Posted September 26, 2012 by Scared Monkeys 2012 Elections, Are You Better Off Today Than You Were 4 Years Ago, Barack Obama, Epic Fail, Mitt Romney - Paul Ryan 2012, Presidential Election | 7 comments |
If you liked this post, you may also like these:
Comments
7 Responses to “Unbelievable MSM Bias: CNN’s Acosta to Romney … ‘If You Somehow Beat Obama,’ How Would You ‘Assure Blacks You’d Be Their President Also?”
Leave a Reply
Whether or not Acosta is ‘aware’ of the nature
of his biased questioning, he is but another poster
child for the for what barely passes for news
gatherers and presenters. These folks are brainwashed
and are conditioned to brainwash others IMHO.
He could of asked this:
JIM ACOSTA, CNN: Christians have a tremendous sense of pride that there is the first African-American president in the White House. If you were to somehow beat the first Christian African-American president, what would you say to the Christian community to assure them that you would be their president also?
And Romney could answer like this:
MITT ROMNEY: I want to be the president of all 53% of the people of America. I want to help all the rich people of America. You don’t get into a race like this with myself and my family and do the kind of work and commitment that we’ve put forward without the passion to help 53% of America. And the people who really need the help right now are the people in the middle class, people who have fallen into poverty. I know how to get them help, but I don’t honestly believe they deserve it. The president does.
(DELETED)
Sorry, we do not allow ignorant claims of racism as comments. Grow up and read a book, learn something for God’s sake. I pray for you.
R
Who are the financial backer behind the liberal/Marxist/Islamic takeover of the Major Networks?
Media ignore Obama attack on ‘those who slander the Prophet of Islam’
Published September 26, 2012
Not that they’re wrong. It was a 4,000-word speech. Obama covered a lot of ground. But the ground the major media covered conveniently left out was the most provocative line of the entire speech.
The president told the UN that the “future must not belong” to a series of people including “corrupt” leaders and those who “bully women.” But one line from that list stood out. “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/26/media-ignore-obama-attack-on-those-who-slander-prophet-islam/
Wow, wow, wow. How racist can CNN get? I suppose a “white” Romney would do a lot better job showing “blacks” he’s their president than Zero has done showing he cares about being ANYONE’s president in America. He only cares about his power and the country’s destruction.
“brainwashed” cost George Romney a shot as Prez, “47 percent” cost Willard his chance.
Mitt was so afraid he’d do exactly what was done.
Whether or not Acosta is ‘aware’ of the nature
of his biased questioning, he is but another poster
child for the for what barely passes for news
gatherers and presenters. These folks are brainwashed
and are conditioned to brainwash others IMHO
The future must not belong to Islam, especially since it
slanders all they have the audacity to call ‘infidels’. Free
speech in America (not in Islamic countries) permits each
to voice his/her position especially regarding Theo-Political
systems openly seeking to ‘Rule da Vorld’ as in the ’30s and ’40s.