Joran Van der Sloot Files Complaint Against Peruvian Police … My Rights Were Violated, They Seized by Laptop

Joran Van der Sloot claims his rights were violated … Hey Joran, what about the rights that you took from Natalee Holloway and Stephany Flores? Oh yea, and their lives too.

Joran Van der Sloot, the ”Little Dutch boy” accused of the murder of 21 year old Stephany Flores in Peru and who had previously confessed to the crime is now singing a much different tune and back to his old manipulative, narcissistic way. Joran Van der Sloot is now claiming that his rights were violated and has filed a complaint against the Peruvian police. Van der Sloot claims that he was denied due process, that evidence was improperly seized and he was denied a proper translator.

Joran van der Sloot has filed a complaint with Peruvian police claiming that his constitutional rights and his right to a defense were violated after his arrest in connection with the killing of a Peruvian woman.

According to a copy of the complaint, obtained by CNN, van der Sloot alleges that his right to due process was denied.

The complaint, given to the Peruvian National Police’s internal investigation unit, singles out the department’s homicide director, Col. Miguel Angel Canlla Ore, and those who work for him.

Van der Sloot said he has been detained without a judicial order.

“I have been denied my right to a proper defense, by imposing an attorney that seems to be the girlfriend of a cop on duty who works in this police department,” the complaint states.

He also alleges that police took his laptop and searched his communications and correspondence without a judicial order.

What else would one expect from a criminal that has evidence that implicated them in a murder dead to rights. Joran claims among a litany of jail house excuses that he was not supplied an interpreter, yet in every VIDEO he is seen communicating perfectly with the police. Joran Van der Sloot, this is just a reminder … YOU ARE NOT IN ARUBA ANY MORE AND DADDY SLOOT IS NOT HERE TO USE INFLUENCE TO GET YOU OUT OF THIS ONE.

Joran Van der Sloot claims that he was confused and coerced into a confession. Wrong Sporter, you were not confused, you had no where to go with your lies as you knew the gig was up and you were guilty of the crime. How exactly is one confused when you were so detailed in the description of how Stephany Flores was killed in his confession?

“There was blood everywhere,” the Dutch national said according to transcripts obtained by CNN. “What am I going to do now? I had blood on my shirt. There was also blood on the bed, so, I took my shirt and put it on her face, pressing hard, until I killed Stephany.”

How could anyone be tricked into say that they killed another person? Seriously. This is the son of a former lawyer and wannabe judge in waiting. Joran Van der Sloot has been through all of this 5 years earlier in Aruba in the death and disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Joran has already used the “I was scared” card in the past. This one trick pony act is getting old. Joran van der Sloot used the same line in 2005 when he was asked why he lied in that he dropped off Natalee Holloway at the Holiday Inn the night she disappeared.

What is most interesting is the continual reference to his laptop. Why does Joran Van der Sloot want the laptop to be thrown out as evidence? If you think about it, the laptop would play into his story of why he attacked Stephany, which would probably mean that the computer was never logged into at that time. The bigger picture is most likely the amount of incriminating evidence there is on it with the things that Joran Van der Sloot has said and done. In the end, Joran brought the laptop into play with his confessions … good lock Sporter in getting that thrown out.

What we see in the end is the desperate acts of a sociopath who is grasping at straws. For once in his life Joran has had his hand slapped and he has no power to react.