What is this? From this page you can use the Social Web links to save It’s Not Always What it Appears to Be … Vancouver Sun reporter Accused Free Republic of Hate Speech Caught in Blogging Scandal to a social bookmarking site, or the E-mail form to send a link via e-mail.

Social Web

E-mail

E-mail It
July 13, 2009

It’s Not Always What it Appears to Be … Vancouver Sun reporter Accused Free Republic of Hate Speech Caught in Blogging Scandal

Posted in: Barack Obama,Bizarre,Bloggers,Child Welfare,Internet,Media,Media Bias,Scandal

Coincidence?

Hate speech accusations from a Daily Kos blogger … that’s priceless.

Those that point fingers might want to look in the mirror. No truer words have ever been spoken when it comes to many on the web, and I think you know who you are. Those that make accusatory statements and comments either have no idea what they are talking about or are in a word, only speaking about them self. Those that spew hate are usually the first to state that is what others are doing. Many times this does not refer to Left or Right sides of the political blogosphere. Pointing the finger of hate is usually just a desperate attempt for attention by those to be recognized who generally are just an after thought in the grand scope of life.

Obama_kid_peace

The pic that created the controversy

Thus is the case of Chris Parry, a Vancouver Sun reporter, who seems to have got him self in quite the blogging scandal pickle. How interesting the a far Left liberal blogger from the Daily Kos would advocated on Daily Kos for liberals to post hate speech on conservative blogs and blame it on conservatives. From Gawker:

But the real story here is that this same reporter and Daily Kos contributer has advocated on his Daily Kos blog any number of egregious offenses, among them: posting hate speech on sites like Free Republic and blaming it on conservatives.

It gets worse, though. Chris Parry, it appears, has advocated on his Daily Kos blog any number of egregious offenses, among them: posting hate speech on sites like Free Republic and blaming it on conservatives. Parry posted under the name “hollywoodoz” on Daily Kos, where his signature was “Fool me once, I’ll punch you in the f*cking head.” Parry outed himself as hollywoodoz here, where he discloses the company he helped start. In essence: Parry, the journalist, found his story right where he’d been circling it for a very long time, and reported it as news. Sigh.

Jammie Wearing Fool reports that the Freepers are firing back. Of course my question is why a member of the media allowed to post on a far Left web site like the Daily Kos? Or is that free speech only provided to the Left?

Chris Parry actually advocated attacking “negros” and blaming the republicans for it. See this post at the Daily Kos by “hollywoodoz”, who is in reallity, as proven below Chris Parry of the Vancouver Sun. See it here: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/9/9/10324/92702 This spells BUSH, CHENEY, BROWN. Now if this is not grounds for losing your job at the Vancouver Sun, I don’t know what is.

As the Gateway Pundit states, what a strange coincidence? He also includes so great examples of hate that this individual has posted while claiming others post hate.

Make no mistake about it, we do not condone attacks against children of any politicians, or children in general for that fact. Much as the case we felt that David Letterman was and still is a coward for attacking the children of Sarah Palin. However, I find it disingenuous that the media would attack a blog for the comments made by it’s readers as they willingly, with forethought and malice continually took part in the shredding of Palin’s family.

Those in the liberal media went after Sarah Palin and her son making fun of his special needs disability and stated that Palin was using him as a prop. That was their justification when Sarah Palin resigned recently to make retard jokes? SICK!

PROP??? The Astute Blogger is dead on in their analysis. Maybe the Left and the MSM would like to explain what their child is doing wearing such an outfit on a Presidential trip abroad if it was not to use her as a prop? So I would ask, what is the difference?

One would like to think that all the children of these politicians, or better yet all children would be off limits to attack. However, it is also up to the parents in many cases to keep them out of the cameras eye. Holding a baby is hardly the same as a teen/tween wearing a “peace” shirt.


Return to: It’s Not Always What it Appears to Be … Vancouver Sun reporter Accused Free Republic of Hate Speech Caught in Blogging Scandal