Barack Obama the Socialist & Marxist 2001: Bring About “Redistributive Change” … Who Needs the Constitution.

America, you want political honesty that is as  frightening as it gets. Listen to Barack Obama and his views of redistribution of the wealth and the US Constitution be damned. The hell with what the Founding Fathers had in plan and the heck with the Constitution, Barack Obama’s visions to achieve “social justice” through “redistributive change” are right and our Founding Fathers were wrong. There is change you can not only believe in but are about to empower. You thought we were joking with Obama’s new National Anthem.

All American voters best take a good listen at what Barack Obama, The Chosen one had to say and “redistribution of wealth” in America in 2001. The interview is from Chicago Public radio. If he smells like a socialist, walks like a socialist and talks like a socialist … Wake up America, he, “The One” is a socialist.

Michelle Malkin discusses the explanation from the Obamamessia in response to a call in question regarding how he would do “reparative economic work.”

A caller asks The One to explain how he would do “reparative economic work.” Obama gives the legislative route two thumbs up as his preferred method of “breaking free of the constraints” placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution and then burbles about cobbling together the “actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change.”

From Protein Wisdom:

In Obama’s America, we’ll finally be able to break free of the “constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution” — and in so doing, achieve “social justice” through “redistributive change.”

Well, then. Fine .

But this is not the America I knew…

It seems that Joe the Plumber has only hit upon a small piece of Obama’s socialist iceberg. It appears that Joe the Plumber has awakened a sleeping socialist. No wonder the LEFT was so hell bent on destroying and discrediting Joe. BTW, it appears that Americans are overwhelmingly against redistribution of wealth 84% to 13%. Your vote does matter on election day … do you really want to elect socialism?

News flash to McCain campaign … fire up the political ads and start replaying this clip in every battleground state. AUDIO PROOF FROM 2001 THAT OBAMA IS A SOCIALIST.

For the critics who think that the above interview was edited, Stop the ACLU has the original interview.

Transcript from Stop the ACLU as well:

If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court. I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order as long as I could pay for it I’d be o.k. But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, and that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendancy to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.
I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts. You know, the institution just isn’t structured that way.