Reille Hunter Lets John Edwards skate on Baby Daddy question … Rules out Paternity Test … Who is the “Reiile” Daddy?

John Edwards initially claimed that the affair and baby daddy allegations was nothing more than tabloid trash. However, in the end who was the real trash?

“Its tabloid trash” … Edwards may want to look in the mirror

What a joke … Edwards says he will take a paternity test while his co-conspirator/ex-mistress Reille Hunter states there will be no paternity test. All Edwards and Reille have effectively done is leave the unanswered Edwards baby daddy question open for interpretation and speculation. The National Enquirer has yet to be wrong on this story, so why should they be wrong now?

Why would anyone go to a hotel to see someone and their baby who they supposedly stopped an affair with in 2006? This is not new math or a trick question.

How convenient for John “Love Lips” Edwards and the Democratic party as Edwards ex-mistress Rielle Hunter rules out a paternity test for her child. Why would anyone want to know who the actual father is of her 5 month old. Maybe its because she and John Edwards both know who the father is and do not want his identity ever known. Ya think? Because every child wants to grow up never knowing who their actual father is. What a complete cop out as she lets Edwards off the hook. This whole baby daddy drama and attempt to keep the fathers identity an mystery is nothing more than a completely fabricated conspiracy, nothing more. Is it possible that Edwards as promised Rielle Hunter hush money to make this embarrassment go away? Come on folks lets just use some common sense and filter it with the fact that John Edwards has done nothing but lie about this story from the beginning.

She will not pester her ex-lover to take a DNA test to establish once and for all the paternity of her 5-month-old daughter, her lawyer said.

Hunter, 42, does not wish to take a genetic test “now or in the future,” attorney Robert Gordon said in a statement.

During an interview Friday in which he copped to the fling, Edwards said the “timing of events” indicate that the child, born on Feb. 27, 2008, could not be his.

“Happy to take a paternity test and would love to see it happen,” he said.

But Hunter’s stance is that she would prefer to “maintain her privacy and her daughter’s privacy,” Gordon said.

Reille Hunter rules out paternity test and will make no more public statements. She considers it a private matter. You have a lot more explaining to do. Ones that might involve campaign financing rules broken.

Rielle Hunter’s lawyer, Robert Gordon, says his client is a private individual who is not running for public office and that she wishes to maintain the privacy of her and her daughter.

“Rielle is therefore making no statement now or in the future,” Gordon said in a statement. “Furthermore, Rielle will not participate in DNA testing or any other invasion of her or her daughter’s privacy now or in the future.”

So all of this is supposed to just go away? Hardly. Oh contraire … if you think this is going away that easily you are a naive soul. Why did Dallas lawyer Fred Baron, who helped bankroll the former North Carolina senator’s presidential run pay for Edwards’ mistress to relocate? Why has Reille Hunter continually paid even after 2006?

In 2006, Mr. Edwards’ political action committee paid $100,000 in a four-month span to a newly formed firm run by Ms. Hunter, who directed the production of four Web videos showing Mr. Edwards in supposedly candid moments as well as in a speech talking about morality.

Mr. Edwards’ PAC followed the six-figure payment with two smaller payments totaling $14,461, the last on April 1, 2007.

Five Questions About the Edwards Scandal, Now That It’s No Longer “Alleged”